Rangers Analysis: What would you give for Ilya Kovalchuk?
Ok so our friend Matthew Gunning over at Bird Watchers Anonymous is doing a story on Ilya Kovalchuk. Since Kovalchuck might get traded before the end of the season he wants to see what every NHL team would give up in order to get him. So every SBNation site is putting together a deal. I wanted to get your thoughts before Jim or I give an "official offer" on behalf of Blueshirt Banter, but before I open the floor there are a few rules.
Here is what Matt says Atlanta will offer:
I'm offering 1) only Kovalchuk, 2) for extend of current contract and 3) first right to extend him before July 1st UFA kicks in. That's it, no "sign and trade" offers please!
Here is what Matt says that Atlanta needs:
GM will want a roster player and a quality prospect(s) and conditional 1st rounders if Kovalchuk re-signs with your club.
No goalies needed (team has three already)
Not looking for over 33 guys or bloated contracts (sorry no Campbell or Huet)
And just remember that Kovalchk has a 6.389 cap hit so remember that when working things out. For the sake of this activity I will allow you to drop ONE of either Michael Rozsival or Wade Redden into the minors. No other trades are allowed.
The deadline to submit an offer is this Wednesday at midnight so have your offers in by then. Either Jim or I will announce our final offer at that time.
So go ahead, make your pick!
262 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You beat me to it. I have a good trade offer in mind, let’s see if someone can top it.
Let’s also keep in mind that “Redden and a 1st round pick” isn’t going to cut it. be realistic, you have to give something to get something, they can’t all be Jagr for Anson Carter.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jan 11, 2010 12:23 PM EST reply actions
by the way, I fully expect mleetch to lead the way here, this is his specialty.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jan 11, 2010 12:24 PM EST up reply actions
before i come up with a deal is this what we would give up or what it would actually take to get it done?
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
i will just do both.
what i would give up that is realistic to an extent: cally, girardi, sangs, 3rd (would have to be ‘11 since we gave up ’10’s for boyle) and conditional 1st.
what it would take if i was atl: AA, Dubi, McDonagh/Sangs, 1st, 2nd.
let’s remember that kessel was dealt just this year for 2 1sts and a 2nd. Kovy is a top 10 player in this league (offensively at least) so it should take at least the equivalent for the right to sign him that it took for kessel.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions
this is by far the deal that makes the most sense… however i think replacing giradi and cally with dubi and lisin might make sense.
not from atlanta’s perspective. lisin wouldnt have value for them that girardi would. sure they might want dubi more than cally as i think they should, but as i said that was the deal i would be willing to give up, but not what i think would be enough to actually make the deal.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 1:58 PM EST up reply actions
If we waive redden or rozsival, trade giradi and sangs, we need 2 more defensemen to cal up, giving us 4 rookies in total playing D. Sure, Heikenen is decent but we need another call up too…
if you trade cally and girardi you dont actually have to waive either to fit the cap this year as we only have to take 1/2 of kovys cap hit since it is for the rest of the year.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions
not that i want to keep them on the roster, but it is a situation we wouldnt have to deal w til the summer.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions
hahaha that was my next question… i couldn’t believe you were giving a free chance to get rid of one of those waste of space. But i agree, i don’t think they would do it midseason, not to mention sather has to admit he is wrong when they do that.
and the hope would be that mcdonagh could be ready this fall, i dont see it, but maybe. either that or a prospal type move on D in the offseason as a stopgap.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions
at this point, i wouldn’t trade for him at all. There’s no guarantee that he will sign with the Blueshirts after his contract is up.
And I personally would like the Rangers to sign more North American grinders (aka Graves, Callahan, Dubi, even Higgins) at 2-3 mil each then sign another 7 mil (if not more) finesse player.
but I have a strong bias towards players that score AND hit (hockey is a physical game and all players should finish their checks) and I think players with less skill but who play the physical game will be more successful in the long run.
I say pass on Kovalchuk altogether.
by truebluesince75 on Jan 11, 2010 12:24 PM EST reply actions
Kovi is pretty physical
Though chippy might be more appropriate.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
Ok Mr. Negative lol
for the sake of the activity let’s come up with something.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
chippy doesn’t do it for me. chippy is how you respond to physical play, not instigate it.
by truebluesince75 on Jan 11, 2010 12:29 PM EST reply actions
A) Welcome
B) Hit the reply button when responding, it will put your comment under the selected post like this
C) If the price isn’t too steep (which would be hard for a guy like Kovy) I take him in the bat of an eye. He is a game breaker and there aren’t many in this league
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
by truebluesince75 on Jan 11, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
no problem
thats what we’re here for. It just keeps things together more on the site. Glad to have you around!
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
Waiving Redden alone clears the space for Kovy (sadly, Redden’s cap hit is more)
Roster Player(s): Higgins, Lisin
Prospects: Sanguinetti, Mike Sauer.
Picks: 2010 2nd, 2011 1st.
Upsides for Atlanta:
Sanguinetti and Sauer both rate higher than any D prospects currently in the Atlanta organization (according to hockeysfuture), which could replace Kubina and/or Schubert (UFAs)
Higgins gives a boost to a bottom 10 PK, and “change of scenery” may see him wake up down the stretch.
Lisin has obvious offensive talents and playing with more talented centers than Brian Boyle may get him to reach potential. Also an RFA so Atlanta would control him for beyond the year. Combination of the two gives Atlanta two NHL-level LWs to replace Kovy’s minutes.
Downsides:
No immediate replacement for Kovy’s numbers. (But really, can any deal?)
No long term deals coming back, which means still having to re-sign players, but they’re more reasonable deals to re-sign.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
the only reason why I disagree on this is because
Kovalchuck is the face of that franchise, and when I talked to matt about this over the summer he made it clear that they needed a face to go on. I would replace Callahan with Lisin there
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
agree with Joe here
I like smurf,s ideas, but I would have to agree with Joe, You would have to give at least Callahan here, they might even want Dubi or Anisomov
Yeah
I was trying my best to not put Cally in the deal. Our roster sucks for this. lol
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah but you have to give them something.
And if you replace Cally with Ilya, it’s a win.
by Lunkwill Fook on Jan 11, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions
I would sooner give up Cally than Dubi though
Which is different than how I woulda felt in October. So there’s that.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions
i completely agree cally before dubi.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions
that is pretty hilarious if you think atlanta would take that. they would get more waiting until june 30th and trading his rights alone.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 12:51 PM EST up reply actions
Well, I took this thread to mean that as a group we were trying to put together an offer. I thought this would be a starting point. Which it seems to have been, as replacing Sauer with Girardi and Lisin with Cally is about what we’re talking.
