Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

2011 New York Rangers Training Camp: Are Erik Christensen And Sean Avery Done?

NEWARK, NJ - SEPTEMBER 23: Marian Gaborik #10  of the New York Rangers celebrates his goal at 1:32 of the second period as Ryan Callahan #24 looks on in their preseason game against the New Jersey Devils.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

Before we get into the Winter Classic, which will be announced at 1:30 EST today, we should take a look at which spots are really up for grabs as of right now. 

In order to do that, we need to see who has their spot pretty much guaranteed. Here are those players when it comes to forwards (I'm just speculating on the line combinations): 

Wojtek Wolski-Brad Richards-Marian Gaborik

Brandon Dubinsky-Derek Stepan-Ryan Callahan

Brandon Prust-Artem Anisimov-Ruslan Fedotenko

??????-Brian Boyle-Mike Rupp

Now there are five players who have a shot at the open position: Erik Christensen, Sean Avery, Mats Zuccarello, Dale Weise and Ryan Bourque. Although, as of right now, it's a race between Christensen, Avery and Zuccarello; but that can always change. 

Join me after the jump for more. 

Star-divide

John Tortorella, as many of you know, addressed Christensen's game against the New Jersey Devils as: "Not much going on there." Christensen told the media he knows he is in a battle for his spot, and he just has to play his game and not put too much pressure on himself. But games like the one he put up against the Devils aren't going to help his cause, and of the three players fighting for that final spot, he's on the bottom of the list. 

Sean Avery seemed to do the exact opposite in his preseason game against the Devils. Avery was all over the ice, made a few good plays and was part of the line which Tortorella said was the best of the game. Honestly, that's about all we've heard from or about Avery since the preseason games started rolling in. 

Finally, there's Zuccarello who has looked strong this preseason, and really impressed Tortorella in camp. Zuccarello is currently skating with the first group in practices (while both Avery and Christensen are with the second group) and he's seen a significant amount of power play time during drills. Those are all signs pointing towards keeping Zuccarello up, and sending Christensen and Avery down, once the season begins. 

More will take shape tonight, as the New York Rangers take on the Philadelphia Flyers

Comment 87 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Me personally, I don’t want Avery anywhere near the Whale Pack. I really don’t want him on the Rangers either but there are some guys who can be a good influence on the youth of this club, and some guys who would do nothing but be a distraction to them. Redden, for all his faults with the big club, has embraced his demotion to Hartford with the appropriate attitude and from what I have always read, has done whatever he can to help the young defenseman we have down there. Avery would do nothing of the sort. It’s a shame his contract situation makes him virtually impossible to trade as I have never been a fan of just sitting a player in the press box, but if Avery isn’t going to play with the Rangers, that’s exactly where I want him, safe inside a little room watching the game, where he isn’t going to hurt anyone.

~R.I.P. Derek

~Those Caps fans sure think they can make some noise.... too bad their team can't.

by Ranger84 on Sep 26, 2011 9:54 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

What's the problem with Avery on the Whale?

You can argue the guy has flaws, but they certainly don’t seem to be the kind of things that will hurt in the locker room. He gets along with his teamates, sticks up for them on the ice, and stays in great shape. If you think there’s better players then him skill wise, that’s one thing, but the guy isn’t a problem to have around the team

by BuckarooClub on Sep 26, 2011 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

He's had issues with teammates in the past

and if he gets sent down he’s gonna stir up all kinds of shit.

by graves9 on Sep 26, 2011 11:40 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Its completely unfair to make that assumption.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Sep 26, 2011 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, to me it makes sense to not want a disgruntled Avery (which is a lot more destructive than a disgruntled Redden) in the same locker room as our prized prospects, who are learning how to become professionals the right way.

All I am saying is that Avery is an influence that the Whale can do without.

#12 Carl Hagelin

by The Blue Seats on Sep 26, 2011 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well said~

You either get an Avery who is positive about the situation (which has still proven to be a distraction in the past) or an Avery who is pissed and biter about it, and becomes that much worse. It may be an unfair assumption, but I think the later option is the more likely of the two.

