Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

Another Team Effort For New York Rangers In Win Over Florida Panthers

NEW YORK, NY - JANUARY 05:  Marian Gaborik #10 of the New York Rangers celebrates his game winning goal at 3:21 of overtime against the Florida Panthers at Madison Square Garden on January 5, 2012 in New York City. The Rangers defeated the Panthers 3-2 in overtime.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

The New York Rangers keep finding different ways to win hockey games.

Even if they're the ones making life difficult for themselves.

Ryan Callahan deflected a Brad Richards' shot early in the third period to give the Rangers a 2-1 lead in last night's eventual 3-2 overtime victory. But just 36 seconds later, the Rangers allowed the Florida Panthers to tie the game, sending the matchup to overtime where Marian Gaborik would rip a shot past Scott Clemmensen to give the Rangers a much needed two points.

But it might be the goal before the Rangers were able to take the lead that set the tone for the game. Anton Stralman --who has improved every game to the point where John Tortorella is now trusting him with significant ice time -- scored the Rangers' first goal the of the game to tie the score at one and wake up a flat New York squad.

Join me after the jump for more.

Star-divide

Stralman would finish the night with a goal and over 23 minutes of ice time, giving him the third most ice time for Rangers' defenseman behind Michael Del Zotto (who played 26:36) and Dan Girardi (24:48). That's a far cry from the 10- and 11-minute nights Stralman was accustomed to when he first made the team.

Now? He's a trusted defender that John Tortorella is comfortable giving big minutes to.

That's huge, for a few reasons, but the biggest is because it allowes Marc Staal's development to continue to move slowly and carefully. Staal only played 13 minutes last night, and that's all the time he should see for the next couple of weeks as the Rangers continue to evaluate his progress.

Speaking of defenseman, let's give Del Zotto another tip of the hat. Del Zotto led all the Rangers in ice time in the win over the Panthers, and picked up a secondary assist on Gaborik's game winner. Del Zotto now has five goals and 18 assists as he continues to become both an offense and defensive force for the Rangers.

Also give a lot of credit to Brandon Dubinsky, who's really picked up his game the past couple of weeks. Dubinsky was never playing as badly as people were saying he was during his goal-less stretches, but it is nice to see him start putting the puck into the back of the net and looking dangerous night in and night out.

As this season continues, we will inevitably look back on big games and big points the Rangers were or were not able to acquire over the course of the season. Friday night's win over the Panthers will be one to remember. The Rangers could have easily lost this game, seeing as how it was the first game back from the 2012 NHL Winter Classic.

But they didn't quit, even when they were down 1-0 early, and they didn't give in. That's been another staple for this team so far this year.

So has winning tough games.

Comment 82 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

traid Brandon Dubinsky! he sucks!

too bad I can’t watch these games on TV, freakin dolan. choke on your money you greedy jerk. anyway, good for the Rangers to win games like these.

"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"

by feslenraster on Jan 6, 2012 10:15 AM EST reply actions  

Well if you could actually watch the games you will notice he indeed does not “suck”. he generated several scoring chances last night. and helped score the game winner in the winter classic. Get off this fake bandwagon on Dubi sucking. It doesn’t exist.

by InTortsWeTrust on Jan 6, 2012 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

If you see the word “traid,” it’s facetious.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

ah, my bad. I guess I am little defensive because I still see people riding dubi all over the sports blogs. Although if people want to harp on his HBO sweater, Im all for that. :)

by InTortsWeTrust on Jan 6, 2012 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh, those guys are here, but they’ve gone back into hiding now as the Rangers are winning and he’s playing well.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

In the absence of something to complain about, people will just make stuff up:

From Rick Carpiniello’s blog

11) IMO, Artem Anisimov really needs to start putting more pucks on goal, because he sure seems to have it on his stick in position to fire an awful lot, and doesn’t pull the trigger (pun intended). I know he’s played well in other areas, and all of that. But in the end, 14-16 goals from the first-line left wing isn’t going to cut it.

with an associated post of

Carp,
its my job to criticize AA, not yours. AA has gone back to being invisible for long stretches. he is the weak link on the GAS line.