I wasn’t that far off. I was trying to give up more potential than established, though Atlanta needs established so that’s where I erred most.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 2:14 PM EST up reply actions
well actually i dont even think where we are is anywhere near legit value for him, but it is what “we” would give up as opposed to what it should actually take. ask any of us and anyone they would actually want we wouldnt want to deal, so it’s not really fair to ask us.
In reality it should take AA, Dubi/Cally, McDonagh/Sangs and conditional picks, but we would all be upset w a deal like that.
I would rather trade Cally, Gilroy, Rozi and a 1st/2nd to Florida for Horton, McCabe as we talked about last week as he might not be as big a scorer as Kovy it is a better team move for a young star who is signed cheap for years, but Kovy was the point of this exercise. lol.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:18 PM EST up reply actions
Well based on the rumors that are out there
Atlanta wants Wheeler and Rask as a starting point from Boston.
They want Barker and Versteeg as a starting point with Chicago.
One writer speculated “two top nine forwards, a defenseman, and picks”
I don’t think we have anything close to that which is why we’re loading up deals with secondary parts.
I agree on the Florida deal (though I don’t remember Gilroy being part of it).
My original thought was Higgins/Cally/Sangs/Gilroy plus the picks, but then I decided I didn’t want to trade Cally and saw Sauer was higher than anything they had.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 2:27 PM EST up reply actions
it was gilroy/girardi/sangs. i think they are interchangeable really, but gilroy would save the most cap wise and has more upside to make them do the deal.
I dont see higgins serving any purpose for them.
Well my deal of AA, Dubi/Cally, Mcdonagh would fit the writers criteria (Girardi instead if they want someone in the NHL already), but i wouldnt do that as the rangers. Cally literally is Versteeg. AA and Girardi would top Barker imo.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:31 PM EST up reply actions
Well yeah, but I don’t want to give up AA in this deal. I’d sooner give up Grachev.
Higgins value is as a PK player + expiring contract. He’s not a major component but it’s something that gives them a little value short term.
Grachev/Cally/Girardi/Sangs + picks?
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 2:34 PM EST up reply actions
didnt say i wanted to at all, but it should take including him to get it done. As i said at the bottom while we all love AA now that he is in the NHL and people are down on Grachev because he isnt beasting the AHL look at the comparable numbers to where AA was 2 years ago as a 19yr old in the AHL for Hartford. Same track. Im not so high on Kovy that i would give up anything that isnt really on this team and i dont want to give away picks or prospects the way Gord has drafted the last couple years.
I still say we should sell or buy long term (Horton type). I would actually argue that this team has shown the last week Prospal is a replaceable part in that EC plays a similar game with less skill obviously, but Prospal could be sold to get more picks and not change the fate of this team. let us remember as hot as we are right now we are only 3 pts up on 9th spot.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed on that front
They shouldn’t be buying. However, Kovalchuk is a top 10 player and still in his prime, if you can buy him, you should. He’s a notable exception. Horton is an acceptable exception also, as he’s young enough that it doesn’t change the direction of the team.
As far as AA/Grachev, if we truly believe they’re on similar paths (and I agree, they are similar), I would always keep the guy that has already done it as opposed to the guy that is likely to do it, b/c prospects fail. So if their value is the same, Grachev can go (he’s also a wing which might be the better fit for Atlanta anyway).
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 2:55 PM EST up reply actions
i would probably give up Grachev before AA, but the reason people are willing to give up Grachev is because they expected him to light the place on fire immediately was my point. Grachev for all we know could get bored and go back to Russia like Filatov, which is also a worry for me with Kovy. I could see the KHL throwing obscene amounts of money at him, something was mentioned during the game like them giving him 75 mil up front to go back there and make that league legit.
I think Kovy is a top 10 scorer in this league no doubt, but with the cap hell this team is in to add another contract over 7 mil makes me more hesitant when you realize staal needs a new deal, girardi needs a deal, dubi, AA need deals in a year and nothing is really coming off the cap other than maybe redden and rozi if they dump them.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t really want to give up Grachev either. I’m not down on him. Just saying one before the other.
As for deals…I honestly don’t think Girardi will come back unless they do get rid of Roz/Red. Sangs and Heik are already knocking on the door and I don’t see both spending another year in hartford (maybe one).
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions
and isnt the cap going to come down as well with reduced revenue?
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions
I believe so.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:09 PM EST up reply actions
so let’s say they dump both redden (6.5) and rozi (5) plus expiring of staal (.827), girardi (1.55), higgins (2.25), prospal (1.1) that gives them 17 mil in contracts gone. Kovy is going to get 8 easy, staal should get about 3.5. That’s 6 mil at most to fill girardi, higgins, prospal, another d spot and realize if dubi keeps it up he is looking at 3-4 mil the following year with AA getting a nice raise as well with only brashear coming off.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:13 PM EST up reply actions
Kovy will get 9.5
He wants 11. Say he gets 10, which is another major problem. So it’s probably closer to 3.5 after Staal. Lisin (790k) and Christensen (750k) are both RFAs also, so that’s 5m to fill the ?’s/
So that would mean:
Kovalchuk – Dubinsky – Gaborik
Avery – Drury – Callahan
? – Anisimov – Kotalik
Brashear – Boyle – Voros
Staal – ?
? – MDZ
? – Gilroy
Sangs is 850k, that leaves 4.15m for 3 spots (plus healthy scratches).
It’s really tight yes, and probably too tight for comfort.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:26 PM EST up reply actions
That’s if we just waited and signed him. If we trade for him, obviously there are more ?, but more $$ available.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:27 PM EST up reply actions
Kovy might be willing to take 7 or 8 million
to play on a conteder and in New York. He does love NY
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:28 PM EST up reply actions
I really, really doubt it. I think 8.5 would be the minimum. Only with a Hossa-type contract would his cap hit only be 7-8m.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:33 PM EST up reply actions
exactly just adding to the problems in dealing for him.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions
It would be reasonable, a front loaded contract wouldn’t sound bad, especially if he really wants to play in NY. 10-10-10-10-10-8-8-8-8-8-6-5-3 (104m over 13 years) would be an 8m cap hit. I don’t see him passing that up, but at the same time, would we want Kovy in NY for 13 years?
Actually
He’s 26. 13 years will give us to him in his prime and his NY decline.
(Walt Clyde Frazier influenced this post)
by xcdudesquad on Jan 12, 2010 12:09 AM EST up reply actions
horton would be a great pick up....
but has florida ever mentioned trying to move him?
by BronxBeliever on Jan 11, 2010 9:50 PM EST up reply actions
Okay, let me make the attempt
Assume that Rozy is made gone (I think that’s the most likely). So that’s $5 mil off the cap. So, 1.3 needs to go. Atlanta is going to need at least one, maybe two NHL caliber, relatively young players for him. Add to that, Atlanta has always had defensive issues.
Girardi is the answer.
