NHL Salary Cap 101
With the Rangers in the midst of a pivotal off-season, and facing it with a limited amount of cap space, we've all been trying to understand the fundamentals of the NHL Salary Cap.
The cap is a complicated lady, she is not easily understood. But thankfully, Blueshirt Banter found a mentor, an Obi-Wan of sorts to help take us through the rules, regulations, and ridiculousness of the Cap.
I present to you Dave, the editor of Blue Seat Blogs. Dave has a brilliant breakdown of how the Cap works, and has graciously agreed to share it with us.
To see Dave's whole story on understanding the cap, it can be found here.
Here are some of the highlights:
Salary Cap Ceiling: The maximum amount of money a team can spend on player salaries. This number varies from year to year based on the NHL's revenue from two seasons ago. For example, the salary cap for the 2008-2009 season was set based on the NHL revenues from the 2006-2007 season. The NHL is looking at a decreasing cap figure for the 2010-2011 season due to less revenues during the 2008-2009 season.
- No player can earn more than 20% of the salary cap
- The minimum player salary will rise to $525,000 by 2011-2012
Waivers: When a player is waived (sent to the minors), each of the 29 NHL teams can put in a claim for the player. In the case that more than one team puts in a claim for a waived player, the team with the worst record gets the claim. The player is moved to the claiming team for the full (or, if mid season, pro-rated) salary cap hit. If a player clears waivers, he can be reassigned to the minors, and the salary cap hit is cleared until the player is recalled. Only players with one-way contracts pass through waivers. Players with two-way contracts do not pass through waivers.
Over 35 Signings: If a player who, as of June 30 of the upcoming season, is over the age of 35 signs a multi-year deal, the signing team will take a cap hit for each year on the contract, regardless of if the player retires. For example, if Chris Chelios signs a 3 year deal worth $2 million per year, and retires after the first year, the signing team still takes a $2 million cap hit for the remaining years on the contract. However, since Markus Naslund's 35th birthday was after June 30, he was 34 as of June 30, thus his retirement removes his cap hit.
And here is the one we've all been wondering about:
Buyouts: Buyouts are a more complicated business, as it requires some serious calculations.
- A player can be bought out for 2/3 of their remaining contract worth
- The cap hit for the buyout is calculated as follows:
- Calculate the buyout amount (2/3 of the remaining contract worth)
- Spread the buyout amount evenly over twice the remaining years on the contract. This is the cap hit the team will have.
This is fairly complicated wording, so let's use Wade Redden as an example. As of the end of the 2008-2009 season, Wade has 5 years and $31 million remaining on his contract. The buyout amount is ($31 million * 2/3 = $20.67 million). Twice the remaining years on his contract is (5 years * 2 = 10 years). Now, spread the buyout amount evenly over the years ($20.67/10 = $2.067 million). If the Rangers were to buyout Wade Redden, they would have a cap hit of $2.067 million over the next 10 seasons.
There you have it guys, that's what it would take to buyout Wade Redden. Realizing that buying him out would mean a 10 year cap hit makes a bad contract look even worse.
Those are just a few of the points of the salary cap, make sure you visit Dave at Blue Seat Blogs for the whole story.
By the way, Dave also registered for our site yesterday, we welcome him, and hope he will become a regular reader of ours, and we look forward to checking in with him in the future.
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
Damn....
forget about buying out Redden. Id rather take a chance on his this season. Maybe he just turns it around?
by FreeBradshaw on May 30, 2009 8:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I say that unless Sather cant make any moves this off season
then keep him for one more year. See what he does. If Sather needs money then send him to the AHL.
The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!
by Joe Fortunato on May 30, 2009 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just some food for thought on Redden: Yes, his cap hit would be $2 million over 10 years, but the $4 million saving now, because of the lower cap, may be more valuable than the $2 million saved in the latter years of the buyout.
http://www.blueseatblogs.com
by Dave (BSB) on May 30, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's not turning it around
but even his play did improve (which isn’t all that hard to do considering how horrible he’s been) his contract is going to severely hamper the teams ability to assemble a cup worthy team around lundqvist.
heres something to fuel the fire when it comes to the inadequacies of Redden.
http://themanicranger.blogspot.com/2009/03/atrocious-wade-redden.html
by Ryan McFadden on May 30, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea, but Redden’s play was considerably better under Tortorella. I personally want to see what he can do with a Torts training camp under his belt. Will he ever be worth his $6.5 million cap hit? No. But can you blame him for signing the contract? He didn’t offer it to himself. I think that under Torts he will be a solid 3rd pairing defenseman. Clearly not worth $6.5 million, but maybe not as much of a liability as he was last year.
http://www.blueseatblogs.com
by Dave (BSB) on May 30, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
maybe it was just season long jitters. Who knows?
The guy can be good. I think someone mentioned Sergei Gonchar as a guy who signed a giant contract (and correct, who can blame him?), didn’t play nearly close to it and really never has. But he’s a pretty good part for the Penguins.
It was a long season for Redden. I can’t really see how you could suddenly not be a scapegoat in NY once the fans and idiots/media start it.
Maybe letting it play out for another season won’t be the worst thing?
by FreeBradshaw on May 30, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Using Gonchar as a comparison is a bit of a stretch. I’d kill for Redden to do for the Rangers what Gonchar does for the Pens, which is QB the PP and put up points. Did you see the way the Pens turned their season around once Gonchar came back? Unreal. If Redden is even half that I’ll be, well, not happy, maybe indifferent?
by Dave (BSB) on May 30, 2009 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Redden can do it
Dont forget Renney ran an all Defense system … hard to put up points in that kinda system
The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!
by Joe Fortunato on May 30, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
when did you become the optimist?
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on May 30, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i became an optimist when
i realized that Redden isnt going anywhere, and there were probably a number of reasons why he wasnt great … not just that he sucked.
Plus you cant blame him for signing the contract … i would have too lol (and probably put up more than 25 points a year)
The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!
by Joe Fortunato on May 30, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your right
I really wasn’t comparing the actual players, I was just saying their situation adn how fans in Pittsburgh thought of Gonchar and his contract at first.
It of course would be incredible if Redden ever turned out to be half the QB of the PP that Gonchar is.
But the Reporter is right. Redden never was a defense first guy. Maybe that was his problem and also why he was a bit better under Torts? I also think in Ottawa part of his decline was due to this too. Still really no excuse for playing as bad as he did, but if could be reason for optimism.
by FreeBradshaw on May 30, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even if he did turn it around, he still wouldn’t be worth his contract.
My Rangers Blog: http://rangerstribune.com/
by NYRBlogger on May 30, 2009 8:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I hate Glen Sather
Lopez wants it away, and it's hit deep to left center, Andruw Jones on the run, this one has a chance... home run!!, Mike Piazza!, and the Mets lead 3 to 2!!
-Howie Rose
Gary Thorne=Simply the Best!
by The American Mr.Hockey on May 30, 2009 9:47 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Dave gets the credit, I’m just glad I found it, because while I consider myself a somewhat intelligent human being, I’m lost when it comes to salary caps
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on May 30, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





