I had to point out that Stepan had gone pointless in his last 4 games, 1 goal in his last 10 and has a grand total of 1 more goal on the season than AA despite getting cumulatively twice the amount of PP team this season.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

That should be PP time

Either way, 1 goal in his last 10 is Dubinsky-like production

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

AA is the defensive cog that makes that line palatable for Tortorella to put out there. Hell, a bunch of Gaborik’s goals can probably be directly attributed to AA making a great defensive play on the back-check and the team transitioning quickly to offense.

We’d all love for him to score more (goal celebrations!) but it ain’t from a lack of effort. Stepan does need to step it up, I mentioned the same thing in last night’s GDT. AA’s defense and Gaborik’s speed are what’s keeping that line afloat right now.

by Caerid11 on Jan 6, 2012 10:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah it infuriates me that a lot of fans place Stepan so far ahead of AA.

Believe me I love both of those guys, but half the reason why Stepan gets to feed Gaborik on 2 on 1s is beecause AA stays back to protect the play defensively.

If you take Stepan’s PP production out of their totals, they’re basically on even footing.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 10:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, how many people do you think realize Anisimov and Stepan both, despite slumping lately, still have more ES points than Richards?

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Probably not a lot. Not too many people like to put production into context.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

GILF-factor (girlfriend youfillintherest). Not bashing Derek, but he can do more.

Was actually interesting to see Torts bench Gaborik for Rupp for a few shifts early in the 3rd (I don’t think it was equipment-related?). Gabby came out flying afterwards.

by Caerid11 on Jan 6, 2012 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Good god. Who’s the associated post from, random commentor?

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Nope, he’s usually pretty fair when it comes to assessing the team but he’s a notorious AA hater. He also thought Staal wasn’t a good shutdown D because he was too soft for his first few years in the NHL. He’s that blog’s version of Buck.

Some of the stuff that people post there would make your head explode. I sometimes think some of the people there are members of the Earth Is Flat Society given their steadfast rejection of advanced stats.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

To clarify, the AA weak link comment is from one of the regular posters over there. The enumerated comment is from Carp.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Carp is right that Anisimov needs more shots. He’s on pace for only about 130-140 after 190 last year. There’s only so many shots on goal for a line though, and Gaborik takes A LOT of shots.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 10:50 AM EST up reply actions  

The shots part I agree with. And in one of my comments I admitted that AA could do better.

But if they’re gonna be critical of him being on the first line and producing less than 20 goals, then the same could be said of Stepan but he often escapes criticism from the crowd over there.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

I think as long as the first line is producing

individual stats don’t matter. That being said, Gaby could have an 80-90 point season if he were playing on a line with more bona fide scorers…he’s on pace for a career year in goals, but his overall scoring total should be higher.

@btown46

by Town on Jan 6, 2012 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s because Stepan is American.

Seriously.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Jan 6, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

was just thinking that

plus add into the factor that AA is Russian

"You fucking loser!" - Sean Avery
"Just reload my weapon, you know?" - Artem Anisimov
The future is looking bright boys.

by Tripodi on Jan 6, 2012 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s sad, but that’s honestly the way it is.

Shit, if anything AA is the better two-way player, but the difference between the two is so small that thinking one is that much better is just silly.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Jan 6, 2012 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Give Artie a couple of more years to build his upper body strength and he will be a beast. You cant teach size !

"Shoot the Puck Barry, Shoot the puck !" Bill Chadwick

by RangerFanInChicago on Jan 6, 2012 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

The guys riding Dubinsky (me included) arent hiding. What we said he needed to do he is now starting to do- play more physically, get more energy and hustle and play the way we all know that he can. He was not doing that the first part of the season thus why he was being called out. when Dubi plays well then everyone is happy- except the other team.

