Rangers Recap: Rangers hold off Hurricanes 2-1
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Dec 31, 2009 11:00 PM EST
in Rangers Recaps
23 comments
Raleigh, NC (Sports Network) - Brandon Dubinsky scored the game-winner near the midway point of the third period, as the New York Rangers edged the Carolina Hurricanes, 2-1, in the opener of a home-and-home series at RBC Center.
Erik Christensen had a goal and an assist for the Rangers, who bounced back from a 6-0 loss to the Flyers on Wednesday night. Marian Gaborik dished out two assists for New York, which got 17 saves from Henrik Lundqvist.
Joni Pitkanen had the lone goal for the Hurricanes, who have lost four of five. Cam Ward turned aside 33-of-35 shots in defeat.
With the score tied 1-1, the Rangers scored with 8:11 remaining in the third period. Gaborik's shot from in front set up a rebound for Dubinsky, who backhanded a shot past Ward.
Lundqvist stopped all six shots he faced in the final 20 minutes to preserve the victory.
The Hurricanes scored on the power play at the 11:08 mark of the first period to take the early edge. Ray Whitney slid a pass to the point for Pitkanen, whose one-timer snuck past Lundqvist.
Christensen's first goal of the season with 2:24 left in the first deadlocked the tilt at 1-1. On the power play, Gaborik fired a shot on net and Christensen was there to put home the rebound.
Ward made 15 saves in a scoreless second, while Lundqvist stopped seven shots.
The Rangers beat the Hurricanes, 3-1, at RBC Center on December 21. New York will host the Hurricanes on Saturday to complete the home-and-home series...Christensen now has 100 points in his NHL career...Rangers head coach John Tortorella coached his 600th career game.
Rangers vs Hurricanes coverage
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
Christensen had a really good game, he should have had another goal or 2, the chances were there but ill settle for some production. Higgins was invisible again. Roszival looks like hes lost half his brain. This is the last place team in the league and we only beat them 2-1. We should’ve DESTROYED them with the chances we had. We also could’ve lost, they hit 3 posts, 2 in the 3rd. Its great to get 2 points, but against any solid team, we probably would’ve lost again.
by Dougee on Jan 1, 2010 1:42 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Higgins was invisible again.
Then all you’re watching are the highlights and the goals.
Higgins has consistently been one of the best and hardest forecheckers the entire year, with an occasional game or two exception. He’s also been one of the best on the PK.
Yes, I too wish he’d score. But he certainly wasn’t “invisible”. Anisimov was more “invisible” last night than Higgins…..
by dbmaven on Jan 1, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i was watching the most important aspect in the game of hockey. the score sheet. If hes not putting up points, hes of no use to me. You can make a case that he Blair Betts that makes more $
by Dougee on Jan 1, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I definitely see the similarity
Between a 4th line center who’s never had more than 13 points in a season and a guy who’s scored 20 goals 3 times in 4 seasons that for some reason is shooting an obscenely low percentage this season.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by RangerSmurf on Jan 1, 2010 3:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
also, blair betts...
was much more significant to the rangers PK than higgins is.
by #17ToTheRafters on Jan 1, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i wasn’t comparing him to his prior seasons, hes only as good as he is right now… if he “revives” his season, we can revisit this arguement. Until then, hes beat.
by Dougee on Jan 1, 2010 7:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Like I said – you’re only watching the score sheet – the highlights and the goals.
The rest of us are watching the things that set goals up and prevent goals against.
To each his own. I’ll take Higgins over Betts every day of the week – in ALL phases of the game.
by dbmaven on Jan 1, 2010 7:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well all I can say is that these players on the Rangers right now have to give a much better effort to go out there and do a job. I know the Canes are coming on Saturday Afternoon, but that home game on Vs against the Bruins, it better not be a flat start again or else Sather has to start cutting dead F’en Weight.
by NYR #35 Richter on Jan 1, 2010 4:18 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I have no clue what happened to us. Yeah, we lost our first game to Pittsburgh, but after that, we had a 7 game winning streak where we dominated every game. We were faster, more conditioned, had a killer forecheck, cycled the puck well, did EVERYTHING RIGHT. Then it all went downhill. Injuries piled up, people started slacking off, We lost any sense of morale and momentum we built up during that streak and went from top of the conference to being a .500 team. Something absolutely needs to be done, and done right now. Not at the trade deadline, not in the off-season, RIGHT NOW.
by Kritikal on Jan 1, 2010 4:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
kritikal – I mentioned this in a recent post. I think in the first couple of weeks the Rangers conditioning took a few teams by surprise (until of course the rest of the league caught up to them in that department). They were going balls out for nearly 60 minutes and controlling the majority of the play. Then came the inevitable defensive breakdowns, largely a result of playing a more offensive game and having d-men join the rush and pinch. Eventually this team was exposed for what they really are: mediocre, with too many deficiencies. I also think some of the “softies” on this team (see Redden, Kotalik, Roszival) got rattled once Tortorella started digging into them a little bit.
by AZRangerFan on Jan 1, 2010 9:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Once Vaclav Prospal comes back, I see the lines as follows:
Gaborik Christensen Prospal
Dubinsky Drury Callahan
Avery Anisimov Higgins
Kotalik Boyle Lisin
Problem here is, Dubinsky looks pretty good on the wing, though he is a natural center. I don’t feel entirely comfortable with this lineup… though that second line does look pretty nasty, especially if Drury has finally shaken the cobwebs from that concussion which seemed to be affecting his play well after he returned to the ice.
