Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Rangers Analysis: Back Where They Belong

Awkward? -  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Last season was the first since the lockout in which the New York Rangers missed out on the Stanley Cup Playoffs. This season was close to becoming the second until the miracle that Saturday was came along and helped the Blueshirts clinch the eighth and final playoff spot in the Eastern Conference. It was a long and rigorous road here, but after waiting for an entire year, the Rangers are back where they belong.

The Rangers have been a playoff team ever since the lockout, but they have been a different style playoff team in each of those years. You had the European Era led by Jaromir Jagr in 2006-07 when they were eliminated by the Buffalo Sabres in the Conference Semifinals. The following season that same team, with the additions of Chris Drury and Scott Gomez, once again made it to the semifinals when this time the Pittsburgh Penguins ousted them.

That would be the last time ex-coach Tom Renney and his defensive approach would bring the Rangers into the playoffs, as John Tortorella was then the man behind the bench to revive the club and get them into the postseason the next year in 2008-09. Torts did this by introducing the jaded roster to a new up-tempo offensive system, which brought about more scoring and overall success. The Rangers, after collapsing on a three-games to one advantage in the series, were forced to a game seven where they were downed by the Capitals.

This time around, in 2010-11, I feel this team is very different compared to the ones that have made the playoffs in previous years. The current Ranger club has a definitive identity to it that they have become well respected for around the National Hockey League. They may not have the talent that the European-centered squads did back in 2006-2008, but I think they have more heart, more focus and more desire.

Continue reading after the jump....

Star-divide

They didn't get into the playoffs by playing any style of game they needed to on a particular night in order to get points. They instead stuck with a gameplan and made it work all the way through game 82. Out of all those playoff teams listed above, this year's is the most deserving of the honor in my opinion.

The ending to the regular season, with the organization and fan base left hanging until about 9:30 p.m. Saturday night to find out their fate, was a very appropriate way for this team to officially clinch a playoff berth. It's been a struggle all year long with emotions constantly swaying in all different directions, but the team has always been able to overcome adversity and in the end got what they deserved.

I've said it before and I will say it again; the Rangers deserve to be in the playoffs this year because, as mentioned above, they earned it. They earned it more this year than they have in any of those post-lockout years. The 2010-11 New York Rangers were the most determined and resilient group of players to don the Blueshirt that we have witnessed in a long time.

They've earned the right to be here, more than the Carolina Hurricanes, and maybe even more so than some of the team that finished ahead of them in the standings. Playoff hockey is all about battling, consistent effort and the power of will. All of those traits are major characteristics of this year's Blueshirts, and that is why this - the Stanley Cup Playoffs - is where they belong.

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good to see them back

No matter the end result I’ll view this year as a success. Of course once the team is in I hope for the best but seeing the team rewarded for sticking with a game plan throughout the entire season even as key players were fell by a myriad of injuries should validate their efforts.

I found some of Tort’s comments about how he viewed this season in the context of building a contender particularly poignant. He understands they need more talent but it appears that he trusts the current core group of players.

As far as them deserving to be in the playoffs more than other teams, I’m not sure I completely agree with that statement. All teams play a long schedule and invariably all deal with injuries. Obviously some teams are able to rely on a greater abundance of skill to pull them through the rough patches but I think enough parity exists that teams can’t just coast for that long before they start to see diminished results. The Flyers have admitted to coasting a little (per Sean O’Donnell) and while it didn’t drastically alter their season you’ve got plenty of people wondering whether a team that two months ago was the hands down Eastern winner is going to survive the first round.

Still, here’s to what hopefully amounts to a nice postseason run.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Apr 12, 2011 8:04 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

tie beaker should be changed

Rangers were about to miss the playoffs to a team with fewer wins. BS my friends. The old tie breaker system should be used, wins. Then, if stll tied, how many in reg/ot.

My opinion of course, but it would have been difficult to see the rangers miss the playoffs by winning more games than the team that beat them for the eight spot

by GAThingy on Apr 12, 2011 8:36 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

not the tie- breaker but the point system should be changed

The tie breaker was just a reaction to the perception that fans need to see a definitive winner to be happy and was a reaction in part to the MLB All-Star game tie. A tie in hockey was part of the game and no one complained. The shootout is a forced ending and is not natural, any more than it is in soccer. I understand that playing ad neaseum is not realistic in the regular season and the shoot out will probably remain. Well then go to a 3-point system with regulation wins getting 3 points.

The Rangers did not have more wins as they had alot of shootout wins and they are just not pure nor natural to decide a game. So I agree with the tie breaker but not the point system. Too many teams fall back on a tie in the 3rd period to preserve their point. It makes for less exciting 3rd periods.

Wins are not wins are not wins anymore. The same can be said for goaltender statistics. But that’s a whole other story.

by truebluesince75 on Apr 12, 2011 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

well said – I get that they don’t want to reward the skills competition (shootout) in the tiebreaker, but you also don’t want to see a hard-working team essentially penalized for pulling out a win in the shootout.
Therefore, one of the better options is to change the point system, and make this moot.

by j-red on Apr 12, 2011 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

I am in no way saying that the Rangers did not deserve to make the playoffs. They absolutely did.

But their win totals were inflated due to shootout wins. If anyone has the time, I would love to see the point spread using the 3-point system.

It’s more the fault of the web-pages that display the standings with SO and regulation/OT wins as one and the same. They count the same for points but not for tie-breakers. This was never reflected until the end of the season and it caught us all off guard.