Honestly, it’s either Staal or Girardi and I think we’d rather keep Staal. So Girardi goes and that clears the cap issue. Of course, they’ll want more, including a potential scoring winger to replace Ilya. As much as I hate it, you give them Cally. Callahan is a great player and tough nosed. But, in the end, he’s probably already maxed out his offensive potential (which, as a 20 goal scorer, is not to be sneezed at). Finally, you give Atlanta a prospect like Sanguinetti.
So, now you’ve cleared a little cap room. And here’s the final trade:
Rozy → Minors
Rangers get Ilya Kovalchuk
Thrasers get Dan Girardi, Ryan Callahan, and Bobby Sanguinetti.
What do you think, too much? Too little? Trying to be realistic here.
you gotta add a conditional 1st rounder if the Rangers sign him
at the end of the year
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 12:41 PM EST up reply actions
If he somehow did come to the Garden, it would be interesting to see how he would deal with being on the same team as Avery. Seans a big part of this team and there could definitely be some tension there.
I honestly wouldnt try to get him, I think he’s a b!tch personally and cant stand him. But I would hope we wouldnt give up Sanguinetti, MDZ (never know w/ sather), or any of the top 3 USA Jr Prospects
Favre 4 Ever
I Believe In Chris Drury
RIP Buddy <3 Love you
Del Zotto is pretty untouchable at this point
But Sanguinetti is quite touchable, and probably would be traded if a deal like this went down
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
I would trade Sanguinetti in a heartbeat. He has not impressed me much with the few games he had. I know hes young but we can afford to lose one of our millions of defensive prospects.
by CrazyRangerFan on Jan 11, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions
okay lets give this a shot.
Redden to Hartford
Roster player(s): Sean Avery, Artem Anisimov
Prospect: Sangs.
2010 1st round
2011 3rd round
the thrashers are looking for a face? here’s one you won’t forget. LW for LW in avery for kovy. i would sadly add artie to the mix to avoid trading cally, dubi, or any young blueliner.
how much cap space do we have left after this? 2 mil or so? think so…
by #17ToTheRafters on Jan 11, 2010 12:48 PM EST reply actions
well this is more realistic in terms of what atlanta would take to make the deal i think. as far as cap space we have enough now to take a 3 mil contract back because there is only half the year left and the combo of dubi’s injury and sending gilroy to hartford even for just the 10 days.
I dont see anyone but the rangers taking avery. they might take higgins instead (expiring contract). the problem with this deal is say we sign kovy long term and people need to remember he is rumored to be asking 9-10 mil a year, we wont have the money to sign both staal and girardi.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions
I’m not too high on Kovalchuk because either he’ll be another pointless rental or the Rangers would give in to his outrageous contract demands, leaving them with no room to pursue any more FA and unable to retain any of their talented youngins once they hit FA.
I wouldn’t want the Rangers to trade any of their top 5 prospects. I can live with losing Sangs and some combination of second-tier prospects (especially if they are defensemen). Players from the current roster that I’d hate to lose are Staal, Cally, and Dubi (I don’t think I need to worry about Gabby, and MDZ and Artem are two of the top prospects I already said I wouldn’t trade). A reasonable combination of any of the remaining Rangers is acceptable, as is a conditional 1st if Kovalchuk re-signs.
So I’d be ok with: Roszival, Higgins, Sangs, Sauer, and a conditional first. Another second-tier prospect or third-line Ranger wouldn’t kill me.
would you take rozi & higgins for kovy? seriously now…i know its hard to think of vital parts of the team as tradable but you gotta offer something of immediate value.
by #17ToTheRafters on Jan 11, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
imagine this:
kovy duby gabby…just until we find a 1st line center…:)
by #17ToTheRafters on Jan 11, 2010 12:59 PM EST reply actions
Kovalchuk
waive redden…there is your cap savings. this sucks because the nhlpa will be pissed, but it is wade redden, so they might be more understandable.
Get: Kolvy
Give: Prospal (veteran who is very cheap this year), Sanguinetti, Grachev, McDonagh, 2010 1st and 2nd Round Picks
This deal is weak on players who could contribute now for atlanta, but will help the thrashers a ton in the future with the rangers 1st, 3rd, and 6th ranked prospects, according to Hockey’s Future.
By waiving Redden, they have the cap space to re-sign Kolvy and can trot out lines like this:
Dubinsky-Christansen-Gaborik (have played well together)
Kovalchuk-Anisimov-Lisin (let the Russian line begin!)
Avery-Drury-Callahan (good line of grinders)
Higgins-Boyle-Voros/Brashear/Kotalik
Staal-Roszival
Girardi-Del Zotto
Heikenen-Gilroy
by brodeur hearts avery on Jan 11, 2010 1:07 PM EST reply actions
and for the future...
i wouldn’t resign higgins…let byers come up and play on the fourth line
resign christensen and girardi
and we still have kreider, stepan, and bourque as center replacements down the line for drury and christiansen
by brodeur hearts avery on Jan 11, 2010 1:21 PM EST up reply actions
I would never give up McDonagh even for Kovalchuk
by CrazyRangerFan on Jan 11, 2010 1:23 PM EST up reply actions
Not too bad of a deal
But prospals value is higher to a team that are buyers rather sellers cause it’s Vinny last year on his contract which is a hit of 1 mil. There are no garentees that he will resign there like the problem we would have if we got kovy so they would almost get nothing but picks and prospects for this deal and a cheap avery being Dallas paying half his salary still. But not a bad deal I feel too many people are giving to much up for a rental for 1/4 of a year.
by klh2009 on Jan 11, 2010 2:24 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Since Philly said they wont deal Carter i would look at LA as the best spot for Kovy. They need a marketing type player and while Kovy doesnt do a lot of media out there he could be something to liven up the NHL West, especially playing w Kopitar.
Frolov (talent and expiring deal), Bernier (goalie of the future), Brayden Schenn and a cond. 1st would be a great haul for Atl. If they dont want Frolov to attempt to resign then maybe they could get Teubert or Hickey out of them instead so LA can make a run this year. I know they said no goalies, but i would take this one and deal one of the ones they got as he is better than what they have.
Atlanta would then have Kane, Schenn, Bogosian, Bernier, Little to build around with slightly older guys in Enstrom, Peverley, Antropov to form a nice core with tons of cap room. Question is can they get anyone to come there as a FA. They would probably have a top 5 pick this year or they could try and make a splash and go after some RFA’s like Backstrom cause of the excess picks.
From what I hear, they might be willing to give up Carter to Montreal for Halak, as their goalie issues don’t seem to be panning out. So he probably won’t be in the mix for us.
that is not what was said yesterday when they quashed all Carter rumors, so what was speculated before is pretty meaningless to me.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 1:56 PM EST up reply actions
also i wasnt suggesting Carter to us, i was thinking in term of Philly using Carter to get Kovy.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions
It looks like they need a reliable goalie more than scoring. They had no problem lighting us up last week. Expect them to keep negotiating with Montreal. If they won’t give up Carter, they might give up Briere…
well the rumors started a couple weeks ago when they couldnt hit the ocean. leighton has played very well for them so i dont see them dealing for a goalie now.
