Anatomy of a Trade: Nikolai Zherdev
By now you probably know about Nikolai Zherdev, the now former New York Rangers forward. Zherdev was seeking a $4.5M per year contract from the Rangers, and after failed negotiations was awarded $3.9M for one year by an arbitrator. Rangers GM Glen Sather chose to not accept the contract and walked away, leaving Zherdev a UFA. Many in the media applauded Sather as Zherdev had been considered lazy, inconsistent, immature, and even a poor teammate.
He also apparently got Doug MacLean fired.
New York acquired Zherdev last summer in a trade with Columbus. The Rangers sent defencemen Fedor Tyutin and Christian Backman to the Blue Jackets in exchange for Zherdev and centre Dan Fritsche. Zherdev and Fritsche were Columbus' first two draft picks in 2003 (4th and 46th, respectively) and were brought in to help New York's anemic offence. Columbus got a solid defenceman in Tyutin and the most consistent player in the NHL in Backman, who had just completed his fourth consecutive 18-point season (and a 19-point campaign with Frolunda during the lockout). It was a good trade for both sides at the time, but a year later Columbus clearly comes out on top. For New York this trade was a failure. Dig into the details, however, and the trade looks far, far worse.
Welcome to Anatomy of a Trade: Nikolai Zherdev. Ranger fans, now is the time to take a deep breath, we're about to enter Glen Sather country.
- February 26, 2008: Trade deadline day. New York sends their 2008 4th-round pick to St. Louis for Christian Backman. In 18 games Backman puts up 8 points to finish with 18 overall and has a decent post-season.
- June 20/21, 2008: St. Louis sends New York's pick to Nashville for goaltender Chris Mason. Nashville then flips the pick back to the Rangers for a 2008 7th-round pick and 2009 4th-round pick. In logic that only makes sense in Sather Land, New York has now re-acquired their own draft pick.
- July 1, 2008: New York signs Wade Redden for six years at $39,000,000.00. Ranger fans weep.
- July 2, 2008: Columbus trades Nikolai Zherdev and Dan Fritsche to New York for Fedor Tyutin and Christian Backman.
- January 29, 2009: The Rangers give up on the underperforming Fritsche and trade him to Minnesota for 26-year old rookie defenceman Erik Reitz. Reitz's salary is only $500,000, making him a spare part.
- March 4, 2009: Trade deadline. Sather makes a bunch of trades and puts Reitz on waivers. He gets picked up by the Toronto Maple Leafs.
- March 7, 2009: Erik Reitz apparently volunteers to take up Carlo Colaiacovo's legacy in Toronto and injures his ankle before even playing a game. He misses the rest of the season.
- Summer 2009: Zherdev files for arbitration, Rangers walk away. Minnesota decides to not qualify Fritsche, he becomes a UFA. Toronto forgets about Reitz, he becomes a UFA. Backman only had 7 points, so naturally he also becomes a UFA.
Here's a quick roundup: Minnesota and Toronto end up with nothing. St. Louis basically swapped Backman for Mason, which turned out fantastically for the Blues. Nashville drafted players, because that's all they ever do. Columbus makes the playoffs and has Tyutin signed for a few more years but let Backman walk. New York is left with nothing.
In 18 months the Rangers managed to give up Tyutin, Backman, Fristche, Reitz, and Zherdev, while also trading two 4th-round and one 7th-round picks. Besides one year of Zherdev, what do they have to show? Their own 2008 4th-round pick that they had to trade two more picks to get. That's right, the Rangers gave up five players and three picks for a net total of their own draft pick. To make matters worse, Backman and Tyutin were deemed expendable because Sather thought Redden was a great signing, and the Rangers now only have four NHL defencemen under contract, and two are Redden and Michal Roszival.
The winners of this monstrosity are the St. Louis Blues. Chris Mason is a fine goaltender who helped the Blues pull off a minor miracle by making the playoffs last season. The loser is not the New York Rangers, nor Glen Sather. The losers are the Ranger fans who are forced to watch moves like this happen again and again and again. They’re frustrated and bewildered, and it’s easy to understand why. Sather’s gamble on Zherdev has left the organization with gaping holes, and one has to wonder how long it will take before Mark Messier finally puts an end to his reign.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I bumped this to the main page
good work man
The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Makes it sound
a whole lot worse than it really is.
What did they give up that you wish they hadn’t?
Probably Tyutin and the 4th round pick – not even sure about the latter.
The rest would probably be in the same state they’re in right now…..unsigned UFAs….
Six times....
The link to the Maclean piece is priceless…Zherdev’s landlord had to change the locks on his apartment six times in one season. Great stuff on what a real loser this guy. How we thought we could change his stripes again boiis down to a consistent failure to scout. Redden was getting slower…Voros was useless….amazes me that these guys stay in power. I’m probably alone in this opinion but the arrival of Messier excites me NOT at all. This is the guy who shipped out Zubov, and that was like 13 years ago.
Tyutin had a breakout year in Columbus
that he never would have had in New York. he would have been a 3rd pair d-man anyway. Redden and Rozi were the number one, and Staal and Girardi (meshed to a degree) so it would have been Tyutin and Mara as third pair. His breaking out would never have happened here with the minutes he would have received, so at the time it was a genius trade. Fritche was never given a shot, so I’ll give you that one, but in the end we gave up a dman that could or could not have been alright in Tyutin, a disaster in Backman for a scratch/potential 3rd liner in Fritche and a hopefully budding enigmatic superstar in Zherdev. I still say we won that trade.
we didnt win that trade
because we didnt keep Zherdev. Had we kept Zherdev i would agree. Otherwise its impossible to win because only Columbus kept a player lol.
