New York Rangers Stats: Use "Elite" with Care
Note: Written on 2/15 before Chicago
Here's the non-mathematical formula that describes the Rangers for me right now:
Good (Top 10) Team + Elite (Top 3 - playing as #1) Goaltender = "Elite" Contender
Henrik Lundqvist is having his peak year in the NHL, and if he keeps his Save % above a 0.935% he's most likely going to win the Vezina trophy, as he finally deserves. The Ranger skaters, meanwhile, have been a top 10 NHL club since Game 11 in terms of Shot Ratio (SR in the chart below); which is a good indicator of future performance. To show how far they've come after their lucky 11 game start, I threw together a quick (very raw) chart:
While this chart is somewhat unfair to certain teams, as they may have been on highs, mediums, or lows at Game 11, it illustrates perfectly the Rangers consistent improvement in becoming a complete team since that Halloween date with the Sharks. There are still clubs with better or equal skaters (DET, BOS, PITT, SJS, STL, VAN, and PHI - in no particular order), but to be honest none of them could match the contributions Lundqvist is making in goal.
So with all the happy and joy, where's my usual negative spin on things? I've got two today:
1) The recent win over the Bruins.
I missed the first period due to watching my brother's Junior playoff game. Texts, tweets, and the in-game tracked stats made it seem like it was a decent period with two NYR goals. Fantastic stuff, seeing as I only consider Pittsburgh, Boston, and Philadelphia as competition in the East right now (and in that order - god save NYR if Crosby comes back). Then the Henrik Lundqvist show started, and while he deserved all the credit in the world for the win, the two points earned by the players who didn't play within the NYR crease was frankly not deserved with that performance over the last forty minutes:
via behindthenet.ca
This is NOT a model we want to see for games going down the stretch. That third period in my mind? Pathetic. I could not WAIT for this chart to update in the morning after watching the third, just to confirm how poor the team played, and how well Lundqvist did. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the Rangers had to win this game 6-0 or something, but I want to see this team continue to improve going into the playoffs and really become the word I think we should all use with care: elite.
If the Rangers play in a similar fashion against Chicago, expect more of the same (aka Henrik or Biron having to do a lot of work).
2) Henrik Lundqvist
I won't beat this topic up, but all I have to say if the season ended now his save percentage (0.941) would be the highest of the post-lockout Vezina winners. He's due for a natural slide (even down to a HORRIBLE 0.930), but if you want some more quick info go back to the last metrics piece and read the first few paragraphs.
Oh and Jim, I probably used Lundsanity in close to ten text message conversations over the past few days. #Lundsanity
To the charts:
No complaints here. Moving on.
via behindthenet.ca
This is where that chart from before the jump applies. The Rangers have driven up slowly and surely, and while the curve is starting to flatten out, that is because the Rangers are really playing towards that 0.55 percentage line on an individual game basis (the "elite" level). The Rangers PDO is driven way up by Lundqvist's historical season.
And now to the data-dump part of the article. How the Forwards are being used:
Not much change here in the last month. Boyle is a beast by taking the majority of D-zone draws and Torts is effectively shielding Gaborik and Stepan so they can just focus on offense. Otherwise, the only note I would add is that Rupp is basically an enforcer in my book, as he's absolutely awful and clearly Torts does not trust him in any sort of situation where the game is on the line.
And the Defense:
Again I included everyone over 10 GP because I wanted to get Staal in (he's at 19 GP). Seems as though he's gone from third pair to second pair in the past month, which makes sense. Also, Sather is looking smart for grabbing McDonagh.
The Rangers, to put it in a complete college mindset, have been invited to the Elite/VIP/Cool kids party for the first time in a while. While they can probably hold their own amongst the group, it never hurts to bring a few girls along either (especially the new Swedish exchange student).
18 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't get it
where is Rick Nash mentioned?
by Prustyballs94 on Feb 18, 2012 8:47 AM EST via Android app reply actions 5 recs
To me
Elite status has nothing to do with year to year… it’s the teams who are at the top and winning consistently and are the top tier teams who everybody is vying to beat… whether it’s 1 year or 10 years makes no difference… This year STL and the NYR are elite teams, last year neither was elite… but thats just my take as far as the word elite is concerned… if you are talking dynasty then then it’s long term… Elite has to do with the right here right now… not the past, not the future…
@clalicata17
as much as I love this team
I’d beg to differ. The Rangers are a VERY good, defensively responsible team with an elite goaltender.
