FanPost

Creating A New Metric: Points Versus Threshold

I preface this by stating that the hard work was many years prior to penning this post by the guys at Behind The Net and Hockey Prospectus.  I also directly leverage some additional work performed by Glen Miller of SNY Rangers Blog.  All credit goes to them.  The stat I created was simply an easier way for me to judge a player’s worth in terms of goals, points, and wins.  

This is a stat I created about a month ago, and posted it on my blog.

Since I started reading River Ave Blues many years ago, I started to “distance” myself from counting stats (goals, assists, etc) and tried to learn metrics to better quantify a player’s real worth to a team.  However, as readily available as metrics were to baseball fans, it was equally unavailable to hockey fans.  The guys at Behind The Net have done a great job at keeping track of a lot of advanced stats like GVT (Goals Versus Threshold), which was created by the guys at Hockey Prospectus, but it has been tough to really combine everything into one stat, like WAR in baseball, to really give you an idea about how useful a player it.

Then along comes Glen Miller of SNY Rangers Blog, who took GVT to a whole new level, and made it into a quantifiable statistic that we can use to see how many wins a player really brings to a team.  First, Miller does a great job at truly defining GVT (here), and gives readers a way to really compare it to the Rangers:

…GVT…represents a player’s value above a “replacement” or “threshold” player in a term (runs for baseball or goals for hockey) fans are familiar with. A “threshold” or “replacement level” player would be defined as the top AHL/minor league player in the organization or the highest ranking free agent on the market in-season (not a prospect) and carries a GVT or RAR value of zero. Basically the guy a club would go get in the event one of their regular players went down to injury or something to that effect. For Rangers fans think Chad Kolarik, Andre Deveaux or Kris Newbury.

In essence, you really find out a player’s worth to a team when he is replaced by someone like Newbury or Kolarik (like we saw last year).  Miller then takes the GVT of each Ranger from last year (courtesy of the guys at BTN), and with the assistance of Tom Awad (hockey metrics guru), created what he is calling Wins Above Threshold, or WAT.

Essentially WAT is just GVT/6, where 6 is the number of goals equivalent to a win in the standings.  You can check out the full Rangers list of WAT by checking out Miller’s article, but suffice it to say, the results really shouldn’t surprise you.

Taking Miller’s work –with Awad’s help– a step (very simple step) further.  Calculating wins in the standings is great, but sometimes I get the feeling that points could be better.  Following up on Awad’s comment to Miller that 6 goals = 1 win, and 3 goals = 1 point, I am just going to use that information to create Points Versus Threshold, or PVT.  PVT gives you the number of points in the standings that a player is worth when compared to a replacement player.

Just a note, you can also use these numbers and compare them to any other player on last year’s roster to see the difference.  For example, subtracting Erik Christensen’s PVT (or WAT) from Brad Richards PVT (or WAT), and you get the difference in points or wins that the addition of Richards should bring.

I’m going to follow that up by saying this really isn’t my work, it’s combining what Miller and Awad did already into something that I personally find to be a little easier to track.  Hockey is based on points, not wins (see: shootout loss), so points may be a little bit easier to judge.  After the jump, you check out the calculations for this year’s Rangers roster based on last year’s GVT numbers.

Player GVT WAT PVT
Henrik Lundqvist

29.60

4.93

9.87

Brad Richards

17.50

2.92

5.83

Marian Gaborik

10.20

1.70

3.40

Dan Girardi

9.90

1.65

3.30

Brandon Dubinsky

9.60

1.60

3.20

Marc Staal

8.70

1.45

2.90

Brian Boyle

8.00

1.33

2.67

Ryan Callahan

7.80

1.30

2.60

Artem Anisimov

7.50

1.25

2.50

Mike Sauer

7.10

1.18

2.37

Derek Stepan

7.00

1.17

2.33

Brandon Prust

6.30

1.05

2.10

Martin Biron

6.30

1.05

2.10

Mats Zuccarello

5.50

0.92

1.83

Erik Christensen

5.40

0.90

1.80

Ryan McDonagh

4.60

0.77

1.53

Ruslan Fedotenko

4.60

0.77

1.53

Wojtek Wolski

3.50

0.58

1.17

Sean Avery

2.50

0.42

0.83

Mike Rupp

1.40

0.23

0.47

Michael Del Zotto

0.7

0.12

0.23

Steve Eminger

0.50

0.08

0.17

The table is sorted in order, from greatest PVT to least.  To use the example I used above, if you were to take Christensen’s PVT (1.80) and subtract it from Richards’ PVT (5.83), and the addition of Richards should bring about 4 extra points to the Rangers.  It may not seem like much, but that’s two full spots in the playoff picture.

I want to end this post by again thanking Glen Miller, Tom Awad, and the guys at both BTN and Hockey Prospectus.  This metric I made here is a product of their hard work and dedication to creating metrics for hockey.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Blueshirt Banter

You must be a member of Blueshirt Banter to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Blueshirt Banter. You should read them.

Join Blueshirt Banter

You must be a member of Blueshirt Banter to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Blueshirt Banter. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9355_tracker