Rangers Recap: Loss to Sabres Puts Rangers in Must Win Position against Leafs
It is not the most ideal situation that the Rangers are in right now, but they are not out of it yet. That is the mentality the players have to have going into tomorrow's tilt with the Leafs, following a rough outing against the Sabres on this night. This loss dug the grave for the Blueshirts, but that grave is not yet filled. They still have a chance to temporarily postpone their death this season with a win, or at least a point, tomorrow.
The first period of this game was much more entertaining than your routine opening stanza between the Rangers and Sabres. There were a total of 25 shots on goal registered by the two clubs, and four of those hit the back of the net. The first was Brandon Prust 6:47 into the game, when he stripped Buffalo defenseman Chris Butler of the puck in the slot, spun, and rifled one over the shoulder of Ryan Miller for his third goal in three games. Exactly three minutes later, though, Derek Roy scored on the powerplay to answer back, making it a 1-1 tie.
In the second half of the first, Drew Stafford put a low shot five-hole on Henrik Lundqvist from a bad angle giving the Sabres the lead for the first time in the game. A P.A. Parenteau powerplay goal with two minutes remaining in the period would lock things back up, this time tying it at two. It was a smart move by Dan Girardi to take the shot from the point, and an even smarter one by Parenteau to sneak in and camp out right at the edge of the crease. 2-2 would be your score after the first.
The second period is one that many Ranger players would like to forget. Jochen Hecht scored through a Tyler Meyers screen 5:17 into the second, which led to head coach John Tortorella pulling Lundqvist from goal and replacing the frustrated netminder with back-up Alex Auld. It was a controversial decision by Tortorella, and really, a strong argument could be made from both standpoints. You do not want to destroy Lundqvist's self-esteem at this point of the season, but at the same time, he will have another shot tomorrow against the Leafs.
Continue reading after the jump.
Toput the icing on the cake late in the second, Toni Lydman beat Auld on a 4-on-3, and this made it 4-2 in favor of the Sabres. Up until that point, I thought that Auld was sharp considering he was coming in cold off the bench. He had to make two quick saves right off the bat and did, just to match Ryan Miller's godly stop on Marian Gaborik just several minutes earlier.
The game lost its excitement in the third period, as it was basically the Sabres protecting a lead and throwing in the occasional odd-man rush by having their defense join the offense. Only one goal was scored in the period, and that went to Tyler Ennis, who was crashing the net hard and tapped one past Auld. Other than that, nothing much was doing for either team. The final score would be 5-2.
The Rangers were outplayed for the better part of this contest, and there really is notanything more to this loss than that. The Blueshirts had some chances, but only scored on two of them. They made costly mistakes in the defensive zone, and they were burned. Goaltending was faulty, and it proved to hurt this team. Nothing went right for the team tonight and it just was a huge mess out there. It will be a tough game to erase from memory by the time they get back at it tomorrow with the Maple Leafs.
That game tomorrow has just become the most important tilt of the season. If the Rangers do not get at least a point against the Leafs, their season will be over and there will be no playoffs this time around. It is game seven tomorrow, and if they win it, they move on to play two more game sevens this weekend against the Flyers, who beat the Leafers on this night. It is a tough situation that the Rangers are in right now....very tough.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I honestly thought Miller’s save on Gabby when the Rangers had the 3 on 1 was the turning point. I think the Sabes were ahead 3-2 at that point, but that save really seemed to take the wind out of the Rangers sails.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Apr 6, 2010 10:31 PM EDT reply actions
agreed
Blueshirt Banter: www.blueshirtbanter.com
Rangers Tribune: www.rangerstribune.com
Follow Me on Twitter: twitter.com/RangersTribune
by Nick Montemagno on Apr 6, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah. That was the game right there. I thought the offense generated decent chances, and this loss can be attributed to a shaky Lundqvist – not a clutch performance – and some really bad defense. Wade Redden is an absolute joke, and Rozi is reverting to his old self.
Those games earlier in the year when the team didn’t show up – there were at least 7 – are going to be why we don’t get in.
