New York Rangers Analysis: Mats Zuccarello Looks Ready For Big Year
Coming into this year's training camp as one of the bigger question marks in terms of an opening night roster spot, Mats Zuccarello knew he needed to impress if he wanted a shot at a starting role.
He can probably check that box off his to do list.
Zuccarello has probably been the Rangers best player during this European stint, and is proving he might be poised for a fantastic year this season. Critics might point towards the bigger ice surface as the reason behind his success, but I don't buy it.
His goal Sunday was from the outer slot, putting home a brilliant Brad Richards feed from the point into the back of the net. Both his assists in the win over Frolunda came from in close, highlighted by his behind the net dish to a streaking Michael Del Zotto who put his shot off the post and into the back of the net for a beautiful goal.
Join me after the jump for more analysis on Zuccarello.
Zuccarello probably isn't a candidate to play on the first line. While he might get a few looks here and there, for now that spot is firmly held by Wojtek Wolski.
But Zuccarello will probably be juggled between the second and third lines. He should also see some pretty significant power play time, if this European stint is any indication. And why not?
Zuccarello made a living in the SEL with his vision and quick shot. And despite having to make the transition from the bigger ice surface to the smaller ice surface, he still put up six goals and 17 assists in 42 games. That's better than a .5 points per game average.
Coming into training camp, Zuccarello was more acclimated to the smaller ice surfaces. He's always been quick and shifty, but now he's learned how to use those skills to his advantage without the extra space along the flanks of the rink. Thus far, his hard work has paid off, with John Tortorella admitting that Erik Christensen and Sean Avery were fighting for the 13th forward spot; which would put Zuccarello in the starting lineup October 7th.
If nothing else, he's giving Rangers' fans just another reason to be excited for the start of the season.
Thoughts on him guys?
50 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Agree 100%
I’m not even considering the games here in Europe. The game he played versus Devils or Flyers (maybe both) he showed more grit and results in the corners. How can you not like him on half boards for power play. He will get over powered at times because he can’t mitigate fully his lack of size.
Bottom line.. i think the Rangers will be smart about using him and not over extending him. I’m thinking 70 games played for him and 40 points.
by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Oct 3, 2011 7:12 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
MZA for the Calder.
We are going to go to Philadelphia... and we are going to win.- Glen Sather
by RichieToGabbySCORE on Oct 3, 2011 7:51 AM EDT reply actions
He can't
his rookie season was last year
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers the only NHL team with three home arenas.
"We can trade Lisin for a gun, then hold it to Drury’s head and make him waive the no-movement clause" - XLII
"Tortorelli sounds like a kind of pasta… an unforgiving, stubborn, chewy, flavorless pasta that demands ‘jam’ from other pastas." - Dig Deep
by Joe Fortunato on Oct 3, 2011 7:55 AM EDT up reply actions
What qualifies as a full season? 40 games doesn’t sound full.
We are going to go to Philadelphia... and we are going to win.- Glen Sather
by RichieToGabbySCORE on Oct 3, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
For Calder purposes, 25 games in one year, or two seasons of 6+ (really bizarre rule that is, it hurt Pietrangelo last season)
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 3, 2011 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
I think that Zuccarello was seen as a novelty last year; the whole “Frodo from Modo” thing where we loved him because he was so small. Now we’re starting to see how talented he can be and that he can have a big impact on the offense
"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx
In Prust We Trust
"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.
A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep
Follow me @8kpower
by Kevin Power on Oct 3, 2011 8:00 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions
there were a few types:
those who bought into the “novelty” the media created and thought he was a sideshow
those who realized he was the MVP of the SEL and we paid him a pretty penny to get him here and thought he was going to score 60 points as a rookie but think he’s a bust becuase he didn’t.
those who regonized the skills but knew he was going to have to adjust to the north american style
Can’t someone be all three?
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Oct 3, 2011 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not ready to anoint him...
He’s played well in 4 games, 2 of which were on the larger surface as you pointed out, 2 were against NHL clubs with AHL talent mixed in and were essentially meaningless games.
There’s no doubt he’s earned the starting role, but I don’t know that we can expect a “big year”. My hope is that he has increased his strength, his speed, his “shifty-ness” and become more accustomed to the smaller ice but my fear is that he will once again get pushed around when playing top-level NHL talent. I’ll keep my fingers crossed though.
I don't think 40 points is out the question.
He is going to get physically man-handled in the NHL. We saw it last season and thats not going to change. But i know you guys remember someone by the name of Theo Fluery. Sure, MZA doesnt have the grit but he sure has the talent.
Keep him on the third line
if WW works out on the first. I’m really not crazy about Rupp on the third line, but I also don’t want to break up Feds—Boyle—Prust as our fourth. I’d take Avery over Rupp on the third line with Steps and MZA.