"Shoot the Puck Barry, Shoot the puck !" Bill Chadwick

by RangerFanInChicago on Jan 6, 2012 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

You’re not who I’m talking about. I’m talking about the “Dubinsky sucks,” “You can’t win with Dubinsky” and “he’s no more than a 3rd liner” crowd.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Gotcha- Dubi, when he plays his game, is a solid second line player. He’ll get you 20 goals and as long he plays tough, hard nosed defense then he is a definite asset to the club. He’s never going to be a Stamkos/Crosby/Ovy type player but he’s solid. Inconsistent at scoring but solid.

"Shoot the Puck Barry, Shoot the puck !" Bill Chadwick

by RangerFanInChicago on Jan 6, 2012 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly. But there’s a lot of people, who I suspect grew up in the 80s, that are under the impression that 20 goals/50 pts = 3rd liner, when reality is that’s almost the cutoff for 1st liner in today’s NHL

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

I was in college in the early 80’s ! I had to suffer through the Fish Sticks dynasty. Very painful. But to your point- I dont think people realize that the days of Gretzky and Lemioux scoring mega goals every yearare long gone. Have you ever done a stat line showing the decrease in top line scoring from the 80"s , 90’s and 00’s ? might be interesting stuff.

"Shoot the Puck Barry, Shoot the puck !" Bill Chadwick

by RangerFanInChicago on Jan 6, 2012 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

What you say here I think is perfectly fine. Giving actual detailed analysis of what he can better and what his strengths are is always good to read. What drives me insane is “(Player) Sucks” or “Trade (player)” . Not a single player in the NHL sucks, its the freakin NHL.

by InTortsWeTrust on Jan 6, 2012 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I dunno. Cam Janssen kinda sucks.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Well…Jody Shelley, Cam Jansesn, Eric Boulton, Eric Godard…

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 11:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Sadly you put those guys in the AHL and they score goals. Or look at their junior numbers and they’re well above average. I guess the word “Suck” is relative. Surely Jody Shelly sucks compare to Gabby but hes still better then 99.9% of the population.

by InTortsWeTrust on Jan 6, 2012 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, there’s nothing about these numbers in juniors that screams “above average”

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

well, except for the PIMs.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

LOL I recant my statement to “No one in the NHL sucks, Its the friggin NHL.. Well Except Cam Jansen”

by InTortsWeTrust on Jan 6, 2012 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

And yet NJ somehow chooses to employ both him and Eric Boulton. Sometimes even dressing both of them in the same game. The guys over at ILWT love when they do that.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Speaking of which (from ILWT)
I’m sure I’m not the only one to cringe at this…

Our lines for tonight?
Parise-Henrique-Kovalchuk
Sykora-Elias-Zubrus
Sestito-Zalewski-Clarkson
Boulton-Carter-Janssen

Excuse me while I go to the bathroom and weep.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Shelly with mooseheads. This prob wont copy well. nearly half goal a game in 97

GP G A Pts PIM GP G A Pts PIM
1994–95 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 72 10 12 22 194 7 0 1 1 12
1995–96 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 50 13 19 32 319 6 0 2 2 36
1996–97 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 59 25 19 44 420 17 6 6 12 125

by InTortsWeTrust on Jan 6, 2012 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I mean relative to their peers they suck.

I’m not even certain they’d be AHL scorers. More than the NHL, probably, but that’s a low standard. Ban fighting from the game at all levels and see how many of those guys still have jobs.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Jan 6, 2012 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

no problem

I should have said, “sarcasm” alert-but I just assumed regular Banter readers would get it.

"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"

by feslenraster on Jan 6, 2012 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Im a regular Banter reader but It was an early, pre coffee read. I shouldn’t do anything pre caffeine

by InTortsWeTrust on Jan 6, 2012 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

lol. as long as we're cool-actually if you read my comments

over the past year, I am one of dubi’s biggest supporters.

