Rangers Review: Erik Christensen
December 2, 2009. Things for the Rangers began getting hectic on this date as they were in the middle of a drought and just waived long time back-up netminder Stephen Valiquette. Then, in the midst of it all, general manager Glen Sather announces that he has picked up forward Erik Christensen off of waivers from the Anaheim Ducks. Many, even outside of the Blueshirts fanbase, questioned the move and looked at it as yet another useless acquisition that the Rangers find themselves making often. Little did we know, though, that Christensen would eventually be a spark on offense for the Rangers, and would become one of the few to develop chemistry with star winger Marian Gaborik.
What We Liked: 26 points in 49 games played with New York are decent numbers for a player that critics felt was not going any further with his career after seeing him continuously fail on various teams around the league over the years. Realizing that this could make or break his future, Christensen poured his heart and soul onto the ice night in and night out while with the Rangers, and was one of those players that was seldom criticized by head coach John Tortorella. He could keep up with Gaborik and always seemed to know where he was, enabling him to lay the perfect feed onto the blade of the Gabs and more often than not, create a legitimate scoring chance. For that reason, the Rangers will seriously consider re-signing Christensen for next season as he is a restricted free agent come July.
Continue reading after the jump.
What We Didn't Like: The 26-year-old center is streaky - has been for his entire career - which is a clear drawback. While Christensen was an overall plus on offense, he didn't help the larger problem of this team, which happens to be consistency. Marian Gaborik and Vinny Prospal were really the only two players to put up numbers regularly, while the rest of the club was hot and cold, on and off. This will hurt Christensen when it comes time to negotiate a new contract, because we hope general manager Glen Sather is smart enough to prevent himself from handing out any more large contracts to players who cannot produce on a consistent basis.
Highlight Game: February 14, 2010: The Rangers, down 2-0 to the Tampa Bay Lightning heading into the second period, make a thrilling comeback to eventually win the game by the score of 5-2, led by two goals and an assist by Erik Christensen. Erik turned many heads with his performance in that contest.
Final Thoughts: I would like to see Christensen re-signed, personally, but for no more than $1 million or so. Tortorella could work with him and eventually get him to be a solid secondary scorer. I believe that the first line still needs to have a legitimate centerman in the middle, but at least we know Christensen can fill the hole if need be.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Erick isn't bad
but he’s a “tweener”….but like you so eloquently typed up, he was a perfect fit for Gabby…and that should be enough to get him re-signed.
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
he would be perfect if he could be consistent.
by CrazyRangerFan on May 14, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions
+1
In the write up it says “Christensen poured his heart and soul onto the ice night in and night out while with the Rangers”.
Umm…seriously?
He’d dissappear for long stretches just like alot of other guys on this team.
Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev.
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!
by 76 Blueshirt on May 14, 2010 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions
Just because he would disappear didn’t mean he wasn’t trying. If he isn’t scoring, you aren’t going to really notice him because he isn’t a physical player.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers for SB Nation.
The Rangers Tribune: A hockey blog dedicated to covering the New York Rangers since 2009.
by Nick Montemagno on May 14, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah I wasn’t saying that he wasn’t trying, because you could tell that he was.
by CrazyRangerFan on May 14, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, my comment wasn’t directed at you anyway. It was for 76 Blueshirt.
I agree with what you said.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers for SB Nation.
The Rangers Tribune: A hockey blog dedicated to covering the New York Rangers since 2009.
by Nick Montemagno on May 14, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions
If your only scoring 26 points in 49 games you better bring something else to your game. He doesn’t. As you said he’s not physical, doesn’t PK, doesn’t get dirty in the corners, and in general he dissappears if he’s not scoring.
Not the type of player I want on my team.
Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev.
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!
by 76 Blueshirt on May 14, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions
wrong stats
He didn’t score 18 points in 26 games. He scored 26 points in 49 games with the Rangers.
It equates to about a 15 goal season and about 40-45 points, allowing for a hot streak or two.
While the stats are wrong, I still think he can improve on those numbers here in NY as he gains familiarity with the team and has a camp. He can be a nice secondary scorer for the right price. Given that his scoring rate projects to ‘only’ a 15 goal season though, $1m is the absolute max i’d give him at this stage.
by Jurgennehls on May 14, 2010 9:59 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Good call. If they’re going to only include some traditional stats, it’d be nice if they were correct.
They have been fixed. Human error. It happens.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers for SB Nation.
The Rangers Tribune: A hockey blog dedicated to covering the New York Rangers since 2009.
by Nick Montemagno on May 14, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Stats
What was his relative +/-? His GVT? These reviews are generally great, but it would be nicer if we could see every Ranger’s predictive numbers while reading about their grit, determination, spunk, chemistry, libido, etc.
His GVT was 5.2 in 49 games, good for 5th among Ranger forwards, behind the expected 4, Gaborik, Prospal, Dubinsky and Drury, but really it’s 4th if you prorate everyone to 82 games.
His rel +/- was 2nd among Ranger forwards (behind Gaborik), as was his QComp.