~R.I.P. Derek

~Those Caps fans sure think they can make some noise.... too bad their team can't.

by Ranger84 on Sep 26, 2011 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats fair I suppose, but to completely assume that he will absolutely cause problems is unfair.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Sep 26, 2011 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

As far as becoming professionals

The reality is, we’ll be lucky to have three guys from that team who last as long as Avery in the NHL. Avery’s playing style is one thing, but he’s lauded, not criticized for how he physically prepares himself for the game. Also, he’s not a moron. Aves is still cashing a big check, only a short ride from NYC, and he knows he’s not doing himself or his NYC business interests any good by being a brat. Seriously, if the Rangers send him to Hartford this year, he’ll be back in the league next year with someone else. My money would be on NJ or the Isles, so he can stay close to the city.

by BuckarooClub on Sep 26, 2011 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

And if I was a betting man

I’d bet on him stirring stuff up.

by graves9 on Sep 26, 2011 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Only in Dallas, and only with a couple teamates, and is was more about them not approving of Avery’s style. Richards became friends with him in Dallas, and has been since, so obviously, he wasn’t pissing off the whole locker room.

by BuckarooClub on Sep 26, 2011 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Said it two months ago, and now that Tortorella [remarkably] assembled it, I’m still liking

Wolski-BR-Gaborik
Dubinsky-Anisimov-Callahan
Rupp-Stepan-Zuke
Fed-Boyle-Prust.

Lines 2 & 4 gives us strong two-way lines, 1 & 3 gives us strong offensive units. Rupp moves off in favor of Feds or Boyle in late game situations.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 10:01 AM EDT reply actions  

From your mouth

To Torts’ ears.

I wonder how long they give Stepan at center if he continues to struggle on face offs though.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Sep 26, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rupp played center a lot… i have no idea what his numbers on faceoffs were, but if they’re decent he could always take the draw and then switch off.

Pierre McGuire needs to go away.

by MartyEqualsPansy on Sep 26, 2011 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was at 50% last year

If he plays with Step I could see him taking face-offs for him like Dubi takes face-offs for AA.

by graves9 on Sep 26, 2011 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love these lines. Im giving wolski a try here but if we had a elite left winger I’d b much happier. The shit rich and gabby were doing the other night not a single line on our team can do so I just wish we could power that line up with one more really skilled player.

I’m going to b personally pissed if zucc isn’t on that roster come play time.

by XxC17xX on Sep 26, 2011 10:30 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

The thing is, Wolski IS an elite winger, at least at even strength. (42nd among all forwards in points per minute over the last 4 years). The question isn’t Wolski’s skill, it’s his dedication.

Sure, I’d like someone with his skill and less baggage, but you’re not finding it for his price.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wolski

Seems like his skillset would also be useful on the PP but he seems to not have been a big PP producer in Colorado or Phoenix. I can’t imagine him staying on the 1st PP unit in NY after Staal returns (and I’m willing to believe that they were merely experimenting with having a 5 forward PP unit the other night) but it would be interesting to see him on the 2nd unit to see if he can produce there.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Sep 26, 2011 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed..it seems so bizarre that he’s so productive at ES and can’t do anything on the PP. Usually for guys with questionable effort, it’s the complete opposite.

I don’t see the 5 man PP thing sticking. They do have the potential to have 2 really good units though, with Cally-Dubi-Gaborik-BR on unit one and Wolski, Step, Boyle, and MZA on unit two (or flip-flop Boyle and Dubi). The question is the 5th member of those units, who I think should be Girardi on #1, and basically any of Staal/MDZ/Erixon on #2.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Even 1 highly proficient

PP unit is good for me this year. I believe the last time the Rangers had a PP that clicked at 20% or better was with Gretzky.

Interesting that Callahan seems to get overlooked when talking about being a key player in the PP’s success. He gets tons of credit for PK work and all around play, but he’s scored 19 of his 43 goals in the past 2 years on the PP. And I could conceive a scenario this year where he gets even more productive if teams are going to be keyed in on Richards and Gaborik, leaving him open for scoring chances from close range.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Sep 26, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

jam

Brich and gabby are so dynamic that you don’t need another “highly skilled” player on that line. Wolski’s effort is too up and down to be a catalyst if brich and gabby aren’t on for whatever reason, or be a stop gap in jam if there is a line mismatch.

Admittedly, I absolutely hate Wolski as a player, so I am biased, but I think feds would be the right player for that line. He makes things happen by himself by his saavy play, high motor and toughness. If the dynamic duo are having an off night, he can be a catalyst that gets them going. When they are on, he has the saavvy to facilitate their style and get them pucks, and forecheck like an animal—besides, he played with Brich in tampa.

Wolski is just too much of a wildcard for the first line. Let him do something on the third line with step and zucc before we consider him one of our big guns. When you have two players as dynamic as brich and gabby, you don’t alwasy need a third (fedotenko when he played with crosby and Brooks Laich with ovie and semin)

by Town on Sep 26, 2011 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wolski’s not exactly soft in the corners. He’s a big guy who when he feels like it can do the dirty work just as well. But again, it’s effort. If the effort is there, he’s the fit.

That said, I’m not against dropping Wolski, but Fedotenko isn’t the answer. Not because he can’t handle it, but because he’s more valuable in his defensive role with Boyle-Prust than he would be digging pucks out for BR/MG.

