Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

New York Rangers Offseason Game Plan

1. Resign Core RFA’s 


The Rangers face an offseason where many players that are part of the core of the team going forward are restricted free agents and are up for new contracts. Forwards Ryan Callahan, Brandon Dubinsky, Artem Anisimov, and Brian Boyle are all up for new deals, as are defensemen Matt Gilroy and Michael Sauer. 

Of that list, Gilroy would appear to be the one most likely to not be retained. Callahan scored 23 goals in an injury-shortened season, while Dubinsky’s 24 goals, 30 assists, and 54 points were all good enough to lead the team. Anisimov had 44 points in his 2nd full NHL season, and Boyle obliterated his career high with 21 goals. Sauer has a phenomenal rookie season on the blue-line, paired with fellow freshman Ryan McDonagh, the crown-jewel of the Scott Gomez trade. 

The Rangers are in an enviable position of having solid organizational depth on defense, all of which at a very young age. Having this strength allows the Rangers to walk away from Matt Gilroy, who played solid but unspectacular hockey the past 2 seasons. 

Expect Callahan and Dubinsky to both get deals in the $3.5-$4M per year vicinity, Anisimov and Boyle both around $2.5M-$3M, and Sauer $1.5M-$2M. It would be in the Rangers best interest to choose 5-6 year deals for Callahan and Dubinsky, as the leadership of the team is clearly in their hands going forward. 

Star-divide

 

2. Acquire a #1 Center to play with Marian Gaborik 

The Rangers have been looking for a #1 center since the departure of Michael Nylander, who helped revive the career of Jaromir Jagr and was integral in helping #68 set a new club record for goals in a season with 54. 

Marian Gaborik, the club’s only true sniper and one of the top 10 players in the world when playing at his best, has been without a true center in his time on Broadway. Experiments using veteran Vinny Prospal, journeyman Erik Christensen, and young players Artem Anisimov and Derek Stepan have yielded underwhelming results at best. Having seen what Gaborik was able to produce in 2009-10 with 42 goals playing without a true #1 only whets the appetite for what can be done if he had one. 

Solution? Brad Richards

Richards, 31, is coming off of a 5 year deal and has expressed interest in staying with Dallas, at times, but an ownership situation that is very up-in-the-air doesn’t give the stability that the center is looking for. 

A former Conn Smythe winner, Richards has played under Rangers coach John Tortorella and won a Stanley Cup under his leadership with Tampa. It is expected that if the situation in Dallas doesn’t work itself out, and signs don’t support the idea that it will in time for free agency on July 1st, expect a hungry Rangers team to make a solid offer to Richards to make him their #1 center. 

3. Buyout Chris Drury and Wojtek Wolski 

The Rangers, at this point in the cycle, have to make sure they have the greatest amount of cap space possible to ensure their restricted free agents are taken care of and they can make moves towards select targets in the unrestricted free agent market. 

If the Rangers are to buyout Chris Drury and Wojtek Wolski, the total cap space available for Sather would be approximately $24.65M, assuming that the salary cap does not increase, which it likely will by up to $3M 

Assume that, as I have outlined above, Callahan and Dubinsky both get deals in the $3.5-$4M per year vicinity, Anisimov and Boyle both around $2.5M-$3M, and Sauer $1.5M-$2M. On the high end, that eats up $16M, which leaves anywhere $8.65M to $11.65M in cap space, pending a cap increase, to sign Brad Richards and other position players if necessary. 

The beauty of the buyout of Wolski, specifically, is that due to his age, the CBA states that, unlike normal buyouts where 2/3 of the remaining contract is owed over double the remaining years, Wolski and other 25 and younger players who are bought out are only bought out at 1/3 the remaining contract. 

4. Continue building for the future: select highest upside forward in 1st round of NHL draft, and use 4th round pick on a goaltender. 

The Rangers are very deep organizationally in young defensemen. Based on a look at current projections, the defensive corps in 2-3 years may be comprised of Marc Staal, Dan Girardi, Ryan McDonagh, Michael Sauer, Michael Del Zotto, and Dylan McIlrath. That list doesn’t even include players such as Pavel Valentenko, Tomas Kundratek, and Mikhail Pashnin, all of which project to be NHL players. The Rangers also acquired former 2009 1st round pick Tim Erixon from the Calgary Flames for 2 2nd round picks, and he is projected to be NHL ready.