ESPN’s Pierre LeBrun though, went to the source and found out this from GM Paul Holmgren:
"I don’t know where all these rumors are coming from," said Holmgren. "We are not trading him, I can tell you that."
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions
who is going to take briere’s contract of 6.4 mil for the next 20 years. well not 20 but it is like 5 more right?
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions
leighton w philly
7-0-1 2.14GAA .928SV%.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:14 PM EST up reply actions
I watched Mike for years when he played for the River Rats… he’s good. Not so Glad he’s doing well with Philly… but yeah…
by fromthe51hate on Jan 11, 2010 3:19 PM EST up reply actions
I offer...
$.78, some lint, an expired Metrocard, my old and tattered Totin’ Chip card, and a receipt for some bagels from Stew Leonards. And a conditional first round pick.
Am I close?
best deal ive seen yet
im not ok with any of these deals unless we have a contract with kovy prior to the trade( which atl is not willing to do) Kovy leaving during the summer along with the players it took to get him here would set the team back another 2-3 years min. not worth the risk
Callahan, Girardi, Sanguinetti, conditional 2010 1st round pick, 2010 third round pick. Seems to be the most viable options on our end, and gives them something now, and something later :P
well that was my deal. lol. also we dont have a 2010 3rd since it went to boyle as i stated above. that shouldnt get it done imo.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions
Personally, Grachev shouldn’t be considered untouchable. We could perhaps package him:
Callahan, Grachev, Sanguinetti, conditional 2010 1st, 2011 2nd.
i wont argue about Grachev being untouchable because i dont think but for a very few there is untouchable for the right price. What i do find amusing is the jumping on and off the Grachev bandwagon as he was the 2nd coming to start the year and he struggles as a 19 yr old in Hartford and now he is diminished.
A blind stat for some, and im sure some will already know immediately who it is.
19 yrs old 1st year in AHL. GP74 G16 A27 Pts43
Grachev: GP 41GP 9G 10A 19Pts
Those two are having very similar 19 yr old seasons in Hartford as 1st year pro’s.
The unnamed guy went on to play 80 games score 37G and have 44 A in his 2nd year and we know him as Artem Anisimov, so let’s see what Grachev does as a 20 yr old in Hartford before we jump ship.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions
The untouchables right now are
Grached, Chad Johnson, MDZ and as much as it might surprise you AA.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:24 PM EST up reply actions
I think he is a tradeable piece
because he is still in college and hasn’t proved his worth in the NHL yet.
For me he is in the class with Stephan, Krieder, and Bourque. and I know not many people want to give them up either.
by CrazyRangerFan on Jan 11, 2010 3:41 PM EST up reply actions
it is because no one this board ever spells is right, so he cant be untouchable if he is unspellable. it’s McDonagh not any of the other 40 combos. and that is not meant as a shot at you specifically crazy.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:40 PM EST up reply actions
are you saying I cant speel?
Becvause iz thats what your saying I will bann yer ars!
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:41 PM EST up reply actions
It’s spelled “arse.”
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
that was part of the joke Smurf lol
do you really think I’m that bad?
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
I wasn’t sure if you were going for ass or arse.
And, mind you, there’s humor in me only correcting the last word. lol
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions
actually now that you say that
I laughed
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions
it’s not as bad as the sarcasm that smurf had to point out in the EC trade where the guy thought i was serious in responding to his Rozi Higgins Kots for Kessel White deal saying we werent getting enough.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions
Damn
Was about to correct your spelling of thread.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions
we already know you cant, but the variations in McDonagh’s name on this board border on comical sometimes.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
Better or worse
Than Heineken?
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions
i can live with Heik when they base it on the beer spelling. lol.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions
oh sorry Its ok Im a terrible speller anyway. lol
by CrazyRangerFan on Jan 11, 2010 3:41 PM EST up reply actions
why?
is grachev or ocho cinco untouchable? i would trade either if it meant getting a player like kolvy, IF we can re-sign him.
specifically, why johnson? with hank around, his ceiling with us is career backup. we can find servicable backups elsewhere
by brodeur hearts avery on Jan 11, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions
I’m trying to work out a feasible 3- or 4-way trade where nobody feels utterly jerked, but it’s pretty damn hard.
its a deal only with the Thrashers
no one else
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:24 PM EST up reply actions
While I want Kovy on Broadway, the reality is, the Rangers should not go for it if there is no guarantee he will not re sign with them. Why bother…..wait until he is a free agent. If cutting Redden or Rozi or both clears up enough cap, then we can wait until June or July to make this move without getting screwed when he re signs elsewhere after giving up all of our young players.
He probably would re-sign
he wants to be on a contender (and he makes the Rangers a contender) and he also wants to play in a full building, which the Rangers can offer
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:29 PM EST up reply actions
To NYR: Kovalchuk (ATL), 2010 2nd (PHI)
To ATL: Sanguinetti (NYR), Girardi (NYR), Callahan (NYR), conditional 2010 1st (NYR)
To PHI: Prospal (NYR), Halak (MTL), 2011 2nd (MTL)
To MTL: Giroux (PHI), Carle (PHI)
i still dont see Atl getting enough. great deal for the rangers, pretty good for mtl, dont really like it for the flyers. better than most 4 teamers.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions
If Montreal gives up something to Atlanta it could work. Throw in a Kostitsyn, and you’re getting close.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:11 PM EST up reply actions
philly gets tossed around in this trade and montreal makes out great
no sense at all for philly
public enemy #1 is jake delhomme jr. a.k.a mark sanchez
to be honest Krit……..that deal is complicated more than it has to be……..you could get it down between NYR and ATL alone if the only stumbling block is a 2nd rder coming back to us……..for Vinny.
it is really just a pair of two team deals ur trying to make a 4 teamer and as i said leighton has been excellent for philly so far so i dont see them giving up girouix.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
Amended proposal, 4 ways:
To NYR: Kovalchuk (ATL),
To ATL: Sanguinetti (NYR), Girardi (NYR), Callahan (NYR), conditional 2010 1st (NYR), 2010 2nd (NYR via PHI)
To PHI: Prospal (NYR), Halak (MTL), 2010 3rd (MTL)
To MTL: Giroux (PHI)
philly loses out terrible
they give up girouix when… they might not make the playoffs so they do not need a rental vet like prospal and they do nt need a goalie because leighton has been great
public enemy #1 is jake delhomme jr. a.k.a mark sanchez
Leighton has been good enough for them that the upgrade is not worth girouix and also they wouldnt be able to resign halak while they would have girouix for peanuts for another year.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:15 PM EST up reply actions
I was trying to make it so everyone wins, but you have a point. This idea probably won’t work. It came to fruition out of boredom.