The Ranger Reporter - My Ranger Blog!
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
by Joe Fortunato on Aug 20, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Draft picks are valuable assets that can turn into really good players (Staal, Tyutin, Dubinsky). Giving up a second-round pick for Antropov is a good short-term fix but you lose the opportunity of maybe snagging a really good player down the road, someone you can keep on your roster for more than a few months. The Leafs used to be run with the same mentality and it backfired immensely.
ryanclassic.net
by Ryan Classic on Aug 20, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I should have rephrased
I meant we won that trade at the time. Overall though, even though Zherdev walked we did free up 2 spaces to develop prospects, which over the long run could be great for our young guys.
Good story
I do wish the rangers kept tyutin backman and not signed redden, but zherdev was the ENIGMA. He gave sather a woody and he had to get him. UPSIDE … it will kill us all. Dubinsky and Callahan are real players with upside, because they work, the tempting zherdev was to much to pass up because if he played to his full potential, then Sather is a genius and Tyutin becomes a small price to pay.
BUT IMAGINE… that deal never panned out and we didnt sign redden, but instead have staal, rozy, girardi, tyutin, and two rook dmen right now. It was an okay gamble.. but i think your right sather ends up with nothing but an illogical redden signing. zherdev couldve possibly been that gaborik type player but it didn’t happen plain and simple.
by louielounz1 on Aug 20, 2009 10:36 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
The Rangers trade with Nashville for what was originally their own 2008 4th round draft pick, was their 2008 7th round pick and their 2009 4th round pick.
The Rangers only had one 2008 4th round pick.
And plus from a business standpoint, I am so sure that this “acquiring their own draft pick” thing is being completely overblown. During the draft, after previous deals were made, the Rangers wanted to move into the 4th round, knew they traded their pick, and just so happened to get the pick that was originally theirs. Not that they intentionally planned it out that way, it just happened. Nashville was probably shopping it, and the Rangers just took it back. If the Rangers acquired a different 4th round pick would Sather seem less of an “idiot”?
The Rangers didn’t lose out on anything. Just evaluating it as if the Rangers lost heavily is a gross overstatement in my opinion. xcdudesquad says it perfectly in that Tyutin would never have had his breakout season in NY. I liked Tyutin, never liked Backman, Fristche never amounted to anything here (or anywhere else for that matter) , Reitz was expendable, and Zherdev is a potential top talent.
Its all business. Without trading their 4th round pick, the Rangers would never have acquired Backman – a defenseman we did use regularly. Without Backman, the Rangers would never have acquired Zherdev – top scorer, best talent on the Rangers last year. Reitz and Fritstche were just a “side” to a bigger deal. Almost every deal has a “side”.
I’ll stop rambling here, but I still stand the Rangers did nothing wrong out of this and just think it is being looked at wrong. Terrific research by the way.
"Jaromir Jagr.... it's a POWER PLAY GOAL!"
- Sam Rosen
After about four rewrites I accidentally said 2008 4th instead of 2009. Thanks for catching that, I fixed it here and on my own site.
I approached this purely academically. Only after did I learn that as a collective whole Rangers fans really didn’t like Backman, and I guess they didn’t care for him in Columbus, either. I think Reitz being put on waivers was part of the Antropov trade, with Burke agreeing to pick him up if nobody else would. But that’s just one of the side deals, and you’re right: almost every deal does have a ‘side’. Zherdev was worth the risk, a go big or go home move. When you look at the collection of moves and see a single 4th-round pick as all that’s left, it doesn’t look very good on your GM. It probably could have been any other team’s 4th-round pick that Sather acquired, but that it was previously his own is comedic. It’s also typical Nashville: why sign or trade for players when you can draft people?
ryanclassic.net
by Ryan Classic on Aug 21, 2009 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Great job Ryan, we appreciate you bringing the story to us
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Aug 21, 2009 8:39 AM EDT reply actions
A little over dramatic
I understand what you’re saying in this article but, at the sime time, I think you’re making it look MUCH worse than it is.
We didn’t lose all those players for nothing. We exchange some of them for the others. We traded three years of Tyutin for one year of Zherdev. We traded a pick for the use of Backman in the stretch run. Just because we no longer have the players doesn’t mean we didn’t get use out of them.
In the end, was it a good series of trades? Probably not since we didn’t go deep into a Cup run any of those years. But was it a HORRIBLE series of trades? Seriously doubt it.
first of all i dont how you could ever put aquiring backman on the sides of positives for the rangers? backman was a terrible player and took way too many penalties. he had a nice shot, ill give him that.
we definitely lost out on the deals, but not much like everyone else has been saying. id like to still have tyuts, but if zheredev lived up to his upside/potential(whoever said that this is a killer hit it right on the $), which im sure we can all agree was possible, then he wouldve looked like a genius. sather not the best gm, but hes far from the worst
Yea, If Dubi gets re-signed it puts more light on what seems to be an already successful offseason. Sure it’s too early to judge, but with Henrik in between the pipes and the gift of the gab, I don’t see how there wouldn’t be another postseason appearance this year. Other than gabs getting hurt of course.

by 


