Best Rangers day: May 27, 1994
Worst Rangers day: April 10, 1984
by Stepan the Ice! on Oct 3, 2011 10:13 AM EDT reply actions
It’d be foolish not to notice MZA’s play, and I certainly wish him (and the Rangers) well this year, but tyhe fact remains——he’s SMALL. Perhaps he’ll be able to overcome his lack of size using his quickness, agility and skill, but the fact remains—-he’s SMALL. The palyers in the NHL get bigger and bigger every year, but he’s finished growing. That doesn’t bode well for him.
On the other hand, look at how far Marty St.Louis got on his talent, irrespective of his size. Although there are few players as small as MZA, he can be, and I hope he will be as successful as Marty St. Louis.
I’ll settle for Gionta level play (50-60 points), let alone St. Louis (80-100).
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 3, 2011 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Don't think he will ever pan out
As a Ranger fan, my first hope is that MZA will be the next Martin StLouis. I just don’t see the consistency in his game, however, to lead me to believe this kid will ever mature into a steady player in this league. He shows flashes of brilliance at times and other times he just fades into the background.
I am a true believer in size being a prerequisite for a successful player today and lack of size means that a player must have an abundance of skill or talent in another area that makes up for it. Size is the reason why a guy like Brian Boyle was allowed to hang around in the NHL for so long (He has matured and improved his skating over time) Most teams tend to show more patience with big physical players than they do with smaller players so the window of time for MZA in my opinion is very short. In addition, my own personal experience with my 16 year old son has been just that. He is a Dman who has played internationally at the highest levels of competition in the world. He is primarily a defensive dman and is usually paired with an offensive dman. He is a decent skater at the elite (AAAA) level but not anything spectacular. Plans on going to Med School and not pursuing hockey yet I am constantly getting calls from colleges and schools interested in him. Why?? he is 6’5" 235 lbs already (still growing with a size 16 foot)
St Louis barely made the NHL at 23 and didn’t become even a 70 point guy until he turned 27.
Plus, that’s like the platinum standard for small guys. He doesn’t need to be a 90 point guy to carve out a successful career.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 3, 2011 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions
Just with the way the current team looks
To be constructed and the future pipeline of talent it looks like his future with the team, remembering that he’s an RFA after this year, would be more of a top 9 than top 6 role. That being said getting 40-50 points from anything below your top 4 or 5 forwards would demonstrate strong scoring depth.
by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Oct 3, 2011 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Top 9 + PP would seem to be his niche. I’m not saying he’s a lock to stay, shear numbers means a few people, while popular, probably won’t last as seasons go on, but I don’t think we’ve seen the peak potential just yet.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 3, 2011 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
I could see him being on the team for the rest of his RFA years. Afterwards I’d assume guys like Kreider/Thomas/Miller would not only have been worked into the lineup but have their roles elevated as well.
by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Oct 3, 2011 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
My gut feeling
If and when Kreider/Thomas/Miller are available:
Unforunately, I think Dubinsky ends up a casualty for Kreider.
Thomas I would expect to ‘replace’ Gaborik eventually.
Miller may cost us Anisimov, unless Artie really takes that Datsyukian leap as a premier two way guy, in which case it’s Boyle, again unless he makes a big leap.
Again, that’s assuming progression goes the way it could, etc.. It’s hard to forecast that far out. The only guys I feel safe saying will be here even after 3 years (among the forwards at least) are Richards, Callahan, and Stepan. After that, anything goes.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 3, 2011 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
whoa
You’re damn right it’s too far out to predict! We can’t assume that three prospects who have yet to play a single minute in the NHL will replace 2/3 of our best two-way line.
the pack liners aren’t THAT much older than kreider/hagelin, etc.
The performance of the prospects is one thing
And certainly a crapshoot, but the cap concerns with the core is pretty easy to project. After 2 years Anisimov is going into his last RFA year where there will be the decision to lock him up even further or let him play out his last team controlled contract.
3 years Cally and Lundqvist are due for a new deal, Dubinsky and Staal in 4. You’re not going to be able to (or maybe even want to) keep everyone.
by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Oct 3, 2011 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Assume, no. I don’t assume that will happen. It’s more of a “if everything goes according to plan, this would be the result.”
Kreider’s supposed to be our LW1 of the future. If that happens, Dubinsky’s the probably casualty.
Thomas is supposed to be our RW1, or at least our primary goal scorer. Thus, Gaborik
Miller is supposed to be a solid 2-way center. Thus, Anisimov or Boyle.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Oct 3, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I wonder how many “experts” who said St. Louis was to small for NHL after his first 30-40 games in the NHL were he hardly made any points. Zuccarello will play great for Rangers when he feels comfortable and established. He is still too nervous but he will get there. I think we can expect 0.7-0.8 points pr. game when he is a regular roster-member. With 82 games I think he can make 60-65 points, mostly assist. He needs to improve his shooting.
But I dont like that he is line with Rupp right now
by BaccardiCoke on Oct 3, 2011 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions
mza didn't play his game last year
Torts had him grinding like everyone else, but look at him; he’s probably the smallest guy in the NHL—he is ALL SKILL. Sure he has grit, but he’s not a grinder—get him on the ice with your better scoreres and he will thrive.