it was a very good attempt and better than most 4 team deals, but doesnt truly fit.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:18 PM EST up reply actions
here is my try....
we get kovy
waive redden
atl gets… girardi, higgins, sangs, sauer, grachev, parenteau, 2 1st rounders
public enemy #1 is jake delhomme jr. a.k.a mark sanchez
we're giving up WAY too much for a rental there.
drop parenteau, give them a conditional first and definite second or third.
not really....
girardi might be gone after this year and sangs did not fit in this system very well… we have nt seen grachev really yet and would rather give him, sauer and parenteau instead of a dubi or callahan
public enemy #1 is jake delhomme jr. a.k.a mark sanchez
so what your saying is that you dont want to give anyone proven but want atl to take a bunch of hope and sees for a top 10 player.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
he is not going back to atl..
so when it gets near the trade deadline 4 prospects a veteran, girardi and 2 1st round picks sounds good for them
public enemy #1 is jake delhomme jr. a.k.a mark sanchez
4 prospects? just because they all play in the minors doesnt make them actual prospects. Grachev and Sangs are prospects. Sauer might make an nhl club and PA is a fringe 3rd liner at best.
If that is the price than 20 teams can come up w better than that.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:20 PM EST up reply actions
that might be the worst one yet, lol.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:23 PM EST up reply actions
I love it when people use trade proposals essentially as an excuse to dump off bad contracts.
by Lunkwill Fook on Jan 11, 2010 3:27 PM EST up reply actions
I made it pretty clear that
ATL was not taking anyone over 33
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:28 PM EST up reply actions
No one in that deal is over 33.
Kotalik is the oldest at 30.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:29 PM EST up reply actions
The response was to Lunk lol
Regardless I can almost guarentee that Kotalik is on ATL’s no trade clause haha
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:33 PM EST up reply actions
Grachev isn't going anywhere
trust me
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
i dont want to trade for him. to be completely honest. its not worth it. like someone said about i rather trade less and get horton and mccabe
to get kovalchuk. my guess.
dubi/cally higgins roszival mcdonagh 2010 1st and 2nd round and 2011 first round
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
NO DEAL!
Do we need him for this year? If not, no trade. If we add him and lose two or three regular contributors, do we get past the second round? Next off-season, we can decide whether to pay him what he wants and how to make room under the cap. He’s just a rental. Lets hope the Islanders trade for him and he goes the way of Ryan Smyth.
by It may HAVE to Last a Lifetime on Jan 11, 2010 3:33 PM EST reply actions
Here we go
Atlanta Recevies: Rozsival, McDonough, Dubinsky, Callahan, Staal 2010 1st rounder, 2011 2nd rounder, 2012 2nd rounder.
Rangers receive: Kovalchuck (with definite word he is signing) and Kubina.
Here’s why I think that could happen: Getting Kovalchuck and Gaborik together sounds orgasmic. The Rangers are giving up Staal, who is due a contract next year, and still receiving a quality D-man in Kubina to fill that cap space. Kubin gets 5 million for 3 more years and Kovalchuck gets 8 for god knows how many. That gives us 13 million we are adding on. I think we can bury Voros and Brash in the minors and bring up cheaper guys (I think Stepan wants to come to the NHL next year I’ve heard) to fill the void. We are only losing one defensemen (Kubina replaces Rozsival and is an upgrade) and Girardi isn’t gong to command too much money (we hope). The only thing that kills us is losing offense, but Kovalchuck scores more then Dubi and Cally combined. Let me know what you think!
you broke like every rule lol
A) It’s not a sign and trade
B) It’s only for Kovy
C) Even with that we give up WAY too much. McDonough, Dubinsky Callahan Staal and a 1st is the future
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
Joe it did break all the rules, but for all they get im sure atl would still take it, seeing as how bad it is for us.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:38 PM EST up reply actions
Hell yes they would lol
Waddle would take me to dinner for a week as well
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:39 PM EST up reply actions
I guess it is a lot
But it was to shed a lot of salary to get both of those guys.
just you? i think he would take all 1005 members of this board as well.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:41 PM EST up reply actions
there is more now lol
that was only from the past 7 months (because we werent around for the first few months this year)
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
ok the staff and the top 10 poster for 2 weeks. final offer.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions
I’ll take vacation from work if that’s the deal.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions
deal
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:56 PM EST up reply actions
except wouldnt want to watch the rangers for at least 3 years. lol.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions
Here's something a little more realisitc
To ATL: Rozsival, Dubinsky, Sangs and 2011 conditional 1st
To NYR: Kovy
That doesn’t even sound that great thinking about it…
READ THE RULES. no old people and no bloated contracts.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:46 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry I thought Rozsival was under 33 (which he is…)
And if we can’t trade any of the bloated contracts (Redden (which we can only waive, which is even more ridiculous), Redden, Drury (his NMC makes sense he can’t be traded), Gaborik (why even bother), or Lundqvist (they don’t need goaltending and we do)) who do we even have???
So this is what you want to hear right?
Atlanta gets: Dubinksy, some prospect, another prospect, A pick
Rangers get Kovalchuck
Rangers kill Michal Rozsival and Wade Redden and are acquitted! Other news water is no longer wet!
I feel that a guy like Rozsival would help Atlanta’s defense and after next season he’ll be a FA. Not that unrealistic to me to be traded. But sorry for not complying to the pipe dream offers.
they have no need to spend 5 mil on rozi a year.
as for what i want to hear, i dont want to hear anything. i said if i was atl it would take AA, Dubi, McDonagh and picks to actually make the trade.
the ranger side w some realism is Cally, Sangs, Girardi and picks.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:55 PM EST up reply actions
Easy boys
Rozy fits the bill for a big contract but it isn’t bloated like Reddens. No need to fight
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:56 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry. The whole thing just made no sense cap wise if you couldn’t trade Rozi. Burying one of them in the minors is so unbelievably unrealistic in my opinion I didn’t want to touch it with a 10 foot pole. For this trade to even be alright we’d need to sign Kovy (I know this isn’t a sign and trade), so if we don’t’ get rid of one of the huge contracts there’s no way we could realistically sign Kovalchuck. Sorry for sounding angry, but we need to move Salary to get this deal done for the long term, is what i was trying to say, but again didn’t say all that nice.
5 mil for rozi isnt bloated on a team that would immediately be rebuilding?
