Rangers News: Dan Girardi Files for Salary Arbitration
Late Monday evening, Andrew Gross of Ranger Rants reported that restricted free agent defenseman Dan Girardi has filed for salary arbitration with the New York Rangers. It is likely that the Blueshirts will strike a deal with the 26-year-old defenseman before the arbitration date, which will be determined by the NHLPA on Tuesday, but for now their qualifying offer has been rejected.
Gross also mentioned that Girardi is looking for a four year deal that would pay him approximately $3 million per. For me, based on what Dan brings to the lineup, I would prefer to have him locked up for $2.5 million, but if it comes down to it, the extra cash will not hurt too much. If there is a common middle ground, though, I would expect $2.5 M to be it.
More after the jump.....
Girardi played all 82 games last season with the Rangers, and during that span recorded a total of 24 points and had a minus-2 rating on the year. His play was a bit cyclic in that he was not as consistent as he would have liked to be. That being said, I feel that "Danny G" is either overrated by the fanbase, or underrated. There really is no in-between when his name comes up in conversation. Personally, I view the Ontario native as a stable stay-at-home blue-liner. He is nothing flashy, but he is not a weakness out there either.
That stable stay-at-home blue-liner should not receive anything more than $3 million per year, otherwise general manager Glen Sather would be overpaying for limited services. Girardi is not overly physical and he lacks heavily in the offensive end of things. That will all be factored in when/if the arbitrator makes their decision.
Also, fans are a bit bitter when it comes to Girardi since he did not come to the defense of offensive star Marian Gaborik when he was challenged by Daniel Carcillo of the Philadelphia Flyers last January. That is a huge mark that Girardi cannot erase, even though it may have been forgotten about in the locker room. I am sure that is something Dan greatly regrets, but guess what, that does not make up for any past mistakes.
Also, Marc Staal, Girardi's usual partner on the blue-line, remains unsigned but is not eligible for arbitration. The Rangers have given him a qualifying offer as well, but that is nowhere near what Marc is seeking. He is expected to eventually re-sign, however.
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
4 yrs/10 mil is a deal i think both sides should be willing to accept. it gives girardi some stability (I believe he just had a child last yr so that might be important to him) and also does not kill the rangers cap. it also makes him a tradeable commodity if it ever came to that between him and the front office. staal needs to get done now too 4 yrs/15 mill or hes getting pretty greedy
After seeing this I am quite confident that Girardi will be signed, especially since Gross made it a point to say he think a deal gets done before the hearing, not once, but twice in his article. As for Staal, I am really upset with Sather over that situation. I let the Boogaard thing go, I found a way to understand the McIlrath pick, but this Staal thing has me ticked. It should’ve been done a long while ago and now GMs around the league are starting to wonder.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers for SB Nation.
The Rangers Tribune: A hockey blog dedicated to covering the New York Rangers.
by Nick Montemagno on Jul 6, 2010 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree about Staal … get him locked up long term … he is absolutely our future captain pending Sather doesn’t do anything stupid …
by NYR9320 on Jul 6, 2010 10:41 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I see Girardi getting 4yrs 3.3m a season. He is average in all aspects and doesnt excel at any. Stall is a different story, I can see him fetching 4m tops. I wasnt really impressed with his play last season, he wasnt punishing players as much as he was during the previous season. It looked like he was playing more conservative this season.
by Beukeboom hockey on Jul 7, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
As was mentioned in this article I think Girardi is overrated. He looks decent when playing with Staal but who wouldn’t, staal is awesome. Girardi isn’t physical enough and is average at best. I think we should let him walk and bring up one of our D prospects …
by NYR9320 on Jul 6, 2010 10:40 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Girardi’s a top 4 defenseman on just about every team in the league, except maybe Philly now after they loaded up. His production is steady yet unspectaular. He’s not a star, but you could do alot worse than having someone of his level for $2.5m a year.
I do think eventually he’ll be expendable as the kids come in and (hopefully) surpass his level of play, but for now he’s still an important piece. If you were going to get rid of him, you would have needed to make a play for one of the many good UFA d-men that were out there. It’s too late now.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jul 6, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Did Willie Mitchell sign anywhere yet? cause if he didn’t I wouldn’t be terribly upset if Danny G walked and we signed Mitchell.
by CrazyRangerFan on Jul 6, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think we have any D prospects ready for the nhl yet, except for McDonagh. We need Girardi because at this point we really don’t have anybody to replace him with. Even if Mcdonagh makes the team and we resign Girardi we are still short a d man
We are?
Staal-Girardi-Rozsival-Redden-MDZ -Gilroy-McD. That’s 7. I know we’re all fantasizing about the glorious time when R&R are gone, but it hasn’t happened yet.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jul 6, 2010 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Will the Rangers be able to get the arbitrator to deduct dollars for Girardi’s violation of the “failure to assist” law?
