Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Lakers Should Trade Andrew Bynum So He Doesn't Go To Waste

New York Rangers Find A Way To Win; Beat Winnipeg Jets 2-1

The New York Rangers concluded their seven game road trip, with a 2-1 win over the Winnipeg Jets. The Rangers come away with eight out of a possible fourteen points to start the season, sounds pretty good to me. The Rangers will now head home, and prep for their home opener this Thursday.

The first period was more gritty than anything. Brandon Prust and Tanner Glass dropped the gloves early, and set the tone for the game. One thing I will say, the Rangers definitely cut down on the penalties this game, only taking one penalty throughout the game.

The Rangers had their third chance to convert on the powerplay, and did just that. The Rangers had some great puck movement, and Dan Girardi made a great pass to Ruslan Fedotenko, who re-directed it past Mason for the 1-0 lead.

Follow after the jump for some more.

Star-divide

The lead didn't last very long, and Nik Antropov was able to tie the game back up for the Jets. The Rangers were unable to get the puck out of the zone, and it landed right on Antropov's stick.

The third period was hectic as anything. The Rangers were often caught in their zone for minutes at a time, but found a way to kill off the pressure. About halfway through the third, the Rangers had the opportunity once again to score on the powerplay.

Ryan Callahan found a lane and skated it into the zone, attempted a centering pass and wound up banking it off Zach Bogosian's skate. Although it wasn't pretty, they found a way to score and take the two points away from Winnipeg.

Ryan Callahan also had a HUGE block in the final 10 seconds of play, to break up the final play of the game. We can't take away from the solid play that Marty Biron displayed between the pipes. He was solid for the entire game, and helped the Rangers bring home two points.

The Rangers will now come home after an extended road trip, to take on the Toronto Maple Leafs in their home opener.

Comment 70 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Sorry to say but they were terrible. They got lucky with Cally’s goal and stole two points. The Jets outplayed them from head to toe. Not impressed with the way they have been playing since the first game.

by WheresTheOffenseLadies? on Oct 24, 2011 11:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Plain and simple, they stole this game.

Final chance count I had is 16-9 WPG, and 14-5 at evens. That’s so brutal, I need a new word instead of brutal.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Oct 24, 2011 11:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Take a page out of Shaq's book

Horrawful.

Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

Writer/Editor for Pinstripe Alley, Blueshirt Banter

"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."

"Every day is a great day for hockey."

by Brandon C. on Oct 24, 2011 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

No it was terrrrrbul. To quote Charles Barkley.

by EricBrat20 on Oct 25, 2011 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ha! Crazy Barkley.

Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

Writer/Editor for Pinstripe Alley, Blueshirt Banter

"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."

"Every day is a great day for hockey."

by Brandon C. on Oct 26, 2011 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

I forget, but do you include missed plays, as we had a few plays that just needed banging into the open net?

PRUSTOSTERONE!!!
"Stepan, step in, step out" Timothy Leary
Scott Gomez, the gift that keeps on giving!

by nathansfamous on Oct 24, 2011 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

If there’s no shot attempt, it don’t count. Callahan’s goal didn’t even count (it was a pass that deflected in).

Yeah, they had a couple woulda-coulda-shoulda’s tonight, but if you don’t execute, you have no chance to score, so that’s the reason they don’t get captured with this project.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Oct 25, 2011 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks.

PRUSTOSTERONE!!!
"Stepan, step in, step out" Timothy Leary
Scott Gomez, the gift that keeps on giving!

by nathansfamous on Oct 25, 2011 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yikes. 5 chances at ES.

 I’m tired of watching the Rangers get less than 20 shots on net per game. Something needs to be addressed.

#12 Carl Hagelin

by The Blue Seats on Oct 25, 2011 12:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is there a stat for ‘shots directed at net’ cause we couldnt hit the broad side of a barn tonight. Im thinking we missed more shots wide or high then we actualy had on goal.

