2009-10 New York Rangers Season Preview
In conjunction with the rest of SBNation Hockey, and James Mirtle's From the Rink, today we bring you Blueshirt Banter's season preview for the 2009-2010 edition of your New York Rangers:
Please note: I had to have this done today, so it is based on who is on the roster now.
2008-09 Recap: The Rangers got off to a 10-3 start last season, but most of us knew it was mostly smoke and mirrors, and the lack of scoring soon caught up with the Rangers. The losses and underachievement began to mount, and Head Coach Tom Renney was put on the hot seat. On February 23rd, with the Rangers in the midst of a 2-10 stretch, which included a 10-2 drubbing at the hands of the Dallas Stars, Renney was fired, and John Tortorella was hired to succeed him as coach of the Rangers.
The team experienced a mild turnaround under Torts, and along with the addition of Sean Avery after his disastrous stint in Dallas, played well enough to secure the 7th seed in the Eastern Conference and a first round series with the explosive Washington Capitals.
The Rangers knew going into the series that they were only going to go as far as Henrik Lundqvist could take them, and the Rangers seemed to be on their way to shocking the Caps by taking a 3-1 lead in the series. But their offensive ineptitude again betrayed them, and the Capitals came roaring back to take the series in 7 games.
The obvious bright spot last season was the birth of Blueshirt Banter, the SBNation Community for the New York Rangers, on March 19th, 2009.
Who's In:
The Rangers turned over a huge part of their roster, as the team is remade to fit Tortorella's style. You may want to grab a cup of coffee and settle in, this is going to be a long list.
Marian Gaborik (RW, free agent signing)
Gaborik is undoubtedly one of the most talented players in the game right now, but also one of the most injury prone. The Rangers gave Gaborik a high risk-high reward 5 year $35M contract, and the team and fans alike will hold their collective breath for the entire length of the deal.
Christopher Higgins (LW, acquired via trade from Montreal Canadiens)
Higgins is a former number one pick of the Montreal Canadiens, and was signed to a one year deal immediately following the trade. Higgins is a former 20 goal scorer, coming off an injury as well. Rangers will also look to him for help on the penalty kill and power play. Also decent on face-offs.
Vinny Prospal (LW, free agent signing)
Prospal is coming off a down year that saw his contract bought out by the Lightning at season's end. A 30 goal scorer just two years ago, he is out for revenge against Tampa for buying him out. Despite a stormy relationship with John Tortorella, Prospal has admitted that the Rangers coach brings out the best in him. If he can return to the form of two years ago, Prospal is the steal of free agency. Prospal may spend time at the center position as well, if the "Great Dubinsky Experiment" doesn't go well.
Ales Kotalik (RW, free agent signing)
Kotalik experienced some of his best seasons with the Buffalo Sabres as Chris Drury's linemate. The Rangers are hoping those two can write a sequel on Broadway. It looks like Kotalik will also bring his powerful shot to the point on the Rangers beleaguered power play.
Enver Lisin (RW, acquired via trade from Phoenix Coyotes)
A speedy winger with a ton of potential, has shown promise in preseason and the Rangers are hoping he will become a top six winger in years to come.
Brian Boyle (C, acquired via trade from Los Angeles Kings)
Boyle is one of the biggest players the Rangers have ever had. Another former first round pick, the Rangers are looking at him as a fourth line center.
Donald Brashear (RW, free agent signing)
One of the most intimidating players the league has ever seen, will need to win Ranger fans over after the hit on Blair Betts in the playoffs. One hit on Crosby oughta do it.....for most of them.
Artem Anisimov (C, Ranger draft pick)
Ranger fans have long awaited the arrival of the 2006 draft pick, and after a strong preseason, his time has come. May find himself as the 2nd line center if Brandon Dubinsky finds himself on the 3rd line after his holdout.
Evgeny Grachev (LW, Ranger draft pick)
Earned himself a spot on the roster after a very impressive preseason. Has showed good skating ability, and a nose for the puck. Only our next entry has been talked about more this September.
Matt Gilroy (D, signed, entry level contract)
The Hobey Baker Award winner has made the team and fans stand up and take notice from day one. Seems to have a great scoring touch, and excellent speed. His defense needs to catch up with his offense, it has been suggested he looks more like a forward than a defensemen. Gilroy has been the talk of training camp for Ranger fans.