TO EVERYONE DECLARING HIM A BUST:
give him some time to develop—skills aren’t an issue -we know that. Toughness isn’t an issue-we know that—LET HIM DEVELOP HIS NORTH AMERICAN GAME, and let Torts figure out how to use him. As George said, it took a few years for St. Louis to find his game. It will take MZA a few years as well—he has the tools, but he’s a bit behind the 8 balls.
At the risk of making a short joke, He will be hard to notice if every team is fully intent on shutting down the Gaborik line. He may get his time against the 3rd D pairs, and 3rd, 4th lines. I think he will be fine.
R.I.P Derek
Rangers FTW!
by BleedsRangerBlue on Oct 3, 2011 11:25 AM EDT reply actions
Just how small is he? I’ve seen 5’7", 5’9"…which is it? Or is it none of the above? (And is Cally really 5’11", or it that overstated as well?)
MZA is a lot of fun to watch! His mad-skillz are mind-boggling at times. Perhaps I’m not seeing things correctly—and if I’m not, please feel free to let me know—but for someone as petite as he is, he didn’t seem to be pushed off the puck as often as Nigel Dawes was.
probably like 5’ 7". St louis i think is listed at 5 10 or 5 9 and hes more like 5 7.
by Zuppa Di Pesce on Oct 3, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Heightening?
PRUSTOSTERONE!!!
I am gonna F-n kill Giroux!
by nathansfamous on Oct 3, 2011 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions
![]()
PRUSTOSTERONE!!!
I am gonna F-n kill Giroux!
by nathansfamous on Oct 3, 2011 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks for the photo! Can’t tell exactly what’s going on there (are they pumping up the little person’s feet?), but it looks more comfortable, and more humane, than the rack.
Seinfeld episode, putting inserts in his shoes.
PRUSTOSTERONE!!!
I am gonna F-n kill Giroux!
by nathansfamous on Oct 4, 2011 5:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Can we at least agree on the following
by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Oct 3, 2011 12:27 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
We don’t have enough of an observation period yet to definitively go thumbs up or down. But odds tilt to him being an NHL regular versus not based on what we have seen to date.
by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Oct 3, 2011 12:31 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
SOunds good to me.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
The great thing about Richards is he opens up space for others and other benefit from his vision and passing as we saw yesterday on the MZA goal.
MZA has obviously worked hard this summer, he will benefit from last year’s experience and from a better PP unit. I think he shows marked improvement this year and will be an asset.
"To everybody else we're underdogs, but we go in thinking we can handle any team in the NHL."
Brandon Prust, #8, New York Rangers
I am very excited for Zucs this year, but we need to temper the expectations.
Remember, these have been games on a larger ice service against players who might be able to compete in the AHL.
I’m excited for this year as well, and I think he has a chance to have a very good season, but we need to take it easy on him, or else he’ll just fail to meet expectations.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
What are you talking about...
We all know that if he doesn’t put up at least 2 pts/game he is a complete bust and should be shipped back to europe for a bag of pucks…..
It is comical
how many people think his size is even still a factor. yes he will get overpowered, we saw that last year. but ignore anything you know about his size and just look at his stats line. he scored over half a point per game, as a first year NHL’er, his first time playing in north america, and he played in a checking/3rd line role with limited minutes.thats fricking awesome no matter what size you are. if thats what he does again this year for 82 games while getting “overpowered” i will be THRILLED. this kids got the goods. enough said. welcome to The Show Mats.
his size is a factor, but like someone pointed out with St. Louis and Gioanta there’s ways to compensate for it. if Zucc is given the right linemates and not afraid that if he doesn’t check Torts will kill him then i see him easily getting 40+points. he has a ceiling we haven’t seen yet, if you ask me.
13th man
Am I the only EC supporter left? He’ll be another ex-ranger that comes back to haunt us if he’s dealt or cut.
I think you may be.
He has skill though for sure, if only he could be motivated.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
really!!
ok I can handle the EC bandwagon by myself.. A ranger that can actually put a shot ON goal during the power play instead of up/over/around and out of the zone is not a commodity I’m ready to give up on yet.. He’s primed for a breakout… (I’m an optimist)
I'd like to believe in EC...
…I really would. I haven’t been a hockey player, but I do know what it’s like to be portrayed as having great potential but having trouble reaching that potential.
That being said, it doesn’t seem like things are working out for Crusher here. Whether it’s the NYC pressure, working with Torts, or what-not, what may be best for him might be a fresh start somewhere new. Maybe he could flourish down in Phoenix or with Florida. I honestly don’t know. But I do wish him all the best, wherever he does land. He seems like a nice guy.
Wiser heads prevailed...
Well now that the Avery distraction is behind us EC will have his shot at redemption. Let’s see if he’s up to the challenge..

by 




