Staal, Girardi, Sauer, and McDonagh were a solid top 4 for the Rangers this year, the former two on the top pairing and the latter two both playing far beyond expectations in their rookie seasons. Del Zotto looks to regain his rookie year form and possibly be their power-play quarterback of the future, while McIlrath is about 2 years away. Valentenko was a throw-in from the Scott Gomez trade that also brought in McDonagh, and has flourished far beyond expectations. Kundratek has been labled by Mark Messier as the fastest defenseman he’s ever seen, and he’s played with Paul Coffey. Pashnin was the #1 pick in the inaugural KHL draft a few years back, and has indicated he wishes to play in North America. The Rangers loved Erixon in the draft in which they chose Chris Kreider, and the Flames's loss is their clear gain.

Clearly, drafting defensemen at this juncture doesn’t appear to be an organizational need, and there is not a lack of offensive prospects for the Blueshirts, but given their depth on the blueline, offense is clearly the way to go. While the Rangers have a few high upside prospects such as Chris Kreider, Christian Thomas, Evgeny Grachev, and Mats Zuccarello, you can never have enough pure scoring. 

Kreider will go into another year at Boston College this year, but the Rangers will do anything they can to turn the speedy wing pro this year. Thomas recently signed an entry-level contract after having a fantastic season in the OHL with Oshawa Generals in which he scored 54 goals and 99 points in 66 games. Grachev had a so-so year with the AHL Connecticut Whale and will be given a look during camp. Zuccarello, technically still a prospect due to his lack of NHL experience, played 42 games with the Blueshirts, scoring 6 goals and 17 assists. The diminutive forward is expected to be in the Rangers top-9 this season. Additionally, names like Ryan Bourque and Carl Hagelin will get looks in camp, but Hagelin is more likely to make the pro team over Bourque, if at all. 

The Rangers depth in goal, longer-term, is more of a question. Only Chad Johnson and Scott Stajcer have any sort of NHL promise of the goalies in the system. Cameron Talbot doesn’t appear to project out as an NHL player, in similar fashion to 6’8" Jason Missiaen. The Rangers would be well served to add another goalie into the prospect pool. 

5. Name Ryan Callahan the Captain 

There isn’t much that needs to be said here. Assuming Chris Drury is bought out, the Rangers will be in need of a captain, and there isn’t a more worthy player on the roster, or a player who better exemplifies what a Ranger is than Ryan Callahan. He has been the heir apparent to Drury for over a year now, and in the event the Rangers move on from Drury, which I completely advocate, the job should be Callahan’s.

 

Brian Attard

@captain9nyr

Contributor to Blueshirt Banter Radio

http://www.blueshirtbanter.com

Comment 50 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Beautifully Said

by XxC17xX on Jun 7, 2011 10:26 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Briefly:

Agree on the range for Cally/Dubi.
No way Anisimov gets that much. Figure on something not far from what Dubi’s coming off of – maybe 1.5 to no more than 2.25.
Same with Boyle – he needs to prove that he can repeat. Say maybe 1.5 max per on a 2 year deal
Sauer – I think 1.5 to 1.75 is the max you’ll see – about what Girardi got on his first deal.

I don’t think you have to buy out both of Drury and Wolski to make the numbers work. One or the other, with the cap increase, will do it. Now, you may WANT to buy out both – and use the extra $$ to go after a UFA winger – but personally I’d keep Wolski if the decision is made to buy out Drury, or if he retires. Wolski, with a full training camp under his belt, and in a contract year, and potentially with a setup man like Richards playing on top line with Gaborik, could be the guy who put up big points in COL. He has the skill. He’s going to have the motivation (contract year). It’s possible. Likely? Probably not – but it might be worth the risk.

by dbmaven on Jun 7, 2011 10:29 PM EDT reply actions  

this

is a must read…Great job once again Captain…you get a rec

"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx

In Prust We Trust

"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.