~R.I.P. Derek

~Those Caps fans sure think they can make some noise.... too bad their team can't.

by Ranger84 on Oct 25, 2011 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

The nhl.com event summary has it.

17 on goal, 8 attempts blocked, 13 missed nets tonight.

At even strength it was 13/6/10. That comes from: http://timeonice.com/shots1112.php?gamenumber=20112

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Oct 25, 2011 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

The reason is there bored of the White Jerseys. When they put the Blue ones on there gonna be unstoppable.

just. wait.

"It's far from done, but we did get something accomplished."-#19 B.Richards

by -19-AgainstAll on Oct 24, 2011 11:57 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I am still craving

Those Liberty Alternates. I can not believe I may have to live the rest of my life without those jerseys ever making a comeback

by Guess Who's Back? on Oct 25, 2011 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, they were bad, but judging from Richards’ and Torts’ post-game comments, they realize that. Not the most talented team in the world, but there are several guys who haven’t really come alive yet.
Grab the points, and let’s hope they got some of these stinkers out of their system now and start to come together.
I feel they will.

"To everybody else we're underdogs, but we go in thinking we can handle any team in the NHL."
Brandon Prust, #8, New York Rangers

by Joe1969 on Oct 25, 2011 12:01 AM EDT reply actions  

I’m happy we got 2 points, but we can’t ignore how bad we really were.

We need to improve.

Still though, to come out of the trip with 8 out of 14 points with how badly we’re playing is a good sign.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Oct 25, 2011 12:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Turning point

That nearly 2 minute onslaught against the rangers in the 3rd. It was sad to watch them penned in like that, not being able get off the ice. But even though they were gassed and being seriously outplayed, they still fought hard enough to keep the score tied. And then how about that “give it all I got” drive to the net by Feds to draw a penalty. Soon after that we score a PP goal and between the goal and when ‘Peg pulled their goalie we kept them real quiet with the forecheck. Yes the majority of the game was awful, but after the boys were forced to step it up big time, it seemed like they weren’t going to let this win get away.

by team awesome! on Oct 25, 2011 12:13 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions  

Richards seems psyched to play at MSG

That’s great to hear. There going to be pumped full of energy and excitement for that home opener. Leafs are gonna get destroyed and the crowds going to go nuts.

"It's far from done, but we did get something accomplished."-#19 B.Richards

by -19-AgainstAll on Oct 25, 2011 1:04 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Ranger with a Rope-a-Dope

Rangers high-tail it out of the west with 6 stolen points in a heist for the ages. Good. Torts is right: “sometimes you play your best game and don’t get any points,” so, get it while you can.

Fedetenko, despite being made into a yard sale by Byfuglien, had a tremendous game. He’s a guy who seems to really shine when other players aren’t excelling (last years playoffs.) He’s probably that good most games but has an understated role/style that doesn’t always catch notice.

Woslki was a wet fart tonight. I counted 4 or 5 times when he was completely bodied out of a play. For a 6’3" 200lb guy, it’s unacceptable. Don’t know if you can pay anyone to train you in grit in the offseason. This isn’t because I want every player on the team to be a Brandon Prust. His lack of physicality prevents the opportunity for him to use his offensive talent.

Artie – get some confidence. The talent is there.

Dubinsky came alive a little bit. I think playing at home will benefit him. He plays an emotional game.

Gaborik – not much from him tonight but I agree with the 3,000 times Micheletti has made the point: He just looks better on his skates this year.

Girardi – a rock.

Mcdonaugh – could be a gem.

Del Zotto – coming along.

Biron – awesome performance.

Thursday night against the red hot Maple Leafs at the new garden!!!! Does anyone else not give a shit about the make-over? Also, for what Redden and Avery are being paid, one of them ought to slit Phil Kessel’s achilles.

by WeWillWin94 on Oct 25, 2011 2:57 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with all of this except Wolski.

