Rangers Analysis: What We Learned from the Preseason
The preseason is over and the New York Rangers will now turn their focus to Saturday night's season opener against the Buffalo Sabres at HSBC Arena. While the players and staff prepare, the fans will anxiously wait out what will seem like the longest five days of the year. We here at Blueshirt Banter will do our best to keep you entertained over the next week until the regular season gets underway. Today we look back at the preseason as a whole, and reflect on what we've learned about the club by watching them play six games against three skilled, but very different type teams.
The first thing that jumped out at me was the Rangers' ability to capitalize on their chances. It is not often that I can say that, so obviously this is something to get excited about, even if it was only the preseason. In 2009-10, the team was not opportunistic at all, and that would later hurt them in long-run due to a series of unfortunate events that we are all aware of by now. The Blueshirts scored 4 or more goals in each exhibition contest they played in, which resulted in more wins than if they were to only score two or so.
The Rangers have buried rebounds, they are making the opposition pay for their mistakes, odd-man rushes are being converted to goals and they have been tremendous on the powerplay. Those are all scenarios that present opportunities for goals, and for the most part, New York has cashed in on many of them. This, in return, makes head coach John Tortorella's offensive-minded system much more efficient. The coach wants constant pressure and he wants to be able to take chances when possible. When you have the lead because of a high conversion rate, both of those tasks automatically become easier to execute.
As a general rule, more scoring equals more wins. If this scoring rate can continue into the regular season, there is no doubt in my mind that our Rangers are a playoff team. Especially since the goals are not coming from just Marian Gaborik or Alexander Frolov. All four lines have been contributing, which makes it very hard for the opposition to match-up lines. Just think about it: if all four lines are applying similar pressure and finding the back of the net, how do you know which trio to put your best defensive pair out against? Or which line do you put your top forwards out against? My point is four lines of offense will give the Rangers an instant advantage over their opponent.
Continue reading after the jump.....
Another thing I have noticed is that goaltending is much better. I realize Henrik Lundqvist is already an elite netminder and cannot get much better than he already is, but what makes goaltending better for the team as a whole is the addition of Martin Biron. The former Flyer and Islander had a rough night on Saturday, but even so only about three of the goals were actually his fault. Ignoring that tilt, his performance in the preseason was astounding. Biron looks very confident in goal, which is something that cannot be said of him last year when he played on Long Island. Lundqvist will actually be able to take a breather every now and then this season because Torts has a reliable back-up to turn to. This is going to help the team out a lot, as long as Biron can continue to play very well.
While the goalies have been great, the defense did not impress me much. I think every defender on the club had at least one bad game, some more than that. Too many times I saw the opponent easily walk into the slot. Too many times I saw odd-man rushes against. I am just hoping that was preseason rust being shaken off, because the Ranger blue-line needs to do some heavy tightening up before Saturday. But again, I think we all realize that there will be mistakes made with such a young core on D this season, and that is something we will have to learn to tolerate. But for the sake of the goaltenders, please limit the legitimate scoring chances.
Bringing in a load of youth this season has made the team much quicker and much more exciting to watch. Everything they do seems like it is a step or two faster than last season. The forwards are getting to loose pucks within a second on the forecheck, which speeds up the cycle in the offensive zone. Passing is much sharper and quicker and has opened up different types of scoring chances. Teams like the Detroit Red Wings are so successful because they can tear apart the opposition with a quick series of passes. The Rangers have shown shades of that during the preseason.
Lastly, and maybe the most obvious point of them all, the Blueshirts are so much tougher than they were a year ago. Their physical play has been raised several notches and has been a weapon of intimidation on the ice. Ryan Callahan, Brandon Dubinsky, Sean Avery, Derek Boogaard, Brian Boyle and Brandon Prust are among the forwards that have been relentless when it comes to throwing around the body. Marc Staal, Mike Sauer, Matt Gilroy and Michael Del Zotto have all been slamming players on defense. Also, no one touches our goalies anymore. Anyone who has even tapped Lundqvist after the whistle has been thrown to the ground within seconds. They do not put up with that nonsense anymore, just as GM Glen Sather promised us during the offseason.
