Scoring Chances for Playoff Game 1 vs Washington
For the newly initiated, here's the definition of a scoring chance:
A scoring chance is defined as a clear play directed toward the opposing net from a dangerous scoring area – loosely defined as the top of the circle in and inside the faceoff dots, though sometimes slightly more generous than that depending on the amount of immediately-preceding puck movement or screens in front of the net. Blocked shots are generally not included, but missed shots are. A player is awarded a scoring chance anytime he is on the ice and someone from either team has a chance to score. He is awarded a “chance for” if someone on his team has a chance to score and a “chance against” if the opposing team has a chance to score.
We'll just jump headfirst into this, starting with the head to head table (click to enlarge):
Quick explanation, the numbers in each box is the scoring chance differential for each player versus each opponent. Boxes with no number indicate there were no recorded chances with those players on the ice. Based on the sea of red in most of the boxes, you can tell there was not a lot of favorable outcomes in this game. The one matchup that seemed to work was the Vinny Prospal - Artem Anisimov - Marian Gaborik line against the Caps 2nd line of Marco Sturm - Jason Arnott - Alexander Semin. Naturally, that's the line that was broken up in practice this morning. The other noticeable result here is that of Brandon Dubinsky, who has no black to be found, and was a whopping -8 against Mike Green.
For the playoffs, I also thought it would be a good idea to track both how and where the chances are coming from. To answer the how, I broke the chances down into 4 categories, listed below with the totals (number of goals in parentheses):
| Chance Type |
WSH | NYR |
| Transition | 11 (1) | 5 |
| Zone Pressure | 6 |
7 (1) |
| Dzone Turnover | 4 (1) |
0 |
| Off. Faceoffs | 0 | 0 |
Transition should be fairly straight forward. 'Zone Pressure' meant any sustained attack by the offense that generated a chance, in contrast to the DZone turnover, which is a chance generated when the defense had clear control. These are highly subjective, and only intended to give a quick guide to how the chances were generated. Any suggestions on additional categories would be welcome.
As you can see. the Washington Capitals' 'counter-punching' created more than half of their total chances for the game, and twice as many as the New York Rangers were able to generate, and both of their goals were quick strike situations. Looking to game 2, the Rangers' D needs to slow down the pace of the game to benefit.
For the 'where' of each chance, I broke down the chances into 4 areas, shown here in this incredibly pitiful MSPaint picture hack job (hey, I'm the math guy, not the art guy):
Now that you see the guidelines, here's where the chances came from:
| Area | WSH | NYR |
| Zone 1 | 8 (1) | 5 (1) |
| Zone 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Zone 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Zone 4 | 7 (1) | 0 |
Again, the zones are a bit subjective, and suggestions on how to improve this data is welcome. I think it is telling to that the Rangers were not able to keep Washington to the outside much, with 17 of the 21 Caps chances coming from up the middle and around the net.
Finally, here's the raw data. The OT gave Vic Ferrari's script some issues, so while i was able to manually correct the data here, there's no individual player ice time/chance summaries this go around.
| Team | Period | Time | Note | NYR | Opponent | Score | |||||||||||
| NYR | 1 | 14:49 | Christensen | 23 | 26 | 28 | 30 | 36 | 97 | 10 | 23 | 25 | 30 | 55 | 90 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 1 | 14:07 | Backstrom | 5 | 17 | 18 | 23 | 30 | 8 | 19 | 22 | 30 | 52 | 90 | 4v5 | 0 | |
| WSH | 1 | 12:42 | Sturm | 5 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 30 | 18 | 21 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 74 | 4v5 | 0 | |
| WSH | 1 | 8:13 | Green | 8 | 22 | 27 | 30 | 38 | 8 | 18 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 52 | 4v5 | 0 | |
| WSH | 1 | 5:35 | Chimera | 17 | 21 | 23 | 27 | 30 | 38 | 4 | 21 | 25 | 30 | 52 | 90 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 1 | 5:03 | Semin Crossbar | 26 | 28 | 30 | 36 | 86 | 97 | 4 | 18 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 52 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 1 | 4:43 | Arnott Crossbar | 5 | 8 | 18 | 22 | 30 | 86 | 18 | 23 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 55 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 1 | 3:45 | Ovechkin | 17 | 19 | 21 | 27 | 30 | 38 | 4 | 8 | 19 | 25 | 30 | 52 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 2 | 13:26 | Knuble Post | 5 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 30 | 42 | 8 | 19 | 22 | 27 | 30 | 74 | 5v5 | 0 |
| NYR | 2 | 12:02 | Gaborik | 8 | 10 | 22 | 27 | 30 | 38 | 18 | 27 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 74 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 2 | 9:00 | Semin | 17 | 21 | 27 | 30 | 36 | 38 | 18 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 52 | 74 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 2 | 3:27 | Backstrom | 5 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 30 | 42 | 8 | 19 | 22 | 27 | 30 | 74 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 2 | 2:09 | Chimera MS | 22 | 28 | 30 | 36 | 86 | 97 | 18 | 23 | 25 | 30 | 52 | 90 | 5v5 | 0 |
| NYR | 2 | 1:27 | Gaborik | 10 | 20 | 27 | 30 | 38 | 42 | 18 | 23 | 25 | 30 | 52 | 90 | 5v5 | 0 |
| NYR | 3 | 18:04 | Gilroy Goal | 8 | 22 | 28 | 30 | 86 | 97 | 4 | 21 | 25 | 30 | 52 | 90 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 3 | 16:11 | BGordon | 23 | 26 | 28 | 30 | 36 | 97 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 26 | 30 | 52 | 5v5 | 1 |
| NYR | 3 | 13:01 | Wolski | 5 | 8 | 22 | 27 | 30 | 86 | 4 | 21 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 52 | 5v5 | 1 |
| NYR | 3 | 10:10 | Staal | 5 | 8 | 18 | 22 | 23 | 30 | 4 | 8 | 19 | 22 | 30 | 52 | 5v5 | 1 |
| WSH | 3 | 7:54 | Laich | 8 | 22 | 27 | 30 | 38 | 86 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 30 | 44 | 55 | 5v5 | 1 |