I thought he skated hard and fought in the corners pretty hard too. I have no complaints about him.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Oct 25, 2011 8:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Respectfully disagree about his play last night. However, given his potential and that he cost a whole Michal Rozsival, he should be given time to prove himself.

by WeWillWin94 on Oct 25, 2011 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree with your disagreement

So many times last night I saw a single D-man push him off the puck—whether it was angling or physicality, Wolski was completely ineffective along the boards in the offensive zone. I know that’s not his game, but if he’s unable to generate anything in any zone, what is his purpose other than being a warm body on the roster?

by Kritikal on Oct 25, 2011 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

We do agree – this is the point I was making.

by WeWillWin94 on Oct 25, 2011 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree with your disagreement with my disagreement.

:)

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Oct 25, 2011 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

steal steal steal

im sorry but il say it again this team is not going to make the playoffs when we starting playing good teams were going to get killed.boston sabers pitts without sindy or malkin wash. even softer teams out play us. 3 shots in the first with a 1 1/2 power play is not acceptable. second period we had what four shots near the end of the second . we get out played the who;e game lucky goal by cali.i know its early but ithink torts nhas to take the blame and maybe its time for him to go.i dont think were that offensivly bad could it be torts system is holding back players i cxant belive we cant carry the puck overv the blue line that we have to dump itin all the time .yes a point is a point but i would not be to happy cause its not looking good for the rangers this season. i hope they prove me wrong cause il always root for them bvut im noy impressed buy the or there wins so far.and stop blaming the d and injuries its the syle of game they play

by nytrueblue on Oct 25, 2011 7:01 AM EDT reply actions  

you hit the nail on the head

its clear that you know hockey from this post, i completely agree with everything you said. Its like we brought a knife to a gunfight, were playing a grinding style of hockey against teams that can absoutely FLY. We rarely come into the offensive zone with speed and numbers. Were getting doubled up on shots every game, torts systems either need a complete revamp or we need to revamp the coaching staff. id say the later, given that torts ONLY response to anything is to shuffle lines. Im a fan and will always be one, but we need to make big changes if we’re going to compete. We can ride out goaltenders forever, poor guys never get a chance to play with a lead.

by rmg10 on Oct 25, 2011 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I also WONDER if you're right

Could it be that Tort’s philosophy/system is slowly in the process of becoming out-dated. In other words, is the league as a whole moving more and more to a speed and skill game, and less of a grind and battle game? Is he trying to build a team exactly like his old Lightning squad? If so, will such a team win a cup in a 2011-12 NHL? I really don’t know the answers to any of these questions, but if he is trying to shove an old square peg into the new round hole, we’re in trouble. Necessary positive changes would then be to bring up our fast skilled players (and lose Rupp and EC)….

Best Rangers day: May 27, 1994
Worst Rangers day: April 10, 1984

by Stepan the Ice! on Oct 25, 2011 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

torts system can be successful when you have strong goaltending, as shown thus far. But its a tough brand of hockey to play, having to scrap every game, so many low-scoring one goal games where one mistake could cost you the W. We’d be better off adopting a new style of hockey on our own, its gonna happen sooner or later whether we like it or not.

by rmg10 on Oct 25, 2011 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Richards and Dubinsky are the only two guys on the time that can carry the puck across the blue line and make something happen. Gaborik showed that he could do it as well, but for some reason he was benched for most of the second half of that game. I remember a specific play where Gaborik skated into the zone, had 4 guys completely surround him and he still got a good shot off (with a nice rebound). I remember when Artie did that last season against the Stars (I believe) and sniped a top corner.

To put it short, if we can’t get our system going (dump and chase, 2-3 man fore-check), let them try to carry it in with creative passing. Most of our offense came as a result of carrying the puck in on transition.

by Kritikal on Oct 25, 2011 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

but for some reason he was benched for most of the second half of that game.