Who's out:
Scott Gomez (traded to Montreal), Markus Naslund (retired), Blair Betts (not resigned), Colton Orr (not resigned), Paul Mara (not resigned), Derek Morris (not resigned), Lauri Korpikoski (traded to Phoenix), Nik Antropov (not resigned), Fredrik Sjostrom (not resigned)
New York Rangers roster from SBNation.com
Team Strengths:
It all starts with goaltending. While the Rangers have improved on offense, Henrik Lundqvist is still the most important player on the roster. The Rangers will have to find ways to keep him fresh with the Olympics coming up in February. If the Blueshirts are in a dogfight all year for a playoff spot, as most expect them to be, the pressure will be on Stephen Valiquette to win games when Henrik needs a breather. A healthy Hank is the difference between a playoff spot and a ball with a number on it.
This Ranger team is also much faster than previous editions. Players like Lisin, Grachev, Gilroy, Del Zotto Higgins, and Avery are all terrific skaters, and will bring speed every night.
One of last year's weaknesses was team conditioning. The Rangers gave up an abundance of goals in the 3rd period, and John Tortorella feels that is because they were poorly conditioned. Expect that to be a non factor this year. Many players said they showed up in camp in the best shape of their lives, due to the fitness program laid out for them, as well as the grueling training camp under the new head coach. This team should be stronger in 3rd periods than they were last year.
Team Weaknesses:
Last year's strength could be this year's weakness. Losing their two best penalty killers in Betts and Sjostrom, the Rangers are going to have to figure out who can step into those roles. Chris Higgins, Marian Gaborik, and Brian Boyle will figure prominently on the penalty kill, but it remains to be seen how effective they will be. Two keys to a good penalty kill are a strong goaltender (check) and not having to do it very often, but staying out of the box has never been one of the Rangers strong points.
With the rugged style in the Atlantic Division, the Rangers may be short on the necessary grit needed to succeed in their division. Getting Dubinsky back in the fold will help, he isn't afraid to get into the corners and get after the puck. This could be an area the Rangers look to address during the season.
I asked a few of our regular readers for their thoughts on the upcoming season:
Craig (dbmaven): "For the first time since Jaromir Jagr left for Russia, the Rangers have a lot of skill players, players who can put the puck in the net, and they should be a lot of fun to watch. I predict the Rangers will finish first in the Atlantic."
The Mouth: Drink the Kool-Aid, gulp it down! In 2 years the Rangers will be an Eastern Conference force!"
Thanks to both of them for sharing their thoughts.
Jim's Prediction:
The Rangers will be a much more exciting team to watch this year, especially with the possible addition of four rookies to the roster. They'll be competitive, but true Cup contention is probably two years away.
Predicted Finish: 6th in Eastern Conference.
0 recs |
38 comments
|
Comments
Well Jim....
feeling a little bit like Jerry Jones after that one, little empty on who you’re picking?
I think Animisov is set in stone but Grachev Im not sure. He just doesn’t fit yet. I’d think he’s on the short list to come up tho.
And yea, I think this team will be very good. Seems all the dead weight of last year is gone and replaced by speedy skilled players. Hopefully the final roster does have an infusion of youth. Excited about the young defenseman, also excited about Animisov, damn is he a big C out there.
Much of the team that I liked and some that I don’t are still there, but the bottom line is score goals and allow King Henrik to do his thing. As the you D matures (and hopefully the dead weight is phased out…), guys like Girardi (FIRE GIR…oh wait…) and Staal get better too, and please let the Lord Stanley allow Gabby to stay healthy.
That’s right. I thought overall this team last year had a nice backbone, but was obviously missing scoring punch, speed and some needed youth. They did all that. Is it “Cup or die” like a few teams out there? Hell no, but I really do think they are contenders. If the youngins mature and show their talent, maintain it too, I think this team is going places…
Oh yea, Gabby and Henrik, stay up.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 23, 2009 8:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Besides the usual “Will Gabby stay healthy?” question, the biggest concern I have is the penalty kill. Jim, you nailed it on the head when you wrote that staying out of the box needs to be a key to this team’s success. Losing Betts and Sjostrom are big blows to this team, as far as the PK is concerned. I really thought Freddie fit in with the Tortorella style of speed and skating. But it is nice to hear that Gabby can kill penalties. If he can notch a few SH goals, and I’m sure with his speed and skill he will, that may nullify the fact that we’re probably going to give up a few more PPG against.
by DJ Wuss on Sep 23, 2009 9:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
PS, I apologize for this being so lengthy on the main page, I had “jump” issues that I couldn’t rectify.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Sep 23, 2009 9:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Surprise!!!!
