Rangers Quarter Grades
It's always fun to do stuff like this. Here are my grades for the players. Del Zotto- B+, He has really been good this year playing 22 minutes a game and not making many mistakes. While the Staal injury isn't good, Del Zotto I think has definetely benefited from it. Playing with a guy a solid as Sauer can really help a guy like Del Zotto giving him more margin for error.
Girardi- A+, The guy is a stud. Leading the league in minutes and on pace for 45 points. Norris canidate?
Jeff Woywitka- D, He hasn't been awful, but I think he'll get the short end of the stick when Staal comes back, or Erixon.
Brandon Prust- C-, I think he's been a little disappointing this year, but the last few games he's played well.
Marian Gaborik- B+, He's back to Gabby we saw two years ago. He's on pace for 43 goals and it seems as if he's found a center that can get him the puck.
Sean Avery- B-, He's been very effective since the call up. He's played smart and offensively he's been good.
Brandon Dubinsky- F, He has been easily the most disappointing this season. One goal? Really? He has been noticeable but still. You don't pay guy like him $4 mil. to score one goal.
Brad Richards- B+, He has been very good, scoring big goals and on pace for a career high 33. The assists are down but I have no problem with the way he's played.
Derek Stepan- B+, So far no sophmore slump. He has really showcased his passing ability this year and found great chemistry with Gaborik. Random question for the day, Would you take Stepan or Eberle?
Brian Boyle- D, He's played like the old Brian Boyle this year, but lately he's been very solid and is playing well with Hagelin and Mitchell.
Ryan Callahan- A-, Simply amazing. Barring an injury, he should get 30 goals. Captain Callahan has been nothing short of spectacular.
Ruslan Fedetenko-D+, Started off slow, but looks better now and he has to be one of the best forecheckers on the team.
Ryan McDonaugh- A, Same thing with Del Zotto, The absence of Marc Staal has benefited him greatly. This guy can easily be one of the best d-men in the league. He's a very good skater with some offensive talent. He's averaged 25 minutes a game and he's incredible +12 this year. In 59 career games he's a +27.
Henrik Lundqvist-A+, So far, it's been his best year. He's got some ridiculous numbers with a SV% 935 and a 2.05 GAA. Big reason we've got the best team defense in the league, he erases a lot of mistakes.
John Mitchell- B, I know it's only been two games but he's been good. Keeps it simple, and he's effective.
Michael Sauer- B+, It's hard to believe that he's only a second year player. He playes like a 10 year vet. Much like Girardi when he first came up. Smart, makes the little plays, and really tough to play against. He's helped Del Zotto a lot.
Erik Christensen-F, This guy won't play another game as a Ranger.
Artem Anisimov- Only 2 goals but he's been alright. He can get 50 points.
Martin Biron- A+, I hope this guy retires a Ranger then becomes a coach or something. He's having a great year and will get 16-20 starts.
Steve Eminger- D, Eh, he's been ok. Only playing 13 minutes a game.
Mike Rupp-F, Bad signing.
Carl Hagelin-B, I'm only giving him a B cause he's only been up for two games, but he's been very good. Great speed. Definetly a better player than the one we saw in training camp.
Wojtek Wolski-F, Disaster, shouldn't see the ice unless an injury occurs.
Here's a poll after the jump.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Some of these grades are a little harsh.
Feds a D+, Wolski with an F? Wolski has barely played, and Feds has no way been a D.
LETS GO RANGERS
by sloppyseconds on Nov 27, 2011 9:36 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I think Gaby gets an “A.” MDZ a C+ (not making many mistakes, seriously?). Boyle – F as he has been totally ineffective up until the Hagelin/Mitchell call-ups. Feds a C+ as he hasn’t played badly overall. I give Richards and Cally Bs because they were invisible for a good # of games up until recently. You can’t have a lack of scoring and then give all these forwards flying grades. Doesn’t add up. They are the ones that need to score hence the “F” is absolutely right for Dubi who is counted on for big secondary scoring. Having a $4M+ penalty killer is not ideal as much as he is one my faves on the team. I wouldn’t give up on Rupp just yet. I would say Woywitka/Eminger is more like a “C” for each. The D and the back end hasn’t been the problem for the most part.
Wolski doesn’t deserve an F for this season at all, he played what 2 games?
by teknics on Nov 27, 2011 12:15 PM EST via mobile reply actions
If Eminger ans Woywitka are playing “ok” as you say, then whats with the D rating? that makes no sense.
by I.Am.Spartacus on Nov 27, 2011 12:20 PM EST reply actions
Yeah I can't agree with a lot of this...
and you never actually gave Artem Anisimov a grade.
Woywitka has played solid and deserves a ‘B.’
Eminger – C
Sauer, McDonagh, Girardi – A
Del Zotto – B- heaps of improvement but there’s still mistakes
Gaborik, Stepan, Biron, and Lundqvist get ‘A’
Richards, Callahan, Fedotenko, Hagelin, Mitchell, AA get ‘B’
Boyle, Prust, Avery ‘B-’
Dubinsky ‘C’ – no worse because I know he’s gonna come around
Wolski ‘D’ - two games or not you know what you’re getting out of this kid; half-assed effort
EC – ‘F’ - need I explain?
by KingHenrik30 on Nov 27, 2011 5:28 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I’m only holding off on a Wolski grade because his last game he was actually battling on the boards not just coasting
by teknics on Nov 27, 2011 6:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Not to sure how I feel about this.
Wowitka and Eminger deserve at least a C. They have been a solid 3rd pair, and have stepped in and played some solid minutes. I don’t understand how they can play solid and get a D.