See below. I don’t think he was actively benched.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Oct 25, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

grand theft hockey game

yes, it’s been ugly so far, but I HAVE to give the Rangers the benefit of the doubt. To start the season on this ruthless road trip not once playing in front of a home crowd (not counting the moseleum) is extremely difficult.

Yeah, I know they are professional atheltes and are paid millions to deal with the circumstances, but they’re also human—it just takes a tole on them. I’m going to reserve my strongest judgements for after their first homestand this week—if they continue to play unispired, sloppy hockey, THEN I’ll be groping for that panic switch.

by Town on Oct 25, 2011 8:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Let’s start with the positives. They won, goaltending was great, defense looked good for the most part and our grinders showed how you play on the PP (you move, don’t just stand around like pylons).

To the negatives: The Rangers offense is awful and that’s because of their horrible transition game. Currently, they have no plan on how to get out of their own zone and start an offensive play. No matter what you think of Torts but that’s his job to fix.

GET RID OF EC!!!

by M.R.M. on Oct 25, 2011 8:04 AM EDT reply actions  

The primary issue with our PP...

….is that it’s Jagr Syndrome all over again. Typical 1PP unit. Richards gets the puck, passes it, back to Richards, passed to someone else, back to Richards, repeat ad nauseum until someone decides to shoot the fucking puck.

Yeah, Richards is elite talent, but be more creative out there. The passes to Richards were so telegraphed that it almost resulted in several odd-man rushes because of proper stick placement to deflect the pass.

by Kritikal on Oct 25, 2011 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not gonna lie...

but Fedotenko/Boyle/Prust looked like our best PP unit out there last night when they were out there for a shift or two. I think that was for the first goal (Girardi firing a perfect pass that he knows Feds (who is wide open in the slot) will deflect.

by Kritikal on Oct 25, 2011 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

It was Fed-Boyle-Callahan, not Prust.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Oct 25, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Having Boyle, or even AA infront of the net is huge. It helps so much.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Oct 25, 2011 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

You mean using the two guys with good hands that are at least 6’3" each is better than two skill guys and 5’9 Callahan?

Next you’ll tell me Girardi’s better suited to play the right point with Richards than Del Zotto. Blasphemy!

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Oct 25, 2011 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Absurd.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Oct 25, 2011 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d rather see Girardi on the second PP unit. He picks his shots well, whether it’s a shot to force a rebound or a hard pass that’s meant to be deflected, he has the hockey sense to know when to make the proper play. He doesn’t have a heavy shot, and his bread and butter (offense-wise) is a low wrist shot. MDZ’s slap-shot appears to be more accurate, and he didn’t hesitate to let it fly. Always nice to see MDZ get shots on net instead of the typical “high and wide” we’re using to hearing and seeing.

by Kritikal on Oct 25, 2011 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

From what I’ve seen MDZ misses that net more than anyone..

Plus, I trust Girardi more on the point and in our zone..

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Oct 25, 2011 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

That unit along with Girardi and MDZ scored both goals on the PP. Here’s a thought why not make that our 2nd unit or even our first?

by EricBrat20 on Oct 25, 2011 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Defense to save offense?

I know the games have not been that great to watch but I think getting Suaer and Staal back will free up offense to play more aggressive. At least I hope thats what is happening!

by atrem on Oct 25, 2011 8:17 AM EDT reply actions  

yea it was a rough game

But let’s be honest, they look gassed out there. They’ve played like dog shit to start this season. But yet somehow they stole 8/14 pts and got 7 road games out of the way. You don’t have to be happy with the way the played but its encouraging to see that even when half the team is asleep and the other half is hurt concussed or indifferent, we can still manage a few wins. The hockey needs to get better, but I think they’re in better shape than some of us wanna admit.

by nhl21 on Oct 25, 2011 8:23 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I can't believe we have 8 pts

This team has not played a decent period other than the 1st period of the Calgary game & the 3rd period of the Canucks game. We can have shots in the teens & expect to win…something’s gotta give. There’s nowhere to go but up me thinks.

by BriGuy27 on Oct 25, 2011 8:41 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

I think we should take the optimistic view with the Rangers. They played pretty bad and were outworked in most games and STILL got 8/14 pts. Can you imagine if they can do a few of the following:

1. stay out of the box
2. convert on the PP
3. have sustained offensive zone pressure and forecheck
4. get some shots
5. PAC line starts to produce

I agree, they should only get better. Of course luck always plays the X-factor, but more offensive zone time, more shots, and less PK time and so on usually leads to productivity and wins.

