First Line Center: The Competition and The Guy Who Doesn't Get a Shot
Seems like each year we have this conversation about who should be the Rangers first line center or IF we even have someone capable of being a number 1 center on the roster. This year is no different as all the talk has surrounded a 20 year old Derek Stepan trying to make the jump from playing at the College and World Junior level to centering a number 1 line on Broadway. The other guy getting all the attention in this "battle" to at least start the year with Marian Gaborik and Alexander Frolov on their wings is Erik Christensen who in some respects at this point has become a journeyman center in the NHL.
In looking at these two I see strengths in both that make me understand why they are under consideration for the job. Everyone in here knows how much I love Stepan's game and I was talking about him being our future number 1 guy long before even last year started when all the hype was on Grachev as the future star. The vision, hockey sense and leadership he plays the game with is well beyond the 20 years on his birth certificate and only seek to enhance the tremendous skill he plays the game with. The only knock I have had on his game to this point is his faceoffs and obviously with his work ethic I expect him to get better at them. I also wonder about the transition from college hockey both in the length of the season and the physicality wearing him down because he is not built like Kreider is and/or will be when he comes out in a year. In watching the preseason games I have also noticed that when Stepan is not with Gabby and Frolov he doesnt have the same chemistry with the other forwards that have been in his games. It makes me wonder if he is in a situation where it is first line or the minors. I know i certainly dont want him to be playing 3rd line minutes here if he can be playing top line minutes in hartford, getting stronger and having the confidence that comes with being very successful down there. I believe he has the talent to be here, but wonder if some time down there might not benefit him down the line.
Where EC is concerned he has shown flashes of great play with some unbelievable skill level both with the puck and vision to pass the puck. He showed chemistry with Gaborik last year which is what is undoubtedly giving him all these chances in camp to play with him again. Erik is also solid on the defensive side, good on faceoffs which can help if Torts is going top line vs top line this year, but I have yet to see enough consistent performance and even in this camp consistent effort worthy of him getting the number 1 line job. Yesterday was obviously his best game but even within that there were huge swings in his perfromance.
Now that we have gone through the two guys who are getting all the talk we also have to mention the possibility that if either or both get their shot and struggle that Torts probably goes back to a safety net in Vinny Prospal. Having said that I come to my real reason for writing this today, Artem Anisimov who for some unexplainable to me reason has gotten no opportunities to win it himself. Artie finished the year on for some inexplicable reason the best line of him Shelley and Prust to the tune of 7 points in his last 10 games and having a dominant presence in the game every night.
This season AA looks bigger, stronger, faster, more physical and much more aware of the ice (skating with his head up) yet many of us are just hopeful that he gets a shot to play on the 2nd line with Dubi and Cally as an example. The other night in NJ he was mostly invisible for the first 2 periods playing with Grachev and Byers, but then in the 3rd he was moved to play with Cally and Fedetenko and it energized him and his game to the point where he was one of the best forwards in the 3rd and a big part of that comeback win. The reward for showing that was pairing him with Prust and Boyle with not even a thought to trying him with Gaborik and Frolov. Obviously the goal that AA scored shorthanded from Frolov any one of us could have made the finish, but he was with him stride for stride and when Frolov had the whole building thinking he was going to shoot, AA never stopped driving the net to be in position to get that pass. Maybe I am the only one who like to see him get a shot at centering those two and if I am that is fine by me, but I am just wondering why we consistently place inferior talent around AA. If he is relegated to playing 3rd or even 4th line minutes again this year then we are now starting to stunt his growth as a player, imo.
18 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rec'd
I love Stepan and his upside but if he doesn’t pan out I think Anisimov should get the nod to center the first line before EC. Anisimov plays a great two-way game, he has great size and speed and as you pointed out last year finished the year (in the most important games of the season for the club) on the Rangers strongest line with Prust and Shelley. Anisimov has looked great this preseason, granted he looked fantastic last preseason too but there is something more to it. He looks bigger and stronger, and he has a real chance at being a #1 or #2 center this year and he has earned that chance.
Prospal is the reliable safety net, who knows… the Rangers may even try Dubinsky in the middle again (though I know Torts has said he is done with Dubi in the middle). There are plenty of players who look like they might get that spot for all sorts of reasons… at the moment I would go with Stepan in the first few games of the season because he has shown some chemistry with Gabby and Frolov. But the club may well benefit from moving Frolov to the second line and having Anisimov center him, those too might have some chemistry (Frolov said he was excited to play with Arty when the Rangers signed him).
It really is a tight race, I think you explained the plot of the battle for the top center excellently. Anisimov does deserve a crack at it… but can he find the chemistry and comfort level that Stepan has shown with Frolov and Gaborik? I am of the mindset that it might best serve the team to split up Frolov and Gabby but play them together on the PP unit. I know it has been great watching Frolov and Gabby play in preseason but I don’t want to get caught with too many eggs in one basket on the first line. Just some food for thought. Thanks for writing this up leetchie, I really enjoyed reading it.
In Hank we trust.
I think AA would be the perfect choice in theory
Thats the big question though, Can he look good with skill guys. I think he is our future 2nd line center but who knows he might have a breakout year after learning a lot last year.
