Rangers Recap: Rangers Stoned by Leclaire, Lose to Senators 3-1
How many times have the Rangers lost games because of missed opportunities and failures on the powerplay? Well, whatever the number may be, you can add tonight's 3-1 loss to the Senators onto it. It was a winnable game, especially since they got away with a horrible first period, but they could not convert when the chances presented themselves. It is a loss that hurts, especially since once again it occurred on home ice.
The first period was a putrid one for the Rangers, which you could probably tell by the red in the face of John Tortorella during his timeout. Despite playing less than 24 hours ago, the Senators came out and dominated the Blueshirts in all areas of the ice. Ottawa was retrieving all of the loose puck, therefore getting some quality scoring chances. Henrik Lundqvist stood strong in goal, though, and made a total of ten saves in the period. If you were wondering, the final shot count in the first was 10-5. New York was unable to generate anything offensively as the Sens were all over them in the neutral zone, giving them no room to make plays. Luckily, the teams went to the locker rooms in a scoreless tie.
That tie was broken just 4:27 into the second period when Chris Kelly took advantage of a Derek Stepan turnover at the blue-line by taking it all the way down ice and beating Lundqvist with a quick shot. That goal would go down as shorthanded since the Rangers were on the powerplay at the time. The Blueshirts would later cash in on a shorthanded opportunity of their own, though, as Brandon Prust whizzed a wristshot over the shoulder of Leclaire on a 2-on-1. Prust showed great patients by holding the puck until the last second to keep the goaltender guessing before actually letting it rip.
The two clubs would stay interlocked at one until late in the third period when a bang-bang play ended up in the Rangers' net. Chris Kelly, again, would benefit by scoring his second goal of the game. This was a dagger in the heart for Tortorella's squad, because they were dictating the pace in the third period and had just failed on back-to-back penalties. Leclaire was solid late when the Rangers scrambled to things, and that enabled Chris Kelly to complete the hat trick by burying the empty-netter with less than a second remaining in regulation.
Continue reading after the jump....
Missed opportunities, in my opinion, were the theme of this game from a Rangers standpoint. They had four powerplays, two of which were in the third period, and could not convert on any of them. How many times have we seen that come back to bite them in a game? Granted they ran into a very hot goaltender, but there is often no excuse for missing the net, which the Blueshirts did quite often this evening. That has become a major problem over the past few losses.
This game wouldn't have been low scoring if it were not for the goalies. Henrik Lundqvist made 22 saves on 24 shots faced, and basically kept his team in it. He made multiple saves on odd-man rushes as well as on the penalty-kill. He was impressive, but unfortunately his mates were not. Hank was equaled on the other end by Pascal Leclaire, too. Leclaire was forced to make 25 stops, and most of them were beautiful. However, if the Rangers would have lifted the puck a little like Prust did, they may have been able to beat him more often.
Derek Stepan was a very noticeable player in this game. He registered four shots on goal and was second amongst forwards in ice time behind Marian Gaborik. He could not find the back of the net behind Leclaire on a few chances right in the slot, but at such an early stage of his career, the coaching staff is going to be happy that he is at least getting himself in the right places and getting those chances.
I liked Michael Sauer's game tonight as well. The defense was not all that great whatsoever, but Sauer was his usual aggressive self. I also though Joe Michelletti on the MSG broadcast did a great job of picking out that replay where Sauer was very calm holding the puck. Those are great signs out of a young defenseman, and he is only getting better on a gamely basis.
So it is back to the drawing board before the Rangers hit up Ottawa on Thursday night to take on the Senators yet again. Three days of rest will do this team good because they have been playing very frequently as of late. Hopefully they can get retribution against the Sens in that one.
40 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I like
George’s suggestion of putting boyle down front on the power play while the 4 others players work the puck around towards the net
i want anisimov there.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
I said Boyle because he’s bigger and stronger. I don’t know that Anisimov would hold up in front of the net all that well at this stage of his career.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Dec 6, 2010 8:25 AM EST up reply actions
I agree
Boyle stays in front and looks for the puck and the deflection. AA still needs to work on that part of his game, he is still very finesse which is fine but not good enough for where he wants to be.