"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"

by feslenraster on Jan 6, 2012 11:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Most important take away stat for me is

and Dan Girardi (24:48)

Getting his ice time down is critical to keeping him healthy for a deep run into the playoffs. He was a work horse when we needed him but now that we are healthier and stralman has improved that kind of ice time is not needed.

by InTortsWeTrust on Jan 6, 2012 10:16 AM EST reply actions  

I LOVE that Del Zotto and Stralman can now be trusted with big minutes…. not just because it gives Staal time to condition, but mainly because it eases the burden from Girardi and McD.
Awesome… Our D will be improving even further this year, despite how good they’ve been already.

by j-red on Jan 6, 2012 10:17 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah, at this point I hope that Eminger gets the same treatment that Wolski’s getting. Stralman’s earned a home in the defensive rotation. Sauer replaces Bickel, and we’ll be all set.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Assuming our D is completely healthy and Staal/Sauer get in game condition, with the rotation you have above, what would you do with the pairs?

McD/G
Staal/Sauer
MDZ/Strawman
?

by Caerid11 on Jan 6, 2012 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s what I do, though I probably keep Staal/Sauer on the 3rd for a bit.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 10:38 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree, just wondering when they’re both back in game-shape if you’d consider putting Staal/G and Sauer/Mcd back together or not.

by Caerid11 on Jan 6, 2012 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I would put Eminger ahead of Stralman but like anything in sports, by the time hes ready, someone else could be hurt so I think you just gotta go day by day.

by InTortsWeTrust on Jan 6, 2012 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Stralman wins out because of 2 things. He’s a much better skater, and he’s better with the puck (he still gives it away on occasion, but he can transport it which is very important).

by Caerid11 on Jan 6, 2012 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

i know hes rought around the edges. but i love watching bick play. he just always sems to be involved. sometimes its bad haha. but he just tries hard. last night they had a scring chance where bick just fired like 3 shot atempts. only the last one came close to getting through but he battled and made sure something got on net.

by nhl21 on Jan 6, 2012 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Who was that mystery man?

OK, I’ve got a question.Living in Florida I was forced to watch the Panther’s feed of the game. The worst ever broadcast team of “goldy” and “Billy” again proved to be horrible! But I digress—- Here’s the question. In the third the panthers were in the Rangers end when the Rangers started thier breakout. As the camera panned to follow the play, one o I caught a glimpse of one of the Rangers sprawled on the ice, behind the play. I was also able to see him skate back toward the bench, doubled over, nursing what appeared to be his right shoulder. Does anyone know who that was, and was the injury serious or not? I couldn’t keep up with the line combinations and really didn’t notice anybody missing (besides Staal) for the rest of the game.
Of course, the two stooges doing the game didn’t see it, or didn’t think it was important, since it wasn’t a Panther, so they never even mentioned it.
Thanks.

by miatajay on Jan 6, 2012 10:21 AM EST reply actions  

I think thats when hags hurt his shoulder on a clean hit. He ended up coming back out to play a few shifts later

by InTortsWeTrust on Jan 6, 2012 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, sounds like that was the Hagelin play. I’m not sure he even missed a shift.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Correct. The MSG feed replayed it a few times, he probably just had a little stinger or something, but was right back out there.

It’s just pain.

by Caerid11 on Jan 6, 2012 10:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks, Guys,
I was a little worried. ai’m just glad the injury bug isn’t returning!!!

by miatajay on Jan 6, 2012 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Domination

This is what domination looks like to me (as I was someone travelling from Minnesota to NY and missed the entire game):

5v5 Shot Totals FLA @ NYR:

by Rob L on Jan 6, 2012 10:22 AM EST reply actions  

Seems to be the pattern for the most part of the season so far. other team comes out and expends a lot of energy in the first and the Rangers start to wear them down and pick up speed throughout the rest of the game. Product of conditioning?

