Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Leandro Damiao Is Still Really Good

Looking at the Donald Brashear hit on Blair Betts

A dirty hit should not be allowed to swing the momentum in a hockey game to the team of the player who gave it. The hit Donald Brashear laid on Blair Betts was not only one of the dirtiest hits of the year, but it was also blatantly intentional. Betts had shot the puck into the Capitals zone from center ice when Brashear elbowed him in the head as Betts was turning towards him. The hit was grossly late and away from the play as Betts didn't see the thug Brashear coming to closeline him. Betts was injured on the play with what is most likely a concussion and could not stand on his own power. He had to be helped off the ice by Jim Ramsay and a teammate. 

Somehow the four on ice officials completely missed the play and the mindless thug Brashear was not penalized for the hit. Ironically, he was penalized after Paul Mara (who is a great teammate) stepped in and went after Brashear after he laid out Betts. Brashear was assessed a 2 minute roughing penalty and the Rangers lost their best face off man and penalty killer for not only the game, but what will most likely be the series.

 

So instead of the Rangers getting what should have been a 5 minute power play - there was clearly an intent to injure - the Rangers played 4 aside for 2 minutes. To make matters worse, when Mara got out of the box he was called for a wimpy 'hold' and the Capitals would score on the ensuing power play.

Am I mistaken or did the referees not use video replay to penalize Sean Avery in Boston for tapping Tim Thomas on the head during a tv timeout? Yet they allow an atrociously dirty hit by a notoriously dirty player in Donald Brashear go unpunished? There will no doubt be a suspension, but that is of no use to the Rangers as the time to be rewarded for that action passed once he was given a 2 minute minor for roughing with Paul Mara. Say what you want about Sean Avery, but he has never intentionally tried to hurt another player. 

The referees are so concerned with these ticky tacky stick penalties that when a player is seriously injured due to a dirty hit, the referees aren't paying any attention. Those 2 referees and the 2 linesman should be embarrassed that they missed that play. Especially because their mistake undoubtedly swung momentum to the Capitals when they are the ones who should have been penalized.

But not as embarrassing a day as it was for the Rangers. Not only did they lose the game, but nobody made any attempt at retribution. Despite the fact that Colton Orr wasn't in the lineup, somebody should have gone after Brashear, step in Aaron Voros

The NHL needs to realize this is the sort of thing that will happen with much more regularity if fighting is taken out the game.

 

Comment 20 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It frustrated me beyond belief just thinking about that play. Brashear is hit (if you can call it that) by Voros, but because Voros immediately goes to the bench Brashear has to take out his macho insecurities on another, unsuspecting Ranger. Props to Mara for having his teammate’s back, but I wish he just pounced on the guy and started beating his face in.

by XLII on Apr 27, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Can’t believe I’m empathizing with Rangers fans here :) … but whether or not there was “intent to injure,” that’s what really turned my stomach about it: Brashear so clearly was looking for revenge for someone having the gall {gasp!} to hit him. Somehow he had the presence of mind to realize he should not follow Voros to the bench, yet did not have the clarity to stop himself from creaming an unsuspecting Betts. Just shows a total cluelessness of context on Brashear’s part: (“Oh, someone hit me? No, that doesn’t fly. I’ve got 15 more seconds to take someone out — oh, hey, here’s someone…” [boom]).

And of course, it comes from a lovable enforcer goon who adds nothing and whose team can easily afford to lose him to suspension. Fighting or no, this is why one-trick enforcers do little for me.

The referees are so concerned with these ticky tacky stick penalties that when a player is seriously injured due to a dirty hit, the referees aren’t paying any attention.

Ironic, isn’t it? But they may have missed the severity of the hit because, you know, the puck was nowhere near Betts

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Apr 27, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

What really hurt Betts was that the moment he started to change his momentum to go to the bench was when he was hit. One of the worst times to get hit as a player is when you are changing directions.

by Rob L on Apr 27, 2009 11:40 AM EDT reply actions  

This was disgusting

A) How does Brashear sleep at night when he knowingly tries to injure players like that.