I think they will catch people by surprise. They vastly improved their scoring depth. Gaborik can flat out play. When I noticed 2 years ago that he was going to be a free agent, I hoped the Boys would go after him. Gilroy definitely has some offenseive chops.
I just wanted to add that I love this column. It is really nice to read intelligent comments from knowledgable blueshirt fans.
P.S. – I have a hockey question. I apologize if this is a stupid one. On even strength, is it preferable to have a LW that is a lefty and a RW that shoots right-handed? On PP, having a lefty shooters on the right side and right handed shooters on the left side?
by NYR35 on Sep 23, 2009 10:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A coach could do a better job then me.. but I’ll give it a go.
A right handed player on the RW has the blade of his stick against the boards when facing the opponent’s goal. He then has an advantage when digging in the corners and making and receiving passes around the back of the net. You also can use the boards to help protect the puck. When for-checking it can also be an advantage… if you can force a player to the outside that that is were your stick is. I player on the outside is less of a threat (does not have as many options).
On the power play you’re hopefully controlling the puck. In this case your not as concerned about the puck in the corners or on the boards or you for-checking. When a right handed player is on LW the blade of the stick is closer to the center of the ice. When the puck is closer to the center of the ice the shooter gets an advantage over the goalie. From the shooters view the goal is the biggest when the puck is in the center of the ice the goalie has the largest goal to defend. As the puck moves to the sides and into the corners the goal gets smaller for the shooter and the goal is easier for the goalie to defend.
by CTrangerfan on Sep 23, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm hearing rumors right now
That MDZ has made the team. Can anyone back these rumors up?
by Lunkwill Fook on Sep 23, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, but I see the East as a whole lot more competitive this season, and I don’t doubt Gaborik goes down for some time early in the season. 9th, just a point out (BOS, WSH, PIT, PHI, CAR, NJD, TOR, and TBL ahead of NYR).
by red army line on Sep 23, 2009 10:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
must be an Caps fan
by the picture. The tend to be crazy
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Sep 23, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is fine, he can root for the Caps all he wants.
But really, Tampa Bay got that much better? And Toronto? The logic escapes me.
by Lunkwill Fook on Sep 23, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
eh let him have his thoughts
I agree Tampa Bay and Toronto wont make the playoffs (although Toronto is closer than the Lightning)
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Sep 23, 2009 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Toronto is MUCH closer than the Lightning but I still don’t buy their goaltending or their defense. I think Montreal and Buffalo have a better shot of taking the Rangers playoff spot than the two T’s.
by Lunkwill Fook on Sep 23, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Sep 23, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I always take a surprise pick. TBL is mine. I think they have the personnel, it’s just a matter of putting it all together.
by red army line on Sep 23, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But if TBL is out, NYR in easily, then BUF.
by red army line on Sep 23, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahaha
"Jaromir Jagr.... it's a POWER PLAY GOAL!"
- Sam Rosen
by rmc235 on Sep 23, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We win the division
put it up … championship. But seriously we win the division
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Sep 23, 2009 10:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rubs eyes…..
You’ve come around to the dark side. I’ll pass out more of my special Kool-Aid. ;-)
by dbmaven on Sep 23, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to be honest
I think we are better than the Devils, much better than the Islanders, and the Flyers dont have the goaltending to contend.
We will fight with the Penguins for the division and I think we will win.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Sep 23, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bold, but I can see it happening. Of course, lots of other things need to happen too…
by red army line on Sep 23, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would say
5th or 6th Seed into the Playoffs. We push to the Conference Finals!
by Poe678 on Sep 23, 2009 12:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
4th or 5th
Unfortunately, I think it’s going to come down to goal tending. If Henrik is still alive at the end of the season I think we take the division. However, with the Olympics and all of the odd man rushes, I think we are going to be relying on Valli a ton. He’s not bad either, but I really like the way Philly looks. Pittsburgh and the devils got worse, but are always contenders. I’m going Boston 1, Wash 2, Philly 3(I think Emery is going to have a good year), and Rangers 4. I think we get rookie of the year, and have a forward in the top 10 in points too. Also, look for us to make it past the first round in the playoffs, but its going to put Hank and our top 3 lines in the hospital from exhaustion.
by WalkerNYRanger on Sep 23, 2009 1:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I say 5th/6th
I like what I’ve seen so far, but it is likely enough that the Olympics will do to Henrik what the WBC has done to Dice-K and some others this season in baseball, maybe worse since they are in the middle of the season. Valli is good, but not good enough to get us into the top 4. I definitely see a playoff spot though, if for no other reason than this year’s team just looks so much faster than last year. The extra speed will, i think, make the difference.
