Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Notre Dame's Turnaround: How Have The Irish Done It?

Larry Brooks: Rangers in talks with Brandon Dubinsky


In today's NY Post, Larry Brooks says the Rangers are in talks with Dubi's reps:

The Blueshirts are at approximately $51M of the $56.8M cap. That does not include either Zherdev or Brandon Dubinsky, who remains an unsigned Group II free agent. That number also does not include a fourth center, fourth right wing or sixth defenseman.

The Post has learned the team is in conversations with Dubinsky's representative regarding contracts of varying lengths, though neither party would characterize the state of the discussions that will accelerate upon the conclusion of Zherdev's final 96 hours.

Earlier this month, the Blueshirts signed Group II free agent Ryan Callahan to a two-year, $4.6M contract. Dubinsky's agent is certain to cite that deal -- Dubinsky went 13-28-41 last year, Callahan 22-18-40; Dubinsky is a career 27-54-81 in 170 games, Callahan 34-25-59 in 147 games -- but Callahan owned the leverage of salary arbitration rights while Dubinsky has no systemic leverage unless he can attract an offer sheet.

Full Story Here.

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hopefully Sather can go for the long term deal.

Sather can take the cheap way and use the leverage he has on Dubi because Dubi cant go to arbitration to lowball him and save the cap money for the upcoming season or take the long view and use some of that leverage to lock up dubi longer term for a smaller cap hit then a contract like Zajac just got by having his breakout 3rd year. Zajac just got 4 years at 13.55 million with a breakdown of 2.75, 3.5, 4.5, 4.8 million. I think you could take Dubi with the leverage and double last years salary to 1.2 for next year, 2.4, 2.9, 3.5 for the following 3 years making it a total package of 4 years and 10 million if you truly believe Dubi is a long term part of the core of this team and lock him up at somewhat of a potential discount (assuming the rangers believe he will have a similar breakout to being a 60 pt player) in exchange for Dubi getting security. This deal would also take into account dubi citing the Cally deal because the 2.4, 2.9 figures would be for the first two years of arbitration eligibility where cally got 2.2 and 2.4.

by Michael Gleich on Jul 31, 2009 10:53 AM EDT reply actions  

completely agree

This would be the perfect deal for dubi…this would lock up our potential first line center and potential leader for 4 years on the cheap…i would like dubi to be a bit more selfish this year…he has the ability to create his own shot…in the end it will help open up the ice for gabby too

by nutz_35 on Jul 31, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

That sounds both reasonable, realistic and fair.

"Malik now." "6 foot 6, 238, not a noted goal scorer but he's gonna give it a shot here." "Malik has not scored this year. In on Kolzig, faked it....SCORES"

by Calm Down on Jul 31, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Article clarifications

Are they assuming Gilroy is the 5th defenseman?

Isn’t Boyle signed to be the 4th line center?

by George E. Ays on Jul 31, 2009 12:22 PM EDT reply actions  

I would say its speculating more than assuming.

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers

Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog

by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jul 31, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Keep him and Trade him!!

They have to find a way to keep him and then trade him. Sather does not like lossing guys for nothing. I don’t think he will be a ranger next season but I also don’t think he they will run away if the salary is not 4.5 million.

by Roc1193 on Jul 31, 2009 1:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Dubinsky

Why would you trade Dubinsky? He’s a line 2-3 center realistically. He doesnt have the offense of a line 1 center but he can fill that hole for now. With better players around him and coming up as the youth movement progresses he will shift back a line or 2 but he’s a solid player and works hard for it and also a fan favorite.

Unless you were referring to trading someone else…this is the way the youth movement/homegrown players works. You make the best of what you have and when better players come up you shift the player down a line or 2. We should have kept malholtra…the problem was the unrealistic expectations that were placed on him. He would be the perfect 3-4 line center right now as he has found his niche in Columbus.

by Dekim19 on Jul 31, 2009 7:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

New York Rangers News, Analysis, Line Combinations, Schedule And Stats

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Christmasflyingpig_small
If I asked you....

Recent FanPosts

Thumbnail_small
An interesting SI article
Brian-leetch_best_small
Brooks Says Rangers And Jackets Talked About Nash
Star-wars-art-1_small
The King Indeed
Thumbnail_small
Rinaldo Faces Hearing
Small
Can You Hear Us?...
Small
Rangers have interest in Brad Boyes?
Ny_rangers_salute_small
How Would You Feel if Dubinsky Was Traded?
Thumbnail_small
Rangers Want Nash
Microphones_small
Who is the Rangers best Defenseman?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New York Rangers 55 37 13 5 79
Philadelphia 56 31 18 7 69
Pittsburgh 56 32 19 5 69
New Jersey 56 32 20 4 68
New York Islanders 56 24 24 8 56

(updated 2.15.2012 at 8:59 AM EST)

37 - 13 - 5

Won 4


Managing Editor

Joe_2_small Joe Fortunato

Editors

Blueshirt-underground-logo1_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Drurybloodsmall_small Rob L

Meandrichards_small Nick Montemagno

Small George E. Ays

Untitled_small Dig Deep

Gaby_small Kevin Power

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Me_small Bryan Winters

Contributors

Twitter_pic_small Laurie Carr