Anisimov
Seems like he's all over the place. Anisimov is in the play a LOT in the offensive zone.
From the New York Daily News:
"ARTE’S ALL ABOUT IT
It’s easy to forget on nights like Wednesday, but Artem Anisimov is just 23 years old, in a foreign country, riding the high of six points in his last three games.
In the Rangers’ postgame locker room, Anisimov tucked the bill of The Broadway Hat low over his tired eyes, tilted his head back and spoke to anyone who would listen - all while wearing an ear-to-ear smile.
“Defense first and go play hockey after, you know?” he said of in-game mindset.
One reporter jokingly asked if Anisimov were mad at the scorekeeper, since he did receive an assist on Marian Gaborik’s first goal even though he had forced the initial turnover by Senators defenseman Sergei Gonchar.
Anisimov shook his head and kept grinning.
“I’d lay down on the ice I’m so tired,” he said. “And there’s the hat. I’m very excited.”"
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I've always been a big supporter of this kid.....
……what he was lacking in previous years was confidence and consistency. I believe the faith shown in him by Tortorella is starting to pan out for AA. Getting him the hell away from all that 4th line bullshit and giving him important minutes between two of the team’s most talented forwards is exactly what the doctor ordered.
The fact that he’s finally finally F-I-N-A-L-L-Y beginning to use that wicked ass mother of a shot of his is even better news. He’s stronger on his skates this year and I think we are only going to see greater production out of him. He’s a slow starter, and that has to change, but I have confidence it will change.
He cannot be traded, not for Bobby Ryan or anybody not named Steven Stamkos. Artem Anisimov will reach the 30-60-90 plateau in a few years tops, I shall boldly predict.
Now if only he learns to keep his damn head up and try and avoid these big hits.
He’s been my favorite player for the better part of two years now.
I’m happy that Torts has finally realized what a great player AA is, and he’s finally rewarding him. Thank god he’s done with the fourth line.
Here’s something most of you probably haven’t noticed. Over the last few years, name some of our most solid lines?
Two years ago, it was Shelley Anisimov Prust. Last year it was Dubinsky Anisimov Callahan. This year its Stepan Anisimov Gaborik. See the common variable?
Yeah, he’s that good. Not only is he good enough to keep up with Step and Gabs offensively, he’s the defensive powerhouse on that line as well.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
+1
he’s one of the best forwards in thinking defensively. he reminds me sometimes of sergei fedorov, when he was 35 years plus. hopefully artie can improve his skating further, so he becomes more of a 25 years old fedorov…
If Artie can improve his skating (BARB!!), and work to improve his deking to the point where he doesn’t have to look down and can instead see the ice in-front of him, we will have a very, very special player.
Probably, at this point, the best two-way forward we have.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
--warning sarcasm coming-- TRAID Anisimov
I remembered a few posts ago where some fans blogged about whether we should keep AA or not. he’s been pretty solid and unnoticed except by us Ranger fans.
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
by feslenraster on Dec 12, 2011 10:45 AM EST up reply actions
agreed i love AA. he reallllyyy needs to keep his head up on the ice though. he has gotten better with that this year, but he did it again last night against toronto in the third and almost got his head taken off. that could have been a terrible few minutes, sauer then AA then MDZ all getting messed up, yikes….
hmm...
like to hear this and all…but we haven’t played the Senators in over a month.
In Prust we Trust
we need to get cam newton before the panther’s get off lock down cause eli cant (QB) by hisselfall this saeson also we need plax back to cause smith is the best (WR) we got nd plax cant help smith nd the team out….. do that nd we have a a shout at the superblow
by Master Ov Brutality on Dec 6, 2011 4:24 PM EST reply actions
SHH!!!
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
I'm not saying he's bad...
…but I don’t think he’s anything that the Rangers couldn’t replace with a good trade or signing or even someone out of the minors. I don’t pay attention to him much, but when I do it’s usually him screwing up a deke or trying to do to much. This year I think he has been much much better than last year and playing with Gaborik and Stepan has helped. I feel that at times he can be inconsistent, at least I thought that last year. He’s not lazy by any means like Wolski or Christensen, he plays hard every night. I know their are a lot of fans that love him and think he is going to be great, but I just haven’t seen anything spectacular from him. I hope he proves me wrong and he becomes a 90 point guy like KingHenrik30 thinks he will.
IDK about a 90 point guy, but game in and game out he is one of the most noticeable players. He knows how to get off his own shot, and great at setting plays up, and is a fantastic two-way forward.
Without him Gabby and Step can’t score because they are trapped in the defensive zone all game.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
Without him Gabby and Step can’t score because they are trapped in the defensive zone all game.
This. A million times this.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Dec 7, 2011 8:42 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
If you think the Rangers can pull someone out of the minors that is as good as Anisimov, you’re right, you don’t pay attention to him.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Dec 7, 2011 8:42 AM EST up reply actions
If you paid attention to what I said in the end, that I hope he proves me wrong, I think you would see that I don’t hate the guy. It’s not like I’m demanding for him to be traded or to be demoted. Maybe it’s just me, but every time I make an innocent comment or give an opinion on something, you seem to be up my ass trying to make me look like an asshole for having a voice, but I guess I contradict myself giving you shit about giving me shit when you have the right to an opinion as well. So whatever. Feel free to bash on this opinion as well.
