Breaking It Down: Taking A Look At The New York Rangers Power Play
With the Rangers ending their home stand with a 4 game winning streak you would think that everything is sunshine and roses for the Boys in Blue as they head to Ottawa to avenge a shootout loss to the Senators Wednesday night.
Well, there is one glaring problem, the power play. In the last two games against the Canadiens and the Jets the Rangers went 2 for 15 on the power play and each game included long 5 on 3 chances that the Rangers could not capitalize on.
What makes the power play so frustrating is not that the team doesn't have the right talent on the ice for the power play. It's that the set up and execution in the offensive zone is so poor and so easily fixable that its almost maddening watching the team stand around and under utilize the talent they have out there.
One of the biggest problems the Rangers have is the inability to move on the power play. Once they get the puck into the offensive zone everyone finds their spot and stays there. The point men skate around a bit up top, one winger stays along the half boards and two other wingers line up vertically in front of the goal.
This makes life easy for the short handed team, as they can stay in their system and force the Rangers to play their way out of the power play situation.
The solution is overtly simple, move on the power play, utilize the full ice in order to stretch the defense and tire out the penalty killing unit.
Follow after the jump to see how the Rangers can do this (Now with pictures)
Against the Jets the Rangers would constantly split the ice in half, having Brad Richards and Michael Del Zotto set up at the points, with Marian Gaborik on the half boards and Derek Stepan and Ryan Callahan trying to create havoc in front of the net.
The problem with that plan is that the Rangers leave an entire half of the ice unused and forces the Rangers to try and make plays in a tight area and we have all seen the results of that.
The Rangers have found success this year on the power play when they have spread the defense, have Gaby play on his off wing so he can tee up his shot and use the entire ice surface in the offensive zone. We've seen it this weekend with Erik Christensen and Derek Stepan both scoring power play goals through quick, effective passing that spread out the defense and saw the goal scorer across the ice from the rest of the set up.
As I said before, the Rangers have the right talent on the ice, except I would use Derek Stepan along the half boards with Marian Gaborik patrolling down low on his off wing and have Ryan Callahan in front cleaning up the rebounds.
See how easy it is to work on the power play, and didn't even need Mike Sullivan's white board to do it
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I have a great idea, why don’t you show up at practice tomorrow with a marker and an easel and give them a lesson.
pass pass pass
All they do is stand still and pass….where’s gabby where’s Richards pass pass pass to them.
If there going to stand still and pass in the same place 2-5 minutes at least just continue to shoot. Its like the lottery….u have to be in it to win it. They aren’t shooting towards the net how will they ever score
"It's far from done, but we did get something accomplished."-#19 B.Richards
by -19-AgainstAll on Nov 7, 2011 3:44 PM EST via mobile reply actions
well said but more imporant than any x’s and o’s is just going out there on the PP with the mentality that every guy has to be a threat with the puck. If they don’t respect you as a threat then take a shot. more shots and more importantly shots ON NET. MIssing the net oftentimes turns into an easy breakout for the mandown unit. Hit the net and make sure we have multiple guys in front (staggered) ready for the short or long rebound. hockey goals for the post part arent pretty, just have to shoot and be in the right area to finish
Power-plays at their core are very simple math calculations. There’s 1 or 2 more of your team than their team. Simply put, if all 5 guys out there (or 4 if you’re a picky s.o.b. and it’s a 4-on-3) aren’t perceived as a threat, then your PP will more than likely fail. That’s what a PP is about; turning each player into a scoring threat in order to force the penalty-killers to adjust.
What? That’s a great question from the back row. How do you make them adjust? By moving. See, when there’s more of your team out there, the penalty-killers should have to move in order to cover lanes and cover the higher scoring threat. If you stand still and just pass the puck, then the penalty-killers will happily stand around for 2 minutes and think about that red-head in the 3rd row.
That’s all it is. It’s simply the greatest cure for most hockey-ills. Move your damn feet. If you’re moving, then they’re moving, and that means that passing lanes will open up, and when players on the PP are making themselves a threat, the PK unit will have to move, which opens up passing/shooting lanes, and it means they have to prioritize threats, which means at least 1 person on your team should be wide open. It is also VERY tiring being a PK player against a PP unit that is skating and moving.
That’s all Mike Sullivan should be worrying about. If I was him, I’d put together 2 units (1 with AA in front of the net, the other with Bigfoot or Dubinsky), have them move around against the PK unit to create passing/shooting lanes, and put the puck on-goal every 15 seconds or they have to skate a lap. Just simplify the shit out of it.
the pictures are from the hockey whiteboard app on my Ipod…that’s why its like that
"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx
In Prust We Trust
"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.
A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep
Follow me @8kpower
I figured it out, but it got me twice.
Random q for you, are you from Kearny nj?
by teknics on Nov 7, 2011 9:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Not even close
"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx
In Prust We Trust
"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.
A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep
Follow me @8kpower
Odd story, wound up getting a check from a company I deal with. Gave me the wrong “Kevins” check instead of me it was for Kevin Power from Kearny Nj
by teknics on Nov 7, 2011 10:15 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Funny you should mention him...
All analysis aside, there is more glaring big-picture problem with the PP that, for the life of me, I do not understand…
This is NY, right? Players from around the league and even around the world dream and clamor to play for this Original 6 franchise in particular, and ironically sometimes even for less money on a big-market team that can afford to shell out more.
So can someone please explain to me why, with all the cash and resources we have at our disposal, we have a saw-no-better-than-third-line-action, never-saw-any-PP-time, ex-NHL journeyman in charge of mapping out the strategies? As an assistant coach, overall, I have no real issues with Sullivan. In fact, I think he does a good job on the bench with the D, with maybe a few exceptions.
But still, that doesn’t excuse why, after 3 years+, Sather hasn’t hired a PP specialist or two (ala Benoit Allaire) that also, heaven forbid, actually SPECIALIZED on the PP as a player!! An obvious choice is Leetch, given his proficiency and organizational tie-in. But even beyond that, there has got to be a plethora of ex-NYR and other ex-NHL players much more worthy of consideration than Sully who could make a significant impact…esp with the talent we can put out there now.
WTH? :(
WHAT pp
If im not mistaking Mike Sullivan is in full charg of the pp for the last three years.So why is this idiot still here when its not working. i have center ice and watch other teams some not as good as ours yet there pp looks good lots of movemnt . And can we get a d man that can keep the puck in the zone and one that can fire the puck.Thats the other problem we have half the pp play is chasing the puck down the ice after we dump and the other taem ices it.and we dont get sots on net we go 2 or 3 pp at times with less the 3or 4 shots .and please put some big body in front to screen the goalie.
Puck movement
You can stand still on the PP if you have fast puck movement. The puck moves faster than any skater and quick passing is the best way to find openings. The problem the Rangers have is slow puck movement AND standing still. So, they can’t just shoot more b/c the shooting lanes are blocked.
Also, can we stop with the Fire Sullivan bs. You can’t coach the PP. Power plays are all about offensive instincts and communication on the ice. Penalty killers are so good these days, it’s all about on-ice recognition and making the appropriate reads. How is Sullivan supposed to teach that? It’s up to the players on the ice.
They aren’t executing an umbrella the way they should be at 5-on-4, and they aren’t executing the spread on the 5-on-3s. Simple as that.
http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2011/10/11/complete-idiots-guide-to-hockey-systems-special-teams/
Blue Seat Blogs
Twitter: @Blue Seat Blogs

by 

