"I reject your reality and substitute my own"
-Adam Savage
by blueandorange4life on Sep 23, 2009 2:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So many questions regarding this team...
everything needs to go right for the rangers to contend for first place in the atlantic…gabby needs to be healthy, higgins kotalik and drury need to put up around 25 goals, prospal needs to regain his old form, dubi and callahan have to keep progressing, redden and rosival need to step it up big time or just get traded (i hope the latter happens), and the young d-men need to progress quickly….as ranger fans we know never does everything go right…but this year i get this feeling that the majority of “ifs” will go our way…this team just seems a whole lot younger, faster, and it seems like this team has a direction…which i feel like past teams didn’t have.
Therefore, I think this team will make the playoffs but end up in 7th place…this team is fairly young and some of our vets (mainly R&R) will cripple this team…but the youth are gonna make this team extremely exciting…i am not expecting much this year in terms of the stanley cup…but i am looking for improvement of the young players and hopefully we can trim some of the fat (R&R…wishful thinking) by the end of the year…by then staal and girardi will be our vets on D and more young D can come up…
I feel like an ass for stressing this but the contracts of redden and rosival are destroying this team…they simply need to leave…they are not only taking 2 spots from our young defensemen but also taking money away that we can be spending on forwards…if the rangers don’t solve this problem they will never win the stanley cup
by nutz_35 on Sep 23, 2009 2:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Contracts
I’m more optemistic then you one this one. I think the team is alot deeper this year and that depth will allow more scoring opertunities as well as make it much harder to deffend against us. While I don’t think we are a likely a cup team I see us as a top 3 or 4. Maybe it is just optimism.
I can’t agree with you more about R&R. I also want to point out that we are not getting any return on invesment from Drury. He is also the reason for siging Kotalik to a bloated contract. If pre-season is look ahead I would like to see him on the 3rd or 4th line.
by CTrangerfan on Sep 23, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No return?
That’s a little strong. You’ve got a 50-55 point center who has played wing, killed penalties, and even played the point on the PP in stages of his Ranger career. Not to mention wear the C, which is sort of a figurehead position but does indicate he’s among the team leaders in the eyes of the organization.
It’s not 7.5m worth of duties…but it’s not like Drury is dead weight flying around either. He’s certainly worth at least 1/2 of that money, if not more.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by RangerSmurf on Sep 23, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone bashes Rozi and Reden… but don’t knock Drury?
OK… it’s a bit strong. But his contract is bloated.. and he’s been mostly absent in the pre-season so far.
I don’t know what happpens in the locker room but the rumers from last year are that he didn’t take charge there either.
Really all I was saying is we have 3 contracts that are hurting us.
by CTrangerfan on Sep 23, 2009 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who's at fault???
How can you knock Drury??? His contract may be bloated but that’s not his fault. His numbers may be a little down, but his production is almost exactly the same as his career averages. If we, or Sather, expected him to be an 80 point player than shame on us, or Sather. BTW this held true for Gomez also.
As far as leadership, or locker room presence is concerned, that’s a little more difficult to quantify. I’ve heard he was a great leader, led by example, always said the right thing, etc. But I’ve also heard he doesn’t have the personality to take control of a team. Not many people have what Messier has, or what Crosby has or some of the other captains and some teams need a more demonstrative leader.
You certainly can’t say Drury came in here and laid an egg, but you can say he was given way too much money for what he brings to the table.
by NYdemo on Sep 24, 2009 3:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can say it’s not Redden or Rozzi’s fault either. Why should they be blamed for being over paid? And to Drurys credit he seemed to have his heart in it down the stretch at the end of the season… Redden was playing better as well.
All 3 contracts are bloated. Plus you can argue we added Kotalik for a premium price to support Drury. I think Kotalik will help on the PP and the contract isn’t bloated like the others
The answer to who is at fault… Sather…. but it looks like we have some youth comming up.