A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep

Follow me @8kpower

by Kevin Power on Jun 7, 2011 10:47 PM EDT reply actions  

A few things

1. Your number for Cally and Dubi could turn out to be a bit low, but everyone else seems very high, so I think you’re OK. If we pay AA or Boyle 3 mil per, I’ll flip out.

2. Richards is a #1 center, but I’m not sure he’s gonna fix Gabby. Still, brining in Richards gives us a REAL top 3 talent, something we lack in the system.

3. Yes and Yes.

4. I think this is still premature. These kids need to show they can do it, and that they know what it takes to do it. Brining in guys like Richards and Jagr will show them what it takes to win.

You completely ignored the mess on D. We need a puck mover/PPQB and a guy who can anchor this group, and be trusted late in games.

by BuckarooClub on Jun 7, 2011 11:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Richards would be the PPQB. And I’m not sure what mess your referring to

by OmarLittle on Jun 8, 2011 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

The D is not “a mess.”

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jun 8, 2011 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

i think it could use some help

by Ahmad Bradshaw on Jun 8, 2011 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Every defense in the league could use some help. A guy like Babchuk would help round out the 3rd pair and give the PP some juice on the backline, but there’s nothing wrong with our top 4, at least to the degree that one would describe the defense as “a mess.”

It’s just more Staal hate from Buck, which is why the little “be trusted late in games” thing is thrown in there.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jun 8, 2011 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right on the money as usual, George….if Staal can’t be trusted late in games when he plays over 30 minutes a night, I guess Buck’s logic would dictate that Chara sucks too, due to his gaffe in OT that allowed Burrows to end game 2.

Most teams in the NHL who aren’t the Canucks would love to have the alleged mess the Rangers have on defense.

Prole art threat.

by greifi griffie on Jun 8, 2011 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chara’s OT play wasn’t nearly as bad as the the give away to avoid a hit, or the no-play on Ovi. But, if Chara made 2 game deciding plays, I think you’d see his ice time cut pretty quick. Espcially is Defense is all he could do. I’m not even looking for Staal to get traded away for that, I’m just asking that we find some people that fill needs for the team, and fuel some competitve fire on defense, to keep everyone working and improving.

by BuckarooClub on Jun 8, 2011 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

To clarify here: Zdeno Chara, (a world-renowned shutdown defenseman who also happens to be his team captain) doesn’t hustle back into position, gets burned, and then doesn’t take his man down and ends up yielding the losing goal 11 seconds into an OT game in the Cup Finals. But that’s not “nearly as bad” as a poor clear by Marc Staal (after two other teammates failed to clear the puck) out of the zone in round 1 of the playoffs.

We’ll agree to disagree on this one.

Prole art threat.

by greifi griffie on Jun 8, 2011 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you’re a bit off saying Chara “doesn’t hustle back into position”. The GOAL was 11 seconds into the period, how far OUT of position do you think he was? Thomas sliding out of control is why that goal happen. If Thomas was back in position, that goal never happened. I think Chara could have taken the body behind the net, but that was pretty dicey, and probably would have been called, with the puck JUST at the tip of Burrows reach.

Marc Staal’s play wasn’t a “poor clear” it was an “OH SHIT” play. He saw bodies flying at him and he gave up the puck. Not taking down Ovi on the breakaway was the other huge bonehead play there. There has to be some accountability back there with a young group like this. Shaking things up, and bringing a guy that makes everyone worry about their standing in the pecking order isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Keep them motivated.

by BuckarooClub on Jun 8, 2011 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like the idea of Babchuck as a 3rd pair defenseman. I really don’t think there is a need to go after a guy like Erhoff. It’s going to be awesome in a few years when we can essentially roll all 3 d pairs against anyone on the ice. I can definitely see Girardi being delt, Mcdonough and Stall being paired together down the road, and potentially forming the best shut down pair in the league with some pretty solid offensive capabilities. Additonally, as much as we like Sauer he might be a third pair D man a couple years down the road, which wouldnt be a bad thing to have a guy like him anchoring down the third line. This would leave Mcilwrath and an erixon/del zotto match to round out the second pair.