If it’s not Wolski, it should be Dubinsky. It will compromise the defense of Anisimov-Callahan a bit, but Wolski’s good enough at ES that flip-flopping them is fine too.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Boyle could be an intriguing option

He could turn out to be the next Mike Knuble if he plays with Richards and Gabby.

by graves9 on Sep 26, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

defense is not a problem for us

the chemistry of our first line is much more important than our third line. We are stocked with guys who can play great defense (now add weiss to that fold) but our achilles heal last year was putting consistent pressure on our opponents offensively.

IMHO, finding a fit for the first line is much more important/difficult than finding a great fit to play with prust and boyle.

by Town on Sep 26, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

IMHO, finding a fit for the first line is much more important/difficult than finding a great fit to play with prust and boyle.

If this was June 30, I’d agree with you. We wouldn’t have Rupp, we could sign a guy that can play tough minutes defense to go with Prust/Boyle, or we could leave that spot open for Bourque/Hagelin to fight over (or even Weise, but I don’t see him being much more than Rupp-lite)

Now, we’re not in that spot. None of Avery/EC/Rupp can be trusted in that role. Dub/AA/Cally are already asked to take the hardest minutes possible. Those 2nd hardest minutes are important to the well-being of this team. Boyle/Prust are locks for the role. That leaves, Stepan, Zuke, Wolski and Feds. 3 heavily offensive oriented players, and a veteran 2-way forward. He’s what makes sense, as this roster is currently constructed.

Richards/Gaborik should produce enough offense on their own that it almost doesn’t matter who plays with them. To do so though, they need to be ‘protected.’ They need to start in the offensive zone alot, and they need to get out there against weaker competition levels. Having 2 strong defensive lines behind them will make Richards/Gaborik’s job that much easier.

I’m not under the illusion that for 82 games, it’ll be Wolski and that’s it. (if nothing else, there will be injuries) But given that Tortorella has already put Rupp with Stepan to keep him off the ‘4th line,’ I think it shows that he realizes the important of the Fed-Boyle-Prust line to this team’s success.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

completely agreed, The Feds Boyle Prust and Dubi AA Cally lines are the two most important lines for this team. Without them were gonna have a tough time keeping the other team off the scoreboard.

by CrazyRangerFan on Sep 26, 2011 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1, I’d Rec if I could on the mobile site.

by teknics on Sep 26, 2011 1:01 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

hmmm

so essentially you’re saying that it’s not that wolski is the best fit for that line, but its too much of a detriment to break up lines 2 and 4

by Town on Sep 26, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's a little of both.

IMO, Dubinsky’s the actual “best” fit, but there’s a lot of value to having a line like theirs that can play tough minutes to a stand-still. There’s not alot of lines with their production that can do that.

Wolski’s size/skill combination does make him, on paper, an ideal fit for BR’s LW. The effort is the biggest thing, and with the work he’s put in this offseason, I have the sense we’re going to see the effort this time around.

I also don’t fear that if it goes horrid that he’ll get a long leash, so i don’t see the big deal with him starting there.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

If MDZ makes the team

I see no reason why he shouldn’t be on the top pp unit. He has the most offensive potential of all the dmen.

by graves9 on Sep 26, 2011 11:44 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think Avery stays with the club but will be a healthy scratch most nights. Christensen is either sent down or traded.

by Mike_from_NNJ on Sep 26, 2011 10:17 AM EDT reply actions  

EC is a goner. As for the Avery-Zuc decision….I don’t know that’s still kind of tough. I noticed Avery a lot more in his preseason game than I noticed Zuc in his, but Zuc has hands down more offensive skill and has really impressed Torts this camp. I guess for me to like Zuc more he’d have to be more noticeable on the ice during games

by team awesome! on Sep 26, 2011 10:37 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions  

Another way to look at this

We’ve obviously got more bodies then spots, but rather then sending guys down, or outright cutting them, I think we should be looking at how much more the guys we have penciled in as “on the team” are then the bubble guys. We’ve really only got 3 skill players on the team (Hank, Gabby, Richards), outside of them it’s just a matter of getting guys who backcheck and can handle the puck to varying degrees, depending on where we need them. Rather then hoping that someone wants to give us something for our scraps, what about looking at what we think we can get out of some of these bubble players contributing to the team, and try to get a better return for the roster players they could replace.

Staal is down, and no one has any idea when he might be back. Furthermore, we can’t be sure what type of player he will be once he comes back. I won’t hide the fact that I haven’t supported Staal as much as other people, and two parts of his game I’ve been critical of are his play with the puck, and his lack of a physical game. Coming back from a serious concussion (if he comes back) I’m not expecting either of those parts of his game to improve. The footsteps are going to be louder when he has the puck, and the reluctance to get involved physically is going to be stronger.

