Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin Continues Rampage, New York Wins On Road

Rangers Review: Marian Gaborik

Marian Gaborik, signed by the Rangers for five years last July, was undoubtedly the best player on this team other than goaltender Henrik Lundqvist in the 2009-10 season. Aside from minor injuries here and there, Marian was able to stay healthy for a majority of the year, playing in 76 of 82 games. If there was one question mark heading into the season when it came to the 28-year-old speed demon, it was his health, because when at 100 percent, we were all well aware of his capabilities on the ice. Luckily, he kept himself in good shape and we got to enjoy watching his talent from opening night in October all the way to the final game in April.

What We Liked: Ummmm..... A LOT. Starting with Gaborik's numbers on the season, his 42 goals and 86 points were the best offensive statistics put up by an individual player on the Blueshirts since Jaromir Jagr in 2005-06. He finished tenth in the National Hockey league in overall scoring, and fifth in goals scored. So if you did not believe that the Slovakian Star was one of the best players on Earth before this season, I think you were probably convinced after watching him all year, and if not, just compare his numbers to some of the world-class talent out there. If on a better team and with better linemates, there is no doubt in my mind that Marian could have earned the Rocket Richard trophy for the leading goal scorer.

Gaborik was one of the few who contributed on the poweplay for the Rangers as well. He registered 14 goals and 12 assists for 26 points with the man advantage, pretty good numbers considering he was on a failing powerplay unit. What I liked about Gaborik on the powerplay is two things. One is that he has the ability to slow a play down, but himself time, and wait for the perfect connection for a goal to become available. If you go back and look at the tape of Ranger powerplays, just take notice of how much space and time he creates for himself just by stick-handling along the boards. Also, he has the ability to do the complete opposite, and that is to make a play happen without even thinking about it and before the opposition has time to react. Gaborik has one of the quickest releases in the game, both wristshot and slapshot, and that was evident with the velocity and speed of some of the rockets he blasted when on the powerplay.

I feel like I say this in almost every post here on the Banter, but the Rangers biggest  problem this season was consistency. What else is new? However, that excludes Gaborik, because the only slump he went through was in January when he did not score in five straight games, if you even want to call that a slump. That is tremendously impressive when playing on a team that just barely finished with a record above .500. Also, Marian was very clutch for New York this year, scoring 19 of his goals in the third period.

Continue reading after the jump.

Star-divide

What We Didn't Like: I know what you're thinking: "How the hell is Nick going to pick out something bad about Gaborik?". Well folks, there is one thing that bothered me about Marian. It may be different from what you didn't like about him, or you may just think he is flawless, but I have one problem with him. On several occasions this year, late in tight games, he was caught watching a play unfold instead of making the defensive play that could have potentially saved them the game. Now I do not know if that is a psychological thing or what, but it happened several times and once sparked coach Tortorella to refer to Gabby's backcheck as "horse****".

Highlight Game: There are a lot of games I could pick as Gaborik's "best" but I have to go with his hat trick against the Colorado Avalanche back on January 31st. He had a goal in each period and was the main reason the Blueshirts were able to come out on top of the Avs. Below, though, is a highlight reel on YouTube with all of Gaborik's 42 goals this season.

 

Marian Gaborik 2009/2010 Highlight Reel [All 42 Goals] (via LoFFeN1987)

Final Thoughts: It's quite obvious: as long as Gaborik can stay healthy, the Rangers will have an offensive gem on their hands for the next four years. Believe it or not, he took some pressure off of Henrik Lundqvist by finally scoring some goals. Now if only we could duplicate him and have two wizards skating around out there.

Anyway, I am looking forward to watching Gabby for the next four years, as he is a real treat to observe, and really hope the Rangers do not do anything foolish like trade him. Because then, Joe would have to go and find a new avatar, and I really like the one he has now.


Marian Gaborik

#10 / Right Wing / New York Rangers

6-1

200

Feb 14, 1982

 



GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG GTG SOG PCT
2009 - Marian Gaborik 76 42 44 86 15 37 14 1 4 0 272 15.4

 

Also, check out Marian's cool new website at www.mariangaborik10.com.