B) It is deplorable for the refs to miss this one. They missed this and the bite. I’m not saying that there is a conspiracy against the Rangers but lets be hoenst the refs seem to be keeping a closer eye ont he Rangers than the Caps. And if you disagree just look at game 6, the reffing was deplorable.

C) Forget a suspension because Brashear is usless anyway. Kick the thug out of the league, he brings nothing to the table and is the worst kind of player.

The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!

by Joe Fortunato on Apr 27, 2009 11:43 AM EDT reply actions  

You had me until the last line. Fighting has been in the game forever. Are you telling me that if Colton Orr was on the ice, Brashear wouldn’t have taken that run?

The problem isnt that the Rangers didnt have an alleged “deterent” in this game. A guy like Brashear is going to be stopped from throwing cheap shots not by having to get into a fight with the goon on the other team. A guy like Brashear IS going to be stopped by an NHL that heavily penalizes him, and his team.

Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.

http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo

by poploser on Apr 27, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions  

thats the problem though

i am sure that the Capitals (as a team) dont mind this hit that much. Big deal Brashear gets suspended they can live without him, the Rangers on the other hand are out their best PKer …

Just becuase they both play on the 4th line dosent mean they have the same value.

The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!

by Joe Fortunato on Apr 27, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

agree

the deterrent is an appropriate penalty to be assessed (and suspending Brashear for game 7 is not an appropriate penalty), not for Brashear to have to drop the gloves (which is something he does all the time anyway)

by JoshNY on Apr 27, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brashear is a far from “a mindless thug”. Say what you want about the hit and his actions during this game, but I don’t think it is fair to label him as “a mindless thug”.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on Apr 27, 2009 1:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Why not?

He has never scored more than 28 points in a year and his only use is to be a tough guy. Now before you go saying “what about Colton orr” Colton Orr is used for fighting but also as a shut down defender. Is he brilliant? No but he is pretty good.

The different between Enforcers and “mindless thugs” are the fact that enforcers have some hockey skill (although granted its incredibly limited) Look at Shawn Thorton (to get close to home), he is a fighter but at least he skates and plays solid defense.

Brashear brings nothing but violence to to the table. I would say the same thing if Colton Orr pulled this stunt, but neither her nor Thorton have been suspended for an action like this.

The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!

by Joe Fortunato on Apr 27, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you’re reaching on Orr. The guy’s not a shutdown defender – he has the lowest quality of competition rating of anyone on the Rangers and doesn’t play in shorthanded situations.

I would say the same thing if Colton Orr pulled this stunt, but neither her nor Thorton have been suspended for an action like this.

Wasn’t Orr suspended five games for cross checking Alex Ovechkin in the face a couple years ago?

by David Getz on Apr 27, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

And as for shutdown defender

I’m not saying shutdown defender like Marc Staal im saying its his job to be a defensive foward. He isnt brilliant but hes pretty good.

As for the cross check thing ill look into it.

The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!

by Joe Fortunato on Apr 27, 2009 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup your right my bad on Orr

I actually do remember the play, and it was violent and uncalled for. THankfully there havent been any more incidents from him and lets hope it stays that way.

The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!

by Joe Fortunato on Apr 27, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand your argument and I am by no means defending his actions. I’m just saying I would not have chosen the words “mindless thug” to describe a guy like Brashear. Brashear appears to be a pretty smart guy. Just because his role on the team is the enforcer just mean that he is an idiot. I don’t know many “mindless thugs” who start their own company in the off season to plan for life after hockey or play classical piano.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on Apr 27, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I also agree with that sentiment

i dont think “mindless thug” was meant for him as a person but for him as a hockey player.

Look at Chris Simon, I would call him a “mindless thug” yet he is one of the nicest and most caring guys i have ever met off the ice. Great guy. But for whatever reason when he is between the boards he does stupid things.