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think its too bloated when he comes off the books after 2 years (my bad on that one). His deal is frontloaded remember. He makes 3 mil in 2011 so Atlanta could realistically trade him easily or buy him out for his last year.
doesnt work that way. if they deal him it still has the 5 mil price regardless of salary and to buy him out they have to eat cap space for double the years remaining. they have the space to take him, but not sure why on earth they would want to when they would be rebuilding.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 4:22 PM EST up reply actions
I guess because Kubina’s deal is expiring? And the fact that if it doesn’t pan out for him he is more tradeable? I think Rozsival is also not as cast out other places as he is in New York. He did have larger offers before the Rangers signed him to his 4 yr 20 million deal. Atlanta also drops off on Defense after Kubina (who is an upcoming FA) and Bogosian (RFA after next season I’m pretty sure). Also, Atlanta has plenty of cap space, so they can do this deal. It comes down to Rozsival>Ron Hainsey. So if they lose Kubina to FA (which they probably will in my opinion) Rozsival can compete with Bogosian and Enstrom to be a top pair defensemen. That’s why they will take Rozsival probably.
5 mil is only the cap hit. The ONLY good part of the Rozi contract was that he made the big bucks the first two years. according to nhlnumbers he gets paid 4 mil next year then 3 mil the year after. for a team that does not intend on getting anywhere near the cap, the cap hit for 2 years of Rozi is 10 mil but you only have to pay im 7. Someone please tell me if im completely wrong.
no you are right, so if a cheap owner wants to get a player that cost less than it appears so he can pay less overall then that’s good. phx immediately comes to mind.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 4:53 PM EST up reply actions
thats a fantastic point NYR10
which is what would make Drury so attractive if it werent for the NMC. Gomez would have been attractive too lol
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
they are only attractive to cheap owners trying to pay less than it appears. not sure how many of those there are that can still attract fans.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions
also dru isnt that much cheaper until the last year of his deal. i think he has 13 mil in salary the next two years (8,5) for 14.1 in cap hit.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:11 PM EST up reply actions
that team is awful, period. We lose 3 of our best young players, another of our best prospects and 3 high picks so we can never get better.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
so the obvious answer is we aren’t getting kovalchuck but we need to get rid of redden and rozsival to make a run at FA this summer
lol if he makes it to FA
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 3:56 PM EST up reply actions
Can't spell Kovalchuk without K H and L
Literally. Just joking :)
does everbody actually think...
he’s gonna get 10 or 11 mil a year? if you do thats a joke. he’s using it as a bargaining piece for getting the hell out of ATL. if guys like, idk, crosby malkin and ovi aren’t getting double digit salary, than kovy sure as hell isnt. the only teams that will pay him that are in his homeland, mother russia. so when thinking about sign and trades don’t assume he’s gonna carry a freakin 10 mil cap hit. 8-9 is a lot, but will probably be what he gets. anything more is absurd, and if a team does pay over 20% of their cap to him, thats ridiculous.
people are way too hyped up on him too. hes great, a top 10 talent for sure, but he’s not super elite, like a crosby, malkin, ovi. he’s a consistent 40 goal scorer with loads of skill. he’s not a proven playoff performer, he doesn’t put up ridiculous goals or point totals (although they are solid and top of the league), and from the looks of this ongoing thing, he seems pretty selfish. the way the hockey world is talking about him is like a gretzkys on the market. yeesh.
LETS GO RANGERS
Post-lockout
Here are the # of 40 goal scorers each year: 10, 10, 10, 8. This year, we’re about on a pace for 10. It’s not the old NHL where teams had 3 guys that score 40. A consistent (5 straight years and counting) 40 goal scorer is as close to super elite as it gets these days.
He’s been in the top 10 in scoring thrice in 4 years (and currently sits 11th despite playing 5 less games than everyone but Ovechkin that is above him)
Short of Ovi/Crosby/Malkin hitting the market, he’s the best possible player that could be available. Maybe he doesn’t get 10, but he’s going to get Ovechkin/Crosby money.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 4:25 PM EST up reply actions
Ovechkin is making 9.2 a year
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 4:25 PM EST up reply actions
Malkin and Crosby both make 8.7 mil just because Malkin got an equal deal and Crosby signed for his number.
Ovie is actually 9.538 according to nhlnumbers and capgeek.
Eric staal is next at 8.2.
Even if you say Kovy is a notch below Crosby, Malkin, Ovie he is at least equivalent to staal so you are talking 8.5 easy.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 4:30 PM EST up reply actions
yeah
we got lucky with Gabby, we really did
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions
i will say yes but w the caveat it is only year 1.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions
unless they drop Redden
then they are basically swapping one out for the other
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 4:41 PM EST up reply actions
The drop Redden thing is too good to be true
because who takes his minutes all of a sudden? He may suck, but he isn’t the worst defender on this team and does play a good 20 minutes a night.
Well
Rozsival, MDZ, Girardi and Staal have all played 20 min a night, so a call up could play less (along with Gilroy) and allow the other guys to shoulder the load for awhile
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions
it’s not a swap if we are talking 8.5 for 6.5 unless my math escapes me.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
higgins is gone after the year so unnecessary. but where do you find the money to sign staal? even if girardi, prospal walk and we count staal’s salary that’s 3.5 mil and you still have 2 roster spots to fill…too much money.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions
speaking of Staal, ive been wondering how much its going to cost to keep him and how many years is probable
i say we go with one of those huge long deals 13/50 or something like that.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:07 PM EST up reply actions
Sather is not smart enough for that. he will give him a two year deal, he will become the nhl’s best defenseman in those two years, and he’ll go somewhere else…..it could happen
im not sure on go elsewhere. but if he goes cheap and short like he did w girardi, dubi in the 2 year to save cap space now it will def cost more later. the difference is i think staal has proven enough already that someone outside would make him an offer and risk giving up compensation and actually for staal it would be very little risk for the other team. if they offered him anything up to 3 mil it’s a 2nd rounder. if it is b/w 3 and 4.5 a 1st and 3rd, which i would pay for a top 2 defenseman who isnt even 23 until Wed.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:17 PM EST up reply actions
If you had kovi and gab, would you play them on the same line?
i’d prob separate them like pittsburgh does with malkin and crosby and put them together on the PP and in important situations
i would do the same
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 4:47 PM EST up reply actions
When is the last time the Rangers had two legit 50 goal scorers on the team? looking at the recent cup winning teams you must have at least 2 game changing players. the rangers could be a top ten team in 3-4 years with our prospects. i say keep our prospects and young players, let some other team pay a kings ransom to have him for a couple months, then give him a contract he cant refuse this summer. Gab, Kovi, the King,and the young kids- life couldn’t be better
I doubt that Kovy makes it to the FA market
especially if he is traded. Just a thought
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
look at Hossa as a similar situation to what could happen. If this guy leaves atl he is going to sign somewhere he wants to be. i see him being on a team for a couple months then signing somewhere else.
completely different scenario as hossa was a known rental for atl to make a run as opposed to looking to deal kovy if they cant sign him.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:00 PM EST up reply actions
yeah but if a team who could be a conteder throw
the Vick deal (10 years 100 mil) he would be kinda insane not to take it
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 11, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions
i was talking about from atl perspective.
sorry but if we are talking money the KHL is his best shot. Sam and Joe were talking about some crazy 130 mil deal where they would give him like 60% or 2/3rds up front. Take 75 mil up front would be crazy to pass up.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:06 PM EST up reply actions
i dont think so that league is more unstable then a washington wizards locker room. he stays in the nhl
i dont care how unstable it is. if they give him 75 mil upfront tomorrow and fold he can come back to the nhl and get paid again. that’s an even bigger win if you ask me.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:08 PM EST up reply actions
No team has two 50 goal scorers any more. Well, I guess PItt could theoretically but there’s only like 2-5 guys that can even score 50 in the whole league.