AA
It looks like AA has let up on his physical game. he’s a big guy and it makes ALL the difference in terms of his effectiveness. When he’s physical, he’s an amazing asset. When he’s not, we can just hope he gets lucky now and then. To me its the difference between his being a 12-20 goal scorer or a 25-35 goal scorer. Its really up to him. He can be good and have a job with most mid-level teams or he can be outstanding and help us run for the cup.
This game was just a dis-heartening loss. They had so many opportunities to put a puck in the net. The power-plays again were abysmal, but our best scoring opportunities came off of odd-man rushes and plays near the net where we could never seem to get a deflection or a shot at anything but LeClaire’s pads. This is Pascal LeClaire we’re talking about, not Patrick Roy.
well that is certainly one way we help. we missed 15 times i think tonight
by Michael Gleich on Dec 5, 2010 10:52 PM EST up reply actions
Don’t discount Laclaire, I believe the guy has the makings of a monster. Remember in 07-08 he pitched 9 SO’s for the Jackets. #8 overall pick in 2001
Let me know how that works out for you . . .
by SimpleManiac on Dec 6, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions
O sorry Caerid I didn’t read your post B4 I posted.
In an Ideal world I would have all ten fingers on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.
the worst part is making Leclaire look like a great goalie, cmon rangers.
In an Ideal world I would have all ten fingers on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.
There is no excuse for the first period. I thought this season would mark the end of that kind of despicable showing, but I guess not. After watching that, it’s hard for me to justify even watching the rest of the game.
Del Zotto lost many one-one-on battles. I’m beginning to think he is clearly our worst defenseman. I hold my breath every time he has the puck near our net. And now that he’s not quarterbacking the power play, what does he contribute exactly?
This one...
Reminded of last year’s team more than anything I’ve seen all year. Very discouraging. In addition to not hitting the net, the rangers need to do a clinic on one timers. They are constantly waiting 2 or 3 counts before passing and then another 2 or 3 counts before shooting. You will never beat an NHL goalie this way.
Wham, bam, thank you mam.
d
by voice22 on Dec 5, 2010 10:02 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
yea you never see the rangers taking a one timer…last person to consistently take one on the rangers was shanahan and last time i checked he was a pretty decent scorer…when the rangers do take a one timer they either fan on it or miss the net completely…its just ridiculous…i mean i do one timers in NHL11 and score all the time, why can’t they realize this (haha)
One-timers require decent passing for people to be able to shoot it. When’s the last time we had any semblance of decent passing, especially on the PP? All of our puck movement is either sloppy floated passes (MDZ) or moving the puck up and down the wall (cycle forecheck on a power-play makes baby Jesus want to bring an UZI to MSG).
also requires you to have the puck
Notice how we’re getting stood up at the blueline and clogged through the neutral zone? Somehow, I’m not sure we’ve mastered the concept of “dump and chase”. We seem to usually understand the “dump”, but I’m not sure we’ve grasped the “chase” part yet. One the rare occasion we did get the Ottawa D turned, I think I only remember once or twice that guys got in and put a body on them. I think both times led to turnovers and scoring chances.
by bleed'n blue on Dec 6, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
I think the power play needs to see Gaborik at the right point. He doesn’t do much sitting on the half boards, and given how much we have the puck at the points Gabby should have plenty of room to fire away back there. And if they like Stepan’s passing so much throw him on the left boards and have him look down low or look for Gabby on a cross ice pass to the right side. honestly this powerplay is terrible considering the talent we have on it.
I’d rather see Gabby in the slot area and have him MOVE between the 2 face-off dots, put Boyle in front, Stepan down in the corner area on his off-hand (so he can pass to Gabby for a 1-timer), and the point-men on either side moving in and out trying to draw a PK to them or getting the puck on net. Our PPs have declined to everything coming from the half-boards and never any quality shots from prime scoring areas. I can remember a good number of times that a puck went towards the side of the net and we wound up just whacking it right into LeClaire’s pad. Can’t score like that.