Taking a small chance, and making a move for a defenseman who can give us some security while Staal is out, and who will still be able to contribute if Staal makes a full recovery, would be a good move for us. The guys on the bubble list are all servicable bottom 6 NHL players at the very least, no sense buying them or outright cutting them, when they might be able to help us fill a hole in our lineup.

by BuckarooClub on Sep 26, 2011 10:49 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with some of this Buck, but to say that guys like Dubi, Cally, AA, and Step aren’t skilled is pushing it don’t you think?

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Sep 26, 2011 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not really

None of those guys have skill set that sets them apart from most of the league. The last time I remember one of those guys dangling, I think it was Dubi 3 seasons ago in the playoffs, and really the defenseman just fell over. AA showed some skill in the A, but has settled in, and constantly gets praise as a defensive center. I’m not saying it to knock them, or any other players, just pointing out that we seem to relying more on a system then individual skill behind those 3 guys. If we make a smart move, I don’t think any of them would come back to haunt us in the future, or even now as long as we think we have a guy who can plug the hole.

by BuckarooClub on Sep 26, 2011 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Personally I rather have a few 55-60 point guys who are solid defensively than a “skilled” guy who can put up 70 points but do nothing else.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Sep 26, 2011 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

My point was to try to move guys that could be replaced, with close to similar results, by a bubble guy to bring in a #1 dman, so it wouldn’t be for a 70 point guy.

by BuckarooClub on Sep 26, 2011 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

To cut right to the point, I’d consider trying all these guys with Richards/Gabby. If they work, and we can get a taker on WW, that would be good. I know he’s playing well, but I’m still not convinced he’s gonna stay that way. My bigger fear is that he actually produces well long enough that we overpay to keep him, THEN the other shoe drops. I say sell hi with that guy. His $3.8 is a good chunk of what we’d need to pursue a #1 dman, and just about exactly what it would cost to make a play for Weber if he’s available close to the deadline and Staal is shutdown/doesn’t bounce back. Weber would be the ultimate prize, but their certainly will be other good solutions, and having that $3.8 in the bank, to combine with a potential LTIR credit for Staal would make us a player for any of them.

Another thought would have to be AA or Step. We were happy with what we saw from some of the young guys, so it’s not like we’re going to have a hole to fill for long. If one of them, Boyle, and BR, can give us a solid 1,2,3 can EC take faceoffs 4 mins a night?

Just saying, we’ve gotta recognize with got a big experience hole on D right now.

by BuckarooClub on Sep 26, 2011 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree its a hole, but we need to wait and see what’s going on with Staal before we act.

I would love to get Weber, and he’s one of the few guys I would give up a fortune for, but how much will it take?

I also agree on selling Wolski high if possible. I would love to bring in a guy like Parise, and with the money from Wolski+Avery+Christensen coming off the books it would be possible. Difficult to fit, but possible.

I also would not be against trading lets say Wolski, Stepan, and Sauer (or something similar) for a really good dman, especially if we believe we could sign a guy like Penner, Hemsky, Boyes as free agents.

Just wondering, what do you think it would take to get Weber if the package started out with the above three?

2 more first rounders?

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Sep 26, 2011 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, what about a package of Girardi, Stepan, and Wolski. I think that would be fair for Weber. Or atleast a very good foundation to build on.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Sep 26, 2011 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry Buck, but all 4 of them are or look to be 50-60 point guys in this league. That’s 1st line production right across the group (the 90th best forward this year scored 49 points). Obviously ice time will factor in there as to how high their boxscore numbers actually travel, but they’re not as easily replacable as you think. A guy like Anisimov, who potentially could fetch you 55 points while playing against the other top centers in the league at such a young age, has incredible value to a team.

No, of course that group doesn’t have the natural born skilsl of BR/Gab/Lundqvist…but how many of those level guys do you think are in the league? And how many teams even have 3 like we do, let alone trying to jam a 4th in on defense? You need an army of guys on that next tier below them, the 40+ point guys (which is about the top 150). We happen to have that army, in theory.

Sure, if you can move a Wolski or a Zuccarello (unpopular as he might be) to pick up a solid top 4 d-man, you look at it, and I’m sure Slats will if we’re in a position to really make a run midseason. Right now is not the time for rash decisions, even if the injury to our most important d-man has everyone concerned about our depth.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 27, 2011 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

(unpopular as he might be)

Unpopular as THAT might be. Four hours of sleep a night will kill you sometimes.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 27, 2011 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Look to be, might, could ...

