Zach Boychuk On Waivers, Should The Rangers Take Another Shot?

Debby Wong-USA TODAY Sports

Should the Rangers take a go at Boychuk again?

Poor Zach Boychuk, the former first-round pick has been waived twice in the span of a month. Originally waived by Carolina, Boychuk was picked up by the Pittsburgh Penguins. There was some thought that the New York Rangers had interest in Boychuk, but the Penguins had a better claim and took Boychuk before the Rangers had a shot.

This time around things are different. When Boychuk was originally waived the Rangers were in desperate need of depth, needed something to spark the offense and simply weren't winning many games. Well, maybe things aren't much different, but now that the Rangers are healthy things are a little better on Broadway.

Boychuk -- who went pointless in seven games with the Penguins this year -- presents an interesting option for the Rangers. Yes, he's obviously had his stuggles in the NHL, but he obviously has a significant amount of potential and he might just be worth the risk.

Boychuk did lead the AHL in scoring a couple of years ago, but has only posted 18 points in 80 career NHL games. He's a bigger body, can protect the puck and has good vision, but those skills (to this point) have never translated to the upper level.

Is the risk worth the reward? In my mind, yes, simply because there's nothing but monetary risk in claiming Boychuk. If he doesn't work out in New York the Rangers can expose him to waivers and allow another NHL team to give him another shot.

He's not a bad option for the third line, he's a fine option for the fourth line and he can allow some other Rangers players not to be leaned on as much. He's a better option than Stu Bickel as a forward for sure and would keep the rotating wheel of prospects coming up for a game from the AHL and then going back down. Not that it's a bad thing to get a good look at the younger guys, but it's better to bring them up when they're actually going to have a chance to stick around.

As for depth, well, every team can use depth. I think the Rangers recent issue with the injury bug proved that. Wouldn't you rather have Boychuk than not? Even if you don't need him.

I don't know how excited I would get about the prospect of this happening, however. Apparently the Carolina Hurricanes -- of all teams -- are interested in bringing him in if he reaches them on waivers. Spoiler alert: Carolina has a better claim than the Rangers do.

So what do you guys think? If his name reaches Glen Sather's desk should they take a risk on him?

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Blueshirt Banter

You must be a member of Blueshirt Banter to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Blueshirt Banter. You should read them.

Join Blueshirt Banter

You must be a member of Blueshirt Banter to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Blueshirt Banter. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.