Where did I say or even imply you hate the guy? You said you don’t pay attention, I agreed that you must not if you think he’s as good as a minor leaguer.
As for the rest, it might just be you, I’m not out to persecute anyone. I had to go look for the last time I even responded to one of your comments, and that was disagreeing about whether Miller should play the puck that got him drilled by Lucic.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Dec 7, 2011 2:36 PM EST up reply actions
no hes not gaborik, he wont put up 90 points and hes not going to score 40 goals. but i wouldnt be surprised at all if within the next 2 years we are talking about him being more vauble than callahan and dubinsky. maybe not callahan because of that whole captain thing. he grinds our points and is never a liability. youre crazy if you think theres someone in the minors with this kids talent/heart/potential
Aberration?
19 C Brad Richards 24 10 13 23 -2 4 2 0 3 53 18.9
10 R Marian Gaborik 24 13 9 22 4 10 3 0 2 97 13.4
24 R Ryan Callahan 24 10 8 18 2 29 4 0 2 77 13.0
42 C Artem Anisimov 24 4 12 16 5 10 1 0 0 45 8.9
21 C Derek Stepan 24 5 11 16 4 8 2 0 2 52 9.6
Anisimov and Stepan are only 1 and 2 assists behind Richards. Are they cherry picking assists from Gabby?
I’d look at it another way.
Four of those 5 players are on the first power play unit.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Dec 7, 2011 8:41 AM EST up reply actions
Yet the 5th still manages to keep up with points….
Hm…
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
I think it may be gabby cherry picking goals from them. It seems like at least 7 of his 13 came directly off odd man rushes in which Step or AA gave him a great pass to polish off.
Take it to the net and keep jamming and jamming until somebody comes on you.
- Eddie Olczyk
by Scratch and Snif on Dec 7, 2011 10:05 PM EST up reply actions
Aetie is really good on the boards too in the offensive zone. Digging pucks out for Stepan to dish to Gaborik
R.I.P Derek
Rangers FTW!
by BleedsRangerBlue on Dec 7, 2011 10:16 AM EST via mobile reply actions
some long thoughts
i know many people here are us- americans and have an american way to approach hockey, which is fine by me and very interesting. to declare american way of seeing hockey (in my point of view): = very statistical; lots of different (more or less mathematically correct) ways to measure the value of a player in different situations. as i said this is fine by me and i have learned to use the information out of the stats… i think the stats are interesting and they give you some kind of image what a player does on the ice, but:
momentum is maybe one of the most important things in winning hockey games. momentum can change during every shift and is in not part of any stat….
i don’t have any statistical profe for that (coz no data exists), but i think that AA is one of the most reliable players in key/ game breaking situations for the rangers (another one seems to be brad richard for me; girardi is too good to describe the last two years and feds is doing well). AA seems to do the right things in allmost all situations (as far as i can judge) and that changes the course of a game.
f.e. duby played very bad at the beginning of the season (from my point of view): not because he wasn’t scoring but because he missed several back checks and didn’t work at the wall properly. there is no stat for that but everyone could see.
from that perspective AA looks to me (!) as one of the best players on the rangers roster. maybe third on forwards behind richards and gabby, with a chance to overcome both in some years under a different coach. have to mention stepan here as different but equal to AA.
i don’t have any statistical profe for that (coz no data exists)
http://blogs.thescore.com/nhl/2011/01/26/the-rorschach-is-momentum-real-or-illusory/
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Dec 7, 2011 6:18 PM EST up reply actions
first of all thanks for the link. interesting article.
maybe the term momentum is not the right way to decribe my thinking. maybe you can help me a bit george…
i want to point out that two different hockey players on the same team could have identical stats (corsi, +/-, wathever) in a game but one broke up 5 scoring chances of the opponent with important back checks while the other one had none. the rest of the game they played similar. so the first one played a much better game… or? if that continues for a whole season…
another example: AA wears (spelling???) down the opponent’s defense with his hard work on the boards every shift in the last games i watched which duby didn’t in the first games of the season (very subjective state i know). this isn’t measured anywhere or?
It’s not measured persay, but if a player is doing enough to break up plays on a nightly basis, it will start to show up in his shots against (Corsi) and scoring chances against stats.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Dec 7, 2011 7:03 PM EST up reply actions
yes. most certainly but not nessecarely.
although this is a very theoretical example, i think you can play good hockey without having good stats automatically. to be more provocant: team A wins 7-6 against team B. player 1 on team A is minus three, bad corsi, etc… but has a natural hatrick in the last two minutes to win the game for his team. meanwhlie player 2 on team B is a plus 3, good corsi, scoring chances, etc. had 4 goals and two assists but had three turnovers which lead to the goals against in the last 2 minutes. (i know bad coach) who had the better game??? better stats for player 2, better game maybe too, but the more important effort was from player 1 in the final two minutes of the game… i would rather like to be player 1 than 2 after the game.
i don’ t want to ban stats from the game. i think they are very informative and helpfull in many ways, but i think mathematik is a language to describe a model of reality, its not realty per se and so hockey players are more than the sum of their stats and hockey games are more than the sum of statistically counted events. (i also got problems with the data that is used in many of the stats, from a mathematically standpoint, not a hockey one)
i just mention this here coz i get sometimes a bit irritated that the guy with the better stats always wins the argument here in this blog and i think that AA does far better than his stats tell ;-)

by 






















