Penalty Kill Perfection (Or Close to it)
The New York Rangers Penalty Kill was one of the few reliable parts during the 2008-2009 regular season. The Blueshirts led the league with a PK percentage of 87.8; allowing only 40 goals to the 329 times they went at least a man down. What made the Penalty Killing units so solid and reliable? I think it was the exact opposite of the Power Play's problem. The Rangers did such a great job with killing Penalties this past season because it had a great mix of player personnel and coaching tactics.
Now although a killed penalty can be a thing of beauty (And it is to me), not many people want to see those highlights, so I couldn't find any video on this topic. But when you look down the Rangers roster, I count at least 4 forwards and defenseman that I think everyone could label "reliable" in their own defensive zone. I've also said for the past couple of seasons that Sather is trying to build this team from the goal-mouth out, and the Penalty Kill showed us just that this past season.
Defensemen-wise, Marc Staal, Dan Girardi, and Paul Mara were the stars when it came to being a man down. Staal and Girardi were the predominant first pair for the Penalty Kill all season, and I think for their ages they did a great job. They kept the lanes clear for King Henrik, who when he saw the puck was tough to beat as usual. They cleared the puck smartly all but a few times, and always were willing to sacrifice the body. Mara was a rock on the second pairing with either Rozival or Redden, and should really not be forgotten even if he doesn't end up in Ranger blue next season.
The top Penalty Killing forwards were obviously Blair Betts and Fredrik Sjostrom, who did a great job running the top part of the diamond for the Blueshirts. To me, Betts and Sjostrom excelled this season on the man down because of their good skating abilities which allowed them to pressure the points effectively, all while protecting the coveted slot area between the dots. Ryan Callahan, Chris Drury, and Brandon Dubinsky made up the second PK unit, who followed suit behind Betts and Sjostrom with similar pressure. Callahan and Dubinsky had great years offensively, but I also thought they really grew in terms of responsibilities in the Rangers own zone. Without the emergence of those two the past two seasons, we could be looking at a playoff-less Ranger squad.
The Rangers Penalty Kill, like I said above, had a great mix of players and strategy that allowed it to flourish. Solid skating forwards along with smart, mobile defensemen gave the Rangers the whole package. Oh, and I guess we can mention that top-5 goaltender. Henrik Lundqvist cannot be under-rated by any Ranger fan for as long as he is a Blueshirt after this past season; especially some of his saves in man down situations.
But give credit where credit is due, which is due to the PK units. I have this little theory that the Rangers Penalty Kill was so good that in practice the Power Play couldn't get proper plays going because of it. Sounds crazy, right? It might, but at the same time it reminds me of my senior year in high school. We had a solid goalie and the league's best PK along with giving up the least amount of goals after the season was said and done. We ran a diamond formation like the Rangers, and being on the first PK unit (remember, I was the Blair Betts of the team), we always caused havoc for our Power Play in practice. Our Power Play was mediocre, and I really think that had something to do with it.
One can only hope the Penalty Kill can be just as good next season, as most of the key components of the man down units will be back. The Rangers swarmed opponents when down a man better than they did five on five at some points, and that can be attributed to an aggressive diamond PK strategy along with good players executing the plan. Now if only the Rangers can start scoring more shorthanded goals.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
PK and power play and scoring
The Rangers’ opponents should take lots of stupid penalties early on: the PP never works, and it will exhaust the top players. The Rangers should compete, trying to take as many stupid penalties as possible, since it’s more likely they’ll get a shorthanded goal than power play goal, and it will exhaust opponents’ top players.
The real problem: Rangers can’t develop creative scorers. Period. The weight of the MSG bureaucracy kills the willingness to take key risks. Only Sather and Messier together had the ability to block the bureaucrats. Since then and before then the Rangers traded away the “non-performing” scorers, who then hit the big time with other teams. Kovalev, anyone??
Sather (like me) is old enough that he can’t tell the difference between a 23-year-old and a 29-year-old (like me also). and we remember the past better than seeing the most recent present: Redden, Naslund. Get Sather away from any personnel decisions!
Someone has to push the team to take creative risks, and accept the inevitable mistakes, especially at first. Or it’ll be a first-round playoff exit, if they even get that far.
Blair Betts is amazing. I can’t recall another player who was so willing to throw his body in front of a shot.
In fairness to Sather, the first time the Rangers traded away Kovalev, it was done by Neil Smith.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on May 18, 2009 1:01 PM EDT reply actions
It will certainly be interesting to see how the unit fares next season without Sjo and Betts, they were truly incredible together most of the time.
And Jeffrey – how can the Rangers top players get tired on the power play when all they do is stand around?
I have a blog too! www.scottyhockey.com
Let's Go Rangers!
how can the Rangers top players get tired on the power play when all they do is stand around?
LOL
i think we all agree based on that statement that its not a talent issue but a fear issue. i think the problem started early in the season when we gave up all those shorties. the lack of confidence was obvious throughout the season.
i know the topic was the PK but the PP is more of an issue. i would look at the successful umbrella pittsburgh uses. i thought their well executed PP is what kept them in the series when they were struggling. a SIMPLE, well executed powerplay along with our already stellar PK would boost the morale and confidence of our players and lead to a more prolific even strength offense.
scotty – why do you think sjoe andf betts won’t be back?
also, my fellow GMs and coaches, why did drury at the point not work in NY? i don’t have a clue, maybe you do…
by #17ToTheRafters on May 18, 2009 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
what makes you so sure they aren’t coming back? It’s not like either one will command a high salary, I think they will both be back.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on May 18, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Sjostrom will 100% be back
Torts LOVED him. and will give him a contract … trust me.
The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!
Oh I trust ya
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on May 19, 2009 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions
both of them should be back. watching the canes pk makes you realize how much of their bodies betts and sjoe sacrifice for the team. sjoestrom is arguably the best pickup (at $840k) the rangers have had post-lockout.
by #17ToTheRafters on May 19, 2009 11:54 AM EDT reply actions

by 
