Regardless, you can never have too many prospects at one position, because you never know who is going to pan out. The perfect example is Sanguinetti, who never panned out, but a guy like Sauer became an integral piece of our season last year. You never know who is going step up, especially with the level of competition at the position. Having this many good prospects can only serve as motivation, because they know the guy next to them can take their job…

by Peter North Stars on Jun 8, 2011 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with everything you have said but one: I expect Sauer with Staal, not McDonagh. This is no knock on McDonagh as both of them have already exceeded expectations, but we could use Sauer’s tenacity on the first pairing, and his ability to always know the right time to pinch or sneak up inside the circles is something we pray MDZ learns. He hung Girardi out to dry too many times over a season and a half because he misread the play. We can only hope that MDZ improves in the off-season.

The truth of the matter is that we are too loaded on D (in comparison to our forward pool). Besides the current top six (at the end of the season), Erixon, MDZ, Valentenko, Kundratek, Pashnin, and McIlrath are all predicted to be NHL-quality D-men. If Gilroy is not tendered and offer and Eminger walks, that leaves two spots for 4 guys (as McIlrath is not ready yet and I think Pashnin has one more year on his KHL contract). This situation almost demands that we move one or two with a roster player for a top-six forward, but until that happens one thing is for sure: there will be fierce competition for roster spots on the third D pairing. This will not only improve an already stacked defense where the top 4 are all but solidified, but will push the third pairing (as well as the entire D corps) to work harder, play smarter, and support the offense when possible.

by Kritikal on Jun 8, 2011 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pashnin’s obligation in the KHL is over – he’s indicated that he’s interested in now coming to North America. In reality, he won’t challenge for a spot this year – he’s going to need a year in the AHL to adjust to rink size, speed, etc.

Everyone seems to be saying that Erixon is NHL ready now. We’ll find out if that’s the case over the course of the summer and training camp.

The concern with Valentenko is foot-speed – many aren’t sure that he has enough to keep up at the NHL level. He seemed to be “ok” but not outstanding in that regard in the AHL.
McIlrath isn’t in the conversation for this coming season as far as NHL goes.

So while it appears we have a “glut” of d-men – as a GM you’d love to have 7-8 truly NHL caliber guys, and another 6-7 who are “almost there”. Right now, the NYR (including AHL) have 6 “ready” (assuming Erixon really is), and another 4-5 at some stage of readiness (if you include Niemi and Pashnin). Consider what happens if (heaven forbid) one of the NHL guys – let’s pick Sauer – goes down with an injury that takes him out for a protracted recovery period. You want to have someone that can step up immediately without it being a big stretch. As a result, trading D right now is not a good idea. It may be doable in 1-2 years depending on lots of factors – but now wouldn’t be the time unless you want to (or think you can) take a risk based on who’s coming along…..

by dbmaven on Jun 8, 2011 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Every defense in the league could use some help

EXACTLY! And all the help we have one the way, in the system, is more of the same. Stay at home defense. You’ve gotta have a guy who’s comfortable with the puck on his stick, who can start a breakout and carry the puck when the forecheck takes away the breakout pass. The closest thing we have to that is MDZ, but I’d much rather have the problem of TOO MANY defensemen who can move the puck, rather then not having any.

Right now the “mess” is that we have alot of young defensemen who all do the same thing. As I suggested in other posts, I think selling high with Girardi is the way to go, and using his money to sign a UFA who can play on the top pair on D. That would make a top 4 alot better.

by BuckarooClub on Jun 8, 2011 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

As much as I love Girardi I do see them trading him in a couple years, but I think it’s too early to get rid of him now. One a very young defense, him and Staal provide the leadership to the other defenseman, and getting rid of him would leave a void of experience on the backend. However, in a couple years when mcdonough and sauer have a few years under their belt, they can help mentor the younger guys (Mclwrath, del zottto) along with Stall who will be a crusty veteran by then haha.