"There are some people who, if they don't already know, you can't tell 'em." - Yogi
by bleed'n blue on Feb 18, 2012 11:25 AM EST up reply actions
The only problem then is coming up with a word for the teams have had talent and longevity. There should be something to distinguish between the St.Louis’s and Rangers’s over the years and the Detroits and Pittsburghs. Elite seems like the highest honor you can give, so it would make sense to give it to a team like Detroit and to describe the Rangers as a “star” team or something.
Take it to the net and keep jamming and jamming until somebody comes on you.
- Eddie Olczyk
by Scratch and Snif on Feb 18, 2012 2:09 PM EST up reply actions
ah
I retract my statement
Take it to the net and keep jamming and jamming until somebody comes on you.
- Eddie Olczyk
by Scratch and Snif on Feb 19, 2012 3:38 AM EST up reply actions
I'm not an advanced stats and/or chart guy..
So, is this another one of those threads that say that we really aren’t that great even though our record says otherwise?
by OhCallyMyCaptain on Feb 18, 2012 12:57 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
Yes/No
Yes: Henrik has been elite, the team has just been good.
No: The team has come a long ways since the start of the season, and having Henrik puts them over the top
Yet the team never leveled out like you predicted we would early on.
This team is proving a lot of the silly metrics wrong. The team doesn’t suck even though they don’t get a ton of shots on goal. The team isn’t mediocre even though they have a mediocre Fenwick score. Could go on and on.
One thing I am actually curious about, though, is that Bruins game. The Bruins dominated possession in the third, yet actually did nothing with it. They just whipped the puck at the net and hilariously missed a number of times. Just kept getting the puck back, which was annoying as shit. How would that actually be “scored” in any of the metric systems? We did a great job keeping the play to the outside and allowing Lundqvist to see the puck. Yet something like that would generally seem to be ignored (although it is about as vital as possible in a hockey game).
It's like saying you dislike Don Frye's mustache, which itself is the equivalent of spitting on the Constitution. - Anthony Pace
These things aren’t designed for single game evaluation, because exactly as you allude to, in a given game, you have a lot of variability. Over the course of 30-40 games, those plateau. Games like the Bruins game, with 40+ SOG but 16 scoring chances against, are leveled off by another game where they might only allowed 25 shots but still 16 scoring chances.
As for the leveling off. The team shooting percentage did level off. Martin Biron is leveling off by the game. The reason the standing haven’t (though there’s still time), is because at the point Hagelin/Mitchell signed on board, this team went from getting 44% of the shots to getting 52%. They’re a completely different team now than the early season when everyone (ok, mostly you) were arguing against these.
That and Henrik isn’t human.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 18, 2012 2:53 PM EST up reply actions
Game 11
Since game 11, the Rangers are:
- A top 10 team in terms of skaters
- In first place because of the best goalie in the league right now.
It’s says don’t be overly excited or think we’re better than we are. You can’t expect your goalie to maintain his play and if he doesn’t we go from very good to average quickly. We are winning games other shouldn’t because of over the top goaltending and stifling defense. We don’t score a lot of goals so if either dip then we lose. Be cautious. Also stats and charts are great but history tells you that they can’t predict big time players taking over games and winning them in the playoffs or predict that John Druce goes berserk and propels a bad team to a run. Proceed with caution with this team
by DieselCane22 on Feb 18, 2012 1:55 PM EST up reply actions
Well said
Just one thing: If Lundqvist does dip back down towards his career self, alls that means is the Rangers should slide a little, not all the way to average. 4th in the East was my prediction all year, and I’m sticking to that because in my mind they are playing like a 4th place team but they’re in first because of Hank.
Well.. 4th in the east can very likely mean 2nd best team…
Well.. 4th in the east can very likely mean 2nd best team…The division thing pisses me off.
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
LET'S GO RANGERS!!!
The team has come very far but they are system and they struggle mightily with teams with speed like Montreal and they can’t make mistakes. They are disciplined enough to beat most opponents but if Henrik slips just a bit were not good enough to make up for it. They don’t score enough and have a below average PP which helps you close gaps
Just realized
I never updated the actual rankings on the team metrics chart. Oops. I’m lazy, and it wont be getting changed now. Sorry.

by 






