Sauer should be given an A as well. He just doesn’t make mistakes. Ever. It’s incredible.
The F for Wolski is unfair. That’s almost the equivalent of giving Staal an F. Let’s be fair here.
Dubinsky has been playing very solid. Sure, he hasn’t scored, but an F is WAAAYY too harsh.
B is too high for MDZ. I don’t understand how you can justify giving Richards, Gaborik, and Sauer a B+, but MDZ a B. We need to be more fair here. Too much bias. The guy has played okay recently, but overall he has struggled a good amount.
Also, saying that Anisimov has been “alright,” as well as your grade for Dubinsky, just shows that you are only looking at stats. Watch Anisimov play. Everytime Gabby and Stepan break out its because AA makes the defensive play. Doesn’t he have like 12 points?
Boyle starts like 75% of his shifts in the dzone, and is playing solid defense. His grade is too harsh.
Lastly, your grade for Fedotenko is an absolute joke. The guy has been fantastic all season.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
by Moshe52792 on Nov 27, 2011 6:08 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
If I was l "only looking at stats"
don’t you think Sauer would have an F? And I disagree with you on Del Zotto. Overall he’s been spectacular. He doesn’t shoot enough on the PP, but that’s about it. He plays big minutes and makes the small plays. Dubinsky’s stat’s do have something to do with his grade. 1 goal? come on? I still think he’ll get 20. His defensive play has been very good. That’s why he’s not a F.
Del Zotto’s been anything but ‘spectacular.’ He’s been average at best.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 27, 2011 6:51 PM EST up reply actions
Don’t know if this means anything but when records a point NYR is 5-1-1. Maybe I gave him a high grade because many people thought he was going to be awful this year, if he was even on the big club. Lots of fans had been bascially declaring him a bust.
based on that logic ...
aren’t they undefeated when Prust fights in the first minute?
MDZ is growing. He still makes mistakes (improper pinches, giveaways, beat wide) – but they are WAY less than last year. Plus he’s had some nice offensive rushes; but NOTHING like MCD’s offensive and defensive consistency. MCD gets the higher “grade” so far.
"There are some people who, if they don't already know, you can't tell 'em." - Yogi
by bleed'n blue on Nov 27, 2011 10:33 PM EST up reply actions
MDZ has been nothing close to spectacular.
He’s been bailed out by Sauer more times than I can count.
Last night he was very good, but most nights hes sub-par, and if we’re lucky, average.
And you did give Dubinsky an F. Look at your own post.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
Glad I am not the only one that sees it is AA that drives that line. Sure Gabby and Step have been very good but when AA is going, so is that line. And when he is not; so goes the line.
Aucune clause de Mouvement
by Blueshirt in Paris on Nov 29, 2011 7:57 AM EST up reply actions
Love AA but he’s a very slow skater. I think the weight he put on (and rightfully so) has slowed him down a bit.
by Richter1994 on Nov 29, 2011 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
I may have been a bit harsh above with my criticism, but thank you for the post regardless.
It has generated a good discussion. Keep it up!!
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
yeah i didn't want to sound too harsh either......
…..you put a lot of effort into the post. Also, there are how many of us on here? Each of us would come up with a different report card and that’s what makes it fun.
by KingHenrik30 on Nov 28, 2011 9:35 PM EST up reply actions
Dubi has been underwhelming, but not a failure. He’s got 2 fewer points than Step.
Prust with a higher grade than Feds is kinda funny.
Not sure what Gaborik needs to do to get an A, short of curing cancer.
Overall, these grades get a C.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 27, 2011 7:06 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
People seem to ignore that assists count too.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
I agree, this grading system gets a C!
by BigB22 on Nov 27, 2011 10:26 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Count me in with the Gaborik "A" crowd
How the fuck is Gaborik a B+? There hasnt been a thing he hasnt done, regarding all facets of the game. Hes leading the team in goals again, points, hes playing VERY WELL defensively, hes skating hard, creating scoring chances, hitting, etc.
Some of these fans are just ridiculous.
by MyNameIsJohnnyMotto on Nov 27, 2011 8:09 PM EST reply actions
Jeff Woywitka and Eminger have been solid and the few games up to the Islander game were giving up the least shots out of any pairing………they have done better than expected therefore should be ranked higher……Richards, on par for career high in goals and you don’t rank him an A for that? Hagelin, Mitchell, Deveax, Rupp and even Avery should not even be rated for lack of games played and a guy who plays 2 games getting a B is just silly. Gabby gets an A he has done everything we ever expected of him. EC, Boyle and Dubi are about right.
Absolute Worst Ranger Fan!!!!!!....yet incredibly realistic and usually correct.
I give myself an A as a fan
I watch every game, DVR them and try not to hear the score until I get home….yeah, I’m a great fan. ;)
I agree with George and Moshe on this
question-how do you judge players? I think the grades are a bit harsh.
to me this is what I would give:
King Henrik: A+
A’s: Gaborik, Richards, Cally, Sauer, Girardi, McDonagh Richards has way outperformed my expectations and he is an awesome face-off guy to boot.
B+’s: Stepan, Biron, AA,
B’s: Feds, Avery
C+’s: Dubi, Eminger, Woywitka, Prust
D’s: Boyle, EC.
INC: Rupp, WW, Deveaux, Halein and Mitchell.
(although personally I’d label Rupp an F anyway)
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
oops forgot MDZ (silly me)- he gets a B
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"

by 





