It looks like agood year for the Rangers… We haven’t seen Duby skate yet this year… but it looks like it is entirely possible that we have 2 better centers (duby, AA) then Drury by the end of the season.
If those 3 contracts weren’t there we’d have such an opertunity in the next year or 2. That is all I’m saying.
by CTrangerfan on Sep 24, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The PK and other things.
First I have to argue that the PK is really no worse for wear. Callahan, Drury, Boyle, Gaborik, Higgins, and Dubinsky can do more than an adequate job killing them. Henrik is the real key. That being said, I think that the use of all these guys on the PK will create more shorthanded chances, thus more goals. I know that everyone was sweet on Sjostrom and Betts, but be honest, they didn’t add much else to the game besides killing the penalties. All these new guys have more offensive upside.
Also, our PK shouldn’t be as crucial as last year because we shouldn’t be as anemic on the powerplay/offense in general. Think about it for a second. Prospal, Higgins, Drury, Kotalik, Callahan, Gaborik (even if he gets injured), and, in my opinion, Dubinsky should all be good for 20+ goals this season. If Gaborik stays healthy 40+. Compared to last year that will make a huge difference.
My last point is this. I think it will be a battle between Philly, Pittsburgh and the Rangers for the division. If Emery and Boucher can’t hold it together, then it will just be between the Rangers and Penguins. I think Pitt will win; but we will get 4th or at the very least 5th in the conference.
by CTRangersFan on Sep 23, 2009 3:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good point about the PK
Haven’t thought about it that way.
by stonecoldcory on Sep 23, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
between
rozi redden drury kotalik higgins and prospal have 25 mil locked up.
do you know what we could do with that money?
____ gaboriklisin anisimov grachev
avery dubinsky callahan
brashear boyle voros
staal girardi
gilroy ______
_ _
lundqvist
valiquete
resign staal/girardi, bring in kovalchuk, maybe volchenkov and paul martin on D..
hows that sound?
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
by Moshe52792 on Sep 23, 2009 3:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sounds daydreamy
Drury and Kotalik aren’t going anywhere.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by RangerSmurf on Sep 23, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More thoughts....
Sixth place sounds about right. This is a work in process and they may take time to gel. Still bottom half of the conference playoff teams but with improved scoring and solid goaltending they will be much more dangerous once they’re in.
Also the most important “who’s out” & “who’s in” may be Renney out and Tortorella in. That may be the most important piece of any “turnaround”. Nothing against Renney but it never seemed like everyone (GM, coach, & team) were all rowing in the same direction. Now there seems to be a cohesive effort to install a new philosophy, with a coach that embodies that philosophy, with players that can play to that philosophy. We’ll see.
by 2mn8tr on Sep 23, 2009 5:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Salary Cap
I love the idea of Del Zotto, Sags, AA, Grachev all making the team, but depending if Seminov makes the team with the league min salary, how do we make it under the cap even if we push the rookie bonuses into 2010-11?
by Section 426 on Sep 23, 2009 5:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bonuses, I believe, count against the next year’s cap. So any bonuses earned this season would count against the 2010/11 cap. Not necessarily a good thing, with the cap actually expected to drop……
I’ll double check that later – but that’s my recollection as to how it works.
by dbmaven on Sep 23, 2009 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
first of all great article jim
with that said, i have to say i disagree with you on the pk. yes, it will not be as good as last year, but even with the same players(betts sjostrom), we wouldnt be able to touch those numbers from last year. with drury, cally, dubs, higgins, and gaborik we will be fine. and if gabby is on the pk he should be able to get a few shorties with his speed. im pretty sure marty did in tampa when torts was there
all in all i think the rangers will be a better team than last year so i would predict btw 4-6 in the conference. sure the team might struggle with rookie miscues, team chemistry w/all the new faces and olympic hangover for hank, but if you give pitt boston and wash the division titles then we are basically playing the positioning race w/the nj, car, and phili. i think we have the chance to be better than all those teams in the regular season and i doubt we will finish behind all of them. and i say buff squeezes in the 8th spot
by Conway on Sep 23, 2009 8:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Conway, I understand that its going to be almost impossible to duplicate those numbers from last year. My point was that they had two players that were very good at what they did, and could be very hard to replace.
Glad you liked the article though
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Sep 24, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by





