"Sorry bro, he Jason Bourned me"- Drama
i am not sure if he is ready, but the only way to find is to give him a shot and see. if he isnt he slots back in 2nd, but why the reluctance to give him a chance is my question
by Michael Gleich on Sep 27, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Hopefully
He’ll get some significant ice with Gaborik and/or Frolov on Wednesday or the next preseason game. I think the Stepan situation has made the coaching staff really interested in what Stepan can do and if he is NHL ready… but it is coming at the expense of the guy a lot of us thought might be the first line center this year. Arty should get that ice with Gaborik and especially Frolov, I would like to see what more they can do together.
In Hank we trust.
i actually wasnt impressed with how the line with Step worked yesterday. i thought he made good plays in the defensive zone but they got very little accomplished against detroit offensively.
by Michael Gleich on Sep 27, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions
i rather see stepan spend a year in the ahl playing 20+ mins a night with mza and grachev on his wings.. i think it would be good for his development..
id love to see AA center gabby and frolov.. i think he definitely deserves the opportunity..
id like to see prospal center dubi and cally on the 2nd line..
than on the third line drury can center avery and one of white/feds/christensen
as for the fourth line id like to see boogey-boyle-prust with kennedy as the 13th forward..
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
Too much by "the numbers"
Sorry folks you put lines together too much based on who you thinj the Rangers 1st line center or 2nd line right wing is etc etc. Anisimov has played very well at times, no telling if he will play well with gabby and maybe Frolov. I still think Gabby and frolov together is bad. They both have enuf talent to make people around them better. We need to spread the wealth. Anisimov played well with Prust and Shelley last year cause he got to play his size feeling protected and that helped his game. I am looking for CHEMISTRY here not "the team’s " top center. If Stepan stays he will do fine with Gabby and I hope Prospal on the Left side. Let Frolov play with Anisimov and maybe Cally on the right. I am NOT keeping Sephan here to play 4th line or even 3rd line with wingers who do not have his mentality. Right now too Fedetenko looks to make the team which is good and bad. Dubinsky? Avery? Prust? these guys are NOT 4th line minute guys, although Prust has to earn his minutes a bit… If Stephan goes then the only real “rookie” left in camp is Mcdonagh. I don’t need another kid on the backline. He may look good today, but in 3 weeks? Semenov should have stayed. I only hope the coaching staff realizes Valetenko has been a solid guy and he gets the nod over Gilroy… I would have taken Semenov over Gilroy… but that me. Lets see what a few more games bring. The key word is CHEMISTRY, lets not forget it.
If Stephan goes then the only real "rookie" left in camp is Mcdonagh. I don’t need another kid on the backline. He may look good today, but in 3 weeks? Semenov should have stayed. I only hope the coaching staff realizes Valetenko has been a solid guy and he gets the nod over Gilroy…
funny you do realize that Valentenko is a 22 yr old rookie too since you dont want another “kid” back there. not to mention Tank has only played 19 games the last two years combined so before we toss him in the NHL let’s remember that too.
by Michael Gleich on Sep 27, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions
i can see u have some dislike for gilroy.. u understand he has easily been one of the best defensemen so far in preseason..
u say u dont want another kid on the blue line, yet u say take a 22 yr old valentenko who has never played a pro game over gilroy who already has his rookie season under his belt..
and its stepan, not stephan.. you talk about chemistry but in all honesty frolov and gabby have had great chemistry so far..
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
Give AA a shot
At this point it seems to me as if Stepan is either taking draws in-between Gabby & Fro or up in Hartford, and that’s fine by me. If they decide Step needs a year of polishing, then I think AA should be given every opportunity to audition for the role, although AA with Fro on the 2nd line doesn’t sound too bad either.
There are definitely some exciting line possibilities for Torts to consider.
by Conway on Sep 27, 2010 7:34 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I think it could work and I hope they give it a shot. Loved that assist from Fro to AA on Sunday. Beautiful. Let’s face it folks, Stepan is not this year’s top line center> he should spending the majority of the season as a Wholfe. I know, I know, I don’t want to wait either but he’ll end up like Gilroy down the stretch, or MDZ just before the Olympics. Oof that was ugly.
excellent post
I also liked what AA did last season, and felt he deserved at least a shot at #1 center, if not number 2. Stepan is going to be a good one, but he should probably be in the AHL as of this year.
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
stepan should be developing in the minors with grachev and mza on his wings playing 20+ mins a night..
anisimov should get the nod to center stepan and frolov.. he deserves it and we all know the skill he has..
with prospal centering dubi and cally on the 2nd line setting them up…
when drury comes back, he should center the 3rd line with avery on his left and either white/fedotenko/christensen on his right, depending on who earns the spot..
the 4th line should be boogey-boyle-prust with kennedy as the ideal 13th forward..
before drury comes back the 3rd line will probably be avery on the left and than whatever combo of white/christensen/fedotenko at center and lw..
on the defensive end, i assume will see.
staal girardi
mdz rozi
gilroy eminger/mcd/sauer/valentenko..
most likely valentenko gets sent down as he needs more development..
i assume they keep eminger as a 7th because they want a veteran back there.. personally id rather have semenov but it didnt work out that way..
for the 6th spot i think it should be an open competition between sauer and mcd.. whoever earns it gets it..
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
It doesnt matter who “deserves” to be on the first line, its who ever fits the first line. Everyone can agree Christensen is not a first line center, but he meshed well with Gabby. AA may deserve to be there over Stepan, but who fits better. You cant force the chemistry Frolov-Stepan-Gabby have. Tomorrow they’ll see if Stepan can play with with others, which will probably decide where he ends up.

by 

