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jul 6, 2010 11:36 AM EDT reply actions
were always short on d as long as we have redd and rozi so why cant we bring up a not ready nhl dman we have two with rr
Rozi isnt terrible, Hes just overpaid.
by CrazyRangerFan on Jul 6, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions
well sometimes he is both, but he had a stretch last year where overpaid was the main problem.
by Michael Gleich on Jul 6, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I think he is both most of the time, his 10-15 game stretch at the end of the season doesn’t convince me he has turned a corner. If I see him do the “Rozsival Shopping Cart” check to get someone out of the crease one more time, I swear I am going to punch a cat.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jul 6, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
lol, I thought for the better part of the season after the first couple of months he really wasn’t that bad. Yeah he made his classic error at not being able to keep the puck in at the point a few times but besides that he hasn’t been horrific. I think having him there as a veteran presence would be smart if the other 5 are going to be young D-men(assuming Redden is shown the door).
by CrazyRangerFan on Jul 6, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
General Custer had a veteran presence, didn’t do much for him :)
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jul 6, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
agree, that solely isnt a reason to keep him, but i think he is one of our better defensemen, and you could make a case he was as good as if not better than girardi last year. ignoring the contract, I think he was either our 2nd or 3rd best defensemen last year (unfortunately that doesnt say much). Certainly not worth 5m cap hit, but id say hes worth 3. Lets just say id much prefer rozi to derek morris
by Ahmad Bradshaw on Jul 7, 2010 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions
Girardi will get the median of what he is asking for (I’m assuming around $4 million), and what the Rangers are offering (I’m assuming around $2 million). It’s a normal part of the process, expect him to get $3 million in arbitration for one year.
It’s a normal part of the process, no worries.
if he asks for 4m rangers should walk out. Period.
by Ahmad Bradshaw on Jul 7, 2010 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions
yes the awards are for one year, but teams can still negotiate up til the day of the hearing on 1 year or longer deals.
by Michael Gleich on Jul 6, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions
jiri hudler got 2 year arb. award somehow i believe. They were talking about it when he said he was coming back to NHL this year
by Ahmad Bradshaw on Jul 7, 2010 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions
I use it only I have no clue what timetable you’re talking about when it comes to Girardi, he could be here 1 year, 5 years, or 10+ years.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jul 6, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Good Riddance Girardi
I’ll never be able to get over that game in Philly. Having been there to witness it in person it was amongst my all time low moments as a Ranger fan. I hope he signs elsewhere and that the Boogy Man punishes him for his transgression.
I also don’t think Girardi is very good. Granted he has Redden there to make him look better than he is but I find that he often misplays pucks and is frequently caught out of position. He’s one of those guys thats either solid or miserable with no in betweens. BYE BYE DANNY BOY!
Granted he has Redden there to make him look better than he is
wow I would’ve said the other way around. I think its foolish to banish a guy for one incident like that.
by CrazyRangerFan on Jul 6, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
agreed.
especially since he learned from that mistake. remember how he decked hartnell after he went after anisimov?
i guarantee you won’t see him just stand around when something like that happens any more.
i view him as a solid force back there. nothing special, probably won’t notice him most nights, but he’s doing his job. stupid mistakes are rare, nothing really to complain about.
Girardi’s GVT: 6.8, good for 6th best on the team, and is top 5 among skaters.
Girardi’s 6.8 GVT puts him in line with Dan Hamhuis ($5 million per year), above Henrik Tallinder ($3.3 million per year), and above guys like Letang, Bouwmeester, Wideman, Phaneuf, Volchenkov, Michalek, and….. WILLIE MITCHELL.
by Dave Shapiro on Jul 6, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Hamhuis got 4.5, the rest is true; lol.
by Michael Gleich on Jul 6, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Redden’s GVT is above that of Avery, Gilroy, and Anisimov. I like GVT, but it’s one number.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jul 6, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m covering bases in case Girardi’s agent comes wandering by and decides to ask for the average of those contracts, which is roughly the $4.5m range.
Incidentally…GVT is a number you can use to defend Redden, if you decided to take on such fodder. I stopped.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
by George E. Ays on Jul 6, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions
girardi is solid...
i was really pissed when he let gabby get killed but i think he’s learned from it…and he is a solid defenseman and when paired with staal, they can shutdown some of the best players in the league…so at 2.5-3 i can live with it
i completely agree
anywhere between 2.5 and 3 id be happy with, and it would be nice it if were for 4 years or so.
staal on the other hand id like to see them sign him up like 8/32 :)
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
dont see staal giving up that many years when he can probably get 4 mil for half the term.
by Michael Gleich on Jul 6, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
+1 theres no way staal is signing for more than 4 yrs at 4 mil. he would love to be a free agent again in a few yrs to sign a massive deal for more than 5 mil a yr. he will most likely be one of the best defensemen in the game by then so theres no reason he will sign a contract that will take him past the age of 30
by BronxBeliever on Jul 6, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions

by 

























