Rangers Analysis and Thoughts from last night
While the Rangers were flying high during their 7 game-winning streak, a trend developed that had Ranger fans scratching their heads:
Why are the Rangers playing so poorly in the second periods of games?
There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason for it, but it's undeniable; the Rangers have been awful in second periods for almost every game this season. It first seemed like an odd anomaly, but it has now become the norm, with the worst effort in the middle period coming last night against the Sharks, who scored three times in the second, and sent Stephen Valiquette to the showers.
If it was the first period, you could chalk it up to them being slow starters. If it was the third period, you could raise questions about their conditioning. But the poor play in the second period is difficult to explain.
Could it be complacency? The Rangers have been fortunate enough to be in command in most of their games heading into the second period, and perhaps they are just taking their foot off the gas. The fact that they have been playing so well in the third period could lend this theory some credence.
Maybe its part of the growing process of this team, and learning to play 60 minutes of hockey every night. If this is the case, and the trend continues, I would expect players to spend some time on the pine if they are continually taking shifts off in the second period.
More after the jump.......
Final thoughts on last night:
- As I stated before, I don't have a problem with playing Stephen Valiquette last night. If you can't trust him to play against top teams in the league, why have him on the roster? That being said, I thought Vally was just awful last night, giving up rebounds so fat they wouldn't fit into my pants.
- Valiquette has faced 18 shots in both games he has started. In one he stopped them all, and in the other he misses 5 of them. His save pct. went from 1.00 to .861, ouch.
- Donald Brashear was completely ineffective last night against the Sharks. He looked slow to the puck all night, and made several mistakes. I'm pretty sure if Brashear and a pregnant lady raced on skates, he would come in third.
- On the plus side, for one night our goalies didn't get run over. Maybe all those red lights flashing behind the net were distracting the Sharks.
- Ryan Callahan brings it on every shift, up by three, or down by three. That's why he is a leader on this team, despite being only 24, and will someday wear the "C" for the Rangers. The goals will come soon enough.
- I hate to say it, but Christopher Higgins might have to sit a game, get his head clear. He is pressing right now.
- Sean Avery had two assists and two dumb penalties. Unfortunately its a two-sided look at what Avery can be, and what he can't seem to stop being all in one game.
- Tough night for Wade Redden too, but I can't get on him too much, because he's been fairly solid most of the season.
- It will be interesting to see how the Rangers rebound against the Devils Thursday night after playing their first complete stinker of the season. I love a good "Rocky" movie quote, and this is one of my favorites, from "Rocky Balboa": "It ain't about how hard ya hit. It's about how hard you can get it and keep moving forward. How much you can take and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done". I have every reason to believe this team will rebound and play well. By the way, Rocky Balboa is the only Philly athlete I've ever rooted for.
- Giants blown out in New Orleans, Jets lose a terrible game in overtime, Yankees lose in extra innings, and the Rangers get their hats handed to them at MSG. A tough 36 hours for NY Sports.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Oldie but a goodie, I think I first heard that one used about Mo Vaughn with the Mets
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Oct 20, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Actually happy Dev’s are up next. Nothing like a rivalry to get a team refocused quickly.
Jim Schmiedeberg: "Kotalik shot that puck like it was a badminton birdie"
by 2mn8tr on Oct 20, 2009 10:42 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Hopefully that will be the case. I think the Rangers are a well coached team, and well coached teams usually bounce back from games like last night strong
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Oct 20, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
i suppose
but who do you replace? Rozsival?
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Oct 20, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Don’t have to replace anyone. Just light a fire under some of the guys who have become too comfortable with their spot on the team (Rozsival, Girardi).
by Dave Shapiro on Oct 20, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions
well, according to Zip, Mathieu Dandenault is heading to Hartford for a tryout so you might get that 7 d-man.
by Michael Gleich on Oct 20, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Brashear
He was a real liability out there yesterday. I can think of two instances where his personal failure on the ice led to goals. Plus, it’s a little indescribable that a fourth line player could possibly end up -3. I mean, yes, that’s out of 7 goals but two of those were on the PP which means he was -3 out of a possible -5. That’s awful.
Maybe he needs a sit down. Let Voros fuck up for a game.
Brashear hasn’t been efective and I don’t understand his role. He doesn’t seem to be much of an “enforcer”. Voros isn’t the answer either. Keeping the 4th line off the ice may be.
Vally had a bad game… He’ll have more of those.
We’ve got to stay out of the box.
You hit on the root of the problem – and it’s most likely Tort’s biggest issue – unnecessary penalties. He’s been harping on it almost since the season began, and it gets mentioned in every press session he has (or so it seems).
And if we’re talking about ‘minus-3’ players – don’t forget to add Wade (D)Redden to the list.
My biggest concern with this team continues to be the inability/unwillingness of the d-corps as a whole to take the body when it’s appropriate. Heatly should have been knocked on his ass instead of allowing him to score that second goal last night. Players have been camping out in the crease all season – and the better teams have taken advantage of it. Staal seems to have been consistently the most physical d-man, Girardi only seems to initiate hits along the boards, and Redden and Roszival only seem to take hits. DelZotto love the hip check and will take the body – but more often than not it leaves him out of position. I can’t remember any hits by Gilroy.
I don’t know much about Mathieu Dandenault – just signed today to a tryout contract by Hartford. Perhaps they’re thinking he could be a temporary solution in this regard.
Goalie choices
I said before the game, and reiterate here — this is a showcase matchup against the elite of the Western Conference; we play the sharks just that one time: Lundquist belonged in goal for that one. nuff said
Referees:
1. I don’t know what the league instructs, but on the no-goal call, the ref was directly behind the net — ANY puck which lands right in front of Nebakov is going to be out of his sight line, even one that is 6"-1’ in front of him, like last night’s call. If he stands slightly to one side (as they had to do in the old 1-ref system, so he could see the whole game), it would have been obvious the puck was still very much in play.
2. We’ve all accepted the rules changes that, while overall greatly enhance flow and offense, result in ridiculous calls but the hooking call on Gaborik waS OUTRAGEOUS — you can’t tell me that players from BOTH teams made identical plays 20 or 30 times in that game — there’s no way that’s hooking/holding or if it is, then its got to be called all night long. absurd
Avery: in his first 5 games, I don’t think he got called for a single penalty; last night he took two bad ones that were simply a sloppy reversion to his old habits — no need to use the stick like that in the offensive zone. Granted, he drew a call on Nabokov but his penalties were costly, at a time when we were’nt totally out of reach on a comeback.
Brashear: I agree with Lunkwill Fook — no big hits, no fights. we don’t need him out there to take a friggin’ hooking penalty. Ditto for Higgins — even if he’s not scoring, he can forecheck with more intensity and make their D pay a price — they had little trouble breaking out in the second and third periods.
I think all of NY sports...
feels like all of NE fans LAST weekend, when the Patriots lost, Red Sox were swept and the Bruins were winless….
Good thing for the fans of these teams (sorry Mets FANS and Islanders FAN)….
We got plenty way to go, and given that we were basically undefeated for October (Jets don’t count…..no reallly..F the Jets) getting knocked down a peg is a good thing for us all.
Its kind of a shame how all of it happened, especially cuz the Rangers and Giants faltered so big against legit contending opponents.
But its OK. We’re still here. And we better frickin win next time out.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl

by 

