We all know they need to be better and hopefully they will be. Its still nice to play poorly have have some luck and decent outcomes. They dont return to MSG in a terrible hole they need to dig out from.

Cant wait for Thursday. These West Coast games and the time difference are killing me.

by truebluesince75 on Oct 25, 2011 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'll be at the game Thurs, I'm excited

However, the Rangers did do #1 & #2 on the list and they were still outmatched the entire game. I think #3 will lead to #4 and #1 will lead to #5, except when the Torts line juggling algorithm comes up with something other than our current top/1b line of Dubi-AA-Cally.

by BriGuy27 on Oct 25, 2011 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

true but for one game

all other games they failed on #s 1 and 2. let’s face it, they were lucky last night. Cally’s goal was a good break and Biron kept them in it. otherwise they were outplayed for good portions of the game.

by truebluesince75 on Oct 25, 2011 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thursday's game should be rockin

I am very jealous. I have home game #2. But I will be watching the “Blue Carpet” pre-game special, whatever that means. Hopefully its not players walking down the carpet in their nice suits.

by truebluesince75 on Oct 25, 2011 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am always happy with a win but there was one section of the third period…I think I threw up a bit in my mouth…it was that disgusting. But the defense played very strong, Biron was sharp, and they learned a great lesson on the importance of a good powerplay, e.g. it can save you, even during the worst of games.

Sometimes, I have to believe that the Rangers alter their game depending on who they play, almost like a baseball player slowing down his swing for a curveball. The Rangers play very hard and look very competitive against teams that most of us would deem in the top third of the league, but look like trash against trash. Its like they think they just have to do the bare minimum to get by. I am sure they will look good against Toronto, as they are doing very well this season.

by purinton on Oct 25, 2011 9:17 AM EDT reply actions  

weve looked pretty poor a lot this year, and we werent playing bad teams

by rmg10 on Oct 25, 2011 9:25 AM EDT reply actions  

He played 4 shifts in the 3rd period, @ 3:09, 9:28, 12:36, 16:26.

Just based on the play by play, it doesn’t look like he was actually benched:

Prust got caught on the ice for 2:12 before Gaborik’s 1st shift,it looks like the others changed but Prust didn’t get off.
They were pinned in their own end for a large chunk of time between 3-9, especially after the 6min mark (that was that ridiculous shift where BR-Boyle-Prust were trapped for an eternity.

He got regular shifts after that. I think he was just unlucky, not actually benched.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Oct 25, 2011 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

So...

….it appears as if Torts refused to place Gaborik out for a defensive zone face-off, which is far from a horrible idea. We were getting pretty much dominated in terms of puck possession, and Gaborik isn’t exactly a defensive dynamo (albeit he was developed under Jacques Lemaire, so he will back-check hard).

Just bad luck that we couldn’t sustain offensive pressure—he would have gotten more shifts otherwise.

by Kritikal on Oct 25, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well it didn’t help that both Prust and BR were hurting during that shift and they were even strength so they couldn’t just dump the puck out and not get called for icing like when you’re shorthanded.

