Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Scoring Chances for Playoff Game 1 vs Washington

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 13: Alex Ovechkin #8 of the Washington Capitals scores at 13:44 of the third period to tie the score at 1-1 against the New York Rangers in Game One of the Eastern Conference Quarterfinals during the 2011 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Verizon Center on April 13, 2011 in Washington, DC.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

For the newly initiated, here's the definition of a scoring chance:

A scoring chance is defined as a clear play directed toward the opposing net from a dangerous scoring area – loosely defined as the top of the circle in and inside the faceoff dots, though sometimes slightly more generous than that depending on the amount of immediately-preceding puck movement or screens in front of the net. Blocked shots are generally not included, but missed shots are. A player is awarded a scoring chance anytime he is on the ice and someone from either team has a chance to score. He is awarded a “chance for” if someone on his team has a chance to score and a “chance against” if the opposing team has a chance to score.

We'll just jump headfirst into this, starting with the head to head table (click to enlarge):

Sc30111_medium

Quick explanation, the numbers in each box is the scoring chance differential for each player versus each opponent. Boxes with no number indicate there were no recorded chances with those players on the ice.  Based on the sea of red in most of the boxes, you can tell there was not a lot of favorable outcomes in this game.  The one matchup that seemed to work was the Vinny Prospal - Artem Anisimov - Marian Gaborik line against the Caps 2nd line of Marco Sturm - Jason Arnott - Alexander Semin.  Naturally, that's the line that was broken up in practice this morning.  The other noticeable result here is that of Brandon Dubinsky, who has no black to be found, and was a whopping -8 against Mike Green.

Star-divide

For the playoffs, I also thought it would be a good idea to track both how and where the chances are coming from.  To answer the how, I broke the chances down into 4 categories, listed below with the totals (number of goals in parentheses): 

 Chance Type
WSH NYR
Transition 11 (1) 5
Zone Pressure 6
7 (1)
Dzone Turnover 4 (1)
0
Off. Faceoffs 0 0

 

Transition should be fairly straight forward.  'Zone Pressure' meant any sustained attack by the offense that generated a chance, in contrast to the DZone turnover, which is a chance generated when the defense had clear control.  These are highly subjective, and only intended to give a quick guide to how the chances were generated. Any suggestions on additional categories would be welcome.  

As you can see. the Washington Capitals' 'counter-punching' created more than half of their total chances for the game, and twice as many as the New York Rangers were able to generate, and both of their goals were quick strike situations.  Looking to game 2, the Rangers' D needs to slow down the pace of the game to benefit.

For the 'where' of each chance, I broke down the chances into 4 areas, shown here in this incredibly pitiful MSPaint picture hack job (hey, I'm the math guy, not the art guy):

Scoringareazones_medium

Now that you see the guidelines, here's where the chances came from:

 Area WSH NYR
Zone 1 8 (1) 5 (1)
Zone 2 2 3
Zone 3 4 4
Zone 4 7 (1) 0

 

Again, the zones are a bit subjective, and suggestions on how to improve this data is welcome.  I think it is telling to that the Rangers were not able to keep Washington to the outside much, with 17 of the 21 Caps chances coming from up the middle and around the net.  

Finally, here's the raw data.  The OT gave Vic Ferrari's script some issues, so while i was able to manually correct the data here, there's no individual player ice time/chance summaries this go around.