Overall, there are more positives to pull out of the preseason than negatives. This is all great and definitely makes the team better than they were in 2009-10, but the concern now is consistency. We want to see all of these pluses factoring in throughout the ENTIRE season. It should not all come to an end once November rolls around, which is the usual trend for the Rangers. It should be non-stop all the way through April, which will prevent New York from having to fight for their lives in game 82 of the season.
56 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I've watched/read a lot of season previews
And no one is giving the Rangers much of a shot. I’m hoping that this year is a mini-version of the first year back from the lockout and they surprise some teams and some of the youngsters make meaningful contributions. The hockey media seems unable to look pastthe Boogaard signing and the admission of a mistake with Redden (rather than the youth that was brought in to replace him). The notion that the Rangers are an old team can be expelled when you look at it that Drury, Rozi, Feds and Biron are the only active players over 30*. I still think it’s more valuable to the long term benefit of the franchise to break in the younger players vs a realistic ceiling of winning a playoff round or two but I wouldn’t mind seeing them shock some “experts” in the process.
- Prospal would be added to that list if he recovers this year.
by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Oct 5, 2010 7:52 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Old???
No one can possibly call this team old, nor have they been in several seasons. Even with Prospal back and maybe the addition of another dinosaur(as Sather is usually so inclined to do) they would still have one of the youngest rosters in the league. “Old” hasn’t described this team since the lockout.
"Old" impressions are hard to shake
Lots of talking heads are stuck with an outdated impression of the team. Same thing applies for how they view the Devils as a team that knows how to win in the playoffs when in reality they’ve become hockey’s equivalent of the Atlanta Baves 91-05.
by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Oct 5, 2010 8:31 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It annoys me a lot
That these “experts” do not give the Rangers any respect. I was watching NHL a little bit ago and they were going over the Eastern conference. They completely skipped over Toronto, Isles, and Rangers during the segment that I saw. I guess I’d rather see the Rangers stay under the radar and do their thing this year (surprise a lot of people) rather than be like the Capitals or Sharks the last two years where every one of these “experts” sweat those teams and all they have done is bounce out of the playoffs early (with the exception of Sharks this year, they actually made it past the first round).
Having this discussion yesterday...
I’m one of the optimistic fans, but playing devil’s advocate… Which playoff team from last season are we now better than?
Right off the bat we can rule out Washington, Pittsburgh, Philly, NJ and Buffalo(for the simple reason they get in for winning the division). On paper I think you would have to give both Montreal and Boston the nod.
We split the series with Ottawa and with Hank in net might have taken both so beating the Sens might be our most likely route into the post-season.
I’m not sure we have yet earned the respect we so desire. Being an optimistic fan, for now, I am looking for a team like Montreal, Boston, Buffalo or even NJ or Washington to have an off-season and our kids to show how deep our system really is.
I think that we're better than Montreal
and honestly Philadelphia as well.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII
"Tortorelli sounds like a kind of pasta… an unforgiving, stubborn, chewy, flavorless pasta that demands ‘jam’ from other pastas." - Dig Deep
by Joe Fortunato on Oct 5, 2010 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree on MTL, I don’t think there’s a chance we’re better than PHI by year end. We could beat them in a game, but not over the long haul.
Camp Torturella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
Blueshirt Banter - "ARISTH"-Assuming Redden is sent to Hartford
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 5, 2010 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't know
I think that it would be a good battle. I think that we’re better than we were last year, and I see Philly basically at the same level. Who knows.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII
"Tortorelli sounds like a kind of pasta… an unforgiving, stubborn, chewy, flavorless pasta that demands ‘jam’ from other pastas." - Dig Deep
by Joe Fortunato on Oct 5, 2010 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions
If Philly
Makes a move or finds a goaltender that can really carry their team in the regular season they are going to be instantly better than the Rangers. But at the moment I think they are about even with us. I am expecting Nik Zherdev to have a big year in Philly.
In Hank we trust.
Flyers are Grounded
The flyers made their team worse over the summer. They picked up Z-man as their scoring threat and we saw first hand how that worked out. Don’t get me wrong, we would have a tough time with Philly on all cylinders, but when has Philly been on all cylinders. They still don’t have a goalie.