I just dont think its the right time to get rid of Girardi, not that I dont think at some point he will go…

by Peter North Stars on Jun 8, 2011 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree that we need some more veteran presence, I’d just like to see that in the form of a more offensively able d-man. If we can get something in return for Girardi, and use his money to land Wisnieski or Erhoff, it would be a big help .

by BuckarooClub on Jun 8, 2011 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I tend to agree with you on this one buck. But I would only trade a player like Girardi if we were absolutely sure that we could sign someone like Wis or Ehrhoff with the money.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Jun 8, 2011 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

You have to sign them first, then make the trade, which is really difficult in our cap situation.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jun 8, 2011 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not necessarily

Signing them, then making the trade is the safest route. Making the trade first offers a little more risk, but also the chance of alot more reward. Having Girardi’s salary off the books give us more flexibility in negotiations with Richards, our own RFA’s, and the UFA defenseman we want to get as a replacement. It also avoids us trying to make the trade when teams know we NEED to make a move to get under the roster. If something happens and we come up empty on the puck mover we want, there’s still plenty of decent “patches” that can hold the fort for a season or two, if the plan is to move a young guy up anyway.

by BuckarooClub on Jun 8, 2011 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

let's get burned

Yeah, let’s risk losing assets for nothing without the promise of replacing or upgrading them. I am now convinced you are Phil Esposito, Buck…..

Prole art threat.

by greifi griffie on Jun 9, 2011 7:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I never said give up Girardi "for nothing"

I said if you move Girardi FIRST, I think you can get better value for him, and have more freedom when you’re negotiating with Richards and whatever UFA d-man we want to bring in. Here’s the list of UFA’s this year. We can certainly get someone of that list who’s is a capable replacement, and can hold the fort for a season or two if we somehow miss out on the puck movers we want.

by BuckarooClub on Jun 9, 2011 7:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

you advocated taking more of a risk

Direct quote from you—“making the trade first offers a little more risk, but also the chance of alot (sic) more reward…”

All I’m saying here is that while there is strategy behind what you advocate, it is far more risky to do what you suggest. If you want to trade a guy like Girardi he needs to be properly replaced, not moved without a safety net in the form of another player in place.

Prole art threat.

by greifi griffie on Jun 9, 2011 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Look over that UFA list

If we land one of the top puck movers, it’s a clear upgrade, but you can go pretty far down that list and still find players he can give us what Girardi does. It’s even easier to find a suitable replacement on that list if you believe (and I do) that the Dan Girardi we saw this past season is better then what we can expect for the rest of his contract.

Our D right now isn’t going to make us a contender. We’ve got to make a move. We can secure the replacement first, and expect to take less in return, and possibly cost ourselves Brad Richards to be “safe”, OR we can move Girardi before the deadline, and even if we miss on one of the top puckmovers, we can certainly find someone on that list who can be a suitable short term replacement.

by BuckarooClub on Jun 9, 2011 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

not sure if i agree with the erhoff pick up because im not a big fan of him. but i definitely agree that NOW is the time to move girardi. most fans here IMO way overvalue him. hes nothing but a grinder who despite his applaud-able dedication in blocking shots, is mediocre in every other aspect. he doesnt take the body, he doesnt pass well, he doesnt shoot and i think this season will prove to be the best of his career despite his age. he doesnt have such a wealth of experience that he really makes a difference in that department. if you want leadership on the d then fine, go get a true veteran d man to mentor. but girardi is not it and his contract is too big to justify keeping him here. id venture to say that in a year or so we will be comparing him to mike rosival: over paid, mistake prone, and taking up a roster spot that we want to give a young up and comer.

by nhl21 on Jun 9, 2011 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nothing but a grinder? Really? i think he was the most sonsistent D man on our team this past season and he blocked a couple of shots too. If he needs to go to land a player like Stastny, then so be it, but inly if we are really addressing our needs.

Absolute Worst Ranger Fan!!!!!!....yet incredibly realistic and usually correct.

by earthworm on Jun 10, 2011 3:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t call the D a mess, and MDZ and Erixon could possibly both step up this year and help in that regard, in addition to Richards for the PP.

by BigB22 on Jun 8, 2011 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think its unnecessary to buy out Wolski's contract

Look at the roster that Scott Cullen proposed on Capgeek… the only difference in the lineup is that maybe you switch Wolski with Zuccarello and Anisimov with Stepan.

The only sacrifices are Prospal and Fedotenko, which I’m cool with… Fedotenko can probably command a multi-year deal as a checking winger on a contending team somewhere. Prospal can probably fetch a contract similar to the one he signed with the Rangers last off-season, as well.

