Time For A REAL Third Line
I might be in the minority here (I certainly hope not) but I think Boyle, Feds, and Prust are really underacheiving this season. Prust doesn't look like Prust and Boyle is definitely not Boyle, and Feds is playing a bit sub par for his standards.
I think it's time we demote them for the fourth line. Boyle and Prust should play more PK to keep Callahan and Dubinsky fresher, and they could log those extra minutes by playing less even strength time on the fourth line.
I really like our top 6. The GAS line and Richards line may be split up eventually, but the players that are in the top 6 now should remain where they are.
These are the moves I suggest should happen:
Send Andre Devaux down and call up Mats Zuccarello/ Carl Hagelin. Really anyone of them would do.
Send down Erik Christensen (I really have a strong dislike for the guy) and call up Johnathan Audy-Marchessault to play center.
Or we forget about Marchessault completely and make Sean Avery center the third line. That idea makes me cringe a little bit but I could live with it.
38 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I would be okay with a Avery-Christensen-MZA line, and when Wolski comes back he can be slotted in as well.
Hopefully in a year or two, the three lines you mentioned are kept in tact (maybe Deveaux or Hagelin replacing Feds), and we can put together a third line of Kreider-Bourque-Thomas, or something to that extent.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
Great post.
I’ve been thinking the very same thing about our third line.
Prust isn’t playing nearly as smart or as aggressive as last year. He’s making the case for an Avery promotion very strong.
Boyle is doing the better job of the three but he doesn’t have the wings to set him up so forget about him scoring any goals this year.
Feds is playing average at best.
I didn’t vote because aside from clips, I know absolutely nothing about Johnathan Audy-Marchessault.
I also don’t think MZA is our solution AT ALL. No diss on him, but we simply aren’t playing strong enough to add another floater to the lineup.
Look, Hagelin isn’t the answer yet either. We can bring him up, but mark my words we’ll be having this same conversation if we do.
Therefore, I’d go Avery, Christensen, Boyle.
Something like that…
For voice: If we’re not strong enough to have a floater, what’s the difference between MZA and EC, honestly?
Feds-Boyle-Prust should be left as the 4th line, let them PK and grab 8 minutes of tough ES defensive assignments a night. It’ll destroy whatever offense they had left, but if you’re building a proper 3rd line, you can build the offense there to make up for it.
While I enjoy what the GAS line has done, if you truly want a strong 3rd line on this team, either A or S needs to come down and solidify it. I’m also assuming we’re just going to continue deploying Richards w/ Dubi-Cally, despite it killing whatever possession chances we have against tough competition. with that assembled.
I’d suggest:
Zuccarello-Anisimov-Gaborik
Dubinsky-Richards-Callahan
Avery-Stepan-??
Fedotenko-Boyle-Prust
Addressing the other two lines:
3rd line – None of EC, Deveaux, Rupp, fit that 3rd line, so I’d go with Hagelin, at least until Wolski is back. Avery and Hagelin on the same line would give you a ton of speed, and also why I’d put Stepan there (he’s faster than Artie).
1st line – Gaborik’s going to draw tough opponents so you keep your best defensive center with him. Zuke’s passing and vision is certainly good enough to replace what gets lost by taking Stepan off the line.
I’m not sure any of it solves our possession/shot woes, but it’d be better than the bottom 6 hodgepodge that exists now.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
This
I think we are on the same page. MZA is the best option as our Gaborik line left wing. In my mind anyone who plays that role is there until Kreider arrives.
Not to mention a line of Avery-Stepan-Hagelin would be ridiculously fast and could generate quite a bit of offense.
We are going to go to Philadelphia... and we are going to win.- Glen Sather
by RichieToGabbySCORE on Nov 21, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions
I always felt MZA would be a great setup man for Gabby. Just need a C who can handle digging in the corners. I thought Dubi would be good for that but AA is fairly capable there too
by teknics on Nov 21, 2011 7:07 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I agree. I know you mentioned it in an earlier post I made about it not being tried this season. It was tried, and given far little time to succeed vs. stacking our top 2 lines, and having the Boyle line with 3 random skaters left over.
There’s been talk in the media about MZA coming up to help with the power-play. If he does come up, then at some point Torts will have to find a way to put together 3 scoring lines, and as you said, keep the Boyle line for tough defensive jobs/PK work. This will keep them fresher so they’re not worn-down like they were last season.
It’ll be interesting to see if Avery sticks. I could actually foresee Mitchell being called-up to fill in somewhere. He seems to be producing points and IIRC wasn’t bad defensively, and at his age might be the better choice so the younger kids like Hagelin get beaucoup playing time with the Whale.
Care to elaborate?
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 21, 2011 8:48 PM EST up reply actions
The problem is still to get MZA playing time
So even if they could suit the same role, giving MZA EC’s soft 9 minutes a night won’t help him as much as playing him top 6 in the AHL.