At the end of the day, even if they ALL become top line talent, we have too many players for too few spots. My point is, if we moved AA (just for example), slid Step into the the number 2 role, and Boyle as a number 3, how much difference are we really going to see up the middle with someone like EC, Rupp, or Newbery centering the 4th line 4 mins a night? WW came alive a bit playing with Gabby/Richards, but could playing with Richards do the same thing for Weise, MZA or Aves?

The mindset seems to be cut the guys from the bottom, I’m just saying that perhaps we’d be better served looking if we can do some of this “teaching” to get a little bit more out the bubble guys, and use some other pieces to get the return we need.

Also, I wouldn’t consider a move to replace Staal a “rash” decision. As I said above, even if does come back before the season, I think the effect the injury will have on Staal developing the parts of game that are lacking (physical play and with the puck) are a serious concern.

by BuckarooClub on Sep 27, 2011 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

how much difference are we really going to see up the middle with someone like EC, Rupp, or Newbery centering the 4th line 4 mins a night?

Who’s playing the 2nd line opponents in that situation? With either Stepan or Richards, you can expect a production drop by increasing their competition right now. Ditto Boyle, who you’ll really hammer then.

Who you get your points against matters as much, if not more, than how many you actually accumulate.

There’s no such thing as too many players for too many spots. It’s called depth, and it’s invaluable. Just because you want the lines to conform to the classic “skill up top, muckers on the bottom” doesn’t mean that’s the only way to build a team, or even the best.

Having 4 lines with definitive roles like they do now is going to be successful, and it’s going to be more successful than throwing Richards/Gaborik out there 22 min a night against all levels of competition, because you left yourself with Kris Newbury on the 4th line.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 27, 2011 8:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think a lot of people still get caught up with the “3rd line is the checking line” and 4th line “is the grinding line” concept.

This is not how it is working for the NYR. Simply, we have 4 lines. The other team has 4 lines. We want 2 of our 4 lines to be sound defensively and will put them up against the other teams 2 top line. Quite frankly not many teams have good offensive depth beyond 2 line these days.

Additionally we want our remaining 2 lines which will be more offensive minded to go up against the weaker 2 lines of the opponent.

As you said George, depth is what makes this work.

Aucune clause de Mouvement

by Blueshirt in Paris on Sep 27, 2011 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who’s playing the 2nd line opponents in that situation?

Then keep AA, and move Step if you don’t think Step can grow up quick and fill the roll. There’s plenty of people here, and more in the system, but there’s a huge lack of experience on the blueline, and still no one who has really proved themselves capable of getting the puck up ice.

I’ll take my chances with the ramifications of having any of the bubble guys on the 4th line, over crossing my fingers that an inexperienced D can hold the blueline, handle attackers without 3 forwards having to come deep and bail them out, and get the puck up ice enough to feed out offense.

by BuckarooClub on Sep 27, 2011 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Zuccarello better make this team or Im gonna be pissed, him and Stepan are gonna have great season. Looking at how Bourque and Wiese have been stepping up this training camp Im a little more disappointed in the Rupp signing. I know the guy can fight and has a much better forechecking game than others in the past, but I would really love that lineup if we could slot Bourque or Wiese in that LW spot on the third line.

by CrazyRangerFan on Sep 26, 2011 11:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Well said. I accept the Rupp signing for the reasons others have given, but 3 years of it baffles me when you have guys much better suited for lineup flexibility that are knocking on the door.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

like you said above

it seems like that signing ties our hands more than anything in terms of line combinations and personel.

by Town on Sep 26, 2011 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

If your making a decision based on who brings more to the team…..EC should have been gone a long time ago. He’s had maybe two games where I can say, he played well. He is a depth player and when your other depth players exceed him in skill or value, he becomes expendable. I think avery still has value and if he is bringing it in pre season, you keep him around and platoon him with Weise or MZA. I think you need a couple of guys along with Rupp and Prust who have a chippy edge to their game.

Absolute Worst Ranger Fan!!!!!!....yet incredibly realistic and usually correct.

by earthworm on Sep 26, 2011 11:25 AM EDT reply actions  

I don’t understand this article Joe.

Your last sentence states that if MZA makes it than Avery and EC would be sent down.

I don’t understand the logic behind this. I’m almost positive the team will keep at least one forward as a healthy scratch, and possibly two. Even if MZA gets into the starting line-up, why would Avery be sent down rather than staying on as a healthy scratch?

Borque and Weise are solid guys, and I like them a lot, but I rather them play top line minutes in CT than play the extra man role in New York. Avery and/or Christensen will most likely make the team as the 13th and 14th forwards, so this article just confuses me TBH.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Sep 26, 2011 11:51 AM EDT reply actions  

One thing we can all agree on... this team needs to add a veteran defenseman.