Bring up either Grachev or Hagelin, and let them play the third/ fourth lines.

by Hoggo on Jun 8, 2011 4:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Basically agree except for the order
  1. - Buyout Drury and Wolski (June 15).
  2. - draft Armia (June 24).
  3. - sign Richards (July 1st).
  4. - sign Babchuk (the other offensive D will be too overpriced) (July 1st).
  5. - sign AA, Boyle, and Sauer to contracts in the $1.5M to $2M per year range each (2 years each).
  6. - waive Redden to get him off the cap (has to stay on the “summer cap”).
  7. - sign Dubi and Cally to contracts in the $3.5M to $4M per year range each (4 years each). They will have to wait because Redden goes back on the summer cap and with the signings of Richards and Babchuk Dubi and Cally may have to wait to sign. But they will.
  8. - re-sign Gilroy for less than qualified (2 years @ approx $1M per year).
    MZA-Richards-Gaby
    Dubi-AA-Cally
    Thomas-Stepan-Hagelin
    Avery-Boyle-Prust
    Staal-Girardi
    McD-Babchuk
    MDZ-Sauer
    King-Biron
    Spares: EC and Gilroy

by Richter1994 on Jun 8, 2011 6:12 AM EDT reply actions  

Why sign Babchuk at all? I know the Rangers need defensemen to play the right side, but I’m sure one the 5 or so prospective rookies can take that spot.

by Hoggo on Jun 8, 2011 6:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Booming shot but so-so D. that’s why I split up McD and Sauer to play with the more offensive-minded D.

by Richter1994 on Jun 8, 2011 7:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

I do like the Thomas idea… and while he really doesn’t have much left to accomplish at the junior level, I wouldn’t be upset if he was returned to his club after a 10 game tryout with the Rangers. The Kings did it with Brayden Schenn, and we can all agree that he’s a monster.

by Hoggo on Jun 8, 2011 7:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think he should definitely get the 10 games (9 games?) to see what he can do. He’s our “Skinner.”

by Richter1994 on Jun 8, 2011 7:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wanted to trade Gaby in December, 2010 for Schenn+ so I obviously agree, lol.

by Richter1994 on Jun 8, 2011 7:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd trade Gaborik and someone else's soul for Schenn

They weren’t giving up Schenn for anything though… at least that’s what I recall.

I wouldn’t trade Schenn either…. They have two young, high-quality goalies in Jonathan Bernier (23 years old) and Jonathan Quick (25 years old)… and we know one of them will eventually be traded for an elite winger. I was surprised Philly didn’t go after one of them by dangling Carter.

Kopitar will only be 24 by the start of the season, and outside of Ryan Smyth, the rest of their core is younger than 27. They’re a couple pieces away.

by Hoggo on Jun 8, 2011 7:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s too late now. The Rangers needed to trade Gaby back then when his value was high. Now the Rangers are stuck with him and pray that he reverts back to 2009/10 form or they will have yet another albatross of a contract. That’s why getting Richards is even more important: To get Richards himself and to help Gaby score goals.

by Richter1994 on Jun 8, 2011 8:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Gaborik can score goals without Richards. He proved that in 2009-10. Again, I feel like his stats were a circumstance of the system. I’m hoping it changes this year, whether Richards signs or not.

The Rangers only won 5 more games last year than they did in 2009-10, with the difference being that they only lost 5 times in OT this past season compared to 11 the year before, That’s not much of an improvement, especially considering the way the NHL counts regulation and overtime vs shootout wins toward who makes the playoffs.

by Hoggo on Jun 8, 2011 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree but what difference would it have made if even just Gaby were more consistent and not scoring all his goals in 5 games? (exaggeration but you get the idea). All this team needs is a little more scoring and they will compete. They really should have beaten the Caps but they couldn’t finish. They did get the scoring chances just didn’t finish. Richards, a Babchuk let’s say, and improvement within the core will make them much better. If they even have an “average” PP then that will go a long way towards success. they made the playoffs with one of the worst PP’s in team history. Even when they were bad in the past they could still score on the PP.

by Richter1994 on Jun 8, 2011 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think the Rangers could have beaten any of the elite teams this year, Washington being one of them. Even with Backstrom having an off-season, the Rangers didn’t have an answer for them.