Take it to the net and keep jamming and jamming until somebody comes on you.
- Eddie Olczyk
by Scratch and Snif on Nov 21, 2011 11:44 PM EST up reply actions
Not playing him 9 minutes a night,
will not help the NYR when Zucca plays for another team next season.
At this point MZA gets nothing out of playing in the AHL. He played 42 NHL matches last season. He’s not a kid.
It’s a question of skill and playing-style, not age. We also have no idea if he gets nothing out of playing in the AHL, but the coaching staff does. They’re well aware of the possibility of him leaving for another team and one has to assume that they’ve weighed the pros and cons of leaving in Hartford, so his being still there is not based on some whimsy, It’s clear that they aren’t necessarily right, but there’s at least some weight to their judgement.
Take it to the net and keep jamming and jamming until somebody comes on you.
- Eddie Olczyk
by Scratch and Snif on Nov 22, 2011 8:44 PM EST up reply actions
work deadline!
but of course, the 15 minute break on banter.
Well, I’m not crazy about Christian but I think he’s more versatile. He can swing from the first to the fourth line and hasn’t hurt the team even if he hasn’t helped. That said, he has a tendency to score key goals out of the blue. He also knows our system even if he doesn’t contribute a physical presence his size demands.
MZA, is still erratic. We can’t rely on him for defense. He creates opportunities but he also gets knocked around. He’s convinced me he’ll be on our club, but I just don’t think he’s ready yet.
I do like your suggests, or at least I agree with your suggestions, about the G.A.S line.
Makes sense. Thanks.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 22, 2011 8:41 AM EST up reply actions
Only feasible reason for that nonsense would be if you wanted to say move Fedotenko up a line for defensive purposes and leave EC with Boyle/Prust to add some touch to that line, or just as a spare part?
Still is a bad idea no matter how you cut it.
We are going to go to Philadelphia... and we are going to win.- Glen Sather
by RichieToGabbySCORE on Nov 21, 2011 10:09 PM EST up reply actions
Right now we don’t have 3rd/4th lines… we have just a bottom 6-8… and i say that because we never know when they are going to play and how much…
I truly believe in having specific duties delegated to all the lines… honestly the number of the line doesn’t matter you could technically put gaborik on the 4th line and say that it’s our scoring line and play them 25 minutes a game…
that being said we need:
-a scoring line
the line that takes on the tough defensive competition most of the time and it’s primary job is to score
-a secondary scoring line
the line that is a hybrid of scoring and defense, not quite pure offense but not quite purely defense, a happy medium of both
-a defensive line
the main purpose of this line is the take the tough defensive zone face-offs and shut down the opposing teams best line, also killing penalties
-an energy line
fast, gritty, in your face, checking line, they are going hit everything that moves, fight if need be and just fore-check like mother fuckers…
Taking only the players that are on the roster now…
Stepan/Richards/Gaborik
- than line gives you the pure offense and also stepan brings some defensive responsibility
Dubi/AA/Cally
- this line brings the defense and the offense, can shut down the opposition and can make things happen offensively… they are the most well rounded group…
Fedetenko/Boyle/Prust
-all three of those players have a higher defensive ability than offensive ability, Fedetenko is no longer the offensive weapon he once was… Boyle’s a good face off guy and prust gives them the speed to force the issue on the fore-check…
Lastly we don’t have the guys to put this 4th line together… we don’t have a true energy line…
Avery is the only remaining player on our roster that fits the energy line ability…
Avery, Hagelin, Bourque are all players that would fit that energy line void… however they aren’t on the team except for avery…
What determines the lines is how you use them… you could say that your pk line is your 4th line and energy is 3rd… what determines what number line they are is their minutes… if you get the most minutes on a normal night (not 20 minutes of PK) the top minute line is the 1st line ect ect…
right now we are waiting on the guys to be ready to fill the roles…
I still don’t think zucc is ever going to play for any extended period of time as a NYR…
@clalicata17
Finally someone who understands “line #” is irrelevant. It’s all about balanced lines which each achieve specific “goals”.
I absolutely hate line #s, because it always leads to “Richards is too god for the 3rd line” etc etc.
Other than that tho I’m not really in agreement with your line setup, on the phone or I’d go into more depth lol
by teknics on Nov 21, 2011 7:12 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
such a system is easy for opposing coaches to defend against. the success of a shift comes down to tremendous line-shift jockeying which is always a home-ice advantage…why play your cards like that?