I was thinking the same thing Jim before I got on here, and as for the Defense everyone was bad with maybe the exception of Staal. Del Zotto was solely responsible for the fourth goal and that really put the nail in the coffin.
by CrazyRangerFan on Apr 6, 2010 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought the Rangers played well until that point as well
Lundquist as great as he is gave us no chance to win this game. The first goal was from no angle and the second he was cheating for the cross ice pass. It should of been 2-0 after the 1st. The rest of the Sabres goals were created by not playing smart hockey trying to create offense when they did not have the puck. Getting 3 men caught in too deep behind the circles in the offensive zone when you don’t have the puck is stupid. Whats more amazing in this game is Redden was a plus 1. I thought the 4th line had a complete game even with Shelley’s stupid penalty in the third. As much as they were talking about how great Dubinsky played I thought that line played a horrible game and were caught up ice a bunch of times when the Sabres counter attacked.
Pulling Lundqvist was the end of the game. The goals Auld gave up were arguably just as “bad” as what you call “bad” goals against Lundqvist. Torts looked like he regretted his decision for the rest of the game after that happened, but pulling Lundqvist was the wrong move. Torts should be blamed. He is an idiot.
"Jaromir Jagr.... it's a POWER PLAY GOAL!"
- Sam Rosen
"Marian Gaborik.... it's a POWER PLAY GOAL!"
-Sam Rosen
The Rangers need to win out now, realistically, and because of my hatred for Torts at the moment, I could care less if the Rangers make the playoffs… maybe Torts’ time here will expire if they don’t make it.
"Jaromir Jagr.... it's a POWER PLAY GOAL!"
- Sam Rosen
"Marian Gaborik.... it's a POWER PLAY GOAL!"
-Sam Rosen
Torts isn't going anywhere
it’s just not happening. Even if this team was in last place, if Sather removed Torts it would be his 6th coach fired in his tenure. If Sather wont admit to Redden being a mistake then there is no way Torts leavs after this year.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Apr 7, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions
sad but true
even my girlfriend knows Torts needs to go, and she’s seen like less than 10 games.
I Just got a question because I hear this a lot here, how is sather not admitting reddens a mistake. I mean just because he’s not In the minors or traded or bought out doesn’t mean sather thinks his signing is great, quite the opposite in some cases. I just hear that so much Im just wondering if someone has a direct line to his office because there’s no way someone can know what sather thinks anymore. He has brain farts after brain farts the guys a moron and you can’t predict what he’s thinking. Unless he has came out and said he loves redden which is why I’m asking, becAuse if he has the guys a bigger idiot than I thought.
by klh2009 on Apr 7, 2010 3:06 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
if I recall correctly last summer Sather said that he will give Redden another shot this year and see how it goes. To me Redden is gone this summer unless Dolan ties up Sather from dumping him which very well could happen.
by CrazyRangerFan on Apr 7, 2010 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed, they all looked like crap at various parts of the game – but the decision to pull Hank is just plain baffling to me. Makes about as much sense as benching Avery against the Caps in game 3 of the playoffs – total spur of the moment bonehead move that totally blows up in our faces. Vintage Torts.
Sure, he had an un-Hank-like night and its not like we regained the lead only to see Auld lose it later – but I just have to think no wonder this team has no fricken pride! Can I anybody explain to me the John Tortorella method of accountability? Seems there’s a different measuring stick for every player – and that’s death to any team in any sport.
I just don’t get it. This entire season is a disaster from just about every angle. Someone should start a “what could be worse” thread just to see if we can dream up anything more horrific.
by schwartzy on Apr 7, 2010 5:31 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Just a different perspective ...
But Hank wasn’t on his game tonight. It isn’t that he allowed the goals, it’s the way the goals were scored. Roy’s goal was a positioning screw up by Hank that he’s done at various times throughout the season. Pucks from the faceoff dot down should never go in if the goalie holds the post. The recent goaltending trend of dropping the long side knee is supposed to make it easier to move accross the crease to cover the backdoor, but it opens up short side high if the goalie leans. We’ve seen that goal numerous times from Hank and other goalies around the league. Same for the 5 hole goal. If you just stand there and close up the puck will hit you from that angle. I’ll cut him some slack on the third goal for the screeen, but when a goalie lets in the first two, and then that one under the arm, he isn’t positionally sharp.