His numbers are even better when you remember that he spent the first 7 games with the team getting relatively little playing time. His 26 points are really over 42 games, a 50 point pace which is needed on this team even if it comes in 20 games.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on May 14, 2010 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Re-sign but
If possible if the Rangers can execute some moves that entail moving at least one veteran tothe minors or via trade then they can bring in a first line center. I would resign Christensen but for no more than $1 million or so noted in the post above.
I agree to keep him due to his hard work and chemistry he has built with Gabby. Re-sign Christensen, prust, Shelly, add one Physical Defensive man like Sanderson and one Center. Two minor moves while attempting or executing the move at least one high price player currently under contract for next year.
Price
So long as the price for Christensen is acceptable, at worst he adds depth to the roster. I think the Rangers should be active in acquiring top line talent/top 6 centers and in an ideal world i dont think he is one but you need scoring throughout the line up so he should be kept.
Given his open concerns about this (NY) being his last chance to stick in the NHL i’d be shocked if he and his agent get greedy.
blueseatblogs.com
Agree. He's a depth player. Thats it.
He’s definately not a #1 center. He’s not a #2 center as i think AA should fill that spot. Drury is our #3 center. Maybe he can be on the 4th line but i suspect he will not be happy there and not play up to his potential.
There’s a reason he’s bounced from team to team.
Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev.
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!
by 76 Blueshirt on May 14, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
He has good speed, he Dubi and Gabby make a decent line. He isnt a number one center, but what are the options? Big money for Marleau and Plekanec? Hope not! Resign him, Shelley, Prust, Auld and lock up Staal. Dump R & R if possible at the very least Redden. Avery needs to go same for Boyle, Girardi, Lisin and Voros. Go youth and live with the results.
Really?
Avery and Boyle going….why???? Girardi too? Wow lets get rid of more guys too. Marleau will be atleast 6.5-7 mill a season, he also plays with Joe Thornton possibly the best passer in the game and another guy named Dany Heatley….his stats are a reflection of who he plays with. Plekanec had a good year, but I think he will be back with Montreal and I dont think he is worth what he will be asking for.
yes that was the point. TY. Boyle big not physical, ok on pk, spot easily filled by Dupont or Drury if they actually pick up another center. Avery isnt that effective under Torts, so why keep him, you can get the same production from a bigger more physical forward like Byers and save a few bucks, maybe get a pick back.
No one wants Avery
I really think Avery will be a Ranger for life. I don’t think any team will pick him up when he becomes a free agent.
Either that or go to a KHL team! Imagine that!
Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev.
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!
by 76 Blueshirt on May 15, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
is it me?
or do these NHL video links not work?
Rangers FTW!
by BleedsRangerBlue on May 14, 2010 1:52 PM EDT reply actions
id be lying
if i said they worked 50% of the time for me
Sorry about the Stats Error
That was my fault. Read them quickly and misunderstood. It is fixed now.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers for SB Nation.
The Rangers Tribune: A hockey blog dedicated to covering the New York Rangers since 2009.
by Nick Montemagno on May 14, 2010 2:39 PM EDT reply actions
resign for sure
not resigning him would be a mistake. He’s relatively young, obviously has some skill and actually meshes with Gabby. Though he’s not really a first liner, he can contribute. a one or two year deal in the low $1m range works well for both sides.
i sometimes fail to understand what people want
people don’t want to re-sign prospal or EC bc they are not 1st line talents(i think rangers would be smart to go after both)
people don’t want to go after plekanec or marleau bc they are gonna be too $$$(couldnt agree more, we allready have too many long-term, big $$$ contracts)
people don’t think AA/dubs are 1st line talents(i think the book is far from closed on both players)
people don’t want to give up picks trying to go after RFAs like pavelski/ryan(i agree here bc overpaying players while giving up a king’s ransom shouldnt be our MO)
what some people don’t realize is that SOMEONE has to be on our first line besides gabby, and if we dont want to overpay UFAs RFAs, then we are goin to have to basically settle for second tier(maybe even third lol) players like EC while we wait for players like stepan kreider grachev take the plunge to the nhl. that is the plan i am hoping for and am ready to settle with something like this for the next 1-2 years
dubs-EC-gabby
dru-prospal-cally
aves-AA-mza
shelley-boyle-prust
Yes sign Prospal. EC I could care less.
No to Plekanec and Marleau.
Put AA on the second line. Dubi on the first line wing.
I’d give up picks to get Pavelski. He’s the type of player Rangers need.
Drury is our 3rd line center. Not 2nd line wing.
MZA could move up to 2nd line.
Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev.
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!
by 76 Blueshirt on May 15, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions
NO WAYY
EC was a nice mid season edition. Now lets leave it at that.
He is an average player with downside. No upside at all. He’s average in face offs, average passer, below average physical player. I say 700 k on a two way contract is the MOST he gets.
by louielounz1 on May 14, 2010 8:38 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
For his career…he’s up around 57% on faceoffs, which is quite above average. Yes, I know he struggled here.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on May 14, 2010 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions

by 