Aucune clause de Mouvement

by Blueshirt in Paris on Jan 6, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

i would agree

we dont seem to be more telanted than most teams. they give us a good run in the begining of games, but our team is so good defensively and well conditined that we just always seem to wear teams down. its great to watch.

by nhl21 on Jan 6, 2012 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

that’s actually really cool

GET RIPPED

"We'll Win Tonight" - The Captain

"Let's go eat a &€% %¥#$ snack" - Rex

by Papa T on Jan 6, 2012 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

It was kind of nice to get a little bit of the shooting% regression out of the way in a win. +26 Corsi last night, +27 when close, +17 when tied is nice for padding the other numbers too.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Shooting % question..

George, everyone states the NYR shooting % is unsustainable. However, their are 8 teans with shooting % above 10% and two higher than NYR. Looking at NYR relative to league average looks less meaningful to me when i see the large cluster of teams 150-200 points higher than league average.

In looking at top 10 shooting teams versus bottom 10, their is clearly a seperation in talent if you were to compare top nine forwards.

Am I missing something?

by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Jan 6, 2012 11:32 AM EST via Android app up reply actions  

Boston’s the only one above 10 currently. Rangers are at 10.0 exact. It’s only considering ES SH%.

It’s not impossible for a team to shoot 10% for a season, it’s just not likely. Few teams have done it in the ‘BTN’ era.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

I was looking at all in SHT %… why would you only look at ES?

by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Jan 6, 2012 11:46 AM EST via Android app up reply actions  

That’s what PDO is based off, and that’s what they’ve shown to regress.

They don’t look at totality presumably because PP shot quality differs and there’s a different baseline, so you wouldn’t want to mix the two sets, especially when teams don’t get equal penalty time. At least that would be my hypothesis.

I’ve shown in the past that at the NHL level, there’s virtually no change in ES SH% year to year.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Looked at the ES SH %and my question remains..

While league wide sh% may remain constant, you will always have teams above/below the average. In looking at those teams above 9% WSH, CHI, VAN, MTL, TB, TOR, DET, PHI, NYR & BOS I’m not overly surprised to see any of them there based on talent up front.

Looking at the Bottom 10, i can see a few where luck may be playing but there are some real turd rosters down there.

I guess I am struggling with why the NYR shouldnt be expected to carry say a 9.5% ES shooting % over the season.

by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Jan 6, 2012 12:05 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

Basically, whatever you think you know about your team’s supposed ability to maintain high shooting and save percentages, they are very likely to crash back to league average regardless of how many shots you’ve observed.

http://www.arcticicehockey.com/2011/12/20/2648333/pdo-regression-to-the-mean-or-why-you-should-ignore-shooting

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

would you say there is any legitimacy to this argument?

take gaborik for an example. hes never had great players around him. avg at best. now that the team hes playing with is better as a whole, he doesnt need to be the one and only offensive force. therefore he takes fewer shots from low quality scoring areas, and recieves the puck more often in high quality scoring areas. thereby resulting in the same(or less shots) overall, but because of the change in quality of chances, his shoting percentage goes up?

by nhl21 on Jan 6, 2012 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

and the less complicated version

similar to GTGS’ argument. wouldnt it make sense that players on more offensively talented teams would see their shooting % creep up?

by nhl21 on Jan 6, 2012 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

The data suggests that players can influence their teammates’ shooting percentages, but only the very best playmakers can do it and even then only to a modest degree. It remains safe to assume for the vast majority of players that when they post an above-average on-ice shooting percentage, it is not the result of their individual passing skills.

http://www.broadstreethockey.com/2011/12/9/2623793/do-playmakers-drive-teammates-shooting-percentage

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

well that was an effective answer haha. but lets tweak it a bit. it may be more of a cicken vs egg question but what about on a team wide basis. do trends show that teams with better offenses usually have high shooting % or are the beter teams the ones who apply the “throw everything at the net and see what goes in” method?

by nhl21 on Jan 6, 2012 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Great Chart but it's wrong

Rangers only registered a total of 41 shots the entire game, That chart is reading at around 57.

by smitty046 on Jan 6, 2012 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

It counts 5v5 shots only.