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

gab was by far with hank our best player just think if we had more then one line scoring like other teams what his numbers would of been .one of the few bright spots this team had last year

by nytrueblue on May 19, 2010 8:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes

Gab and King were our best two players this past season. If you like scoring, Marian did not dissapoint at all. Have to give bigger credit to the Man Upstairs for keeping him healthy, just about all season long.

I Am HockeyMan!!

"When I tap my stick like this (thump, thump, thump), put the puck on the tape, and I'll take care of things." Jaromir Jagr, for Bud Light.

by Danz10 on May 19, 2010 9:09 AM EDT reply actions  

I wish I had the time to go back and pull out the quotes from those players that almost guaranteed Gabby could not stay healthy…

by NYdemo on May 19, 2010 9:15 AM EDT reply actions  

bite your toungue sir

lets not tempt fate here…

Blunter than Sather's Cigars....

by Jersey BlueshirtFan on May 19, 2010 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Stats

In case anyone was wondering, here are Gaborik’s advanced stats:
Relative +/-: 18.3 (Best on the team, 20th in the league)
GVT: 20.4 (Second only to Lundqvist, 22nd in the league, 9th among forwards)
QOC: 0.143 (Best in the league among players who played at least 60 games and averaged 15 minutes or more of ice time. Marc Staal was right behind him in 2nd)
QOT: 0.159 (4th – Prospal, Christensen, and Dubinsky all get a boost from having played serious minutes with Gaborik)

by dar9898 on May 19, 2010 9:15 AM EDT reply actions  

Thanks Smurf. Oh wait....

Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev.
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!

by 76 Blueshirt on May 19, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

He can have this…I have much better Gaborik stuff coming. Haven’t had time to run the reports though.

Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay

by George E. Ays on May 19, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Best Game

I got to watch that game here in Denver and it was awesome. I couldn’t believe all the Rangers fans there were at that game. The number of hats that went on the ice after the hat trick was amazing!

I also got to see fellow Nanook Chad get his first NHL victory. I had to buy an extra $100 ticket to take my buddy who is a Bruins fan but it was worth it. My buddy even said there were more Rangers fans than Avalanche fans there.

there was even a brief “Potvin sucks” chant in the third period.

by Thomas B on May 19, 2010 10:47 AM EDT reply actions  

I have nothing to criticize Gabby about. Inconsistency will happen over a long 82 game season. I guess I can complain about his lack of scoring down the stretch after the Olympics but i think he played injured which resulted in him looking tired out there.

By far our best player other than Hank and as the write up said imagine if he had a legit #1 centerman. He’d be putting up Ovechkin like numbers.

Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev.
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!

by 76 Blueshirt on May 19, 2010 11:09 AM EDT reply actions  

I have nothing to criticize about Gaborik himself, but his Quality of Competition was extraordinarily high for someone who’s not a top pairing defenseman. This is probably indicative of two things: Tortorella has not done a very good job of getting Gaborik on the ice against weaker opponents and the Rangers lack of line depth has allowed opponents to focus on Gabby.

by dar9898 on May 19, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

The whole first line faced that. You’ll also note that the 4 of them (Prospal, EC, Dubinsky, Gaborik) all outscored the insane competition.

That’s a BIG plus from a Rangers standpoint. Sure, they’d probably be more dominant against 2nd/3rd line opponents, but having a 1st line that can outscore other teams 1st lines is a pretty big key.

The problem is our 2nd and 3rds don’t outscore their comp. Anisimov, Drury, Avery, Callahan, Voros, Lisin and Boyle were all even or negative against their competition. Only Prust and Shelley managed to outperform (and that may be more indicative of their play before they got here, I haven’t checked)

It’s really proof once again that the issue this team has is not who to play with Gaborik…it’s who to play on the 2nd and 3rd lines that will turn their performances around.

Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay

by George E. Ays on May 19, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is one thing I give Tortorella credit for. He handled Gaborik very well. When he needed a day off, Torts gave it to him and I think that had a major impact on his health. And also, like you mentioned with the whole match-ups thing.

Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers for SB Nation.
The Rangers Tribune: A hockey blog dedicated to covering the New York Rangers since 2009.

by Nick Montemagno on May 19, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

but we can all agree, that gabby and hank alone won’t get us the cup

by Dougee on May 19, 2010 3:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Fellas…….4th in the league in goals. Think for a moment who was ahead of him……Ovie, Crosby and Stamkos……theres a lot of players we consider great that are behind him. He is a rare type of player, like Jagr who has the potential to get a win for his team any night. If we could only draft a super star player to accompany him.

by earthworm on May 19, 2010 5:45 PM EDT reply actions  

We don’t even need a superstar… just one or two more 20 goal, 40 point forwards to balance out the scoring.

by Kritikal on May 19, 2010 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok he had 42 goals, if you watch the video of his goals, more than half of them are from nice crisp one time passes. No is debating the fact that hes a top tier sniper, but crosby and ovechkin are in a league of their own.

by Dougee on May 19, 2010 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

to us….those are super star #’s. lol

by earthworm on May 19, 2010 9:36 PM EDT reply actions  

They are superstar numbers.

Remember Gabby didn’t have a legit #1 center on his line and he still put up 42 goals. Look at Ovie, Stamkos, Cindy, they all have star players complimenting them. Crosby had Malkin, Stamkos had St.Louis and Ovie had Backstrom. Who did Gabby have?? Prospal? EC?? Thats laughable!

Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev-Prust
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!

by 76 Blueshirt on May 20, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

While I appreciate your point, how many people outscored Prospal this year? The number is 67, or roughly 2 guys per team.

He may not be a star persay, but he’s certainly a high caliber forward, or at least played like one. He had as many P/G as Cammallieri and Penner, slightly more than Pavelski or Mike Richards.

You can do worse than Vinny Prospal.

Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay

by George E. Ays on May 20, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. Vinny Prospal has been maligned over his career despite putting up good numbers and even playing with some “grit.” I believe if he were American or Canadian, he might be viewed in a different light.

by dar9898 on May 21, 2010 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

My point being Gabby played with a few different centers and wingers this past season that it’s amazing he scored as many goals as he did. I’m not maligning Vinny, far from it. He’s a good player who jelled with Gabby right of the bat and i think we should sign him for 2 more years. All i’m saying is that if Gabby had a bonafied star playing with him he’d be leading the league in goals.

Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev-Prust
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!

by 76 Blueshirt on May 21, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

All i’m saying is that if Gabby had a bonafied star playing with him he’d be leading the league in goals.

I don’t know that this is true.

First, his final total was 5th in the league as is. 42 goals is ALOT of goals in this era.

Second, # of goals is still based on number of shots * shooting percentage, and only 14 guys took more shots than Gabby did this year. Combined with that, his shooting percentage is right on line with most of his career, especially the last 5 years.

I don’t really believe that adding a star to his line would have that significant effect on his shot totals or shooting percentage, so I don’t really see his goal totals going up that far.

I could be wrong of course, in theory it does make sense, I just don’t think it does in practice.

Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay

by George E. Ays on May 21, 2010 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Honestly do you really think if he had Crosby feeding him the puck all the time he wouldn’t have scored 50+ goals this year? Or Backstrom? He definately would have had more shots for sure.
 
In my mind having a playmaking centerman making sick passes to Gabby you would think he’d score more.

But maybe not. Like you said 42 is alot of goals in this NHL.

Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev-Prust
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!

by 76 Blueshirt on May 21, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

As I said, in theory it makes sense.

For an exercise though, let’s take one of Crosby’s current linemates, Chris Kunitz. Here’s his year to year Shots per Game totals while in Anaheim:

2.22, 2.22, 2.39, 2.24. Pretty consistent.

Here’s his totals since joining PItts: 70 games, 2.42. So there’s a slight bump, but it’s not drastically different from the odd bump he had in 07-08.

Now of course, Ovechkin saw a large bump in his SOG totals that coincides with Backstrom joining the team, but you could also attribute it to his natural growth that should come from being 21 to 24 y.o.

It’s an interesting argument for sure.

Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay

by George E. Ays on May 21, 2010 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

That Kunitz stat is interesting for sure. You would think he’d get a bigger bump in SOG with cindy.

I wonder what would happen if you reverse the thought. Lets say you took Marty St.Louis away from Stamkos and inserted your “average” centerman. I bet Stamkos wouldn’t be anywhere near 51 goals for the season. I don’t know what the percentage of Stamkos goals St.Louis assisted on but i bet it’s pretty high.

Now i understand that whoever replaces St.Louis is going to have quite a few assists anyway because we know Stamkos will get his share of goals but your average centerman isn’t going to have as many assists as Marty. Therefor fewer goals from Stamkos.

Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev-Prust
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!

by 76 Blueshirt on May 21, 2010 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

uhhh 76,

Stamkos is a center. St. Louis is a winger. St. Louis, despite his size, has always played wing. He doesn’t back check responsibly enough to play center. St. Louis is no more a play making center than say his diminutive compatriot Gionta.

by dar9898 on May 21, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s tougher to tell with Stamkos, it’s too early in his career to know where his true shooting percentage would lie.

But just because someone will have fewer assists doesn’t mean that Stamkos will have fewer goals…it’s still the number of shots and your shooting percentage that will dictate your goal total.

Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay

by George E. Ays on May 21, 2010 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

@Dar9898
You’re right he is listed as a winger. I thought he was a center because last game the Rangers played them he was taking faceoffs.

@Smurf

Well you would think he’d get more shots if he has a passer on his line. But Your statement earlier about Kunitz and Crosby kinda verifies that is not the case.

Oh well…like you said it makes a good argument.

Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev-Prust
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!

by 76 Blueshirt on May 22, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

one small problem....clutchness

hasnt been mentioned much here, but Torts certainly didnt miss it. Overall Gabby had a great season, but next year we need to see his best when it counts most

by Ahmad Bradshaw on May 19, 2010 9:50 PM EDT reply actions  

I thought clutching and grabbing is illegal and enforced more these days

by dar9898 on May 19, 2010 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I totally agree Ahmad..........Gabby had an amazing offensive season but...........

where was he down the stretch and the final week of the season when we needed him the most? Ice cold is what he was………and dont even get me started on him not being in the shootout in the last game in Philly….but that was more Torts. That coulda been the diff in us making the PO and maybe it woulda been us in the conf. finals…………….sick to my stomach………..GO BLACKHAWKS!!!!!!!

by giantsNYrangers on May 20, 2010 7:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes and no.

I agree for the most part BUT he did have a terrific game the final home game against Philly. He just didn’t show up for the final game in Philly.

I’m also kinda thinking he was injured for the stretch drive.

I think Philly concentrated on shutting him down the last game. Seems like that was the strategy all season. Shut Gabby down and the opposition had a good chance of winning.

Even more reason to bolster our secondary scoring!

Lundqvist-Staal-MDZ-McDonagh-Krieder-Stepan-MZA-Cally-Dubi-Gabby-AA-Grachev-Prust
The core of the 2014 Stanley Cup winners!

by 76 Blueshirt on May 20, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

HAHA clutch doesn’t exist. I’d rather have a good player than a lucky “clutch” one. You can keep your David Eckstein. I’ll take A-Rod.

Clutches are for cars.

by dar9898 on May 21, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I cringed when they signed him, figured he was too fragile. Had a great year, hope he continues and stays healthy.

by Kmp on May 24, 2010 5:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

New York Rangers News, Analysis, Line Combinations, Schedule And Stats

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Brian-leetch_best_small
Trade For Jeff Carter? Interesting Take.
Rangers_small
Prospal signs extension with Columbus
Small
NHL needs to make a change, officiating has too much power.
Small
Injustice in Pictures
Capt_7819442e90a0442ea68fca0ace6735a4_rangers_islanders_hockey_nyjj111_small
NHLOA Enemy
Small
Time to cool off
Microphones_small
Looking Ahead...
Brian-leetch_best_small
Can We Please Stop Talking About Nash, Weber, Suter, And Parise?
Small
Selanne? Smyth? Nash? Ryan?
Small
Wolski's Value and possible trading partners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New York Rangers 51 33 13 5 71
Philadelphia 53 30 16 7 67
New Jersey 53 31 19 3 65
Pittsburgh 54 30 19 5 65
New York Islanders 52 22 22 8 52

(updated 2.9.2012 at 9:25 AM EST)

33 - 13 - 5

Lost 1


Managing Editor

Joe_2_small Joe Fortunato

Editors

Blueshirt-underground-logo1_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Drurybloodsmall_small Rob L

Meandrichards_small Nick Montemagno

Small George E. Ays

Untitled_small Dig Deep

Gaby_small Kevin Power

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Me_small Bryan Winters

Contributors

Twitter_pic_small Laurie Carr