Different era.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jan 11, 2010 5:26 PM EST up reply actions
marleau and heatley have a chance to do it in SJ this year
If Semin ever stayed healthy and played 82 Was would have 2.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:29 PM EST up reply actions
to your larger point…06-07 2 in the league. 07-08 3 in the league. 08-09 1 in the league.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:31 PM EST up reply actions
a good number of these proposals seem to be enough for atlanta...
now do you think sather is actively trying to make this happen? cause i have a strong gut feeling (not tryna get all eklund on you but its true) that kovy would want to play in ny than all other places…its a huge market, diehard fanbase that spend money and fill the place up, big $$$ owners, has another elite forward and a elite goalie with great youngsters, and will (if he gets here) make the playoffs every year. i don’t see kovy picking a philthadelphia, or even LA over ny. just a gut feeling though.
plus, doesn’t kovy seem to love playing at MSG? haha
but anyway, do you think uncle glennie is tryning to make this happen? cause if he really wanted to, it could. the pieces are all here, and the moves can be made.
LETS GO RANGERS
Take Higgins and Rozival………PLEASE………and we will throw in Brashear just to get rid of him……
Only GM stupid enough to take this trade is SATHER or Gainey in Montreal…..PS Thanks Bob, Gomez was pathetic, inviisable and lazy…..
well Maloney in Phx loves to trade for guys he drafted. lol.
Gomez finally woke up in Montreal too w 12 pts in the last 9 before that he was 18 in 34 or something like that.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 5:19 PM EST up reply actions
Trade
I would trade Staal, Girardi, and Callahan and a conditional 1st round pick 2010. This is if we trade Kotalik, Higgins, and Brashear, at the deadline and drop Redden down to Hartford next year.
To NYR: Kovalchuk (ATL),
To ATL: Staal (NYR), Girardi (NYR), Callahan (NYR), 2010 1st (NYR), conditional 2011 1st round
To finish the season:
Gaborik Christensen Dubinsky
Kovalchuk Drury Prospal
Avery Anisimov Lisin
Beyers Boyle Voros
Rosival Delzotto
Sauer Saguenetti
Gilroy Heineken
Why Trade for Kovy Anyway
Everyone hates it when Sather gets a rental to squeak into the playoffs and this seems like just a massive rental for me. According to the rumors out of Atlanta, Kovy is asking for 8 + million. Signing him next year and taking care of Staal and Girardi and Dubinski in the following off season would be pretty hard without dumping somebody. I would rather just accept that we dont have the space to compete in this lottery and move on.
We have a top flight talent already and are producing what looks to be some very good prospects in the next couple of years, even though they wont be superstars.
If I were to make a trade proposal it would be Roszival, Prospal, choice of D prospect and a conditional first rounder. The reasoning is as follows:
NYR- Gets a rental of Kovy with a chance to resign him, albeit doing so might cost us some other player to make all the cap play nice next year and the following year. Even if they dont resign him, they can get rid of Roszivals cap hit. This money can be used to either sign a cheaper defensemen, of which there are plenty of serviceable veterans available next year and to offer long term extensions to the younger Rangers.
Dont forget that Florida gave up Jay Boumeaster for only a third round pick at the draft last year. Since we are not going to win the cup this year, really what we are getting is the same thing Calgary got.
ATL- Roszival may not be the second coming of Bobby Orr, but despite the hatred, he is a pretty good 2nd pair defenseman. Also comes at not too bad a price in terms of real dollars. $4 million this year and more importantly, $3 million the following year. For a small market like ATL, this is important. He does also have the high cap hit which could help them reach the floor if that is an issue.
On top of that they get their favorite D prospect, of which we have plenty of quality ones and Prospal. While he is not marquee, he has done enough in the league to be considered a star. He can play left wing on the top line and have a little marketing power to him.
It might not be what ATL wants, but this late in the game, the fact is, they are not getting a star in return, nor do I think they would get much better. Think of the Hossa deal. 1 NHL player who was not too removed from prospect (Christensen), one prospect, one draft pick. This deal they would get a second tier D man, a pretty good forward that has some name recognition, a prospect, and a first rounder. Would be better than the deal for Hossa.
Let me give this a shot
Roster players: Anisimov(.8k) Higgins (2.1m) and Kotalik (3.3m)
Prospects: Evgeni Grachev and Sanguinetti
Picks: 2nd & 4th Rounders in 2011
For this year you have 6.2 million coming off with the Roster players. You send down Gilroy and Voros. Clearing up another 3 million giving you 9.3 million… i believe… in cap space.
Then you call up PA parenteau and Dane Byers to fill the holes in the roster and the third and fourth lines. Call up Heikkenen to fill in Gillroys spot.
Leaving you with just enough money to have Kovalchuk who is making 6.7 million this year.
Lines for Forwards looking like:
Kovalchuk, Prospal, Gaborik
Avery, Drury, Lisin
PA, Dubinsky, Callahan
Byers, Boyle, Brashear
….lol imagine.
by louielounz1 on Jan 11, 2010 6:38 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Better for ATL
let me add .. the trade would be dead even as far as leverage… If ATL didnt prove that they cant sign him. I mean yeah hes awesome, and having him can make us a cup contender but.. another big midseason change plus losing young talent is not what we need. Now atl on the other hand gets AA who is a a couple of months away ( PROBABLY) from being a point per two game player in the NHL and Kotalik who is a powerplay point man through and through. Grachev will be good if not close to great in the NHL…EVENTUALLY.
Sangs will do great on a team like ATL because there defense is suspect and he can really get good playing time down there. The picks are good.. i dont think they deserve a 1st rounder because that would be asking to much for a team that might not end up with anything.
by louielounz1 on Jan 11, 2010 7:22 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
After reading every suggestion here...
I really do not want to see Kovalchuk in a Rangers jersey.