The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!

by Joe Fortunato on Apr 27, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Chris Simon has earned the title “mindless thug”. I would have no problem with that.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on Apr 27, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I figured we would agree on that point lol

Hopefully the Rangers take game 7 because i would love to have these debates in round two!

The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!

by Joe Fortunato on Apr 27, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

This debate is pretty easy to resolve...

both Orr and Brashear are mindless thugs!

Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.

http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo

by poploser on Apr 27, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Another atrocious officiating decision...

Was the 14 minutes in penalties to Dubinsky. Now I know that checking from behind/boarding is something that refs need to drop the hammer on. But to give Dubi 14 mins in penalties when Braschear only gets 2 when he injured someone is beyond rationalization. I would have been fine w/2 mins for boarding & then 2 mins for roughing, but throwing in the misconduct is just plain ludacris. Top it all off with the Braschear incident before the game & there is a real problem here. I just hope that the Rangers get the last laugh in Washington tomorrow night…if not, then congrats Caps. You’ve sleezed, elbowed & bit your way into round #2.

by BriGuy27 on Apr 27, 2009 1:50 PM EDT reply actions  

If I’m guessing what McCreary was thinking, maybe the scenario could have been similar to the Voros and Orr misconducts from Game 5, so he was going to shut down a situation which could have gotten worse.

I’ve got to shower after being in Bill McCreary’s head now.

If I had the wings of an eagle,
If I had the arse of a crow,
I'd fly over New York tomorrow,
And shite on those bastards below.

by Bald Pollack on Apr 27, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

this is why i have NEVER respected Donald Brashear

Say what you want about Colton Orr, as far as I am concerned, they are two different individuals. If Colton Orr were to go out head-hunting in Game 7 and Caps fans (or hockey fans in general) wanted him out of the league because his sole purpose was illegally hit a player who was in a precarious situation, SO BE IT!

Comparing the two players is not the point. The point is that in this instance, a) Brashear calmly skated over towards the Rangers side during the pre-game warmups, b) threatened Colton Orr, c) proceeded to push Colton Orr (unprovoked) and then as soon as he had an opportunity, d) charge over to a Blair Betts, who was in a defenseless position, and hit him about the head so hard that Betts lost consciousness and no doubt is suffering from a concussion.

Say what you want about enforcers fighting one another to switch momentum, players trying to finish checks on opposing players in order to “let them know they are in for a long day,” and players, such as Sean Avery, who try continually to piss off the opposition, BUT remember that this is not the case here. In this case, Brashear hinted that he was out for blood, and acted out his aggression.

If the NHL, and more importantly, FANS OF HOCKEY, had any decency, they would not allow this garbage to continue on. Players who have a history of actions demonstrating malicious intent to seriously injure or incapacitate should not be playing in this league, PERIOD. Don’t try to pretend that this was not Brashear’s intent, some people here have called him a mindless thug, while others have said he is actually quite bright. I AGREE with those who say he is quite bright, since it is obvious that it took some sort of intelligence to know that hitting a defenseless player in the head means he won’t be able to hurt my team anymore.

Let’s not take away ANY responsibility here from Brashear, and subsequently, Bruce Boudreau and the Caps organization. Brashear did not accidently hit Betts in the head, he purposely aimed there in order to inflict as much damage as possible. WHAT IS THE BENEFIT OF HAVING PLAYERS LIKE THIS IN THE LEAGUE!?!?!?!?!?! Furthermore, what is the benefit of people in this forum actually standing up for what Brashear did and try to mitigate it by saying “orr does the same thign on his team.” I support fighting in the game, I support agitators in the game (like Ruutu, Avery, Clutterbuck, etc), and I support enforcers who protect the skill players; what I do not support are players like Chris Simon, Todd Bertuzzi, and Donald Brashear who act in criminally reprehensible ways, and are not removed from the game. People talk about players like Avery lacking honor, but are they blind to what Brashear does? Are they that ignorant? Unless the league, and those who support the league (aka WHOEVER IS READING THIS) let it be known that players like this do not deserve second/third/fourth (in Brashear’s case, i think it is like his 70th) chances to amend their malicious play, then it will continue and good guys like Blair Betts will be left with severe head trauma and the feeling that justice was not served.