I think Gabby on the right point is a good idea, with Staal or MDZ on the left, put Boyle in front Dubi on the left wing and Stepan on the right. Gaborik with room on any spot in our zone is a good idea but on the point he can step up and shoot or create a nice pass. Having those guys on forward(Dubi takes the primary faceoff) give us a leg up as far as being aggressive on the face off and Boyle in front is a no brainer.
No hitting, no Winning
For a team that leads the lleague in body hits they treated Ottawa like fine christal. If this team doesn’t take the body they are not talented enough to beat most teams.
by RangerFanInChicago on Dec 6, 2010 7:52 AM EST reply actions
pretty sure the rangers outhit Ottawa tonight ...
I’m sure of it from the first period stats, just not sure for overall game stats.
by bleed'n blue on Dec 6, 2010 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
Take the "Hangover" tactic....
Look at the film from this game once, then delete it. This team has bounced back remarkably well from bad losses so far this season, I expect them to do the same Thursday night.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Dec 6, 2010 10:48 AM EST reply actions
I’d expect a superior effort as well, especially away from MSG. Maybe someone should check for a CO leak in the home dressing room.
Let me know how that works out for you . . .
by SimpleManiac on Dec 6, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions
well put Jim
i think that is wat separates this year’s team from last year’s…we’ve had a few of those losses already this season but we haven’t dwelled on them whereas last season most of those losses would have killed us and we would be in our usual christmas spiral down the crapper.
Seems like deja vous Jim, haven’t we done this a couple times already? I hate to say it, but this team seems to be pretty thick in the head, or maybe the coaching staff is rubbing off on them. Michelletti spoke about it ad nauseum about Leclair’s legs being strong. Got to get the puck up high. Rangers kept shooting into his pads. Why are they so unable to make these little tweaks here and there in the game? Forget about the PP, what’s the point in working on it in practice if you’re gonna put inexperienced guys to play the point during the game.
I have to be honest, although it’s only December, I have been able to maintain a very level-headed approach to this team, enjoying the wins, and shrugging off the clunkers. I have no delusions about where they are going this year, and I have maintained all year that all I want to see is progress and development, and I think overall we are seeing both.
One of my favorite Rocky lines:
It ain’t about how hard you hit. It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward; how much you can take and keep moving forward. That’s how winning is done
Corny and cliche’? Maybe, but it applies to this team, because they keep showing they can get up off the mat.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Dec 6, 2010 5:52 PM EST up reply actions
My 8-year-old
wanted to know why Ruutu kicking the puck into the net after the 3rd period scrum pissed me off so much. Took everything to filter the appropriate response.
What a weasel.
Let me know how that works out for you . . .
This was last years team
I agree with what most of you guys are saying. But Jim is right when he says they should bounce back because they have all season. I expect them to come out firing against Ottawa in the next game and really get going again. I think this next game is going to be a real testament to Torts and his coaching staff on fixing up the kinks against this Ottawa team. I said it once and will say it again, as long as we stay above .500 until Prospal and Drury come back we are in great position. Those guys are as sound defensively as anyone in the league and can boost our faceoff numbers.
yea...
but if we want to get up there in the W column we can’t keep dropping the lazy games. Last I checked, we’ve played more games than a bunch of teams below us so expect us to skip down to 7-8 place in the coming weeks. We must win these games and get our footing at MSG.
We’re 8th in the conference based on points% (we’re at 56.9%), and we’re a decent chunk ahead of 9th (Carolina – 48.1%)
Doesn’t change your point about losing lazy games, but the games at hand isn’t what is keeping us afloat, it’s the pile of poop below.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Dec 6, 2010 3:28 PM EST up reply actions
The difference between average to good teams and very good to great teams is that average to good teams will lose games like last night. I think we all know the Rangers have a ways to go before they are very good to great, and I think we all know that doesn’t happen overnight, it takes years.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Dec 6, 2010 5:54 PM EST up reply actions

by 


