I looked over at the Birdwatchers blog
They put a comment next to us that we’re already at 200 comments lol:
FLA – 6
TAM – 2
Ott – 12
NSH – 30
NYR – 219
CGY – 27
NYI – 21
DAL – 8
EDM – 8
PHI – 7
219 is about the attendance level in atl so they should be honored.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 8:01 PM EST up reply actions
Hahaha that's hilarious us ranger fans must really wanna see kovy in a blueshirt
by klh2009 on Jan 12, 2010 12:05 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
we’re just realistic about the fact that any player would want to play here, so its all about the price tag. we’re greedy, but with justifications.
by #17ToTheRafters on Jan 12, 2010 5:44 AM EST up reply actions
Lets say this somehow happens for us. Is it possible that Sather can get Kovy to sign for lets say 9yrs 75 mill? Answer me that?
by louielounz1 on Jan 11, 2010 7:40 PM EST via mobile reply actions
He won’t sign for a cap hit of less than 8m. Gaborik’s getting 7.5 (because of his injury history), he’ll surely want more. At least 8m/yr avg would be a no brainer.
Thats what i would give him if i was sather but then again i dont even like the numbers of that deal.
Im starting to think we would be putting way to much on the line here guys.
by louielounz1 on Jan 11, 2010 10:39 PM EST up reply actions
Re-amended 3-way trade proposal:
To NYR: Kovalchuk (ATL),
To ATL: Sanguinetti (NYR), Girardi (NYR), Callahan (NYR), conditional 2010 1st (NYR), 2010 2nd (NYR via BOS via TOR)
To BOS: Prospal (NYR)
I would do that in a heartbeat, just have to send down Redden to make it happen.
by CrazyRangerFan on Jan 11, 2010 9:32 PM EST up reply actions
Re-reamended 3-way trade proposal (FINAL)
To NYR: Kovalchuk (ATL), 2010 or 2011 4th (BOS)
To ATL: Sanguinetti (NYR), Girardi (NYR), Callahan (NYR), conditional 2010 1st (NYR), 2010 2nd (NYR via BOS via TOR)
To BOS: Prospal (NYR)
got to give you credit for continuing to try, especially slightly adding in what we talked about in the chat, but let me ask you this.
Rangers take Prospal to Bos for Tor 2nd, Bos 4th.
Rangers trade Rozi, Cally, Gilroy/Girardi/Sangs our 2nd for Horton and Mccabe.
In the end we get Horton McCabe basically a late 1st for Cally, a d and our 2nd vs. Kovy for what you give in your deal and i still dont think atl does it without AA, Dubi or McDonagh at least. which do you take?
Im taking Horton McCabe and basically have two 1st rounders this year, eliminating Rozi as opposed to having Rozi and losing our own 1st w how we have been drafting lately.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 10:51 PM EST up reply actions
not to mention the 4 mil a year in cap savings.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 10:52 PM EST up reply actions
i have no idea what florida will do. their trade/no trade decisions are some of the worst in history. luongo dealt when he should have been kept. jaybo kept when he should have been dealt, so predicting what florida would do is impossible. lol.
by Michael Gleich on Jan 11, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions
good point you should give Sather a call lol, cause I love deal you are talking about.
by CrazyRangerFan on Jan 11, 2010 11:46 PM EST up reply actions
Personally, I would love to see Horton in Blue. Not entirely sure about McCabe.
The topic of discussion is solely about Kovalchuk, so I tried to come up with something reasonable, not too far-fetched in regards to what one team would be giving away.
I would do the Horton/McCabe deal over Kovalchuk hands down. But in regards to the topic at hand, I’d probably be inclined to giving up Grachev over McDonagh.
this was your best trade idea yet Kritikal
this works would pretty well for all teams especially Boston who get some help right now when they need it
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Jan 12, 2010 8:53 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Hey i'm new here
Call me crazy but i was never a fan of having kovy come to NY. First and foremost his salary demands are insane. He wants to be paid like Alex Ovechkin is and yet he doesn’t bring as much to the table as Ovie does. Second do we really need him here. I mean we have so many prospects growing up and in two and a half years we dump around 15 mil ( drury kotalik rozival) in salary so why would we go back to scraping the ceiling? We could use that money to sign a few players that can help a team contend instead of one player who is just learning how to use his teammates. Kovy also wants something like ten years so we would be stuck with him until hes 37! The Rangers don’t need a quick fix, they need kids who go through the system and learn what it means to play for the Ranger orginization.
I really think Sather is so dumb....not news but w/e
Zetteberg makes1 mill less than Drury per year.
Rafalski makes 500k less than Redden per year.
Duncan Keith makes the same amount as Rozy a year.
If we had these guys or even someone of less talent we would be an elite team and not have to talk about these trades. …. okay im bitter lol
Not Worth It
If you want it to be “REAL” there’s no way I’d trade for Kovalchuk without a sign and trade. If we’re talking the about the rental market we should be “sellers” coming into the trade deadline, not “buyers”.
We don’t have the cap space without making major roster changes. On top of that, even if we get Kovalchuk I still dont think we’re good enough to make a run for the cup.
How about we trade some of our roster players for draft picks!!!
The only players other teams would want would be the players we’re not willing to give up (Unless they desperately need a Higgins or Prospal, or their D is so bad they need a Sanguinetti). So packing a little (note, I said a little) dead weight with a roster player or two and a prospect makes the deal look a little more well-rounded. Prospal for 2nd/4th would be good (as proposed by mleetch in the chat last night), If we can get a 3rd or 4th for Kotalik I’d be more than happy.
Nothing. The Rangers are rebuilding. If you are going to mortgage the future, do it when the team is ready to be a Cup contender, but a playoff contender.
The right player at the wrong time is still the wrong player.
Anyway, most people here are overpaying. Think more along the lines of the Pronger deal. Assume a good, young roster player (Staal), a good prospect (Sanguinetti, McDonagh, Werek, Stepan), a 1st and a conditional 1st if he signs. It’s essentially the same as the Pronger deal. Personally, I would make the Thrashers choose one of Sanguinetti or Werek, I wouldn’t offer up McDonagh or Stepan (or Grachev).
Essentially, if you put a gun to my head and said make an offer:
Staal, one of Sanguinetti/Werek/Kreider, 2010 1st, conditional 2011 1st if he resigns.
Throwing my hat into the ring...
ATL: Kovalchuck, Hainsey, 2nd rounder
NYR: Anisimov, Dubinsky, Rozsival, Gilroy, 1st Rounder
ATL dumps the Hainsey salary, gets 3 affordable and up-and-comers, ATL-type players in return, Rozsival salary off the table for NYR as Hainsey wash.
Redden gets traded for some Big League Chew.
"...also I'll brush my teeth and remember to turn off the stars at night and put the hyena out." ERNEST HEMINGWAY

by 




