I think game to game we can beat Philly, MTL, Buffalo (Miller is hard to score on though) and the Devils. Our problem the last two years is having a consistent game. We have too many lulls in the season to make the playoffs and be considered a threat. If we play the entire season like we did last October we can be 1- 3 in the Atlantic and top five in the Conference.
by Leetch4prezofNYR on Oct 5, 2010 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Except for goaltending
I really don’t see any area where the Rangers are better than the Flyers. Richards are Carter right now are light years ahead of the Rangers top 2 centers. And their wingers match up very favorably to the Rangers. Not to mention their top 4 D is immensely better.
And any team that makes the Stanley Cup finals is definitely firing on all cylinders at some point.
by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Oct 5, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions
PHI/NYR Matchup
Obviously this is not scientific and I’m sure some stats maven could do a better job but offensively we match up pretty well. Our D isn’t as good but our goalie is ten times anything Philly can field which evens things out.
Just because PHI went to the Stanley cup Finals doesn’t mean they are the team to beat in the East. They could have hit a groove. We could have jumped started it with the Shootout loss. PHI was just tougher than the teams in their brackets. There are a myriad of reasons why a team wins, not all of them have to do with being the “better” team. Rarely has the same team been as big a threat two years in a row. Pens being an exception the year they won. OTT and BUF are a perfect example.
Betts – Drury – Rangers
Briere – Prospal – Rangers
Carcillo – Prust – Rangers
Carter – Frolov – Flyers
Giroux – Dubinsky – Rangers
Hartnell – Avery – Flyers
LaPerriere – Anisimov – Flyers
Leino – Christensen – Rangers
Powe – Boyle – Rangers
Richards – Gaborik – Rangers
Shelley – Boogaard – Even
Zherdev – Stepan – Even
Riemsdyk – Callahan – Rangers
Bartulis – Sauer – Rangers
Carle – Girardi – Flyers
Coburn – Rozsival – Flyers
Mezaros – Gilroy – Rangers
O’Donnell – Eminger – Flyers
Pronger – Staal – Flyers
Timonen – MDZ – Flyers
Walker
Boucher – Lundquist – Rangers
Leighton – Biron – Even
Backlund
by Leetch4prezofNYR on Oct 5, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions
I think their goalie is the biggest X factor
But still, the Flyers are a team that has gone to the conference finals and the Stanley Cup finals with pretty much the same core of guys they have now.
I think the comparison of Betts-Drury highlights the biggest problem with the Rangers right now. A 4th line checking center who excels on the PK is great to have and Drury will outproduce Betts 99 times out of 100 but that’s not what the team needs from a $7mn center. I also think you’re underestimating the talents of Giroux and JVR.
Now it appears that Prospal will be out.
by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Oct 5, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Giroux and JVR aren’t better than Callahan and Dubie based on points production. They may be flashier, more hype or just more consistent play from game to game, but pure points, it’s pretty even. Cally and Dubie I think brings a grit to the Rangers which puts them over the Flyers. Cally has more hits and Dubie has a better +/- than either of them.
Even Ranger fans undervalue our players, no wonder the “experts” do.
by Leetch4prezofNYR on Oct 5, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Potentially better than MTL, BOS, OTT, PHI, BUF. Of course if they tank midseason like they always have, they are potentially worse than all but the fishsticks.
Agree with
MTL and OTT.
I don’t think they’re better than PHI or BOS. I think both those teams underperformed in the regular season last year and a lot of Boston’s struggles were due to injuries to some of their top forwards.
I think they could be at the level with Buffalo if they could play as cohesively as Buffalo seems to do every year.
by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Oct 5, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions
I think it's best the Rangers are "underdogs"
the teams I root for seem to thrive in those roles anyhow. Let the Rangers “surprise” a lot of “experts” and other fans around the league in 2010-2011.
go Rangers!
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
agree with MFB…Rangers aren’t better than Philly or Boston…Buffalo it remains to be seen….somehow that team loses players every year to free agency and they still play great hockey…gotta credit Lindy Ruff
I think the Rangers will make the playoffs, but probably only by a small margin again.
Pitt, Caps, Jersey, Boston, and Philly are shoe ins and are significantly better than the Rangers
Sens, Lightning, Rangers, Sabres, MTL should be in a battle for the remaining spots
The rest, maybe next year…
http://thehockeysuit.com/
From another thread
The defense scored 35 goals last year.
