Rangers News and Notes: Callahan and Avery Injuries, Flyers Move Six Points ahead of Rangers
The last thing the Rangers needed was two of their more energetic and passionate players suffer from injuries in the middle of a playoff push. Unfortunately, that is the case with Ryan Callahan and Sean Avery both injuring their legs when attempting to beat out an icing call this past week. Callahan’s occurred last Sunday in Boston when he collided with defenseman Zdeno Chara. Callahan did in fact make a return after that injury in the next game against the Islanders, but then re-aggravated the pain in his right leg Thursday in New Jersey.
Sean Avery has been playing some of the best hockey of his career as of late. It has not only been scoring goals, but using his mouth, skating, knowing how to get under the skin of opponents. Sean has been a key to the Rangers recent success, or, at least their two-game success. That being said, it is going to hurt this team if Avery is out long term after having his leg pinched along the boards when chasing a puck against Luke Schenn Saturday in Toronto.
For once, I think head coach John Tortorella hit the nail on the head when referring to Avery’s injury in his postgame comments.
"It’s a tough break, he’s probably playing his best hockey of the year," Tortorella said. "He’s really focused in the past couple of weeks, he’s a big part of us trying to find a way and it’s a tough break, not only for him, more importantly, for the hockey club."
Both Callahan and Avery remain unsure whether or not they will be able to play Tuesday against the Islanders at Nassau Coliseum. However, if both are out long term, the Rangers will have a very difficult time establishing a forecheck and playing an energetic game. On their respective offensive lines, Avery and Callahan are always the first players in the corners, chasing down the loose pucks on the forecheck. Other than them, there are not many players who are efficient in doing so on this team like Sean and Ryan are.
Much more after the jump.
The good thing is, Andrew Gross of Ranger Rants confirmed that Avery walked out of the Air Canada Centre without crutches followingSaturday’s contest. That is a hopeful sign considering that Avery could not put any weight on his leg after the collision and could barely walk for that matter. I am sure we will find out more on Avery’s status in the coming days after he skates in practice, and the same goes for Ryan Callahan.Either way, the Blueshirts are keeping their fingers crossed that both can return to the lineup on tomorrow against the Isles. Without them, I do not see the Rangers even coming close to that final eighth place playoff spot in the Eastern Conference, because the key from this point on will be effort and desire. Not many players on this team, other than Avery and Callahan, have that.
Also, If you were following my tweets last night, you would have seen that the New Jersey Devils were defeated by the Philadelphia Flyers 5-1 at the Wachovia Center. For the Rangers, the result of this game decreases their likelihood of making the playoffs slightly, as the Flyers have now pulled ahead of the Blueshirts by six points in the Eastern Conference standings. The Rangers can only hope that Boston loses to Buffalo tonight, otherwise their chances of making the playoffs will be extremely slim.
If the Bruins happen to defeat the Sabres, I am pretty convinced that the Rangers will have to win out to conclude the regular season in order to make the postseason. As you can see, not winning in Boston last Sunday and not being able to capture the full two points in Toronto on Saturday is already coming back to haunt this hockey club, and now they have a ton of pressure on them.
New York has seven games left this season, which means there is a total of exactly fourteen points up for grabs. If they were to get all fourteen, they would be at 90 on the year. Based on recent trends, I have a feeling that the postseason cut-off will be somewhere between 88 and 90 points, which is why the Rangers cannot afford to lose another game. I just do not see them being able to go on a seven-game winning streak right now, because the last time that happened was in the first three weeks of October.
Right now, the Rangers need to take it day by day, game by game, period by period. I know it is hard, but they cannot look too far ahead. They need to focus on the task at hand and that is the New York Islanders at Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum on Tuesday. Get two points in that game and you are still alive. That needs to be their mentality, otherwise they will get too far ahead of themselves and not have the right focus. This happens to many teams each and every year.
Like I said, the fight for the final playoff spots will come down to which team is more consistent. The Bruins have been streaky, the Flyers have been streaky, as have the Atlanta Thrashers. It is anyone's playoff spots right now based on how these teams have played as of late, and it will provide for a very exciting finish to the season. That is, of course, if the Rangers are able to somehow sneak in.
Updated Playoff Race in the East:
6. Montreal Canadiens - 82 pts
7. Philadelphia Flyers - 82 pts
8. Boston Bruins - 80 pts
------------------------------------------------
9. Atlanta Thrashers - 78 pts
10. New York Rangers - 76 pts
Both the Bruins and Thrashers will be in action tonight.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
While this is completely over-reactionary
At some point the NHL should consider going to the no-touch icing that everyone else in the world uses.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
I dont know smurf I disagree w/ u on this one.........................
