Interview With Connecticut Whale Beat Writer Mitch Beck
Mitch Beck has been primarily covering the Hartford Wolf Pack / Connecticut Whale for the past six years. Mr. Beck also has extensive coverage of the Rangers/Whale's ECHL Affiliate, first the Charlotte Checkers and now Neil Smith's Greenville Road Warriors. Somehow he also finds the time to cover the Rangers too. You can read and follow his site at Howlings.net.
Let's get straight to the questions.
BC: Who has impressed you most this season in Connecticut?
MB: Jonathan Audy-Machessault has come completely from out of no-where it seems and leads the team in points and is showing that he has great potential. He's been playing a lot with Mats Zuccarello and been centered by John Mitchell and Kris Newbury. He has a real chance of being a possible NYR if he keeps up the pace that he's going on.
BC: How has Tim Erixon played in his limited time in Connecticut? Do you feel he needs more time with the Whale?
MB: Tim Erixon has only played a couple of games with the team. It's a bit early to be assessing who he is and what he could or couldn't do. But I will tell you this; J.J. Daigneault is about as good of a coach for young defenseman as they come. Add in the help he'll be getting from Wade Redden and Brendan Bell and he could possibly become something very special.
BC: How helpful do you think Michael Del Zotto's time with the Whale helped him mature and prepare for the NHL?
MB: I think he benefitted greatly from the time here. Again, he was given great counseling from the staff and Redden. He also dedicated himself, maybe even obsessed, on improving his game over the summer and the results certainly are showing.
BC: Which goalie has been more impressive: Cam Talbot, or Chad Johnson?
MB: Chad Johnson was just named the Reebok/AHL Goaltender of the Month. Cam Talbot has been exceptionally locked in. They're both good goaltenders in their own right. The keys for both; Johnson needs to control rebounds and Talbot needs to remain healthy.
BC: Jonathan Audy-Marchessault leads the team in all scoring categories. Do the stats lie, or has he been that good?
MB: It's still early to give a definitive answer one way or the other, but he sure has been impressive to this point.
Follow me after the jump for more, including thoughts on the top prospects in Connecticut
BC: Carl Hagelin is a prospect many Rangers fans are interested in. Any thoughts on his play so far?MB: Hagelin is the fastest skater I can remember. He has a good nose for the puck, a good shot and seems to be sound defensively. He will be a NYR at some point, but he needs more time working on his total game here in the AHL.
BC: Which defenseman has impressed you the most so far?
MB: To this point nobody has really jumped out at me. What I am seeing though is a group of guys that have each other's backs and have been very strong on both sides of the ice. The good thing is that there is a lot of talent and depth there which should keep the team highly competitive and give the Rangers assets to move should they need to.
BC: The Whale are off to a great start, what would you attribute that to?
MB: They are just playing good team defense and scoring timely goals. This team has amazing speed and a great balance of youth and experience as well as a good measure of toughness. They've also has some very solid goaltending between the pipes.
BC: Who do you feel is most deserving of the next promotion?
MB: Depends upon the position and the need. There are three choices in terms of top two line talent would be Zuccarello, Audy-Marchessault and Hagelin. If the need is for grinders, Newbury and Mitchell would be the top two with Thuresson also a possibility. On defense, Erixon, Bell, Bickel and Valentenko are all players with NHL potential.
BC: Do you see Mats Zuccarello as a player that should be in Connecticut, or that truly belongs in the NHL right now?
MB: Zuccarello is definitely an NHL talent. Whether he becomes one for the Rangers is hard to tell. He's not a third or fourth line player. He needs to be on the top two lines and should be.
**
Interesting to see the comment about Hagelin's speed, as well as that Jonathan Audy-Marchessault has impressed so far. Thoughts?
Thanks again to Mr. Beck for the answers.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
JAM is a great find…. Halegin as every one has said needs at least this year in the AHL and this is a good sign that he is learning…. Same goes for Erixon…..MZA unfortunetly doesnt have spot on our roster which sucks really like him but it just doesnt look like we have room…..i know we all make fun of Redden but he has done a good job being a mentor down there…. his contract is Sathers fault he just signed it no one turns down money…. good post
Had no idea JJ Daigneault was our D coach down there, no wonder we’ve been building good D talents.
by teknics on Nov 8, 2011 8:51 AM EST via mobile reply actions
With Wolski out (and not producing when he was in), I don't see why MZA can't be a top six forward
Dubinsky-Richards-Callahan
Gaborik-Stepan-MZA
Prust-Boyle-Fedotenko
Anisimov-Christensen-Avery/Deveaux
Home of the Jared Jeffries Shot Tracker
Because Anisimov’s better than him.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 8, 2011 9:32 AM EST up reply actions
Nailed it
"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx
In Prust We Trust
"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.
