Why I Am Excited for Next Season
Hi all. I have been at this as a Ranger fan since 1967. I have been through all the heartaches, the few really good times, and the one really high over those many years. I have waited for this for many, many years. What am I talking about? A team that has a significant number of home grown players and that has outside players that really want to be here. For the first time in a long time, I feel that we have a "team" of players that want to put the Rangers' sweater on, fight for it, and win for it.
You look up and down the current roster and all you see is players that you know will put in the effort to help make the Rangers winners. Last season was one of the most enjoyable for me in quite some time. We all know the team wasn't great talent-wise but the night-in, night-out battling that they displayed was appreciated and something to behold. I knew they would make the playoffs. Even during an early March 3 game home stand in which they lost all 3 (unfortunately I was there for all 3 of them) I knew they would make the playoffs because I could see that this team always finds a way to get it done. The Boston home game at the end of the year was incredible. Coming back from a 3 goal deficit in front of the home crowd in a game they had to have was like being at a Game 7 in the playoffs.
To add to that determination, it was quite obvious that the talent level needed to be elevated. Bring in Richards, bring in Erixon, bring in Rupp (an enforcer that can actually be given ice time and score some goals), and have the core grow one more year results in a team that I believe can get to the 5th or 6th seed of the conference. That may not seem significant, going from 8th to let's say 6th, but actually it is. Sports have become a year-to year type of thing. There will no longer be any dynasty-type teams in sports that have a cap and free agency. i would bet starting with this past year's Cup winner, we will see 5 different Cup winners over the next 5 years. So, making the playoffs "easily" as opposed to having to fight and claw to the end is a significant step. Don't forget, this is a 3 year plan: Make the playoffs in 2010/11, bring in more talent for 2011/12 and keep the core intact, and seriously compete in 2012/13 when the next wave of young players are ready. IMO, we are right on track to not only win in the short-term but I feel we are built to win and compete long-term.
Gone are the days of paying poor Bobby Holik like a #1 center, playing him there, and blaming him for not succeeding. Sather FINALLY GETS IT. This team is constructed the way it should. There is now a balance of speed, grit, and talent that will allow them to compete with anyone in the league. Don't forget, the team had a great combined record against the elite teams last year, the problem was consistency over teams they should beat. With a better team they should be at least 10-15 pts better by just being more consistent because they now have a little more scoring. Barring a visit from the injury bug (especially the King), God forbid, I believe that we are well positioned to be a part of something really special going forward. And this comes from a pessimistic, long-time Ranger fan. Thanks for reading.
24 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm Right There With You
You’ve got me beat by about 10 years - I’ve been a fan since around ’77’78 when I was like 8 years old. Our natural default position cannot help but be pessimism, but like you, the tide has turned.
bq.You look up and down the current roster and all you see is players that you know will put in the effort to help make the Rangers winnersbq.
There are still a few players who I believe do not fit your description: Eric Christiansen wins this prize, and the jury is still out on Wolski. But I’m more than willing to give him this full year with NYR to see if he really wants it. Believe it or not, I might also include Gaborik in this category. I know he’s not a high-energy-grinding-in-the-boards kind of player, but it’s indesputable there are large segments when it looks like he’s just loafing. Hopefully Richards lights his fire. . .
Best Rangers day: May 27, 1994
Worst Rangers day: April 10, 1984
by Stepan the Ice! on Jul 23, 2011 10:36 AM EDT reply actions
Fail on the block quote AND the unintended strike through. Arrggghhhh!
Best Rangers day: May 27, 1994
Worst Rangers day: April 10, 1984
by Stepan the Ice! on Jul 23, 2011 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions
I could have gone on and on but didn’t want to turn into War and Peace, lol. I didn’t even say that Sather putting Gordie in charge of the draft and what appears like having the right coach to fit the players in Torts all points to going in the right direction. BTW, glad you weren’t a fan to witness the Rolfe/Schultz fight in the 1974 playoffs, one of the darkest days in Rangers’ history, and the JP Parise OT goal when the Isles beat the Rangers in 1975. Another tough pill to swallow. The style of play fits the playoffs and is the way to play with the appropriate scoring in place.
by Richter1994 on Jul 23, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
+1
Became a fan in ’80 (ripe age of 6), when I learned a little about Wayne Gretzky, and then snuck a peek at a late night Rangers game against the Kings. Lucien Deblois…wow, that was a flashback!!
You are correct about the roster, and I do hope Richards is the player I think he can be under Torts.
"The winner of the Steven McDonald Extra Effort Award is Number Eight, Brandon Prust!"--Ofc. Colin McDonald, NYPD, April 7, 2011
While I may not always agree with your assessments/suggestions/critiques, I totally think you’ve nailed this. So I won’t say anything else – other than:
rec’d
Thank you, I really appreciate it. We can disagree, that’s what blogs are for, and I really enjoy the Banter. Thanks for reading.
by Richter1994 on Jul 23, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I disagree with you both, and while he didn’t present any here, I find db’s logic extremely flawed.
Wolski for MVP.
Good write up Ric. Can you imagine how stacked the Rangers would be if Prospal was 3 years younger? All this team is missing is a 32-year-old Prospal, and an offensive defenseman. I, too, am excited to see what this upcoming season brings.
I would have liked to see Prospal back this year even at his age. We def. lack a #1 LW (other than Duby) #2 a puck moving d-man, and # most importantly Playoff exp. Other than Richards, Feds, and Rupp ( did he win the cup when he was in Jersey?). Not too much exp. on this squad.
On Rupp
He did, he played 23 games (plus 4 playoff) for the ’03 team.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Jul 25, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Didn’t Avery win a cup with Detroit?
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
This is a really well written positive post. Thank you. I’m not sure about the a bump of 10-15 points, but I think we’ll get enough of a bump to get us higher than #8, which could make all the difference in the world in terms of going deep into the playoffs. Let’s drop the freaking puck already!
"To everybody else we're underdogs, but we go in thinking we can handle any team in the NHL."
Brandon Prust, #8, New York Rangers
Thanks for reading Joe. I do believe that this team can get over 100 pts this season. And if they are going to reach the 5th/6th seed then they will have to be over that mark.
If we get those 15 extra points like you said, we would finish with 108 points. Thats fair beyond the 5-6 seed. thats most likely a 1-2 seed.
:)
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
Actually if you look at this year’s standings that would be correct. I suspect though that the 10 extra pts is more realistic and based on this past year would put them right around 5th or 6th in the conference. Thanks for reading.
Sounds good to me. Being legit contenders should be fun, huh?
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
wow there are other old guys here!!!
a ten point minimum jump in the standings, assuming no major injuries, is very feasible for this team
and depending on how things shake out, that’s likely good for anywhere between fifth and second in the standings
funny thing, twenty years ago there was one team with 100+ points, last year there were eight
how times change
@joereiter
Blueshirt Banter
"You can be a lion maybe once in your life. If you don't make this deal, you're a
mouse forever….Wouldn't you rather be a lion for one day than a mouse for life?" - Lord General Sather
"Nobody knows anything" - William Goldman
respectfully disagree.....gramps
ooooh that was as mean as the crap i get from the young’uns on here
@joereiter
Blueshirt Banter
"You can be a lion maybe once in your life. If you don't make this deal, you're a
mouse forever….Wouldn't you rather be a lion for one day than a mouse for life?" - Lord General Sather
"Nobody knows anything" - William Goldman

by 





