Team Period Time Note NYR Opponent Score
NYR 1 14:49 Christensen 23 26 28 30 36 97 10 23 25 30 55 90 5v5 0
WSH 1 14:07 Backstrom 5 17 18 23 30   8 19 22 30 52 90 4v5 0
WSH 1 12:42 Sturm 5 18 19 21 30   18 21 28 30 44 74 4v5 0
WSH 1 8:13 Green 8 22 27 30 38   8 18 28 30 44 52 4v5 0
WSH 1 5:35 Chimera 17 21 23 27 30 38 4 21 25 30 52 90 5v5 0
WSH 1 5:03 Semin Crossbar 26 28 30 36 86 97 4 18 28 30 44 52 5v5 0
WSH 1 4:43 Arnott Crossbar 5 8 18 22 30 86 18 23 28 30 44 55 5v5 0
WSH 1 3:45 Ovechkin 17 19 21 27 30 38 4 8 19 25 30 52 5v5 0
WSH 2 13:26 Knuble Post 5 10 18 20 30 42 8 19 22 27 30 74 5v5 0
NYR 2 12:02 Gaborik 8 10 22 27 30 38 18 27 28 30 44 74 5v5 0
WSH 2 9:00 Semin 17 21 27 30 36 38 18 28 30 44 52 74 5v5 0
WSH 2 3:27 Backstrom 5 18 19 20 30 42 8 19 22 27 30 74 5v5 0
WSH 2 2:09 Chimera MS 22 28 30 36 86 97 18 23 25 30 52 90 5v5 0
NYR 2 1:27 Gaborik 10 20 27 30 38 42 18 23 25 30 52 90 5v5 0
NYR 3 18:04 Gilroy Goal 8 22 28 30 86 97 4 21 25 30 52 90 5v5 0
WSH 3 16:11 BGordon 23 26 28 30 36 97 4 10 15 26 30 52 5v5 1
NYR 3 13:01 Wolski 5 8 22 27 30 86 4 21 28 30 44 52 5v5 1
NYR 3 10:10 Staal 5 8 18 22 23 30 4 8 19 22 30 52 5v5 1
WSH 3 7:54 Laich 8 22 27 30 38 86 21 22 23 30 44 55 5v5 1
WSH 3 6:19 Semin 5 17 18 19 21 30 4 8 19 28 30 52 5v5 1
WSH 3 6:18 Ovechkin Goal Rbd 5 17 18 19 21 30 4 8 19 28 30 52 5v5 1
NYR 3 4:17 Gaborik 10 17 18 20 28 30 15 21 27 30 74   5v4 0
NYR 3 2:10 Fedotenko 5 19 21 26 27 30 8 19 28 30 52 74 5v5 0
WSH 3 1:34 Semin 8 17 22 27 30 38 4 18 28 30 44 52 5v5 0
NYR 4 18:42 Anisimov 10 20 27 30 38 42 21 27 28 30 44 74 5v5 0
NYR 4 18:41 Gaborik Rbd 10 20 27 30 38 42 21 27 28 30 44 74 5v5 0
NYR 4 18:06 Gilroy 8 22 28 30 86 97 4 15 25 26 30 52 5v5 0
WSH 4 18:00 Chimera MS 8 22 28 30 86 97 18 23 25 30 52 90 5v5 0
WSH 4 14:39 Johansson 8 20 27 30 38 42 18 25 27 30 74 90 5v5 0
WSH 4 8:45 Chimera MS 8 22 23 28 30 97 4 18 25 30 52 90 5v5 0
WSH 4 8:26 Ovechkin 17 22 23 28 30 97 8 19 23 25 30 52 5v5 0
NYR 4 6:34 Prospal 10 20 28 30 42 97 21 27 28 30 44 74 5v5 0
WSH 4 1:38 Semin Goal 5 8 17 18 23 30 4 21 28 30 44 52 5v5 0

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 1 7 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
2 2 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 5 5 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 4 5 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 12 21 11 18 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Comment away...

Comment 19 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Where are the chance-assists™?

Blogger for Russian Machine Never Breaks (RMNB) and WaPo's Capitals Insider
I also log the Caps scoring chances for 2010-11. The summary spreadsheet is posted on Google Docs.
Follow me on Twitter @ngreenberg

by NGreenberg on Apr 15, 2011 7:31 AM EDT reply actions  

Edited for time.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Apr 15, 2011 8:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

chance-assists?

"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx

In Prust We Trust

"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.