A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep
Follow me @8kpower
by Kevin Power on Nov 8, 2011 9:59 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
honestly
i love callahan. but hes been playing well and i feel he should help spread the welth. hes a tough guy who can pla those 3rd line role minutes and produce on the scresheet, sespecially with power pla time. call me crazy but yould anone be winterested in these lines:
dubinsky-richads-zuccarello
gaborik-stepan-anisimov
prust-boyle-callahan
feds-christensen-deveaux
Drop Anisimov for MZA?
Why? AA is a better player, offensively and defensively.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
No
MZA second line, Anisimov 4th? Really?
by gravyfan on Nov 8, 2011 1:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
So many people underrate AA
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
couldnt agree more with you on MZA. he is top flight scoring talent, but there is sadly no place on him the rangers barring massive injuries. I would like to see him traded for a second round draft pick. that way he gets to play like he should, and the rangers get something in return. They draft the best in the 2nd round anway.
I’m sure maloney will take MZA from us at some point this year
by GAThingy on Nov 8, 2011 10:38 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
maybe but i find that counter productive.
hes one of our core players. play him as such. being with richards, he will eventually turn it around.
Question: Maybe it’s a bit early for these kids, but why not put together a “skilled” third line?
If we keep our current top 6:
Step AA Gabs
Dubi Richie Cally
And we keep Feds Boyle Prust together:
Why not try to put together some semblance of a decent 3rd line? Sure, WW is out for a while. But what about when he comes back?
Wolski EC MZA.
Not the best line in the world, but could probably play 10 minutes a night and be effective. Thoughts?
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
agreed thats the best bet for MZA getting into our lineup\.
by CrazyRangerFan on Nov 8, 2011 11:37 AM EST up reply actions
it is def a better line talent wise than avery-ec-devaux but then you lose the big hitters in avery and devaux, but then again we do have big hitters with dubi and cally…..but it would be the only way for mza to get into the lineup. messing around with our top 3 lines is insane considering we just won 4 in a row….
Dubi and Cally
Are not big hitters. Hitters, maybe. But they’re not big. Regardless, the answer anyway you slice it is not hitters. It’s guys who are tough to move off the puck that are faster, nastier and can play 3rd or 4th line minutes. After lines 1&2, anything remotely resembling that drops off considerably. What’s more… with regards to hitting? Im all for the intimidation factor of the player with the ability to run you through the boards. But the notion of a mighty mite running around hitting everything in sight merely suggests how often that person is not controlling the puck. And is instead simply chasing it.
by gravyfan on Nov 8, 2011 1:19 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Avery could replace WW or EC on the line if having a hitter is an issue
Although I still would consider this the 4th line either way. Next year, if some of the kids (e.g., Kreider, Thomas, Hagelin, Bourque, maybe even Audy-Marshmallow if he keeps it up) are ready to make the team, a couple of them could combine with MZA (if he’s resigned) to form a skilled 3rd line, with Rupp-Boyle-Prust (if he’s resigned) pushed to 4th line/PK duty.
by LJR on Nov 8, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions
There’s zero defense on that line. If they’re willing to give the line 10 minutes, then put Anisimov between EC and MZA, and let Wolski go with Step-Gabs.
They’ll never do it though. It’s not the way Tortorella uses his lines.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 8, 2011 11:50 AM EST up reply actions
How is MZA considered defensively? I haven’t heard much regarding his defense.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
George raises a very good point. In the current state of the NHL (favoring skill and speed) it would be reasonable to have 3 lines with skill and a 4th “checking” (no goons) line. The key as he said is defensive responsibility. There are other factors also; Tortorella isn’t exactly known for rolling all his lines out there, nor keeping them together, and the focus isn’t exactly a slick, playmaking scheme.
but the skilled third line becomes in reality a 4th line… because torts leans heavily on the boyle line… so in a way the boyle line becomes the 3rd and then ec mza and avery or whoever is on that line… gets 4th line minutes… that’s the way it is… thats why if he’s not on the 2nd line he’s pretty worthless to us…
@clalicata17
Well, we have seen Torts lean heavily on 3 lines because he only has 3 strong lines.
I’d like to see what happens if he were given four very solid lines.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
He had 4 solid lines last year (when he was using Wolski-Step-MZA on the 3rd, Avery-EC-Gaborik on the 1st). He looked for ways to cut it back to 3.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Nov 8, 2011 3:33 PM EST up reply actions
I suppose.
Although that “first” line isn’t too solid, it just has Gaborik.
I’d like to see what he does 2-3 years from now, if we have something like:
Stepan Anisimov Gaborik
Dubinsky Richards Callahan
Kreider Borque Thomas
Hagelin Boyle Prust
Would he be willing to cut the playing times of the kids and run 3 lines instead? And if so, at that point we should just tried those assets for a few extra stars, and run three really strong lines and play random1-random2-random3 for a few minutes a night.
What’s the point of developing all these kids if he won’t play them? I guess we’ll find out when he’s forced to make a choice 2 years from now.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by 

