Totally agree
we’ve seen it time and time again. Hugging the post just doesn’t suit his style. He’s a butterfly goalie who goes down on everything but on those sharp angle shots he’s sort of in between going down and standing up leaving holes for the puck to squirt through. Definately something Goalie coach Benoit Allaire (sp) has to work on.
Those first two sabre goals Lundqvist HAS to stop!
We have to win out. I think we are done.
I agree but ...
I think he’s coached to do just that. This new “technique” for positioning on steep angle shots is all over the league, and not just with Hank. The one goalie I’m sure doesn’t play that way is Brodeur. All this being said, was this the only reason to pull Hank? Maybe Tort’s was thinking of tonight’s game, maybe he was seeing if it would “spark” the team – hopefully he’s 1 for 2 on that mentality. Until they lose again, I’d stay with Hank no matter what. He’s our best player, he is the Rangers, and the fate of the team should rest in his hands.
by bleed'n blue on Apr 7, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Win Out
If the Rangers don’t win the final games of the season, they are through for the year. Hank has to be on his game. And we have to get scoring from players other than Prust and Paranteau. Both players have been pleasant surprises and are definitely keepers for next year. Wonder if we will close out the season with only one player, Gabby, who has 20 or more goals? We certainly miss having consistent scorers other than Gabby. Bench Redden and play Gilroy.
Ryan Miller
is just too damn good. That save not only took the winds from our sails, but put it right into the Sabres. I mean they came out with fury after that save. It definitely turned the game.
I don’t think pulling Hank was a big deal. Having him in while he was obviously frustrated probably would have came out to the same result we got with Auld. He actually has more rest now for tonights game.
Wow I wish I could watch this game
But apparently the execs deemed that the MSG channel should only show the Knicks. You know, because they are in the thicket of a playoff race
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
not at school
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
by Joe Fortunato on Apr 7, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Same here it really sucks, the only reason why I saw the game was because Sabres Hockey gets priority over anything up here. I had to listen to that crazy old guy again and almost went insane.
by CrazyRangerFan on Apr 7, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Rick Jenerette (sp?) is not that bad. I actually think he is one of the better announcers. Some of the stuff he says is just hilarious.
He is terrible I just wanna cry when I listen to him.
by CrazyRangerFan on Apr 7, 2010 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I live in upstate NY and the Sabres get the priorty over the rangers even though i’m closer to nyc than buffalo. I can’t stand the Sabre play by play guy. Rick whatever his name is. As soon as I found out the Sabres were broadcasting the game I muted the volume.
by 76 Blueshirt on Apr 7, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Took me a while to find the damn game-my info bar said that MSG2 was televising the Isles/Montreal game, so I went to 414, which had the Devil’s game. Flipped back to MSG2 hoping they’d say where the Rags game was…and I saw Sam and Joe.
Having all this crap on 2 channels is too much.
Why cant the Devils and Isles get their own damn channels!
I’m sick of trying to find the Rangers on cable. This is MSG! The Ranger channel! Not the damn devils! Not the fishsticks! Not the bloody hell Sabres!! WTF is with that. I dont watch the Hockey night in NY show just for that reason. I dont care about the Devils. I dont wanna listen to butch goring. MSG is the Rangers!!
I’d have to say the turning point of last night’s game was Roszival having quite possibly the worst shift in NHL history for a defenseman. Rangers score early and are up 1-0, Roszival manages to backhand the puck around the far cornerboards in their own zone right to a Sabre, the play moves back to the front of the net, Roszival takes the penalty, Sabres go on PP, and score to make it 1-1.
How many times can he take a penalty before he doesn’t see any more ice time? Just infuriating. He did the same exact F*CKING thing the other night against the Islanders. Just brutal. I’m so pissed off right now.
MATTEAU!!!!! MATTEAU!!!!!!! MATTEAU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+100
i dont think that was the turning point bc we bounced back from that but that was godawful. i was screaming at rosi from the point when he fanned on the clear attempt in the corner.
have to agree it was the ridiculous save on gabby that changed the game
guess you forgot last game where he had a shift that was two turnovers and a penalty that lead to a goal.
by Michael Gleich on Apr 7, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions

by 

