by aVERYgrate1 on Apr 27, 2009 2:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Sorry...
and I support enforcers who protect the skill players; what I do not support are players like Chris Simon, Todd Bertuzzi, and Donald Brashear who act in criminally reprehensible ways, and are not removed from the game

sorry, but you can’t this both ways. Trying to draw the line between an “enforcer” and a “thug” is impossible. Brashear and Orr are the same person, with the same basic role. Neither one of them have any place in the game, in my opinion.

BTW – Brashear has been suspended 3 times in his career. Compare that to a real dirty player, like Chris Pronger.

Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.

http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo

by poploser on Apr 27, 2009 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is fine

If you want to eliminate both Orr and Brashear from the game, I suppose you could argue that. It is not as much of the enforcer/thug problem as it is the motivational problem. If Orr shows a motivation to seriously injure, then get him out of the league. If not, leave him in.

When players show a penchant for cheap/debilitating/illegal hits (AND I DO INCLUDE PRONGER IN THIS CATEGORY) then there has to be severe penalties, perhaps even panishment. A few years ago, it seemed like every time Chris Simon came back from a suspension, he would go out and do something else malicious and disturbing. Pronger also has a history of this, as well as Brashear.

Instead of trying to outlaw ALL fighting, why not just eliminate the players who seem to show a blatant disregard for everyone else’s well-being. Point in case, earlier this season, Ranger’s defenseman Paul Mara was fighting Flyer Arron Asham. During the fight, Mara injured himself, and Asham IMMEDIATELY stopped fighting and allowed Mara to go to the dressing room. Mara later said, “Give Arron a lot of credit. The respectful player that he is, he stopped. It was a very good character thing on his part.”

It does not matter that super-pests like Avery, Ruutu, Clutterbuck (honestly, I could name at least one player from each team who satisfies this role) are dirty per se, because they are not trying to send people to the hospital. I understand this is a losing argument, since so many people hate players like Avery & Ruutu on an emotional level. But honestly, can we really expect Sean Avery to start ramming people’s head into the ice a la Bertuzzi? The answer, throughout his career has been no; the same cannot be said for Brashear.

by aVERYgrate1 on Apr 27, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Honestly, that’s more of an indictment of the NHL’s justice system than it is a defense of avery

by snowburnt on Apr 27, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

New York Rangers News, Analysis, Line Combinations, Schedule And Stats

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Christmasflyingpig_small
If I asked you....

Recent FanPosts

Thumbnail_small
An interesting SI article
Brian-leetch_best_small
Brooks Says Rangers And Jackets Talked About Nash
Star-wars-art-1_small
The King Indeed
Thumbnail_small
Rinaldo Faces Hearing
Small
Can You Hear Us?...
Small
Rangers have interest in Brad Boyes?
Ny_rangers_salute_small
How Would You Feel if Dubinsky Was Traded?
Thumbnail_small
Rangers Want Nash
Microphones_small
Who is the Rangers best Defenseman?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New York Rangers 55 37 13 5 79
Philadelphia 56 31 18 7 69
Pittsburgh 56 32 19 5 69
New Jersey 56 32 20 4 68
New York Islanders 56 24 24 8 56

(updated 2.15.2012 at 8:59 AM EST)

37 - 13 - 5

Won 4


Managing Editor

Joe_2_small Joe Fortunato

Editors

Blueshirt-underground-logo1_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Drurybloodsmall_small Rob L

Meandrichards_small Nick Montemagno

Small George E. Ays

Untitled_small Dig Deep

Gaby_small Kevin Power

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Me_small Bryan Winters

Contributors

Twitter_pic_small Laurie Carr