I think Torts has the right idea about playing who’s hot and matching up against the specific team we’re facing.
i didn’t suggest it as a system… a system is the setup of defense and flow of the offense… having specific lines allocated to specific duties will allow the pressure to be relieved off of specific lines like dubinsky and callahan who are getting overworked…
all i propose is allocating lines to specific duties… i do agree that you have to play the hot hand, but thats besides the point of having specific lines to do specific things…
this concept is in practice on almost every team… whether you call it a checking line/ energy line / whatever… for example the malholtra line in Vancouver is there primarily for defensive situations… i mean there are occasions where you want to get that line out against another teams defensive line to get them away from our top line, but that is just playing matchups…
@clalicata17
by Clalicata17 on Nov 21, 2011 11:23 PM EST up reply actions
Boyle
Had an outlier first half of a season last year and everyone thought his career turned around… He has like 4 goals in his last 40 plus games played (including the playoffs), which is pretty much consistent with his underachieving career numbers. We shouldve sold high.
you are right about his numbers but he’s still a great contribution to this team. his size and power help define what we are all about.
what he needs to do is learn how to pass so he can be an effective first or second liner.
d
i don’t think he will every be a top 6 forward… and for being 6’7" he doesn’t use his size effectively… he’s shown flashes of it but hasn’t done it with any regularity…
boyles a defensive forward with some offensive upside… but IMO i don’t think he’s a top 6 player…
@clalicata17
by Clalicata17 on Nov 21, 2011 11:49 PM EST up reply actions
Certainly would never be a top 6 player on any team in this league. Well, maybe the islanders.
We are going to go to Philadelphia... and we are going to win.- Glen Sather
by RichieToGabbySCORE on Nov 22, 2011 10:18 AM EST up reply actions
Starting MZA on the 4th line and expecting him to succeed was ridiculous and a waste of time. He needs to be top 6 and I always believed that the 1st line LW should be either MZA or Stepan. MZA if you wanted him on the big club. They need to emphasize his skills not restrict them. You also have to be careful about making this team too soft. Yes, even in “today’s NHL.” Look at the Sabres’ response (or lack thereof) on the Miller/Lucic thing. If I had my way you would see this: MZA-BR-Gaby, Pack Line, Avery-Stepan-Hagelin, Feds-Boyle-Prust/Devaux. You need to add speed as well and Hagelin can provide that. Time for Torts to stop the mancrush on EC and put him in street clothes. Prust is hurt and that is why he has not been as effective as last year. Sit him and play Devaux for now as he has provided good minutes.
Its funny...
under Renney there was always an easily distinguishable 4th line, which went out and provided forechecking, speed, grit, and ‘the odd tussle’ as Don Cherry would say.
under Torts it seems like the fourth line is only for players who are undergoing punishment.
As far as personnel, I agree that Boyle-Feds-Prust are not operating anywhere near the effectiveness of last year’s level. Why that is I’m not sure…I think Prust is fighting an injury though. He seems off.
Torts does not like Zuccarello; perhaps he thinks he’s just too small to trust out there.
Either way he keeps giving a roster spot to EC, and that isn’t likely to change unless we hit a bigtime skid. Then anything’s possible.
I’m more concerned with the power play.
i don’t get how people keep saying torts doesn’t “like” this guy or that guy. the point is he does like him. he brought this kid up very quickly from the European leagues and is giving him an honest shot to make the NHL.
Zucc got sent down for a reason and it has nothing to do with any inherent dislike of anyone. he needs more time to develop. honestly, have we ever seen Zucc succeed for extended periods of time in whatever capacity he’s been used in? don’t get me wrong, I LIKE Zucc. I never thought he’d make the team and now I can’t wait until he does. But this doesn’t mean that all of the prospects we “like” should be getting all their experience at the expense of the New York Rangers. If we brought up all the first round draft picks and exciting prospects and dumped them on the team as so many of you are advocating, we won’t make the playoffs for another five years.
Deveaux
If you send Deveaux down, you put Prust back in an enforcer role. You can say fighting is done, but it’s not. Without a guy like Deveaux, you’ve got Prust and Avery answering the bell against every heavyweight who comes looking. Both players can handle themselves (Prust better then Aves) but they’re not heavyweights. You get stuff like Knopka just leaving on Aves up in Ottawa.
The fourth line shouldn’t be making or breaking this team. The only reason it sometimes appears that way, is because Torts has nothing his gameplan other then shuffling the lines when we hit a bump in the road. We’ve gotta quit worrying so much about who’s gonna play 5 mins a night, and start figuring out why we can’t get things done when EVERYTHING doesn’t fall into place perfectly for us.
The quality teams in the league, the Detroits, the Vancouvers, the Chicagos, the Pittsburghs, the Bostons – they all have something in common.
They don’t have 5 min a night wastes at the bottom of their roster. All of them have guys trusted for 8-9 ES minutes. The closest any of them have to a black hole there is Shawn Thornton. They have the guys like Prust – Asham, Mayers, Weise that can contribute while bringing toughness/fighting, but there’s one of them, maybe 2.