A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep

Follow me @8kpower

by Kevin Power on Apr 15, 2011 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yup, more 'innovation'

I kept track of any pass that directly led to a scoring chance, for instance Ovechkin springing Backstrom for the breakaway.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Apr 15, 2011 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

so if there’s a scoring chance off a rebound does the goalie get a negative chance-assist

"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx

In Prust We Trust

"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.

A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep

Follow me @8kpower

by Kevin Power on Apr 15, 2011 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Haha. No.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Apr 15, 2011 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

so it just works with passes that set up scoring chances? Like regular assists on goals?

"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx

In Prust We Trust

"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.

A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep

Follow me @8kpower

by Kevin Power on Apr 15, 2011 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that’s the basic idea. I have it a little more strict, like not a pass behind the net that a player then takes 200 feet for a chance. Just something to get a little more info on who is contributing.

For instance, in Game 1, Ovechkin had ‘only’ 3 chances himself, but he had 5-6 chance-assists (forget the number right now), so he was directly involved in like 8-9 chances, which I think it is much more descriptive of his game.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Apr 15, 2011 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

got it…ill try keeping track of whatever line gaby is on to see how many chances he’s involved in tonight

"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx

In Prust We Trust

"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.

A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep

Follow me @8kpower

by Kevin Power on Apr 15, 2011 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not much more than anyone who has time to watch a game in its entirety.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Apr 15, 2011 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’d imagine keeping track of these stats makes the game more enjoyable. Maybe its just me, but digging into the science of any game is when you finally begin to appreciate it for what it’s worth.

by one-bar on Apr 15, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow— meant to say this IS fantastic work. Hands type faster than my mind processes, I guess.

by GnarlyVarly on Apr 15, 2011 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

He uses a magic abacus

"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx

In Prust We Trust

"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.

A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep

Follow me @8kpower

by Kevin Power on Apr 15, 2011 11:51 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Horrible work

the art was just terrible… haha good work as usual Smurf

@clalicata17

by Clalicata17 on Apr 15, 2011 1:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Well the Dubinsky-Stepan-Fedotenko line was terrible… that line has to be broken up. And it makes sense that the Boyle-Prust-Wolski line was able to keep even with the Ovy line, being that they’re more physical – It seemed as though Boyle and Prust were at Ovy’s throat any chance they could get. Not sure what to think of the Zuccarello-Christensen-Drury line, but I did say Drury would be a key factor in this playoff run and took a lot of shit for it… I’m sticking to my guns though, Drury needs to be a big help for everyone else or we’re dead in the water.

Good work George, always appreciate the breakdown.

by one-bar on Apr 15, 2011 1:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Awesome as usual. And I love the chance-location tracking (and not just cause MSPaint rocks). And for once, its always nice to see in statistics what you “saw” during the game itself – Dubinsky was horrible.

Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.

http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
http://twitter.com/poplosertwit

by poploser on Apr 15, 2011 1:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

New York Rangers News, Analysis, Line Combinations, Schedule And Stats

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

11p0584_small
Zuccarello signed in KHL
Small
Good Season boys! Now for next year.
Rangers_small
Just my thoughts...
Brad_richards_florida_panthers_v_new_york_cntbddbremtl_small
Strategy For Game 6
Small
It’s time to get Nasty.
Small
Rangers Viewing Party Questions
Staal-marc_small
In case you haven't seen this yet...
Dictator_small
Win Tickets to Gm. 4
Small
Some principles on defensive hockey tactics (nothing for experts but for the "casual fan")
Small
Let's have some fun. I have a time machine!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

51 - 24 - 7

Lost 3

Rangers Schedule


Managing Editor

Joe_2_small Joe Fortunato

Editors

Blueshirt-underground-logo1_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Drurybloodsmall_small Rob L

Meandrichards_small Nick Montemagno

Small George E. Ays

Untitled_small Dig Deep

Kreider_small Kevin Power

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Me_small Bryan Winters

Contributors

Twitter_pic_small Laurie Carr