We really need to trade our dead weight or buy out some contracts. Redden, Roszival, Voros, possibly Kotalik, Brashear, possibly Drury… we’ll be in much better shape.
by Kritikal on Jan 1, 2010 5:22 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I gotta say Christiansen
looked amazing last night. Why has he been on the bench?
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 1, 2010 9:36 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Probably the same reason that Brashear has been put on the 3rd line, Anisimov can’t crack the top 6 for more than a game or two, and variation other curious moves.
Torts has no idea what to do with the parts he has.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by RangerSmurf on Jan 1, 2010 11:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
anisimov sohuld with out a doubt we a top 6 forward. especially with prospal out
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
by Moshe52792 on Jan 1, 2010 11:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
After watching last night's game...
I’d be shocked if the team doesn’t attempt to move Drury (noting his limitations on trade approval). It was obvious he could care less out there. Higgins – I love ya’ – but you simply stink in this system. Please give this man a better opportunity. Brashear is an abomination; even Voros is an improvement.
Watching Christiansen dominate – a guy with no points all year – made me realize that talent is not holding this team back, rather the absence of heart. There’s no forecheck to be found anywhere (Sean Avery; what gives?), and half of our defense doesn’t finish checks nor take shots. (It’s like watching James Patrick and Sergei Zubov in their last years as Rangers all over again. Both, of course, rejuvenated their careers once moved.)
Heart, in my opinion, is a product of your leadership and coach. Both need to go.
"...also I'll brush my teeth and remember to turn off the stars at night and put the hyena out." ERNEST HEMINGWAY
by pslieber on Jan 1, 2010 10:42 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
'Brashear is an abomination' (yes, I know he didn't play) :)
"...also I'll brush my teeth and remember to turn off the stars at night and put the hyena out." ERNEST HEMINGWAY
by pslieber on Jan 1, 2010 10:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
voros was much more effective that brashear
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
by Moshe52792 on Jan 1, 2010 11:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
when vp comes back.
prospal – christensen/dubinsky – gaborik
christensen/dubinsky – anisimov -callahan (dubi/christensen for faceoffs)
avery drury lisin
higgins boyle voros/kotalik
what do you guys think?
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
by Moshe52792 on Jan 1, 2010 12:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
and until he comes back.
dubinsky christensen gaborik
avery anisimov callahan
higgins drury lisin
voros boyle kotalik
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
by Moshe52792 on Jan 1, 2010 12:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Brashear
It is unreal to me that Brashear is in this league. I have ,with no lie played with better players in high school.
by Aubrey HUFF ! on Jan 1, 2010 12:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
brashear was brought in only because sather was afraid teams were gonna go after Gaborik. But hes too old and slow to even fight or catch someone. Aaron Voros seems to be fighting…. and actually WINNING. Voros is a better skater, hits harder and more often, fights on par or better than Brashear right now, and has been shown to have a SLIGHT scoring touch. Remember a bigger cone can take up even more space and thats not necessarily a bad thing when talking about Voros and Brash.
by Dougee on Jan 1, 2010 2:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Voros did win his fight last night, despite getting hit in the back of the head once or twice (any MMA fighter will tell you that a shot to the back of the head is worse than taking one clean on the chin or temple), seemed to shake him up for a couple seconds before he regained his composure and brought it hard. If he can play with the intensity he played last night, I could possibly make an argument to keep him around, otherwise he’s an unnecessary cap hit.
by Kritikal on Jan 2, 2010 2:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No case for aaron voros
too late now. i’m done with him.
by #17ToTheRafters on Jan 1, 2010 3:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Blueshirt Banter
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
Atlantic Standings
| GP | W | L | OTL | PT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pittsburgh
|
66 | 40 | 22 | 4 | 84 |
|
New Jersey
|
64 | 38 | 23 | 3 | 79 |
|
Philadelphia
|
64 | 34 | 26 | 4 | 72 |
|
New York Rangers
|
66 | 29 | 28 | 9 | 67 |
|
New York Islanders
|
65 | 26 | 31 | 8 | 60 |
(updated 3.9.2010 at 8:37 AM EST)
Rangers Schedule
Next 5 Games
|
@
New Jersey
|
Wed 03/10 | 7:00 PM EST |
|
@
Atlanta
|
Fri 03/12 | 7:30 PM EST |
|
Philadelphia
|
Sun 03/14 | 3:00 PM EDT |
|
Montreal
|
Tue 03/16 | 7:30 PM EDT |
|
St. Louis
|
Thu 03/18 | 7:00 PM EDT |
Last 5 Games
|
Buffalo
|
Sun 03/07 | OT - L 1 - 2 |
|
@
Washington
|
Sat 03/06 | L 0 - 2 |
|
Pittsburgh
|
Thu 03/04 | OT - L 4 - 5 |
|
@
Ottawa
|
Tue 03/02 | W 4 - 1 |
|
Tampa Bay
|
Sun 02/14 | W 5 - 2 |
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