Summary: change the point system.

by truebluesince75 on Apr 12, 2011 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I forget who said it, but I really liked their idea for the tiebreaker. Whoever it was said the first tiebreaker should be regulation/ot wins, followed by overall wins, and then head to head. I’m ok with devaluing shootouts, and it was a good start using the regulation/ot wins as the first tiebreaker. Using Carolina and NYR as an example (If Carolina Won,) who both would have had the same number of points and regulation/ot wins. How could it be possible that a team (Carolina) would make it over the Rangers with 5 less overall wins? They are essentially rewarding a team for unsucessfully “going for it” in overtime. Like Eddie said, in what sport is a win not a win? You shouldn’t be punished for winning games within the rules set by the NHL, and if shootouts are a part of it then more power to the Rangers for being one of the best teams at them.

by Peter North Stars on Apr 12, 2011 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

If anyone has the time, I would love to see the point spread using the 3-point system.

http://www.coppernblue.com/2011/3/28/2076777/bettman-point-vs-no-bettman-point-vs-3pt-system-what-would-the

This was through 76 games, so it may have moved the meter slightly, but it doesn’t really change anything standings-wise. It’s not really a 1 to 1 comparison though, because incentives would change if there was more incentive to win the regulation.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Apr 12, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks

Thanks for the job well done. I figured the Rangers would benefit from the 3-point system.

It is very weird to see the top teams with 150-point seasons.

by truebluesince75 on Apr 13, 2011 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am fine with that

3 points reg win
2 pts ot/so win
1 pt ot loss

by GAThingy on Apr 12, 2011 2:46 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I’d like to see a play in game like in baseball as the tiebreaker. Its a long grueling season, its the most fair way to see who has more left in the tank for the playoffs.

by NJblueshirt on Apr 12, 2011 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Keep it spread out

5 (almost 6) 20 goal scorers and 18 different players with a GWG. Let’s keep it spread out in the playoffs. Say 16 different Rangers with GWGs sounds good to me.
Glad they’re in. Now let’s keep up that compete level and take out the Caps.

Manning lobs it, Burress alone, touchdown New York!
For the empty net, Mark Messier... do you believe it?! Do you believe it?! He said we will win game 6 - he has just picked up the hat trick!

by Broheem NJ on Apr 12, 2011 10:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Anyone..

have any stats on Callahan’s point production vs Washington this year?

by l.whit7873 on Apr 12, 2011 10:47 AM EDT reply actions  

http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/players/3886/splits;_ylt=Ame7pC6avL8oMcio2nE9N9FivLYF

3 games, 2-1-3, +3, 7 SOG

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Apr 12, 2011 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

I miss Cally...

Watching him come out on crutches during the Thrashers debacle was deflating. It added a human element to him, which of course he is, but it was disheartening.

Somewhere, Dubi is looking at Cally’s framed portrait and sighing.

by truebluesince75 on Apr 12, 2011 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting that this version of the Rangers developed a system and stuck with it. Caps, I think, have done the same thing since December. Tends to favor a close, tactical, low-scoring series, imo.

Patron saint of quality footwear.

by fat_daddyo on Apr 12, 2011 11:38 AM EDT reply actions  

I definitely sense alot of 2-1, 3-2 type games.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Apr 12, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hope so. Because I don’t see NYR getting blown out a whole lot, but I can see the Caps coughing up a laugher if things go poorly.

3 goals is going to be the Rubicon in this series. The Caps win the vast majority of the time when they get 3 goals. I have to imagine the Rangers have similar statistics.

Patron saint of quality footwear.

by fat_daddyo on Apr 12, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

All the title of this article made me think...

“love lift us up where we belong”… god i’m such a loser

@clalicata17

by Clalicata17 on Apr 12, 2011 1:13 PM EDT reply actions  

quick question

About TV broadcasts..

I’m at school in Queens with limited channels, just MSG & VS. Are there any blackout restrictions or games on MSG+ or 2 that I need to worry about?

Just asking incase I need to find a place to watch the game besides my room.

GO PACK GO -- 13 Time World Champions
Let's Go Rangers

by Plusch on Apr 12, 2011 1:31 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

The first game is on MSG+, the other games (other than the one on NBC) are on regular MSG.

by Joe1969 on Apr 12, 2011 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok so it’ll be blacked out on VS in NYC again? & thanks

GO PACK GO -- 13 Time World Champions
Let's Go Rangers

by Plusch on Apr 12, 2011 2:31 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yes, VS will probably show Detroit-Phoenix on Wednesday for NYC viewers.

by Joe1969 on Apr 12, 2011 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup thats what it is. Im goin to my Uncles for the game then, thanks for the help again.

GO PACK GO -- 13 Time World Champions
Let's Go Rangers

by Plusch on Apr 12, 2011 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

New York Rangers News, Analysis, Line Combinations, Schedule And Stats

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

11p0584_small
Zuccarello signed in KHL
Small
Good Season boys! Now for next year.
Rangers_small
Just my thoughts...
Brad_richards_florida_panthers_v_new_york_cntbddbremtl_small
Strategy For Game 6
Small
It’s time to get Nasty.
Small
Rangers Viewing Party Questions
Staal-marc_small
In case you haven't seen this yet...
Dictator_small
Win Tickets to Gm. 4
Small
Some principles on defensive hockey tactics (nothing for experts but for the "casual fan")
Small
Let's have some fun. I have a time machine!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

51 - 24 - 7

Lost 3

Rangers Schedule


Managing Editor

Joe_2_small Joe Fortunato

Editors

Blueshirt-underground-logo1_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Drurybloodsmall_small Rob L

Meandrichards_small Nick Montemagno

Small George E. Ays

Untitled_small Dig Deep

Kreider_small Kevin Power

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Me_small Bryan Winters

Contributors

Twitter_pic_small Laurie Carr