It says so in the good book and it shall be so.

I think Moshe is ordering a Chris Campoli jersey for the Winter Classic.

Back to the story above.

Wolski stays on 1st line until he plays himself off it.

I dont want Avery near Bourque and Hagelin up in CT. Make watch from the press box.

Zuccarello has made this team already.

by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Sep 26, 2011 12:34 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

No we do not need a vet defensemen. Staal will be fine, and we have Erixon or Del Zotto with Eminger. If Staal does miss time, Erixon and Del Zotto will both play and they will be split up, one with Sauer and the other with Eminger. McDonagh slots up top with Girardi just like last year.

by CrazyRangerFan on Sep 26, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

MDZ is still MDZ and Erixon is a few months from being ready.

Search your feelings, you know it to be true. Don’t be scared.. your among friends.

by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Sep 26, 2011 12:57 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

No, we really don’t

"Don't look now, but there's one too many people in this room and I think it's you." Groucho Marx

In Prust We Trust

"Kovalev would work with Tortorella like a kitty would work in a microwave.

A lot of smoke and desperate clawing at the door. It wouldn’t work. It would just be a big, hot mess." -Dig Deep

Follow me @8kpower

by Kevin Power on Sep 26, 2011 1:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Well when u put it that way…. No we still dont

by teknics on Sep 26, 2011 1:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Embrace your fear. Don’t run away from it.

by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Sep 26, 2011 1:10 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Have faith, it shall lead the way.

by teknics on Sep 26, 2011 1:41 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

gotta agree witih gabby on this one

having Erixon and MDZ in the lineup at the same time is going to be a lot of growing pains at once. And we still don’t know if Sauer and mcD will have sophomore slumps.

Signing a vet isn’t abandoning the youth movement. It’s just insurance for the young guys who are forced to play. Like I said in the other thread, Staal was the rock that could keep the infusion of youth functional and under control. Now that his outlook for the beggining of the season is dubious, We are going to need more experience on the blueline. One top four guy with more than 1 year of experience will not cut it.

by Town on Sep 26, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

And we still don’t know if Sauer and mcD will have sophomore slumps.

We don’t know for sure, but it’s usually the offense that suffers for defenseman, not the D, at a young age.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

i personally don't anticipate it

but i still think we need some more experience as insurance

by Town on Sep 26, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Experience is nice, but we saw last year with McCabe that experience doesn’t necessarily do much to improve a roster. I mean, Campoli, the name most commonly throw around, isn’t exactly a top 4 guy himself. He gives you something a little more stable on the 3rd pair, but reality is that Tortorella probably wouldn’t use that pair much regardless, similar to what he did in the playoffs to hide McCabe and Gilroy.

If we in fact have no Staal, they have no choice but to rely on McDonagh to handle the top pair minutes, and hope either Erixon learns real quick.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even with a healthy Staal you have MDZ, Eminger and Erixon as a bottom pair. I really don’t have a lot of confidence in that. Erixon has the goods but is he ready? If so he still might get protected minutes. And its not like his partner (Eminger/MDZ) are really going to to bail him out when he has some hiccups.

So now you have a 3rd pair that wont get a lot of minutes because Torts wont give them minutes. Which means the Giradi/Staal pairing will be over worked again.

And this is with a healthy Staal. If that is an issue we have Bell. No offense but a d pairing of Eminger/Bell wont be getting us very far.

And worse of all I dont want to make the same mistake that was done with MDZ. Not having any other options that we have to play the kids even if they are not ready. MDZ should have went down but we had a huge hole that seemed he could fill. The decision was made as the best for the team, not best for the player.

Aucune clause de Mouvement

by Blueshirt in Paris on Sep 26, 2011 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

There’s not much wrong with Staal-Girardi, McDonagh-Sauer, Eminger-Erixon. Yes, Torts will lean on the top 4, but that’s going to happen even if you have a veteran on the bottom instead of Erixon, at least any veteran you’re acquiring right now.

The mistake made with MDZ was putting him in a top 4 role after a sub-par offensive season. That won’t be the case with Erixon unless more than just Staal is out, and then we have bigger problems anyway.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was thinking more of an upgrade of Eminger. Keep Erixon if he is ready and give him a better partner.

I think Eminger fills a great 7th role.

I really dont think MDZ makes the team out of camp. Unless Staal is still injured and then we will eat up all of his games before waiver…then its Erixon that will have to go down once Staal comes back.

Aucune clause de Mouvement

by Blueshirt in Paris on Sep 26, 2011 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

please just stop

Proudly suffering as a Ranger fan.

by Tripodi on Sep 26, 2011 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t agree.

Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

Writer/Editor for Pinstripe Alley, Blueshirt Banter

"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."

"Every day is a great day for hockey."

by Brandon C. on Sep 26, 2011 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

What?

I dislike the Idea of bringing in a veteran defensemen, and I especially hate the idea of bringing in Campoli.

Where do you come up with your shit?

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Sep 26, 2011 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

E.C trade value?

His only upside as far as a trade goes is his shoot out prowess. 3rd round pick maybe?

by smitty046 on Sep 26, 2011 1:54 PM EDT reply actions  

doubt it

any GM who is looking outside the club for a shootout specialst is a little loopy—unless billy beane took over an NHL team.

by Town on Sep 26, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's my two cents........

I think Avery brings some positives to the line-up; speed, a tenacious forecheck, and he’s a skilled passer. His finish is poor, though, and there’s always the referee stigma working against him. I do not, however, think he is a bad influence on young players. For all his idiosyncracies Sean does not take a shift off. He skates hard and mucks it up in the corners; he still has value as an agitator, and I think at the very least you platoon him with whatever left over forwards you have. You don’t send Avery to Connecticutt.

I think if Christensen were traded or demoted last week, it wouldn’t be fast enough for me. My biggest pet peeves in hockey are guys like EC; you know they have the skill set, but you can’t ever seem to find it for more than a few shifts here and there. Goodbye; I want to see my team win the Stanley Cup, I don’t want to psycho-analyze these fragile players who can’t get their shit together. Turn Carl Hagelin or Ryan Bourque loose in the shootout; they’ll tear it up I bet………and give you 100% heart and soul effort the other 99.9% of the time; during regulation and overtime. Seriously, enough with this guy already. Its time to move on.

Top line LW: I think Torts has shown us that he won’t marry himself to any particular LW on that top line. He will plug in the hot hand on that line and change it up as needed. I too can’t stand WW; who I believe is a lot closer in overall effort/results to EC than he is to someone like Callahan or even Gaborik. That line screams for either Brian Boyle or Brandon Dubinsky. I think those two are the only guys we have with the combination of skill set, size, and willingness to go to the dirty areas of the ice, and thus the spots should be theirs. If WW gave enough of a shit to play physically; if he could yank out the tamp-on long enough to let his balls drop, he could be a fast, skilled power forward and probably score 40 goals with Brad Richards as his center. Lets hope he gets it. Lets hope he comes out flying and sustains it. Lets hope Gretzky and Messier come to my house for beers this weekend. Hey we can always hope right?

Defense: If we can land Chris Campoli and not give too much up for him, I say do it. I don’t have too much confidence in MDZ; Erixon may not be ready yet, and we do not know what’s going to happen with Marc Staal, and that scares me. He is such a big piece of the puzzle, and right now the organization cannot replace his thirty minutes and his poise from within. With the possible CBA impasse looming after this season, I don’t know about you guys but I don’t want to waste two years of Henrik Lundqvist’s career with taking steps backward and with another work stoppage. Don’t mortgage the future but the time is ripe for a deep playoff run. Campoli gives us a legit veteran presence back there who has experience, skill, and isn’t too old. I say do it.

by KingHenrik30 on Sep 26, 2011 2:22 PM EDT reply actions  

those of you who don't think we need a vet on D

Don’t you agree Erixon could be better served getting 1st pair minutes in hartford to round out his game and work on his offense? We could have a very polished, very skilled player on our hands in a year or two if we do this. I’d hate to rush him into the linup just to stay strict with the youth movement.

Just something to consider.

by Town on Sep 26, 2011 3:32 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think Erixon is two years away from contributing.

I think the obvious comparison is what happened with McDonagh, who went and adjusted his game for 1/2 a year and came out really well. In addition, McDonagh was getting acclimated to the speed and size of guys, as he was playing against college kids. McDonagh’s such a ridiculously smooth skater, though, I don’t think it really would’ve mattered, and certainly think he would’ve been a better option than last year’s situation where Del Zotto was in our top 4.

What’s different is that Erixon’s been playing against men for 3 years now in one of the hardest non-NHL leagues in the world, and doing it with top pair minutes and assignments to boot. The biggest adjustment for him will be the rink size. I don’t think that requires one-two seasons worth of adjustments, especially for a kid of his skill. I think they can very easily live with 20-30 games of growing pains with him on the 3rd pair, especially with Eminger on his other side to stabilize things a bit, even if Eminger isn’t all that fantastic himself.

For me, it’s not about the ‘youth movement,’ but more about ’he’s one of the 6-7 best defensemen in the organization, and deserves a roster spot because of it.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m more concerned with the his adjustment to physical play as a result of a smaller ice surface. He looked smart and skilled but did not look strong.