The race to negate an icing is very exciting. I mean whats better than 2 guys racing for the puck and the forward touches 1st and the linesman waives off the icing and the off team gets a real cycle going and creates scoring chances off of that no-ice call and maybe eventually scores? And besides there are alot of other ways to get your neck or leg snapped in this full contact sport of hockey. Yeah does it suck that we lost 2 of our forwards to virtually the same play? Yes it does but it doesnt always happen…………..I say no to the no-touch icing. I’ll feel like im watching my mens league hockey…………….well not quite but you know what im saying here………..lol.
by giantsNYrangers on Mar 29, 2010 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions
And besides there are alot of other ways to get your neck or leg snapped in this full contact sport of hockey.
That’s not a justification for allowing it. Any time you can add something to the sport that helps reduce the chance of injury, it’s a good thing.
I actually only recently changed my feeling of it, I’ve always thought it good that you have an opportunity to clean up a mistake. But in watching the olympics and now the college tournament, the game isn’t missing anything by not having a no touch icing, especially when you consider how few icings actually result in a chase.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Mar 29, 2010 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions
*by having no touch icing.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Mar 29, 2010 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions
you know what I would be curious to find out..............
the stats on the # of guys who actually get hurt on icing plays……..forget about what happened to Cally and Avery for a second but look at it as a whole. What % of players get hurt racing to negate an icing…………any way to find out?
by giantsNYrangers on Mar 29, 2010 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions
No clue
I’d also like to see how often icing is actually negated along with that, but can’t find anything.
There is this though, from Steve Sullivan (NSH):
"With the rule not allowing us to change after an icing, if there is not a 70/30 chance that I will be the first one to get to the puck, I won’t go," he said. "You need to conserve the energy."
Which I hadn’t thought of but makes a ton of sense with the new ‘no-change’ rule.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Mar 29, 2010 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Well in terms of actually having an icing negated as opposed to the d-man getting there 1st
No doubt that the vast majority of times the defensemen will touch up cuz he’s in a much better position to get there 1st. But I gotta say I do agree w/ Steve Sullivan on conserving energy. You waste ALOT of energy on that play right there and if you were allowed to go to the bench after that it would be ok. But given the fact that you are not allowed to change……….that player would be absolutely shot for the next face-off rendering him completely useless and giving the other team a very distinct advantage till he could get off the ice so it def makes sense.
by giantsNYrangers on Mar 29, 2010 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions
I dont know.........I still like the rule the way it is now but
there are alot of reasons to change it as well…….
by giantsNYrangers on Mar 29, 2010 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Spam Poster has been banned
Blueshirt Banter: www.blueshirtbanter.com
Rangers Tribune: www.rangerstribune.com
Follow Me on Twitter: twitter.com/RangersTribune
by Nick Montemagno on Mar 29, 2010 9:58 AM EDT reply actions
im not sure if i am all in on the no touch icing but i am definitely for the no touch in obvious cases it is just a waste of time to watch the d have to skate back by himself for the touch.
by Michael Gleich on Mar 29, 2010 10:58 AM EDT reply actions
Well you cant really have a situational no touch icing..............
it would have to be on or off entirely i would think……….
by giantsNYrangers on Mar 29, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions
They should make it interesting.
Institute no-touch icing.
Require the offending team to skate a lap in under 30 seconds prior to lining up for the face-off.
note: this time, I’m NOT going to say it.
BlueshirtBanter - beating up reporters at bus stops since 1994
"Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right......"
apparently Cally and Aves are under going PRP (platlet rich plasma) therapy to promote quicker healing but if the injuries are that bad it would seem to call into question there ability to not only play tomorrow vs the fishsticks but this weekend in the fla games.
by Michael Gleich on Mar 29, 2010 11:14 AM EDT reply actions
were 6 points behind montreal and philly. and have a game in hand on both. boston is 4 points ahead of us but they have a game in hand on us. we really could make it because we have that home and home with philly.
on the other side of it. were 1 points ahead of columbus and we have a game in hand. were 4 points ahead of the isles and lightning (same amount of games) 5 points ahead of florida and carolina (florida has a game in hand) and were 7 points ahead of toronto.
if we dont win a game the rest of the way we could get a 2nd/3rd pick. i wish we didnt get those 5 points……
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
hey moshe you cant think that way anymore, it'll drive you nuts............
im resigned to rooting for the playoffs right now and letting the chips fall where they may……….cuz they are not gonna lose outright down the stretch. Could you imagine if they missed the PO by like 1 point?………..I would be straight up suicidal w/ a splash of homicidal for sure
by giantsNYrangers on Mar 29, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions

by 






