For all even strength (incl OT 4v4): They had 2 goals, 35 saved, 12 missed, and 14 blocked. 63 total. So they had 6 at 4v4, which sounds about right without looking.

Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf

by George E. Ays on Jan 6, 2012 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Correction

The game was on Thursday night, not Friday.

by ginevg on Jan 6, 2012 11:02 AM EST reply actions  

Why did Hags get demoted?

I apologize if I missed this along the way somewhere but why is Hags no longer with BR and Cally? He seemed to be doing exceptionally well on that line. Dubi in his place is playing very well but Hags seemed to be a better sniper?

"Shoot the Puck Barry, Shoot the puck !" Bill Chadwick

by RangerFanInChicago on Jan 6, 2012 11:53 AM EST reply actions  

More about keeping Dubi’s upward swing moving. Hags will be fine anywhere they put him IMO.

by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Jan 6, 2012 12:08 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

I diagree Joe. I think Dubinsky WAS playing as badly as people were saying he was during his goal-less stretches. He wasn’t making good passes, he wasn’t receiving passes (he seemed to lose the puck frequently off his stick), he was making bad decisions with the puck (heading back towards his own net instead of going forward), he wasn’r as physical as he normally is, etc. Having said that, he’s playing extremely well now. And I’m glad to see it.

by JordyNYR on Jan 6, 2012 11:59 AM EST reply actions  

Carl Hagelin?

Any word on what happened to him last night? I was mortified when I saw him going back to the bench hunched over in pain. I was sure he separated his shoulder. Then, before I know it, he’s back! Anyone know what happened and if he’s 100%?

by JordyNYR on Jan 6, 2012 12:07 PM EST reply actions  

Not sure.

But he had an uneven game. Few shifts where he stood out and a couple where he looked passive (especially after the injury). He was also partly to blame for Santorelli goal.

by Gabby the Gutless Sniper on Jan 6, 2012 12:10 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

Yes he was. Even JM mentioned it during the broadcast. The play was right in front of him. A simple poke check would have, in all liklihood, prevented that goal from happening.

by JordyNYR on Jan 6, 2012 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Back in Caps Land

And now I have to rely mainly on the recaps of the games from various sites because I’m back down in Maryland where I can hardly ever see the Rangers play :(

To cheer myself up, I used Christmas money from family to outbid someone on Ebay for a nice Cally Winter Classic jersey; just waiting for it to arrive…

Homo homini lupus est - Human beings are wolves to each other

by NYRWolfer on Jan 6, 2012 1:40 PM EST reply actions  

I love how Dubi’s starting to play physical on the boards and win the battles. That’s how he creates chances for himself and his teammates.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Jan 6, 2012 3:36 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

New York Rangers News, Analysis, Line Combinations, Schedule And Stats

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cally_small
Okay Time For Some Real Offseason Talk
Cally_small
Just Wanted To Say Thanks
11p0584_small
Zuccarello signed in KHL
Small
Good Season boys! Now for next year.
Rangers_small
Just my thoughts...
Brad_richards_florida_panthers_v_new_york_cntbddbremtl_small
Strategy For Game 6
Small
It’s time to get Nasty.
Small
Rangers Viewing Party Questions
Staal-marc_small
In case you haven't seen this yet...
Dictator_small
Win Tickets to Gm. 4

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

51 - 24 - 7

Lost 3

Rangers Schedule


Managing Editor

Joe_2_small Joe Fortunato

Editors

Blueshirt-underground-logo1_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Drurybloodsmall_small Rob L

Meandrichards_small Nick Montemagno

Small George E. Ays

Untitled_small Dig Deep

Kreider_small Kevin Power

Babe-ruth-and-lou-gehrig_small Brandon C.

Me_small Bryan Winters

Contributors

Twitter_pic_small Laurie Carr