Aucune clause de Mouvement

by Blueshirt in Paris on Sep 26, 2011 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t see any amount of seasoning fixing that. He doesn’t strike me as someone who is going to be a physical d-man. That’s something that will come with age and strength conditioning, if at all.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well I agree that he isnt going to turn into the hulk anytime soon. But a year of growing, a year of workouts and a year of getting used to the physical play, how to react, how to avoid it, might make a difference.

I do think the kid is close from what we saw. But we wont really know until he plays a few tough games. Im pretty sure he can handle 3 pairing minutes…but wouldn’t we rather he get more minutes the that to help with his deveoplment?

Aucune clause de Mouvement

by Blueshirt in Paris on Sep 26, 2011 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

There’s no guarantee he gets top minutes with Gernander either. With Redden, VTenk, Kundratek, Parlett presumably down there, there’s nothing that says he’d get more than bottom pair minutes there either (I believe McDonagh was getting 3rd pair minutes to start w/ CT as well)

I’m not sure if Erixon’s definitely ready, but given the D in our organization, I don’t know who we think is a better option, nor do I think any one that simply has experience being 3rd pair fodder is better either.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

the thing about mcdonaugh

he may be the best raw athlete on the rangers, so it came easier to him. It may not take Erixon two years, but I think some time on the Whale could benefit everybody.

2 questions about your last comment, George:

You think he is in the top 7 D in the organizations, so why wouldn’t het get first pair minutes in Hartford?

Second, is even if he isn’t in the top 7, but Torts and co. want him to get top minutes in Hartford, wouldn’t that trump any input from Kenny G?

by Town on Sep 26, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t have solid answers to the why, but as I said, McDonagh was in the same situation last year, where he was one of the last cut from the big club roster, and then went to Hartford and was getting fewer minutes than a few guys who had no chance to make the roster.

I don’t follow the Whale that closely, but I have to imagine that Gernander has some autonomy when it comes to managing his lines.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 26, 2011 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nothing wrong with Emi/ Erixon as third pair.

PRUSTOSTERONE!!!

by nathansfamous on Sep 26, 2011 4:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Avery has played well so far this preseason and as of right now that spot is his.

by Eric Bure on Sep 26, 2011 4:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Christensen was done before he even showed up. Just seeing his emotion-less face every game is enough for me to know that the guy is useless. I also enjoy how Fedotenko is a lock for a spot even though it would be more effective for him to sit all year, play the last five games of the season, and then get plugged into a playoff lineup when he is actually effective. I thought that guy Thuresson looked good (even without the goal) as well as Hagelin…heard their names a lot, in the middle of physical play, and often around the net.

I have always been in the minority in terms of not liking the defensemen that we have and the thought of another softie in Erixon making the roster makes me genuinely sad. There is not a need for 6 puck moving, soft, defensemen. Take a look at any Stanley Cup winning team and notice how there is an even mix of offensive talent, defensive skill, and physicality. Yes, the Rangers at times have the defensive skill but offense and physicality is an issue. You have to admit…wasn’t it nice to watch Stu Bickel last night respond in the way he did? It would be nice to have a guy or two like that, your 5 & 6 guys.

by purinton on Sep 27, 2011 12:51 PM EDT reply actions  

wasn’t it nice to watch Stu Bickel last night respond in the way he did?

Yes, it looked very much like Sauer at least 1/2 dozen times last year.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Sep 27, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent call…and I often felt bad that he was often the only one to do so. I give Sauer credit for assessing what the team needed and filling that role.

by purinton on Sep 27, 2011 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

New York Rangers News, Analysis, Line Combinations, Schedule And Stats

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cally_small
Okay Time For Some Real Offseason Talk
Cally_small
Just Wanted To Say Thanks
11p0584_small
Zuccarello signed in KHL
Small
Good Season boys! Now for next year.
Rangers_small
Just my thoughts...
Brad_richards_florida_panthers_v_new_york_cntbddbremtl_small
Strategy For Game 6
Small
It’s time to get Nasty.
Small
Rangers Viewing Party Questions
Staal-marc_small
In case you haven't seen this yet...
Dictator_small
Win Tickets to Gm. 4

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

51 - 24 - 7

Lost 3

Rangers Schedule


Managing Editor

Joe_2_small Joe Fortunato

Editors

Blueshirt-underground-logo1_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Drurybloodsmall_small Rob L

Meandrichards_small Nick Montemagno

Small George E. Ays

Untitled_small Dig Deep

Kreider_small Kevin Power

Babe-ruth-and-lou-gehrig_small Brandon C.

Me_small Bryan Winters

Contributors

Twitter_pic_small Laurie Carr