To that end, it is the 4th line that is make or breaking this team, because what should be our 4th line (Fed-Boyle-Prust) is skating around as our 3rd, because there are players worse behind them.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 23, 2011 10:36 AM EST up reply actions
I agree…we’re missing a line. but nobody is ready. do you think sather is holding cards for a package deal?
No clue, but I have failed to see why we can’t field a 4 line team.
No, MZA hasn’t shown consistent NHL production, but he was a still a 0.5 point per game player last year as an undersized rookie. I don’t see how we’re built so well offensively that we can afford to have a 30-40 point guy (in limited minutes!) toiling away at the AHL level.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 23, 2011 5:46 PM EST up reply actions
And by the way…Deveaux being in the lineup obviously didn’t prevent Avery vs Konopka.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 23, 2011 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
Avery went looking for Knopka.
And that shouldn’t have been what happened. The nonsense took place in the press with Knopka, then Torts had to shoot back and escalate it. Aves addressed things with Knopka in warm up, but even when that was happening, our true enforcer should have stepped up and let it be know HE would like to dance. Boogy did this a few times the beginning of last season. Aves is good at mixing it up, that’s his roll. If you’ve got an enforcer, it’s there job to step in let it be known they’re gonna finish what Aves picked up, and what everyone who read the paper knew was coming anyway. I’m not trying to defend staged fighting, but it’s still a part of the game. You can’t just ignore it, especially when your coach is getting sucked into the crap that leads up to it pregame.
I have no problem with Prust being on our 4th line, and mixing it up when he has to, like some of the guys you’ve mentioned above, but TORTS is the one who specifically said he doesn’t what Prust doing that last season, because TORTS thinks Prust is a better player then that. I’m not going to get into what roll best suits Prust, but whatever that is, it needs to be established, so he can know what his job is and go out and do it.
As far as the quality teams in the league Chicago is employing Carcillo, and Mayers is more mutt then skater. I’d venture his PIM’s outweighed his shots on goal last season. Pittsburgh keeps Engelland around as well Super Mutt Matt Cooke, Boston (as you mentioned) has Thornton. In Vancouver, Aaron Volpatti seems to be taking the George Parros route from the Ivy League to the Penalty Box and you’ve got a guy in Bieksa who can, and will, fight even though he doesn’t have to. Detroit is a team who really has stayed away from keeping a goon or two around, but I’ll also say that of all those teams they’ve been the one who have kept everyone else on their heals every game for the longest time. That’s really the biggest difference, when you’re playing those teams, you’re so worried about figuring out how to contain them, you can’t get involved in anything else. If you RISK taking a penalty to start a fight, they’re going to make you pay on the resulting PP. Those aren’t problems teams have with the Rangers.
I’m not really even disagreeing with you, if we could put a team on the ice with three lines of players who had the talent, and a system to let them SKATE with any team in the league, that would be awesome. I’d be all for it. We don’t though. As you said, we’ve got a 4th line skating as a third line. We’ve also created an identity as a “gritty” team, and we seem to be trying to be a tough team play more then we are trying to put the other team on their heals and scoring goals using our system. In the meantime, we’ve gotta play the hand we’re dealt.
by BuckarooClub on Nov 23, 2011 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
In an instance like Konopka, I won’t even argue that we shouldn’t have a Rupp/whatever in the lineup. But that’s seriously pre-meditated crap. Sure, play your ‘mutts’ in those games where it’s clear that there will be shenanigans. Playing them 60-70 games in favor of guys with actual offensive talent is ridiculous, even with identities and all that jazz.
If we’re including Bieksa who can and will fight, we obviously have Dubinsky, Sauer, and even Callahan that can and will also.
This argument just reminds me of one thing. I pray like hell every day that McIlrath pans out, because:
a) he might actually be on the ice to prevent shenanigans as they happen
b) It might mean we can stop icing these 5 min forwards
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 23, 2011 5:59 PM EST up reply actions
Deveaux only carries a 550K cap hit, so keeping him around to play situationaly shouldn’t be a problem. You’re right that you don’t need him every night, but when you do, you can dress him. When you don’t put someone else in. The initial post said send Deveaux down and call up Zuc or Hagelin, so that’s what I was responding to, and why I was saying Deveaux has to be around.
by BuckarooClub on Nov 24, 2011 7:35 PM EST up reply actions
Every line matters in the nhl
This isn’t like my high school team that only rolled 2 lines maybe 3 or 4 if we were up by a lot or losing by a lot to much better teams.
We are going to go to Philadelphia... and we are going to win.- Glen Sather
by RichieToGabbySCORE on Nov 23, 2011 12:07 PM EST up reply actions

by 






