I don’t feel like making the playoffs is as great an accomplishment in the NHL as it is in say, the MLB or NFL. More teams make it to the Stanley Cup playoffs than not. And you can aruge about Philly in the 8th spot in 2009-10, but they were a sick team just maddeningly (for Flyers fans) inconsistent.

I don’t think they were bad in the past… again, they made the playoffs, but you have to remember that they were playing with Jagr, his Czech-mates with whom he played well, and Shannahan (who could put the puck on a dime if you threw it at the net).

by Hoggo on Jun 8, 2011 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the Rangers would not have gotten out of the second round if they did get by Washington, which I think they should have. We need scoring on this team. We’ve had a relatively sound defense and scoring goals has seemed like its been our issue for a decade.

Absolute Worst Ranger Fan!!!!!!....yet incredibly realistic and usually correct.

by earthworm on Jun 8, 2011 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

With more timely scoring they would have beaten the Caps and then who knows? I agree about the scoring which is why I suggest the line-up above for next season.

by Richter1994 on Jun 9, 2011 6:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

GOOD WORK

The only thing I disagree with is the amount of each resigning.

Dubi and Cally I think you predicted accurately, but you overpayed Sauer, Boyle, and Anisimov.

AA should yield around 2 mil, Boyle somewhere between 1 and 1.5, and Sauer somewhere between 1 and 1.5 as well.

Otherwise, strong work.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Jun 8, 2011 3:07 PM EDT reply actions  

agree

i agree to the game plan…we just need to shed as much as money as possible we got a solid 2nd n 3rd line. our dominating young defense just need the top talent i wouldnt trade girardi unless yea down the road and if we r that close for a final piece.

by Anthony Tamburro on Jun 8, 2011 5:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Also, like Richter said

Let Fedotenko and Prospal walk.

Has anyone seen the 20 in 20 series this summer? Here’s Carl Hagelin. I really want to see him on a line with Boyle and Prust.

I love Fedotenko and Prospal…. but Feds can probably get a 2-3 year deal on a contender (which he should do) and Prospal is old. He can probably get a 1 year deal on a contendor.

by Hoggo on Jun 8, 2011 10:03 PM EDT reply actions  

I like Feds if we have a spot for him. He did what he was supposed to and he would come cheap.

Absolute Worst Ranger Fan!!!!!!....yet incredibly realistic and usually correct.

by earthworm on Jun 8, 2011 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

anisimov

is a curious case. i think hes worth slightly less than what youre alotting for him. however, hes a russian who pocketed 20 goals this season. i wouldnt be surprised if he tries asking for 3 million or more. similar situation with boyle. he had a career year and will be looking to cash in so despite his career numbers i could see him asking for a considerable amount mroe than what youve suggested, maybe 2.5.

by nhl21 on Jun 9, 2011 2:30 AM EDT reply actions  

sorry the 2.5 for boyle was in response to an earlier post i read. the numbers you originally posted look about right

by nhl21 on Jun 9, 2011 2:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

New York Rangers News, Analysis, Line Combinations, Schedule And Stats

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

11p0584_small
Zuccarello signed in KHL
Small
Good Season boys! Now for next year.
Rangers_small
Just my thoughts...
Brad_richards_florida_panthers_v_new_york_cntbddbremtl_small
Strategy For Game 6
Small
It’s time to get Nasty.
Small
Rangers Viewing Party Questions
Staal-marc_small
In case you haven't seen this yet...
Dictator_small
Win Tickets to Gm. 4
Small
Some principles on defensive hockey tactics (nothing for experts but for the "casual fan")
Small
Let's have some fun. I have a time machine!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

51 - 24 - 7

Lost 3

Rangers Schedule


Managing Editor

Joe_2_small Joe Fortunato

Editors

Blueshirt-underground-logo1_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Drurybloodsmall_small Rob L

Meandrichards_small Nick Montemagno

Small George E. Ays

Untitled_small Dig Deep

Kreider_small Kevin Power

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Me_small Bryan Winters

Contributors

Twitter_pic_small Laurie Carr