by EricBrat20 on Oct 25, 2011 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

what positive pp

are your kidding saying anything good about the pp the first period i dont think we had any shots on net for 1 1/2 pp 3 shots all period and cali was lucky.and how encouraging could you be that the team half asleep still won how much do you thing our goalies cant do there not superman your gonna waer them out real fast or injury them you thing they gonna pull games out with the top teams in the east were gonna be chum in shark infested waters. like i said i truly hope im wrong

by nytrueblue on Oct 25, 2011 10:09 AM EDT reply actions  

I would argue the Canucks are as good as any team they would face in the East. Sure they got dominated for 2 periods in that game but they took it right back to them in the 3rd.

by EricBrat20 on Oct 25, 2011 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dump and Chase not the answer

The Rangers have looked bad in each of their first seven games. The dump and chase system isn’t working. It does not allow us to control the puck in the offensive zone and it doesn’t lead to scoring chances. More often than not, the other team is able to clear the puck quickly and begin the transition to our offensive zone. Torts wants everyone to play like Brandon Prust. Prust is a great grinder who contributes a lot to the team, but you don’t want a whole roster of Brandon Prust clones. Torts won in Tampa Bay, but he had a very skilled team and played a different system than Torts is using now. Why can’t the Rangers carry the puck into the offensive zone an execute set plays through passing? Do they lack the skill to do so or is the coaching at fault?

by snark38 on Oct 25, 2011 10:52 AM EDT reply actions  

to be honest

im tired of torts on so many levels. his system is stale and its not working in the current nhl. it was ok last year when we played like underdogs and grited out wins, but this is a team with some skill now and they need Chemistry! let the pack line play their grind game, its what their good @. but in general, the teams needs to be comfortable with eachother and the line changing is killing that. im just tired of seeing random line combos. save it for the stagnant power play. even strength, please let the lines stifck together. its pitiful.

by nhl21 on Oct 25, 2011 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

until Krieder, Bourque, and Hagelin get here

you need speed on the wings in order to play this system effectively. Look who we have on the wings today (Stepan, Cally, Fedotenko, Prust, Rupp). There is no speedster among this group. When the Rangers have faced a speed team like the Islanders, our lines were constantly a step behind.

by MRichter35 on Oct 25, 2011 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

and the Edmonton game

by MRichter35 on Oct 25, 2011 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

We “play” RWL.

by teknics on Oct 25, 2011 12:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yes, we do.

      X

   X
  X

X X

by Kritikal on Oct 25, 2011 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

X_____X
   X__X
       X

flying V?

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Oct 25, 2011 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

X_____X
   X__X
       X

flying V?

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Oct 25, 2011 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I prefer the Tampa model

  X

XXX
 
  X

"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx

In Prust We Trust

"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.

A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep

Follow me @8kpower

by Kevin Power on Oct 25, 2011 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s their power play model, not their neutral zone strategy :P

by Kritikal on Oct 25, 2011 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

actually they use the 1-3-1 5 on 5 as well through the neutral zone

"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx

In Prust We Trust

"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.

A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep

Follow me @8kpower

by Kevin Power on Oct 25, 2011 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I liked that strategy when I watched some of their games, with the couple of speed guys and shutdown D we have it could work here

by teknics on Oct 25, 2011 10:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

New York Rangers News, Analysis, Line Combinations, Schedule And Stats

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Rangers Viewing Party Questions
Small
In case you haven't seen this yet...
Dictator_small
Win Tickets to Gm. 4
Small
Some principles on defensive hockey tactics (nothing for experts but for the "casual fan")
Small
Let's have some fun. I have a time machine!
Small
Offense From The Defense
Small
Sauer Update
Henry_small
Invading games 3 or 4 at the Prudential Center
Sauer_small
The Match Up
Small
Tickets......

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

51 - 24 - 7

Lost 1


Managing Editor

Joe_2_small Joe Fortunato

Editors

Blueshirt-underground-logo1_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Drurybloodsmall_small Rob L

Meandrichards_small Nick Montemagno

Small George E. Ays

Untitled_small Dig Deep

Kreider_small Kevin Power

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Me_small Bryan Winters

Contributors

Twitter_pic_small Laurie Carr