Other notable defenses:
Chicago 35 Detroit 36 Philly 32 Pittsburgh 35 Vancouver 42 San Jose 37
It doesn’t seem like it’s our defense’s scoring was the issue. Del Zotto was T-24th in Def. Goals, Staal T-27th.
Just to add something else rather than simply regurgitating old comments, I’ll add Washington (37) and Boston (32) to that list. We had comparable goal scoring from the defense to all of the ‘elite’ teams in the NHL. And that was last year, before expected improvements from Staal/MDZ/Gilroy/Girardi as they continue to grow.
Camp Torturella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
Blueshirt Banter - "ARISTH"-Assuming Redden is sent to Hartford
Twitter: RangerSmurf
They're really going to miss
Redden’s annual goal.
by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Oct 5, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Biannual goal.
Just to add further, the defense went 5-10-15 in the preseason in 6 games. Not that it means a lick starting Saturday, but there’s some promise there.
Camp Torturella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
Blueshirt Banter - "ARISTH"-Assuming Redden is sent to Hartford
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 5, 2010 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m all for the D scoring, but we really need them to keep it out of our net more. While we scored a ton in preseason, we also gave them up in bunches. Hank is in for another busy season. Let’s hope the growing pains are worth it.
This too is my greatest concern
Expect to see a lot more 6-5. . .5-4 games this year. If Hank (and especially Biron — big question mark) can be sharp, most of these will go in our favor. . .
Worst day: April 10, 1984
by Stepan the Ice! on Oct 5, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
I doubt it will get that out of control.
The defense is fairly constant here, with 5 of 6 guys returning. The lone new guy, Sauer, might not give offense, but he should be able to at least replicate Redden’s performance against 3rd line opponents (which contrary to popular believe, wasn’t really that bad).
Also, the forwards that were added, Frolov and Fedotenko are both responsible in their own end, so the only true concerns among the forward group are Stepan and Boogaard. If Stepan stays on the 3rd line, then it’s only Booger to worry about.
The team allowed 2.61 GAA and 29.9 SA/G (2440) last year. I think they can stay within about 0.12 GAA (about 10 goals) and within 0.5 SA/G of those numbers. The question will be can they get enough offense from the forwards to get us about +20 in goal differential, which is almost always enough to make the playoffs.
Camp Torturella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
Blueshirt Banter - "ARISTH"-Assuming Redden is sent to Hartford
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 5, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Love the stats on your original post though. Just shows we’re solid in back a development should push us over the top.
Nick
Good write-up, I am not sure I would describe the goaltending as looking ‘great’ though. Even with a cobbled-together defensive group in front of Hank and Biron neither goalie was playing at regular season form (to be expected… after all they should have been playing in preseason form during the preseason). 139 minutes played for Biron, 67 shots against, 11 goals allowed (2 EN). I don’t know what I was expecting from Biron but I think I was expecting something a little bit better… again it is early but I am not sold on him being the ‘big offseason acquisition’. I am sure I will be cheering his name when he comes in relief for Henrik and gets a few wins for the team (besides he had that great assist that created a breakaway goal).
I am pulling for Brian Boyle this year, I have a feeling he might be a scratch when Drury comes back unless Torts wants that big fourth line together during the season. If you want to know more about Brian Boyle this is an interesting read. There will be scoring from the blueline but I also think they will really make Hank and Biron work given what we saw from this group in preseason. One thing is for sure- this is a very different team than it was last year.
In Hank we trust.
Nick, which goaltender would you prefer to Lundqvist? These fools who manage the team are wasting Lundqvist’s prime years. He is better than Giacomin or Richter
by florida fella on Oct 5, 2010 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions
The article about knowledge gained from the preseason games is very optimistic. However having watched this hapless team since 1961, I have learned every season starts on a high note but generally ends in the GARBAGE CAN. scoring will dry up and the defense will be just as porous as it has been in previous years.Once the season starts the scoring will dry up and the defense will be just as porous as in the past. All the yougsters who were sent down should being on the Rangers. The Ranger team now assembled WILL NOT MAKE THE PLAYOFFS. At least the younger players would get experience.