| WSH | 3 | 6:19 | Semin | 5 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 30 | 4 | 8 | 19 | 28 | 30 | 52 | 5v5 | 1 |
| WSH | 3 | 6:18 | Ovechkin Goal Rbd | 5 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 30 | 4 | 8 | 19 | 28 | 30 | 52 | 5v5 | 1 |
| NYR | 3 | 4:17 | Gaborik | 10 | 17 | 18 | 20 | 28 | 30 | 15 | 21 | 27 | 30 | 74 | 5v4 | 0 | |
| NYR | 3 | 2:10 | Fedotenko | 5 | 19 | 21 | 26 | 27 | 30 | 8 | 19 | 28 | 30 | 52 | 74 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 3 | 1:34 | Semin | 8 | 17 | 22 | 27 | 30 | 38 | 4 | 18 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 52 | 5v5 | 0 |
| NYR | 4 | 18:42 | Anisimov | 10 | 20 | 27 | 30 | 38 | 42 | 21 | 27 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 74 | 5v5 | 0 |
| NYR | 4 | 18:41 | Gaborik Rbd | 10 | 20 | 27 | 30 | 38 | 42 | 21 | 27 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 74 | 5v5 | 0 |
| NYR | 4 | 18:06 | Gilroy | 8 | 22 | 28 | 30 | 86 | 97 | 4 | 15 | 25 | 26 | 30 | 52 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 4 | 18:00 | Chimera MS | 8 | 22 | 28 | 30 | 86 | 97 | 18 | 23 | 25 | 30 | 52 | 90 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 4 | 14:39 | Johansson | 8 | 20 | 27 | 30 | 38 | 42 | 18 | 25 | 27 | 30 | 74 | 90 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 4 | 8:45 | Chimera MS | 8 | 22 | 23 | 28 | 30 | 97 | 4 | 18 | 25 | 30 | 52 | 90 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 4 | 8:26 | Ovechkin | 17 | 22 | 23 | 28 | 30 | 97 | 8 | 19 | 23 | 25 | 30 | 52 | 5v5 | 0 |
| NYR | 4 | 6:34 | Prospal | 10 | 20 | 28 | 30 | 42 | 97 | 21 | 27 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 74 | 5v5 | 0 |
| WSH | 4 | 1:38 | Semin Goal | 5 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 23 | 30 | 4 | 21 | 28 | 30 | 44 | 52 | 5v5 | 0 |
| Period | Totals | EV | PP | 5v3 PP | SH | 5v3 SH | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Totals | 12 | 21 | 11 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Comment away...
19 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Where are the chance-assists™?
Blogger for Russian Machine Never Breaks (RMNB) and WaPo's Capitals Insider
I also log the Caps scoring chances for 2010-11. The summary spreadsheet is posted on Google Docs.
Follow me on Twitter @ngreenberg
Edited for time.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Apr 15, 2011 8:20 AM EDT up reply actions
chance-assists?
"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx
In Prust We Trust
"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.
A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep
Follow me @8kpower
Yup, more 'innovation'
I kept track of any pass that directly led to a scoring chance, for instance Ovechkin springing Backstrom for the breakaway.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Apr 15, 2011 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions
so if there’s a scoring chance off a rebound does the goalie get a negative chance-assist
"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx
In Prust We Trust
"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.
A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep
Follow me @8kpower
Haha. No.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Apr 15, 2011 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions
so it just works with passes that set up scoring chances? Like regular assists on goals?
"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx
In Prust We Trust
"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.
A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep
Follow me @8kpower
by Kevin Power on Apr 15, 2011 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, that’s the basic idea. I have it a little more strict, like not a pass behind the net that a player then takes 200 feet for a chance. Just something to get a little more info on who is contributing.
For instance, in Game 1, Ovechkin had ‘only’ 3 chances himself, but he had 5-6 chance-assists (forget the number right now), so he was directly involved in like 8-9 chances, which I think it is much more descriptive of his game.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Apr 15, 2011 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
got it…ill try keeping track of whatever line gaby is on to see how many chances he’s involved in tonight
"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx
In Prust We Trust
"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.
A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep
Follow me @8kpower
by Kevin Power on Apr 15, 2011 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Not much more than anyone who has time to watch a game in its entirety.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Apr 15, 2011 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Wow— meant to say this IS fantastic work. Hands type faster than my mind processes, I guess.
by GnarlyVarly on Apr 15, 2011 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
He uses a magic abacus
"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx
In Prust We Trust
"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.
A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep
Follow me @8kpower
by Kevin Power on Apr 15, 2011 11:51 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Well the Dubinsky-Stepan-Fedotenko line was terrible… that line has to be broken up. And it makes sense that the Boyle-Prust-Wolski line was able to keep even with the Ovy line, being that they’re more physical – It seemed as though Boyle and Prust were at Ovy’s throat any chance they could get. Not sure what to think of the Zuccarello-Christensen-Drury line, but I did say Drury would be a key factor in this playoff run and took a lot of shit for it… I’m sticking to my guns though, Drury needs to be a big help for everyone else or we’re dead in the water.
Good work George, always appreciate the breakdown.
Awesome as usual. And I love the chance-location tracking (and not just cause MSPaint rocks). And for once, its always nice to see in statistics what you “saw” during the game itself – Dubinsky was horrible.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
http://twitter.com/poplosertwit

by 


