I think a fair amount of fans here
Look at this year and most likely next year as well as rebuilding years. I still prefer making the playoffs over not making them, but I understand them not wanting to rush a couple of guys that haven’t even spent that much time (or no time at all) in the AHL. I know they’ve been preaching about youth, but there’s a right way to handle developing potential franchise cornerstones and constantly over-matching isn’t one of those ways. Some of the more successful teams over the past couple of decades have made sure their guys are ready when they take on an NHL role. Versus a team like the Islanders who can’t rush their players fast enough.
by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Oct 5, 2010 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions
A team that takes their sweet time with prospects and does it exceedingly well
The Detroit Red Wings.
In Hank we trust.
Guys its all about addition and subtraction
Look at Redden for example. Everyone including my grandma wanted him gone…its true lol. But is sauer or gilroy better. Not yet at least. Thats a full subtraction on d.
Add in the progress of mdz, staal, and girardi. The defense should look the same.
Next up, the goalie situation.
Hank is Hank, but Biron is completely better than vally or ochocinco. Thats the difference of 4-7 games right there, imo.
So, in getting to the forwards, vinny p. looks like hes headed for the season IR. Which really sucks because i had him and stepan platooning all year for that number 1 slot. Big minus(maybe fingers crossed). Frolov gives us a big boost, but more importantly Cally, Dubi, and Frolov are playing for contracts, these guys will go all out this year, that is a fact. With the addition of Stepan and Feds(who im still not sold on yet) i think we are definetly in the plus column with our forwards. All in all we make the playoffs as the 7th seed.
by louielounz1 on Oct 5, 2010 11:48 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
biron
All I keep reading about his how fortunate the Rangers are to have been able to sign Martin Biron to back up Henrik Lundqvist. The columnists on this site are talking about him like he is the 2nd coming of Eddie Giacomin not the guy that has played his way off of the last 3 teams that he was on. I hope the EXPERTS are right but I have some serious doubts.
by boxcarand bugsy on Oct 5, 2010 12:03 PM EDT reply actions
Simply put
Steve Valliquette’s Even Strength SV% with the Rangers: .908
Martin Biron’s ES SV% the last 3 years – .920
He’s not Giacomin, but he’s a serious upgrade over the guy who held his spot the last 3+ years.
Camp Torturella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
Blueshirt Banter - "ARISTH"-Assuming Redden is sent to Hartford
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 5, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions
more biron
Stats serve a purpose but they can also be very misleading. This is a guy that seems to have a penchant for giving up some very soft goals. The kind of goals that demoralize a team and shake the confidence of the goaltender. We’ll have to wait to see how this plays out and I hope i’m wrong but his track record doesn’t give me any comfort.
by boxcarand bugsy on Oct 5, 2010 12:19 PM EDT reply actions
However you feel about the fragile psyche of a veteran NHL goaltender, ES SV% is a pretty good predictor of goalie talent. Biron is much better than Valiquette. There’s no denying that, even by eyeball.
Camp Torturella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
Blueshirt Banter - "ARISTH"-Assuming Redden is sent to Hartford
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 5, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Biron has a whole
He has a whole in his glove side from the circles. OTT took advantage of it constantly during that last game.
by Leetch4prezofNYR on Oct 5, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Valiquette
Valiquette was finished with the Rangers as of the middle of last season, this wasn’t a choice between him or Biron, there were plenty of other options out there and i’ll say it again I hope that I am proven wrong but I will definitely be surprised if this guy is the answer.
by boxcarand bugsy on Oct 5, 2010 12:52 PM EDT reply actions
Totally Random and Pointless, but
Can someone remind me why/how we let Nik Antropov go? Was it all about money? I think he would have been a great fit on this team. IMO another Sather blunder.
Worst day: April 10, 1984
Money, he signed a 4 yr deal with a cap hit of $4,062,500 and a Modified NTC. That is a good chunk of change for someone who tends to disappear in big games. Sather was smart to walk away.
by NTB on Oct 5, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Backchecking
We have all recognized that the young (and fairly inexperienced) D corps is gonna make the goalies and the team suffer more SA and GA. We also know that Drury is the only sure dot man among the centers. Smurf has noted that Frolov and Fedentenko are responsible in their own end and we’ll have to see how responsible Stepan and Boogaard are there. Of all that, we are pretty certain.
But I ask about backchecking among the forwards. Cally dashes from O to D every time. What about everybody else? So many times last year — soooooo many times — I saw problems with this. Like when there’s a 3-on-2 against, our closest forward trails the play, and the fourth attacker (a D-man) moves in unchecked for a feed or a rebound cuz he was skating harder than our trailer. Gaborik was guilty of this. Dubinsky too. I also watched Fs coast to the bench, making for slow line changes and leaving us vulnerable on center ice TOs.
Could you all comment? Can we rank the forwards in backchecking hustle? That is a huuuge part of team D.
T
Something like that is obviously not tracked, so it’s hard to really rank them, it’s a perception thing. I’m sure every forward has been guilty of it at some point, but unless you’re watching every shift and counting every time someone does and does not do it, I’m not sure there’s much to be gained from evaluating it. That’s one of those things that falls under the ‘confirmation bias’ umbrella, you don’t remember when they come back 9 times out of 10, but you surely remember every time the team got burned because of it.
I imagine guys like Callahan are better at it than others, just because of his/their non-stop motor. Any top 9 forward that was truly terrible wouldn’t see ice time with the regularity that they do. I don’t think it’s something to really worry about in the long run, coaching staffs would/should correct that pretty quickly.
Camp Torturella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
Blueshirt Banter - "ARISTH"-Assuming Redden is sent to Hartford
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 5, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
White and Kennedy Waived
Per Zipay on Blue Notes
by Leetch4prezofNYR on Oct 5, 2010 2:03 PM EDT reply actions
NOT KENNEDY!!!!
Bad move there.
Worst day: April 10, 1984
by Stepan the Ice! on Oct 5, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
It is preseason, period.
The stats produced this preseason are very nice, considering the difficulty we have had scoring these last few years, BUT, it is only preseason, and we played against only 1 team that had their main guys in there, the 8-5 loss at Ottawa.
So picking them 9th, 10th, or worse is not out of the question.
The defense is still smallish, can not say they will punish anyone in front of Hank.
We are a 1 line team, which will be easy to defend when we play anyone in the regular season.
Torts is still there, will he be manic and change lines all the time.
Love Stepan, but to rely on a rook in the middle is dangerous.
We still have the absurdity of Drury and Rozi contracts, let alone their poor play.
And top all that off with Sather pushing for a washed up canon from the point, he will always be enamored with the big name (from yesterday) that will undo any positives from this summer.
I have been watching the Rangers these last 40 years, love them win or lose, but we should all be realistic, and hope that our youth serves us well.
Here is to hoping for a playoff spot, but not really expecting it.
Predictions
C’mon guys, get real!!
I’ve been a fan for 53 years, and I’ve heard the same predictions every year——great, look fabulous, gonna be a contender, finally younger than before, playoff bound, gonna go deep this year, etc,etc.
So far, they’ve met expectations ONCE (guess when)!
That doesn’t stop me from dying every time they lose, and flying high every time they win, but it puts things in prospective—-you’re not going to know what they’re gonna be like till the season is over!!!!!
My suggestion is to sit back, root like crazy, enjoy the wins, mourn the losses, and come back for the next game and do it all over again!
Go Rangers!
As mentioned many times above, the ‘experts’ make their predictions based on last year’s standings. There are always surprises, and it’s not impossible that the Rangers will be one of those surprise teams. It seems pretty clear that we’re better than last year, and given the fact that we missed the playoffs by a point, that should mean we’ll get in.
Big question in my mind is the D.
We should definitely be a playoff team
He made a great point in the article saying how we have to continue playing good hockey past November. This team has been infuriatingly streaky the past few years. No one can deny that the talent is there on this team. Increased physicality and 60 minutes of hustle and we can surprise a lot of people. Hank gives us the ability to beat any team on any given day. I expect this team to not only make the postseason, but for them to make it out of the first round with the help of a rested King. If we get hot, we can do some damage.
by BombersGmenBlueshirts25 on Oct 5, 2010 2:45 PM EDT via mobile reply actions

by 
























